Dal manuale del Giudice di gara… - Delphi Formazione e...
Transcript of Dal manuale del Giudice di gara… - Delphi Formazione e...
Azienda Relazione Patologia
Sanofi training area medica, consulenza
clinico-epidemiologia ca. prostata, m. diabetica, m.
cardiovascolari, sclerosi multipla
Janssen partecipazione advisory board,
produzione value dossier ca. prostata
Takeda partecipazione advisory board,
training forza vendite ca. prostata, ca.mammella
Astellas partecipazione advisory board,
training area medica ca. prostata
Pfizer training area medica ca. rene, artrite reumatoide, m.
cardiovascolari
GSK training area medica ca. rene
Roche training forza vendite,consulenza
clinico-epidemiologica ca. polmone, ca. ovaio
Novartis training forza vendite ca. rene, ca. mammella
UCB training forza vendite,
produzione value dossier
m. di Parkinson, m. epilettica, artrite reumatoide, artrite
psoriasica, spondilite anchilosante
G.L. Pappagallo: relazioni con l’Industria farmaceutica e potenziali conflitti di interesse
Medicina Basata Sull’Evidenza (EBM)
• La EBM costituisce:
• un approccio alla pratica clinica dove
• le decisioni cliniche risultano dalla integrazione tra l'esperienza del medico e
• l'utilizzo coscienzioso, esplicito e giudizioso delle migliori evidenze scientifiche disponibili
• mediate dalle preferenze del paziente.
Sackett DL, BMJ 1996
Medicina Basata Sull’Evidenza (EBM)
• La EBM costituisce:
• un approccio alla pratica clinica dove
• le decisioni cliniche risultano dalla integrazione tra l'esperienza del medico e
• l'utilizzo coscienzioso, esplicito e giudizioso delle migliori evidenze scientifiche disponibili
• mediate dalle preferenze del paziente.
Sackett DL, BMJ 1996
Interpreting Results of Clinical Trials
Confidence?
Applicability?
Clinical Relevance?
Risk of Bias
Indirectness
Δsup, Mnon-inf, M.I.D.
look at
look at
look at
aiming to define the benefit-to-harm ratio
Interpreting Results of Clinical Trials
Confidence?
Applicability?
Clinical Relevance?
Risk of Bias
Indirectness
Δsup, Mnon-inf, M.I.D.
look at
look at
look at
aiming to define the benefit-to-harm ratio
Interpreting Results of Clinical Trials
Confidence?
Applicability?
Clinical Relevance?
Risk of Bias
Indirectness
Δsup, Mnon-inf, M.I.D.
look at
look at
look at
aiming to define the benefit-to-harm ratio
Direct evidence…
…comes from research that:
• is conducted in the Population that we are providing answers for;
• includes the Intervention that we are interested in…
• …and compares these interventions with the appropriate Alternatives;
• measures the Outcomes in which we are interested
EGFR-activating mutation-positive NSCLC patients
Erlotinib (Gefitinib), (Afatinib)
Gefitinib (Erlotinib), (Afatinib)
ORR, PFS, OS (benefit); Rash, Diarrhea, Hypertransaminasemia (harm)
Defining the Clinical Question…
Il sogno di ogni Giudice
è di poter disporre di un fotofinish (da un confronto testa a testa fra gli atleti)
Abbiamo invece Atleti che corrono da soli, in momenti diversi, su piste diverse e con diverse condizioni climatiche…
Quality of Evidence
EGFR TKI 1st line NSCLC
Gefitinib Erlotinib Afatinib
ORR Risk of bias Indirectness
Indirectness Indirectness
PFS Risk of bias Indirectness
Indirectness Indirectness
OS Risk of bias Indirectness Imprecision
Indirectness Imprecision
Indirectness Imprecision
Rash Indirectness Indirectness Indirectness
Diarrhea Indirectness Indirectness Indirectness
Hyper-transaminasemia
Indirectness Indirectness Imprecision
Indirectness Imprecision
Quality of Evidence
EGFR TKI 1st line NSCLC
Gefitinib Erlotinib Afatinib
ORR Risk of bias
Indirectness Indirectness Indirectness
PFS Risk of bias
Indirectness Indirectness Indirectness
OS Risk of bias
Indirectness Imprecision
Indirectness Imprecision
Indirectness Imprecision
Rash Indirectness Indirectness Indirectness
Diarrhea Indirectness Indirectness Indirectness
Hyper-transaminasemia
Indirectness Indirectness Imprecision
Indirectness Imprecision
• Search Strategy ✔
• Risk of bias assessment ✔
• Statistical analysis
o outcome evaluation ✔
o inconsistency evaluation ✔
Interpreting Results of Clinical Trials
Confidence?
Applicability?
Clinical Relevance?
Risk of Bias
Indirectness
Δsup, Mnon-inf, M.I.D.
look at
look at
look at
aiming to define the benefit-to-harm ratio
Attenzione alla imprecisione delle stime
(ampiezza LC95%)
Estimated probability of being BEST for…
PFS Afatinib
Erlotinib
Gefitinib
70%
27%
3%
29%
61%
10%
OS Afatinib
Erlotinib
Gefitinib
45%
3%
2%
27%
19%
19%
Estimated probability of being BEST for…
PFS Afatinib
Erlotinib
Gefitinib
70%
27%
3%
29%
61%
10%
OS Afatinib
Erlotinib
Gefitinib
45%
3%
2%
27%
19%
19%
Network design; Outcome definition
(Hazard Ratio)
Network design; Outcome definition
(1-year estimate)