Lo sviluppo della valuazione nel futuro Programma MED Bologna, 20 june 2013 La valutazione dei...
-
Upload
mervyn-sanders -
Category
Documents
-
view
223 -
download
0
Transcript of Lo sviluppo della valuazione nel futuro Programma MED Bologna, 20 june 2013 La valutazione dei...
Lo sviluppo della valuazione nel futuro Programma MED
Bologna, 20 june 2013La valutazione dei progetti di Cooperazione Territoriale
Europea:metodi di lavoro e riflessioni
Lydwine Lafontaine, JTS MED Programme
Content
State of the Art - Current period
Some findings
Recommendations - Next programming period
Challenges Solutions “under review”
Principles – Next programming period
Evolvement of the evaluation of projects results and added-value in the future MED Programme
State of the Art Current period (1/2)
State of the Art Current period (2/2)
“The in-depth interviews and analysis of projects results (particularly deliverables) reveal that situations are complex. The types of situations/projects are very diverse.
• At the conclusion of their work, some 'traditional' projects appear to be projects that could be categorised as 'strategic'.
• Others appear to be a combination of local projects, where the transnational element has generally been achieved but with very limited ambition.
• High quality projects and results which have not benefited from the right partnership to produce results and which are very unlikely to result in any sustainability.”
* Extract from Evaluation in Itinere 2012 Report to be published shortly on www.programmemed.eu
Evaluation of implemented projectsSome findings on results*
- Selection of projects: • More qualitative information inserted in a simplified application form• More targeted calls, better understanding of programme expectations• Technical of scientific expertise to support selection process
- Monitoring and support in implementation of project activities:• Structured animation• Improvement of monitoring methods and tools ( incl. tools to enable use
of meta-indicators)
- Assessment and capitalisation of outputs and results:
• Setting up a technical qualitative evaluation for final outputs and results insisting from the AF on the obligation of results
• Better structure and coordination of process
Some recommendations Next programming period
ChallengesNext programming period
MED projects generate three types of outputs, corresponding to three different phases:
• Exploration of intervention fields and state of the art > action plan• Experimentation with operational activities, pilot projects• Capitalisation and dissemination of outputs and practices
Applicants can set up projects on one, two or three different phases
* Task Force
Solutions « under review »*Type of calls / projects
Projects with two or three phases:
• Each phase is considered as a project• Applicants must achieve the main objectives of one phase before
applying for the next one• The implementation of the following phase is submitted to a new
selection process through a new application
Different competencies for each stage/phase (new partnerships)
Solutions « under review »Type of calls / projects
For one single call, projects can be of different profile and dimension:
• Micro-projects, small budgets focused on targeted issues / pilot actions (intermediary bodies, private bodies, research centres…)
• Large projects with institutional partners, larger networks, important territorial coverage, etc.
Pilot actions• Concrete and measurable activities• Innovative dimension• Possibility of small scale investments
Solutions « under review »Type of calls / projects
• Support of external expertise for selection and evaluation of technical aspects of outputs and results
• Set of relevant indicators (on-going working group for TF)
• Integration of additional monitoring tools on PRESAGE in addition to reporting procedures to feed indicators
• Harmonization of monitoring approach, more participative, involving NCP, LO for more effective and efficient dissemination and capitalisation process
Solutions « under review »Necessary complementary adjustments
Evaluation of the future MED ProgrammePRINCIPLES
Reduce identified limited zone of readability for :
• more accurate and deeper knowledge of projects implementation, • qualitative monitoring and support, • deeper analysis of outputs and results ,
better decision making process for programme adjustments and capitalisation