Carcinoma della mammella Her2 positivo Ruolo della radioterapia Carcinoma della mammella Her2...

34
Carcinoma della mammella Carcinoma della mammella Her2 positivo Her2 positivo Ruolo della radioterapia Ruolo della radioterapia Dott.ssa M. Trignani Dott.ssa M. Trignani Università degli Studi “G. D’Annunzio” Facoltà di Medicina e Università degli Studi “G. D’Annunzio” Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia Chirurgia Scuola di Specializzazione in Radioterapia Scuola di Specializzazione in Radioterapia Prof. Giampiero Ausili Cefaro Prof. Giampiero Ausili Cefaro CHIETI CHIETI

Transcript of Carcinoma della mammella Her2 positivo Ruolo della radioterapia Carcinoma della mammella Her2...

Carcinoma della Carcinoma della mammella Her2 positivomammella Her2 positivo

Ruolo della radioterapiaRuolo della radioterapia

Carcinoma della Carcinoma della mammella Her2 positivomammella Her2 positivo

Ruolo della radioterapiaRuolo della radioterapiaDott.ssa M. TrignaniDott.ssa M. Trignani

Università degli Studi “G. D’Annunzio” Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia Università degli Studi “G. D’Annunzio” Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia Scuola di Specializzazione in Radioterapia Scuola di Specializzazione in Radioterapia

Prof. Giampiero Ausili CefaroProf. Giampiero Ausili CefaroCHIETICHIETI

BCS + RTBCS + RT MastectomiaMastectomia

Recidive localiRecidive locali 5% - 13%5% - 13% 2% - 14%2% - 14%

SopravvivenzaSopravvivenza 59% - 79%59% - 79% 59% - 82%59% - 82%

Opzione standardChirurgia conservativa + Radioterapia

BCS + RT vs Mastectomia

Milano I, NSABP, EORTC, IGR, NCI, DBCG

Vincent V-H, J Natl Cancer Inst 2004

Rischio relativo (RR) di Rec. Locale= 3

BCS + RT vs sola BCS

Beneficio RTNo beneficio RT

Rischio relativo (RR) di morte= 1,086

BCS + RT vs sola BCS

9422 paz

Pooled-Analysis

Beneficio RTNo beneficio RT

Dimensioni del TMarginiGradingEICEtà

Komoike Y, Cancer 2006

1901 pz

Over the past ten years, the genomic analysis has revolutionized research in oncology.

Mammary tumors 5 "molecular subtypes" characterized by different aspects of gene expression Sorlie T Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(19):10869-74

Tayloring locoregional and sistemic treatment

Molecular subtypes

Make a clinic decision

Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and c-ERBB2 (HER2/neu) are therapeutically and prognostically important markers in the management of breast carcinoma.

About 60% to 70% of breast carcinomas express ER protein, and these tumors are associated with better prognosis.

Thike AA, Chng MJ, Chong SF, et al. Pathology. 2001;33:21-25.

ER status is important in predicting the response to adjuvant tamoxifen (hormonal) therapy. PR is a surrogate marker of functional ER because PR is an estrogen-regulated gene.

More than half of ER+ tumors express PR. Hence, simultaneous analysis of ER and PR gives more information regarding likely hormonal response.

ER, PR and HER2 are indipendent prognostic and predictive biomarkers

Esteva FJ Breast Cancer Res 2004;6:109-118

Payne SJ Hystopathology 2008; 52:82-90

Hormone therapy remains the mainstay for hormone receptor–positive breast cancer. The decision for hormone treatment has traditionally relied on assessment of ER and PR status of primary tumors, with the response generally related directly to ER and PR content.

TAILORING OF MEDICAL THERAPY

The efficacy of trastuzumab is highly dependent on the c-ERBB2 status of the tumor and in the metastatic breast cancers that overexpress c-ERBB2 has been proven.

Studies specifically relating receptor status of primary tumors with local recurrences are also few.

TAILORING OF LOCOREGIONAL TREATMENT

Few published reports regarding the comparison of c-ERBB2 status between the primary and metastatic or locally recurrent sites. Am J Clin Pathol 2010;133:416-429

??

Few studies have examined these biomarkers as predictors of locoregional recurrence (LRR)

Am J Clin Pathol 2010;133:416-429

To identify patients who had an increased risk of LRR and therefore might benefit from adjuvant systemic treatment or more aggressive local treatment uniform evaluation of ER, PR, and HER2 expression.

Whole breast 50 Gy in 25 fractions using medial and lateral tangent fields, followed by a tumor bed boost of 10 Gy in 5 fractions.

The 8-year LRR rate was greater in patients with ER-negative disease, PR-negative disease, and HER2-positive (17.5% vs. 3.9%, p = .009).

Tumors ER or PR positive were categorized as HR positive. Tumors that were both ER and PR negative were categorized as HR negative resulting in four tumor subtypes: HR+HER2, HR+HER2+, HRHER2+, and HRHER2.

HER2-positive breast cancer and ER/PR-negative disease independently predicted for LRR.

Additionally, close/positive margins (with close defined as <2 mm) and lobular histologic features continued to predict for LRR.

Patients who have HER2-positive tumors 1 cm or smaller have a high risk of relapse and consequently a shorter recurrence-free survival time.

HER2 STATUS

SUBTYPES

Multivariate analyses confirmed the prognostic role of HER2 status on locoregional recurrence

Was investigated the potential association between biological subtype and increased risk of LRR compared with conventional prognostic factors.

Patients baseline characteristics stratified by biological subtype (4 subgroups HR±/HER2±).

On multivariate analysis HR-/HER2+ and LN (>1) were found indipendent prognostic factors with increased risk of LRR after BCT.

For the subgroups radical mastectomy on multivariate analysis triple negative and LN (>1) were found prognostic factors.

RT to the breast (42.5–50 Gy in 16–25 fractions) was offered to all patients after segmental resection; regional LN irradiation being offered if 4 LN-positive.

Post-mastectomy chest wall and regional LN irradiation (45–50 Gy in 20–25 fractions) if they had LN positive or T3.

Triple negative, Rec-/HER2+, Rec+/HER2+ are an increased risk of LRR after radical mastectomy.

No difference of LRFS between HER2+ and HER2-

PERICOLO RICADUTA

CHIETI UNIVERSITY

RADIOTHERAPY

OUR EXPERIENCE

OUR EXPERIENCE

OUR EXPERIENCE

OUR EXPERIENCE: SUBTYPES

MILESTONES

• HER2-positivity predicts for recurrence, with an increased risk of LRR.

• These issues seem to be confirmed in patients HER2+ surgically treated or conservatively than with mastectomy.

• Given the risk of relapse, HER2-positive patients might benefit from chemotherapy, anti-HER2 therapy, or more aggressive locoregional therapy, even in very early-stage disease.

Which is the more aggressive loco regional treatment that should be considered?

WHICH IS THE MORE AGGRESSIVE LOCOREGIONAL TREATMENT THAT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED?

- BOOST: increase the dose to the tumor bed;

- WHOLE BREAST: increase the dose to the whole breast;

- NODAL IRRADIATION: irradiation of the clavicularregion even if less than 4 lymph nodes involved.

- RT associated to adjuvant trastuzumab.

YOUNG BOOST TRIAL : essai de phase 3, randomisé évaluant de l’augmentation de dose de radiothérapie au lit tumoral, chez des femmes jeunes ayant cancer du sein [fiche d’essai clinique sur Internet]. Boulogne-Billancourt : Institut national du cancer. Disponible à l’adresse: https://www.e-cancer.fr/les-essaiscliniques/ registre-des-essais-cliniques (accès le 22/6/2011).

Trastuzumab adjuvant to

radiotherapy increase

radiosensitivity and could

be associated with

reduction of LRR.

Trastuzmab determinate

cardiotoxicity..

Future prospective studies, including clinical trials, are needed to fully

determine the utility of these biomarkers in guiding treatment decisions in

this patient population.

Several forthcoming clinical trials have begun to address medical and loco

regional therapy basing on molecular characteristics.

These prospective clinical trials, and other future trials, might provide

insight as to whether combining radiotherapy with HER2-directed therapies.

De la taille unique……..au sur-mesure…..ce n’est pas toujour facile!