Stato del calorimetro elettromagnetico

Post on 15-Jan-2016

29 views 1 download

description

Stato del calorimetro elettromagnetico. Nuove misure a TERAS (maggio) TEST beam al PSI (ottobre – novembre-dicembre) Lxe facility Criostato. TERAS g Beam Line. Compton Spectrum (E g -Ec/2) 2 +(Ec/2) 2. Electron beam Energy: 764MeV Energy spread: 0.48%(sigma) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Stato del calorimetro elettromagnetico

A. Baldini 23 sett CSN I Lecce

1

Stato del calorimetro elettromagnetico

• Nuove misure a TERAS (maggio)

• TEST beam al PSI (ottobre – novembre-dicembre)

• Lxe facility

• Criostato

A. Baldini 23 sett CSN I Lecce

2

TERAS Beam Line

• Electron beam– Energy: 764MeV– Energy spread: 0.48%(sigma)– Divergence: <0.1mrad(sigma)– Beam size: 1.6mm(sigma)

• Laser photon– Energy: 1.17e-6x4 eV (for 40MeV)– Energy spread: 2x10-5 (FWHM)– Divergence: unknown– Beam size: unknown

Compton Spectrum

•(E-Ec/2)2+(Ec/2)2

Collimator size

A. Baldini 23 sett CSN I Lecce

3

• D: depth

parameter MC simulationData

Previous Test

This Test

Short abs

Long abs

D=

D

DD

DD

D: 20~100 0~25cm

LP operato con Xenon purificato

A. Baldini 23 sett CSN I Lecce

4

Energy Spectrum Fitting

• Principle…

E Npe

Response functionCompton Spectrum

Convolution of

Compton Spectrum

Response Function

•For understanding simply…•Suppose Response function is an asymmetric Gaussian

left

right

A. Baldini 23 sett CSN I Lecce

5

Energy Spectrum Fitting cont’d• Require D(depth

parameter)>45– ~34% of events in the range

of 40MeV+/-4MeV are discarded by this requirement

• Suppose Compton Spectrum around the edge(E-Ec/2)2+Ec2/4

• Detector Response Function– Gaussian with Exponential tailf(x) = Nexp{t/2(t/2-(x-x0)}, x<x0+t

Nexp{-1/2((x-x0)/)2}, x>x0+t

• Convolution– Integration +/- 5

Fitting is done in two steps•Determine the edge position

•Fix the edge in the 2nd fitting for determining the other prams

Detection efficiency (estimated by MC) : 74% within +/- 4% energy cut at 52.8 MeV (cf. Progress Report Jul 02)

(16% of events are lost due to interaction with material in front of the active volume)

26%

A. Baldini 23 sett CSN I Lecce

6

Energy Resolution vs. Depth Parameter

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Sigma2 threshold

Res

olut

ion

(%)

Number of Photoelectrons

D

• For incident at the detector center

• D > 35, 45, 55….85• Resolution: < 2% in sigma

except shallow events (D<45).

A. Baldini 23 sett CSN I Lecce

7

LP al PSI (meta’ agosto): test in ottobre/novembre con fotoni monocromatici

A. Baldini 23 sett CSN I Lecce

8

The elementary process - (essentially) at rest captured on protons:

- p 0 n - p n

0

Photon spectrum

54.9 82.9 129 MeV

A. Baldini 23 sett CSN I Lecce

9

Experimental configuration

NaI

LXeCoincidence:

C & !A & NaI

(Offline: & LXe)

-- beam

AC T Mod

TARGET?•Rate

•Background

•Thin/small (angle/X0)

•Handling

Previous use

•GH2 (Panofsky….)

•LH2 (PIBETA)

•CH2 (MEGA, prec.misure)

•LiH (e at SIN)

A. Baldini 23 sett CSN I Lecce

10

Misure del 1999

•D=100 cm

•10 x 10 window

•9.5 hours

•60 cm (NaI) 75 cm (CsI)

•11 x 13 window

8%FWHM

A. Baldini 23 sett CSN I Lecce

11

Lxe facility

A. Baldini 23 sett CSN I Lecce

12

Criostato• Necessita’ di rivedere il disegno (appoggio esterno )• Selezione materiale finestra di ingresso• Simulazioni nuovo progetto• Contatto con Ditte produttrici il prima possibile

A. Baldini 23 sett CSN I Lecce

13

Photon Detector schedule

2002 2003 2004 2005

Test MilestoneAssemblyDesign Manufactoring

Large Prototype Beam Test Beam Test

Vessel Design Assembly & Test

PMT Delivery + Testing

Refrigerator Manufactoring Assembly

Liq. Purification

Assembly Test

Manufactoring

Engineering runs