2008-09 Crim Lit LGS2

download 2008-09 Crim Lit LGS2

of 24

Transcript of 2008-09 Crim Lit LGS2

  • 8/9/2019 2008-09 Crim Lit LGS2

    1/24

    www.city.ac.uk/law

    World-class legal education

    in the heart of London

    Bar Vocational Course

    Criminal Litigation & SentencingLarge Group Session No. 2

  • 8/9/2019 2008-09 Crim Lit LGS2

    2/24

    Objectives

    To understand:

    Consequences of failure to attendcourt

    Consequences of breach of bailconditions

    Determination of mode oftrial for either-way

    offences (including plea before venue)

    Summarytrial ofadults

    How summarytrial ofyoungdefendants differs

    from summarytrial ofadults

  • 8/9/2019 2008-09 Crim Lit LGS2

    3/24

    Notaccordingto plan

    Youarrive atthe Magistrates Court

    ready forthe start ofa summarytrial.

    Buttheres a problem. Yourclient,whowas granted bail onthe last occasion,

    has notturnedup.

    1. Whatare the possible consequences for

    yourclient?

    2. Whatdo youdo?

  • 8/9/2019 2008-09 Crim Lit LGS2

    4/24

    Failure to Surrender

    Benchwarrant (backed/not backed for bail)BCP D7.71-74

    Guidance (Thomas LJ)

    http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/docs/judgments_guidance/protocols/bail_trials_absence.pdf:

    Warningletters should be used ratherthanwarrants backed

    for bail inany event, should be uncommoncases,as court

    shouldusuallyissue awarrant (not backed for bail) orproceedinabsence of D;

    Should be unusual for D to be re-bailed on same conditions;

    Proper evidence is requiredif D claims he is unfitto attend

    court.

  • 8/9/2019 2008-09 Crim Lit LGS2

    5/24

    Consequences of failure to surrender

    (contd) Trialinthe absence ofthe accused: MCA 1980, s 11 unless it

    appears to the courtto be contraryto the interests of justice,

    court must proceedin Ds absence.Court mustnot proceedin

    absence of D ifthere appears to be anacceptable reason for

    his failure to appear (s 11(2A))

    Separate offence of failingto surrender (BailAct, s 6;

    Consolidated PD , para 56); R v White [2003] 2CrApp R (S) 29

    (BCP D7.83-84); Sentencing Guidelines Councildefinitive

    guidance on sentencing for failure to surrender: http://www.sentencing-

    guidelines.gov.uk/docs/Fail%20to%20Surrender%20to%20B

    ail.pdf

    Consequences forlatercases involving D

  • 8/9/2019 2008-09 Crim Lit LGS2

    6/24

    Sentencing range

    Nature of failure & harm Starting point Sentencing range

    Deliberate failure to attend

    causingdelayand/orinterference withthe

    administration of justice.

    14 days custody

    Crown Court

    Community order (medium)

    40 weeks custodyMagistrates courts

    Community order (low) 10

    weeks custody

    Negligent ornon-deliberate

    failure to attendcausingdelayand/orinterference withthe

    administration of justice.

    Fine Fine Community order(medium)

    Surrenders late onday but

    case proceeds as planned.Fine Fine

  • 8/9/2019 2008-09 Crim Lit LGS2

    7/24

    Factors

    Additionalaggravating

    factors

    1. Lengthyabsence2. Serious attempts to evade justice

    3. Determinedattempt seriouslytoundermine the course of justice

    4. Previous relevantconvictions and/or

    repeated breach ofcourt orders or policebail

    Additionalmitigating

    factors

    1. Promptvoluntary surrender

    When not amounting to a defence:

    2. Misunderstanding3.A failure to comprehend bail significanceor requirements

    4.Caring responsibilities

  • 8/9/2019 2008-09 Crim Lit LGS2

    8/24

    Breach of bailconditions

    BA 1976, s 7(3):where a personhas been bailedto attendacourt,a police officer mayarresthim withoutwarrant priorto thebaildate if:

    (a) the officerhas reasonable grounds for believingthathe is notlikelyto surrenderto custody; or

    (b) the officerhas reasonable grounds for believingthathe eitherhas broken oris likelyto breakanycondition ofhis bail; or

    (c) a suretyhas givenwrittennotice to the police thatthe personbailedis unlikelyto surrenderto custodyand forthat reasonthesuretywishes to be relieved ofhis obligations.

    Section 7(4): followingarrestunder s 7(3), person must bebrought before a magistrate as soonas practicable and,inanyevent,within24 hours (excluding Sundays)

    See R (DPP) v Havering Magistrates' Court[2001] 1 WLR 805;R (Vickers) v West London Magistrates' Court(2003) 167 JP473 (BCP D7.79-81)

  • 8/9/2019 2008-09 Crim Lit LGS2

    9/24

    Classification of offences

    Is the offence summary, either-way orindictable-only?

    Whatthe quickestwayto find out?

  • 8/9/2019 2008-09 Crim Lit LGS2

    10/24

    Mode oftrial procedure

    Advance information request?

    CrimPR, Pt21; BCP D6.4-6.9

    Lack of sanction:R (AP, MD, JS) (2001) 165 JP

    684 Para 57 ofA-Gs guidelines (BCP, App. 5)

    Determining mode oftrial: see BCP D6.10-

    30 Indication of plea (plea before venue):

    Guilty sentencing stage

    Notguilty/no indication mode oftrial:-

  • 8/9/2019 2008-09 Crim Lit LGS2

    11/24

    Prosecution representations (including Ds

    previous convictions)

    Defence representations Benchdecide whethercase suitable for

    summarytrial

    Mode of Trial Guidelines inConsolidatedPractice Direction, section 51 (BCP App 7) (cf.

    Sentencing Guidelines Council allocation

    guidelines:BCP D6.28) Key question:adequacy of sentencing powers

    Presumptionin favour of summarytrial (N.B.Criminal

    Justice and ImmigrationAct2008 restores power of

    committal for sentence afterconviction followingtrial,which

    was to have beenabolished byCJA2003)

  • 8/9/2019 2008-09 Crim Lit LGS2

    12/24

    If mags decide case not suitable for summarytrial

    (they decline jurisdiction),case sentto Crown

    Court fortrial (transferunderCDA 1998, s 51) If mags decide case suitable for summarytrial: D

    is askedwhetherhe consents to summarytrial

    Before answering, D may seekanindication of

    sentence (custodial ornot) thatwould be passedifhe consents to summarytrialand pleads guilty [CJA

    2003]

    If D does notconsentto summarytrial,case sentto

    CrownCourt fortrial (transferunderCDA 1998, s51,as amended byCJA2003)

  • 8/9/2019 2008-09 Crim Lit LGS2

    13/24

    Advisingthe defendant on mode

    oftrial

    Are the magistrates likelyto accept jurisdiction

    (thatis,decide that summarytrialis suitable)?

    If so, shouldyourclientagree to summarytrial?

    Ifthe magistrates are notlikelyto agree to

    summarytrial, shouldyoutryto persuade them

    to accept jurisdiction?

  • 8/9/2019 2008-09 Crim Lit LGS2

    14/24

    Mags or Crown Court?

    CrownCourttrial:

    Higherchance ofacquittal

    Better for points oflaw, esp.admissibility of

    evidence (since triers oflawand factare split),

    butN.B. mags powerto make binding pre-trial

    rulings underthe MCA 1980, s 8A

    Prosecutionwitness statements (butdefence

    can obtainthese through AdvanceInformation)

    Risk ofhigher sentence

  • 8/9/2019 2008-09 Crim Lit LGS2

    15/24

    Pros & cons ofMags Ct trial

    Lowerchance ofacquittal (e.g. mags more likelyto

    believe police, case-hardened)

    Trial shorter,less formal (andcheaper relevant

    to D ifno legalaid) Limit on sentence

    underCJA2003, mags powers to be increased

    to 12 months for one either-way offence (65

    weeks for more than one offence)

  • 8/9/2019 2008-09 Crim Lit LGS2

    16/24

    CPS figures 2007-08

    Annex A:Casework Statistics inthe CPS AnnualReport for2007-08:http://www.cps.gov.uk/publications/reports/2007/annex_a.html

    Mags: ofdefendants pleadingnotguilty, 63%were convictedand 37%were acquitted(comparedwith 64%and 36% respectivelyin

    both2006-07 and2005-06).CrownCt: ofdefendants pleadingnotguilty, 54%

    were convictedand 46%were acquitted(comparedwith 54%:46%in2006-07 and

    55%:45%in2005-06).

  • 8/9/2019 2008-09 Crim Lit LGS2

    17/24

    In2007-08, 89% ofcases were sentto the

    CrownCourt fortrial because the

    magistrates declined jurisdiction (with only

    11%goingto the CrownCourt because of

    defendantchose trial onindictment).

    These figures are very similarto those for

    2006-07 (90%:10%) and2005-06(91%:9%).

  • 8/9/2019 2008-09 Crim Lit LGS2

    18/24

    Evidence ata summarytrial

    What evidence willthe prosecutionwant

    to call?

    live witnesses witness statements to be readto the court

    real evidence (exhibits)

    What evidence willthe defence wantto

    call?

    shouldthe defendanttestify?

  • 8/9/2019 2008-09 Crim Lit LGS2

    19/24

    Summarytrial outline

    Prosecution opening speech Live witnesses/witness statements

    Defence objections to prosecution evidence

    Submission ofno case to answer (BCP D21.39-42)

    Defence evidence (N.B. risk ofadverse inferences if D

    doesnttestify - CJPOA 1994, s 35)

    Defence closing speech

    Ver dict

    See generallyCrimPR Pt 37

    Role ofclerk/courtlegaladviser (Consolidated PD,

    section 55):BCP D21.51-56

  • 8/9/2019 2008-09 Crim Lit LGS2

    20/24

    CrimPR Part 37.1(1) Onthe summarytrial ofaninformation,where the accused

    does not pleadguilty,the prosecutor shallcallthe evidence forthe prosecution,and before doing so mayaddress the court.

    (2) Atthe conclusion ofthe evidence forthe prosecution,theaccused mayaddress the court,whether ornothe afterwardscalls evidence.

    (3) Atthe conclusion ofthe evidence,ifany, forthe defence,theprosecutor maycall evidence to rebutthat evidence.

    (4) Atthe conclusion ofthe evidence forthe defence andtheevidence,ifany,in rebuttal,the accused mayaddress thecourtifhe has notalreadydone so.

    (5) Either party may,withthe leave ofthe court,address thecourta secondtime, butwhere the courtgrants leave to onepartyit shallnot refuse leave to the other.

    (6) Where both parties address the courttwice the prosecutorshalladdress the court forthe secondtime before the accused

    does so.

  • 8/9/2019 2008-09 Crim Lit LGS2

    21/24

    Procedure followingguiltyverdict

    Ifverdictis guilty:

    ? Pre-sentence report on D

    Pleain mitigation bydefence Sentence passed by Mags

    Possible committal for sentence (under PCC(S)A

    2000, s 3) [powerto commitaftertrialwas to be

    abolished byCJA2003 butthis was reversed byCriminal Justice and ImmigrationAct2008]

  • 8/9/2019 2008-09 Crim Lit LGS2

    22/24

    Procedure onaguilty plea

    Summary of facts by prosecution

    ?Committal for sentence (if serious either-

    way offence) ?Adjourn for pre-sentence report

    Pleain mitigation bydefence

    Sentence

  • 8/9/2019 2008-09 Crim Lit LGS2

    23/24

    Juveniles key points

    Normaldistinction betweenindictable and

    non-indictable offences does notapply:

    youthcourtcantryindictable-only offences

    (excepthomicide) Trial process inthe youthcourtis less formal

    (e.g.courtroom layout no dock,accused

    sits near parentandadvocate; publicexcluded from courtroom; use of firstnames

    for juvenile accusedandwitnesses) and

    magistrates have to be speciallytrained.

  • 8/9/2019 2008-09 Crim Lit LGS2

    24/24

    Next Crim Lit Large Group:

    Juveniles; Disclosure

    Blackstones Criminal Practice 2009

    D23: Juveniles

    D9: Disclosure