1 Organisation of Rail Transport: A Case Study in Lombardy Workshop: Infrastructure Planning and...
36
1 Organisation of Rail Transport: A Case Study in Lombardy Workshop: Infrastructure Planning and Design (Urbanistica - Politecnico di Milano) Milano, 24.11.2011 (*) DiAP, Dipartimento Architettura e Pianificazione, Politecnico di Milano Giorgio Stagni in co-operation with Paolo Beria (*) Lesson 2. Timetables and Passengers
-
Upload
alyssa-keene -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of 1 Organisation of Rail Transport: A Case Study in Lombardy Workshop: Infrastructure Planning and...
1
Organisation of Rail Transport:A Case Study in Lombardy
Workshop: Infrastructure Planning and Design(Urbanistica - Politecnico di Milano)
Milano, 24.11.2011
(*) DiAP, Dipartimento Architettura e Pianificazione, Politecnico di Milano
Giorgio Stagniin co-operation with Paolo Beria (*)
Lesson 2. Timetables and Passengers
Table of Contents
• LESSON 1. Railways in Lombardy
– Railway: Subjects and Contracts
– Implementing a Master Plan: Hardware and Software
– S-Bahn & Regional Lines in Lombardy
• LESSON 2. Timetables and Passengers
– Our Tools: Timetables and Charts
– Designing the Timetable
– People on Trains: Some Examples
2
3
Our Tools: Timetables and Charts
The tool used to regulate and define the services is the timetable.
Graphical timetable is the representation of a train on a space(time) diagram.
Space
Time
Station B
Station A
9:00 10:00
The line is a train, departing at 9 and covering the space between A and B in 1h.
Graphical Timetable: Basic
German speaking people put Time on Y Axis and Space on X.
Familiarising with timetables:
Space
Time
Station B
Station A
Graphical Timetable: Basic 2
Slower
Faster
Running in the opposite direction
Crossing(incrocio)Needs to be in a station on single-track lines
Passing(precedenza)
Minimum time gap(related with signals)
The capacity of a line depends (also) on the way the timetable is built.
Slow trains onlyFast trains only
Fast and slow trains together
The capacity of a line could be increased if timetable is homogeneous (all trains have the same speed).
But in real life it is necessary to find a compromise between faster and slower services!
Minimum headway between 2 trains
time
space
time
space
time
space
Timetabling and Line Capacity
“Focused” timetable
“Charter strategy”
Train circulates only if (considered) profitable.
The train is located in the timetable in order to maximise the highest potential demand.
The train is dimensioned according to the foreseen demand.
Minor or secondary traffic flows are left unserved or served by other transport means.
Traditional Timetable
Melegnano - 23/ 10/ 2009(verso S. Giuliano Mil.)
.05.02 .29
.00 .08 .25 .36 .53
.26
.18
.34
.15.37
.14
.14
.41
.39
56
7
8
9
10
11
1213
1415
1617
18
19
20
21
22
2324
R D/ IR S IC/ EC ES EN An effective
representation of departures from a
station!
Peak hour trips
Regular interval timetable
Global approach to mobility (including other modes)
Timetable built to grant the constant availability of service:
Departures at regular intervals Constant pattern of appointments
at specific nodal pointsThe financial sustainability must look at the whole network and not to single trains (that can be losing).The benefit for the user of having “always” a train is greater than the cost of having some trains more empty!
Regular Interval Timetable
Melegnano - 24/ 10/ 2011(verso S. Giuliano Mil.)
.09 .39
.09 .39
.09 .39
.09 .39
.05 .39
.09 .39
.09 .39
.09 .39
.09 .39
.09 .39
.09 .39
.09 .39
.09 .39
.09 .39
.09 .39
.09 .35
.35
.35
56
7
8
9
10
11
1213
1415
1617
18
19
20
21
22
2324
R D/ IR S IC/ EC ES EN Same station, the next year :)
Why is regular timetabling important, especially in local transport services?
Allows the creation of a hierarchic network (train – bus – urban)
Introduces mono- and multi-modal transport nodes
Allows the passenger to arrive at any time to the initial stop, avoiding the use of timetables also when using more lines.
Increases the quality of the trip
Reduces the perceived cost
Increases number of users on the network
Influences the housing choices in peripheral areas
Regular Interval Timetable: Why?
Paolo Beria
MIGLIORARE SUCCSSIVAMENTE CON LAVORO SICILIA
The symmetry is, jointly with regularity, one of the main properties of “modern” rail timetables
The use of regular timetables implies the definition of symmetry axes
The symmetry axis identifies the basic grid on which the whole timetable is built
The symmetry axis is chosen according to commercial evaluations
The preferred axis is 00 – 30: if the train leaves at minute x, the corresponding one arrives at the same station at minute 60 – x
The customer can easily memorise the timetable in one direction and calculate it for the other one.
Symmetrical Timetable
50 10
00
30
Station A
If the train from A to B leaves at minute 10, the corresponding train from B to A arrives at minute 50 (symmetry around minutes 00 – 30)
With a 00 – 30 symmetry and 1h headway, trains always make a crossing at minutes 00 and 30
Symmetry Axis
Symmetrical Timetable and Nodes
With a 30’ headway two other stations become nodes, in this case at minutes 15 – 45 (because there is a crossing every 15 minutes)
Timetable planning should put nodes where it is possible to make connections: main stations, branch stations, stations with bus terminus and so on.
50
07
00
30
Station C
0555
53
10
DirectionB – D
Direction D – B
E
DBC
It is important that all the services are based on the same symmetry axis. Otherwise only mono-directional appointments are possible.
Example (same symmetry):
Line B – D: Intercity train
Line C – E: regional train
We can go from B to E and from E to B
Symmetrical Timetable in Nodes
DirectionC – E
DirectionE – C
58
7
00
30
Station C
0555
53
10
Direction D – B
E
DB
Asymmetrical Timetable: a Connection is Missing
Line B – D train IC
Line C – E train R
We can go from B to E
We CAN’T go from E to B
(the Regional trains arrives “too late”)
If, for example, the Regional service is designed with another symmetry axis, connection works only in one direction.
DirectionC – E
DirectionE – C
DirectionB – D
C
Regular timetabling together with symmetry allows the creation of network systems at a regional scale (or even national)
Application of the hub&spoke model also to railways
Symmetrical Timetable: the Network
16
Designing the Timetable
17
The Easiest Way
FOGGIA - 23/ 11/ 2011(verso Amendola)
.36
.47.56
.12.33
.42.51
.01.10
.18.26
56
78
910
111213
1415
161718
1920
2122
2324
R D/ IR S IC/ EC ES EN
mercoledì 23/11/2011
FOGGIA
Amendola
Frattarolo
SipontoManfredonia
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
R
83
14
83
15
83
16
83
17
83
18
83
19
83
22
83
23
83
24
83
25
83
26
83
27
83
28
83
29
83
30
83
31
83
32
83
33
83
34
83
35
83
37
Line Foggia-Manfredonia• A single train is going to and from
Manfredonia, with a stop of few minutes in each terminus
• Highest efficiency in using rolling stock• Worst case for users: cannot guarantee a
standard frequency, except lucky case in which travelling time is just a bit lower than 30 (or 60) minutes (this is not the case!)
Departure time “looses” about 10 minutes per trip
mercoledì 23/11/2011
MI.S.CRISTOFORO
MI Romolo
MI.P.TA ROMANA
MILANO LAMBRATEMI.P.GARIBALDI MILANO CENTRALE
MI.GRECO PIRELLI
SESTO S.GIOVANNI
MONZA
Lissone-Muggio`
Desio
SEREGNO
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
R
52
93
53
72
53
83
24
10
02
41
01
24
10
22
41
03
24
10
42
41
05
24
10
62
41
07
24
10
82
41
09
24
110
24
111
24
112
24
113
24
114
24
115
24
116
24
117
24
118
24
119
24
12
02
41
21
24
12
22
41
23
24
12
42
41
25
24
12
62
41
27
24
12
82
41
29
24
13
02
41
31
24
13
22
41
33
24
13
42
41
35
24
13
62
41
37
24
13
82
41
39
24
14
02
41
41
24
14
22
41
43
24
14
42
41
45
24
14
62
41
47
24
14
82
41
49
24
15
02
41
51
24
15
22
41
53
24
15
42
41
55
24
17
42
41
75
18
The Best Way (in Our Opinion)
Line S9 Milano S.Cristoforo-Seregno• Constant frequency of 30’ for the whole day• Good efficiency in using rolling stock• Best case for users. • Peak hours can be managed using double
compositions (easy with EMUs, more complex with Loco+Coaches)
Milano Romolo - 23/11/2011(verso MI.S.CRISTOFORO)
.24
.24 .54
.24 .54
.24 .54
.24 .54
.24 .54
.24 .54
.24 .54
.24 .54
.24 .54
.24 .54
.24 .54
.24 .54
.24 .54
.24 .54
.24 .54
56
78
910
111213
1415
161718
1920
2122
2324
R D/ IR S IC/EC ES EN
martedì 23/11/2010
MI.P.GARIBALDIMI.GRECO PIRELLIMILANO CENTRALEMILANO LAMBRATE
SegratePIOLTELLO LIM.
VignateMelzo
TrecellaCassano d`Adda
TREVIGLIOVidalengo
Morengo BarianoRomano
Calcio
Chiari
ROVATO
Ospitaletto T.
BRESCIA
Rezzato
Ponte S.Marco
LonatoDesenzano
Peschiera d.GardCastelnuovo D.G.
SOMMACAMPAGNA
VERONA P.NUOVA
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
IC/EC
37
42
89
93
EN
22
0
22
1
D/IR
20
87
20
88
20
89
20
90
20
91
20
92
20
94
20
95
20
96
20
97
20
98
20
99
21
00
21
01
21
02
21
03
21
04
21
05
21
06
21
07
21
08
21
09
211
0
211
1
211
2
211
3
211
4
211
5
211
6
22
01
26
69
27
10
R
49
03
49
04
49
05
49
07
49
08
49
09
49
10
49
11
49
12
49
13
49
14
49
15
49
17
49
18
49
19
49
20
49
21
49
22
49
23
49
24
49
25
49
26
49
27
49
28
49
29
49
30
49
32
49
33
49
34
49
35
49
36
49
37
49
38
49
39
54
82
54
85
55
02
ES
94
51
94
56
97
00
97
01
97
02
97
03
97
04
97
05
97
07
97
08
97
09
97
10
97
11
97
12
97
13
97
14
97
15
97
16
97
18
97
19
97
22
97
23
97
26
97
27
97
29
97
30
97
32
97
33
97
35
97
37
97
38
97
39
97
40
97
41
97
42
97
43
97
45
97
46
97
48
97
49
97
50
97
53
10
45
0
10
45
2
10
45
4
10
45
6
10
47
5
10
47
9
10
48
3
10
60
21
06
03
10
60
51
06
06
10
60
7
10
60
8
10
60
9
10
61
0
10
611
10
61
2
10
61
4
10
61
5
10
61
6
10
61
8
10
61
9
10
62
0
10
62
1
10
62
2
10
62
3
10
62
4
10
62
5
10
62
6
10
62
7
10
62
8
10
62
91
06
30
10
63
11
06
32
10
63
3
10
63
51
06
36
10
63
7
S
10
65
1
10
65
3
10
65
4
10
65
5
10
65
6
10
65
7
10
65
8
10
65
9
10
66
0
10
66
1
10
66
2
10
66
3
10
66
4
10
66
5
10
66
6
10
66
7
10
66
8
10
66
9
10
67
0
10
67
1
10
67
2
10
67
3
10
67
4
10
67
5
10
67
6
10
67
7
10
67
8
10
67
9
10
68
0
10
68
1
10
68
2
10
68
3
10
68
4
10
68
5
10
68
6
10
68
7
10
68
8
10
68
9
10
69
0
10
69
1
10
69
2
10
69
3
10
69
4
10
69
5
10
69
6
10
69
7
10
69
8
10
69
9
10
70
0
10
70
1
10
70
2
10
70
3
10
70
4
10
70
5
10
70
6
10
70
7
10
70
8
10
70
9
10
71
0
10
71
2
10
71
4
10
80
2
10
80
4
10
80
5
10
80
6
10
80
7
10
81
8
10
82
0
10
82
2
20
55
5
20
56
3
20
57
6
20
57
8
20
58
3
20
58
4
23
00
0
23
00
1
23
00
2
23
00
3
23
00
4
23
00
5
23
00
6
23
00
7
23
00
8
23
00
9
23
01
0
23
011
23
01
2
23
01
3
23
01
4
23
01
5
23
01
6
23
01
7
23
01
8
23
01
9
23
02
0
23
02
1
23
02
2
23
02
3
23
02
4
23
02
5
23
02
6
23
02
7
23
02
8
23
02
9
23
03
0
23
03
1
23
03
2
23
03
3
23
03
4
23
03
5
23
03
6
23
03
7
23
03
8
23
03
9
23
04
0
23
04
1
23
04
2
23
04
3
23
04
4
23
04
5
23
04
6
23
04
7
23
04
8
23
04
9
23
05
0
23
05
1
23
05
2
23
05
3
23
05
4
23
05
5
23
05
6
23
05
7
23
05
8
23
05
9
23
06
0
23
06
1
23
06
2
23
06
4
23
07
52
30
77
19
A Complex World (Main Line)
Line Milan-Verona• Eurostarcity Milan-Venice, Interregio Milan-Verona,
local traffic Brescia-Rovato (to Bergamo) and Brescia-Milano must share the same tracks
• Although “out of structure” trains still exist, a good structure is important to standardise traffic (useful for both users and operators!)
• In suburban area (Treviglio-Milan) 4 tracks are required to have also S Lines (S5-S6)
BRESCIA - 22/ 11/ 2011(verso Biv. Mella)
.03 .24 .44
.00 .08 .15 .42 .50 .56
.07 .46
.00 .44
.00
.00
.53
.00 .44
.00 .44
.00 .44
.00 .44
.00 .44
.00 .31 .44
.00 .53
.00
.00 .44
.27
.27 .42
.27
.27
.49
.27
.27
.27
.27
.27
.27
.27
.27
.27
.18 .27
.09
.17
.33
.09 .39
.09 .39
.09 .39
.39
.09 .39
.39
.39
.39
.09
.39
.09 .39
.09 .39
.39
.06
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
R D/ IR S IC/ EC ES EN
Closed for maintenance!
20
People on Trains: Some Examples
1981: “Prehistoric” Timetables even on Main Lines
Milan-Rome:• Three Trans Europ Express (around 6h),
each one with its own name:– “Settebello” (ETR.300)– “Vesuvio” (to Naples)– “Ambrosiano”
• One Rapido to Naples• Two Rapido on partial route
Bologna/Florence-RomeThats all!
Increasing the number of trains per day (and thus the number of seats) is a good measure of "progress" in railway, even more than increasing speed and performances.
1985: a New Era in Italian Timetables
The first “really new” timetable in FS history: a structured service in North-West Italy.
Every 2 hours:• Intercity Turin-Milan (1h35)• Direct train Turin-Milan (1h47)• Intercity Milan-Venice (2h45)• Direct train Milan-Venice (3h)• Intercity Milan-Genoa• Express train Milan-Ventimiglia• Direct train Genoa-Ventimiglia
Stazione di MILANO CENTRALEDirezione: ROMA (AV)
.00 .10
.00
.00
.00
.00
.15
.00 .15
.00
.15
.15
.15
.15
.15
.15
.15
.15
.15
.00 .15
.00
.15
.00 .30
.45
.00
.00 .30
.00
.00
.00
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Milan-Rome, from Intercity to Frecciarossa
Non Stop Milan-Rome
Stops in Bologna-Florence
Today (2011)The Frecciarossa system: 32 connections Milan-Rome:
• 17 non stop (3h)• 15 with stops (3h30)
Yesterday (1987)The Intercity system: 9 connections Milan-Rome in 5h10
People on Board (another use of timetable charts)
Line Milan-Molteno-Lecco (S7)• Thickness represents the number of passengers in each section
Students going to Lecco and coming back at noon
LECCO
Valmadrera
CivateSala al Barro
Oggiono
MOLTENO
Costa Masnaga
Cassago-N.-B.
Renate-Veduggio
Besana
Villa Raverio
Carate-Calò
Triuggio-P.A.
Macherio-C.
Biassono-Lesmo ParcoButtafava
Villasanta
Monza SobborghiMONZA
SESTO S.GIOVANNI
MILANO GRECO PIRELLI
MILANO P.GARIBALDIMILANO LAMBRATE
mar11 R A
51
21
51
23
51
25
51
29
51
31
51
33
51
35
51
37
51
39
51
41
51
43
51
45
51
47
51
49
51
51
51
53
51
55
51
57
51
59
51
61
mar11 R R
51
22
51
24
51
26
51
28
51
30
51
32
51
34
51
36
51
38
51
40
51
42
51
44
51
46
51
48
51
50
51
52
51
54
51
56
51
58
51
60
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
200 100 50 25
Workers to/from Milan
Schools in Villa Raverio and Oggiono
University service from Milan Garibaldi to Greco
People on Board: Getting On and Off the Train
Line Milan-Molteno-Lecco• Areas of the circles represent passengers getting on and off the train
LECCO
Valmadrera
CivateSala al Barro
Oggiono
MOLTENO
Costa Masnaga
Cassago-N.-B.
Renate-Veduggio
Besana
Villa Raverio
Carate-Calò
Triuggio-P.A.
Macherio-C.
Biassono-Lesmo ParcoButtafava
Villasanta
Monza SobborghiMONZA
SESTO S.GIOVANNI
MILANO GRECO PIRELLI
MILANO P.GARIBALDIMILANO LAMBRATE
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
100 50 25 12,5SALITI
DISCESI
People on Board: S Lines
Line S5 Varese-Treviglio travelling along the Passante (every 30 minutes from 6 to midnight)In section Rho-Passante-Pioltello(-Treviglio peak only), frequency is 15 minutes thanks to overlapping with S6
• In peak hours trains are crowded in both directions (Passante effect)• The performance is very good along the whole day
VARESE
Gazzada Schian.M
CastronnoAlbizzate S.A.
Cavaria Oggiona
GALLARATE
Busto Arsizio
Legnano
CanegrateParabiago
Vanzago Pogliano
RHO
Rho Fiera Milano
MILANO CERTOSAMi VillapizzoneMI LANCETTIMi P.Gar.Sott.Mi RepubblicaMi. P. VeneziaMilano Dateo
MI. P. VITTORIA
SegratePIOLTELLO LIM.
Vignate
Melzo
Pozzuolo M.Trecella
Cassano d`Adda
TREVIGLIO
mar11 A
23
00
0
23
00
2
23
00
4
23
00
6
23
00
8
23
01
0
23
01
2
23
01
4
23
01
6
23
01
8
23
02
0
23
02
2
23
02
4
23
02
6
23
02
8
23
03
0
23
03
2
23
03
4
23
03
6
23
03
8
23
04
0
23
04
2
23
04
4
23
04
6
23
04
8
23
05
0
23
05
2
23
05
4
23
05
6
23
05
8
23
06
0
23
06
2
23
06
4
23
06
6
23
06
8
23
07
0
23
07
2
23
07
4
23
07
6
mar11 R
23
00
1
23
00
3
23
00
5
23
00
7
23
00
9
23
011
23
01
3
23
01
5
23
01
7
23
01
9
23
02
1
23
02
3
23
02
5
23
02
7
23
02
9
23
03
1
23
03
3
23
03
5
23
03
7
23
03
9
23
04
1
23
04
3
23
04
5
23
04
7
23
04
9
23
05
1
23
05
3
23
05
5
23
05
7
23
05
9
23
06
1
23
06
3
23
06
5
23
06
7
23
06
9
23
07
1
23
07
3
23
07
5
23
07
7
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
400 200 100 50
10
65
0
10
65
21
06
54
10
65
6
10
65
8
10
66
0
10
66
2
10
66
4
10
66
6
10
66
8
10
67
0
10
67
2
10
67
4
10
67
6
10
67
8
10
68
0
10
68
2
10
68
4
10
68
6
10
68
8
10
69
0
10
69
2
10
69
4
10
69
6
10
69
81
07
00
10
70
2
10
70
4
10
70
6
10
70
8
10
71
0
10
71
2
10
71
4
10
71
6
10
71
8
10
72
0
10
72
2
10
65
1
10
65
3
10
65
5
10
65
7
10
65
9
10
66
1
10
66
3
10
66
5
10
66
7
10
66
9
10
67
1
10
67
3
10
67
5
10
67
7
10
67
9
10
68
1
10
68
3
10
68
5
10
68
7
10
68
9
10
69
1
10
69
3
10
69
5
10
69
7
10
69
9
10
70
1
10
70
3
10
70
5
10
70
7
10
70
9
10
711
10
71
3
10
71
5
10
71
7
10
71
9
10
72
1
MILANO CADORNA
Milano Domodossola
MILANO P.VITTORIA
Milano Dateo
Mi Venezia
Mi Repubblica
MILANO P.G. PASS.
Mi Lancetti
MILANO NORD BOVISA
Quarto Oggiaro
Novate Milanese
Bollate Centro
Bollate Nord
Serenella
Garbagnate Milanese
Cesate
Caronno Pertusella
Saronno Sud
Saronno
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
200 100 50 25SALITIDISCESI
Getting On and Off the Train: S Line
Line S1+S3 Milano-Saronno, frequency of 15 minutes all day• Peaks are relevant, but there are passengers along the whole day
Morning peak: people mainly getting on towards Milan
Afternoon & evening peak: people getting off from Milan
People on Board: Interregio Traffic
Line Turin-Milan, an Interregio every hour. Stops every 15’ in each node (Chivasso, Santhià, Vercelli, Novara, Magenta, Rho):
• Excellent performance from early morning to late evening!
Novara-Milan: Line S6 (especially crowded in peak hours)
MILANO P.VITTORIAMilano DateoMi VeneziaMi RepubblicaMilano P.GaribaldiMILANO P.G. PASS.Mi LancettiMi Villapizzone
MILANO CENTRALE
MILANO CERTOSARho Fiera Milano
RHO
Vittuone ArlunoCorbetta S.Stef.
Magenta
Trecate
NOVARA
Ponzana
Borgo Vercelli
VERCELLI
Olcenengo
S. Germano Verc.
SANTHIA`Tronzano
Bianze`
Livorno FerrarisS. Ant. di Sal.
Saluggia
TorrazzaCastelrosso
CHIVASSOBrandizzo
SETTIMO
Torino Stura
TORINO DORATORINO P. SUSA .
TORINO P.NUOVA
feb10 D A
20
02
20
04
20
06
20
08
20
10
20
12
20
14
20
16
20
18
20
20
20
22
20
24
20
26
20
28
20
40
20
70
10
14
4
feb10 D R
20
01
20
03
20
05
20
07
20
09
20
11
20
13
20
15
20
17
20
19
20
21
20
23
20
25
20
27
20
71
feb10 R A
10
49
2
feb10 R R
10
07
9
feb10 S A
10
65
0
10
65
2
10
65
4
10
65
6
10
65
8
10
66
0
10
66
2
10
66
4
10
66
6
10
66
8
10
67
0
10
67
2
10
67
4
10
67
6
10
67
8
10
68
0
10
68
2
10
68
4
10
68
6
10
68
8
10
69
0
10
69
2
10
69
4
10
69
6
10
69
8
10
70
0
10
70
2
10
70
4
10
70
6
10
70
8
feb10 S R
10
65
1
10
65
3
10
65
5
10
65
7
10
65
9
10
66
1
10
66
3
10
66
5
10
66
7
10
66
91
06
71
10
67
3
10
67
5
10
67
7
10
67
9
10
68
1
10
68
3
10
68
5
10
68
7
10
68
9
10
69
1
10
69
3
10
69
5
10
69
7
10
69
9
10
70
1
10
70
3
10
70
5
10
70
7
10
70
9
10
711
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
400 200 100 50
People on board: non structured lines
Line Pavia-Alessandria (diesel railcars)• Non structured timetable. Mainly for students (see passengers from
Pavia between 13 and 14). It’s difficult to reach outstanding performances.
ALESSANDRIA
Valmadonna
VALENZA
TORREBERETTI
Castellaro
Mede
Lomello
Ferrera Lomell.
Sannazzaro
Pieve Albignola
Zinasco Nuovo
Sairano ZinascoSairano
CAVA CARBONARA
PAVIA
mar11 R A
10
36
0
10
36
2
10
36
4
10
36
8
47
30
47
32
47
34
47
42
47
44
47
46
mar11 R R
10
36
1
10
36
3
10
36
5
10
36
7
47
31
47
33
47
39
47
43
47
45
47
49
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
200 100 50 25
People on Board: Structuring the Service - Before
Line Milan-Chiasso, November 2003• The line has international long distance traffic (Gotthard) but regional
service is not structured.
CHIASSO
COMO S.GIOVANNI
ALBATE-CAMERLATA
Cucciago
Cantu -̀Cermenate
Carimate
Camnago-Lentate
SEREGNO
Desio
Lissone-Muggio`
MONZA
SESTO S.GIOVANNI
MI.GRECO PIRELLI
MI.P.GARIBALDIMILANO CENTRALEMILANO LAMBRATE
MI.P.TA ROMANA
MI Romolo
MI.S.CRISTOFORO
nov03 A
25
72
25
80
10
78
6
10
79
0
10
79
2
10
79
4
10
79
6
10
79
8
10
80
0
10
80
2
10
80
4
10
80
6
10
80
8
10
81
0
10
81
2
10
81
4
10
82
0
10
82
2
10
82
4
23
12
2
23
13
0
nov03 R
25
61
25
73
25
81
25
83
10
78
9
10
79
1
10
79
3
10
79
51
07
97
10
79
9
10
80
1
10
80
3
10
80
5
10
80
7
10
80
9
10
811
10
81
3
10
81
5
10
81
7
10
82
1
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
400 200 100 50
• Trains only in peak hours. Absolutely nothing in mid morning. Mainly addressed to “traditional” commuters
• It’s difficult to increase passengers
People on Board: Structuring the Service - After
Line Milan-Chiasso, today (March 2011)
CHIASSO
COMO S.GIOVANNI
ALBATE-CAMERLATA
Cucciago
Cantu -̀Cermenate
Carimate
Camnago-Lentate
SEREGNO
Desio
Lissone-Muggio`
MONZA
SESTO S.GIOVANNI
MI.GRECO PIRELLI
MI.P.GARIBALDIMILANO CENTRALEMILANO LAMBRATE
MI.P.TA ROMANA
MI Romolo
MI.S.CRISTOFORO
mar11 S A
10
83
2
10
83
4
10
83
6
10
83
8
10
84
01
08
42
10
84
4
10
84
6
10
84
8
10
85
0
10
85
2
10
85
4
10
85
6
10
85
8
10
86
0
10
86
2
10
86
6
10
86
8
10
87
01
08
72
10
87
4
10
87
6
10
87
8
10
88
0
10
88
2
24
10
0
24
10
2
24
10
4
24
10
6
24
10
8
24
110
24
112
24
114
24
116
24
118
24
12
0
24
12
2
24
12
4
24
12
6
24
12
8
24
13
0
24
13
2
24
13
4
24
13
6
24
13
8
24
14
0
24
14
2
24
14
4
24
14
6
24
14
8
24
15
0
24
15
2
24
15
4
mar11 S R
10
83
5
10
83
7
10
83
9
10
84
1
10
84
3
10
84
51
08
47
10
84
9
10
85
1
10
85
3
10
85
5
10
85
7
10
85
9
10
86
1
10
86
3
10
86
5
10
86
7
10
86
9
10
87
1
10
87
3
10
87
5
10
87
7
10
87
9
10
88
1
10
88
3
24
10
1
24
10
3
24
10
5
24
10
7
24
10
9
24
111
24
113
24
115
24
117
24
119
24
12
1
24
12
3
24
12
5
24
12
7
24
12
9
24
13
1
24
13
3
24
13
5
24
13
7
24
13
9
24
14
1
24
14
3
24
14
5
24
14
7
24
14
9
24
15
1
24
15
3
24
15
5
26
85
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
400 200 100 50
• S9 Milan-Seregno every 30’ all day + S11 Milan-Chiasso every 60’ off-peak / 30’ peak + Direct trains Milan-Chiasso-Bellinzona (CH)
• Excellent performance
Structuring the Service - Year after Year
Line Milan-Chiasso 2001-2010: • from 16000 to 39000 passengers per day = +145%
Total Passengers (weekday Mo-Fr)
16.6
38
15.5
44
16.5
70
18.6
77
21.1
87
23.7
68
26.0
48
36.3
37
39.1
39
39.1
43
1.34
2
4.80
6
5.07
1
7.29
9
8.07
9 13.4
70 18.2
57
16.4
67
05.000
10.00015.00020.00025.00030.00035.00040.00045.000
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010Year
Pass
enge
rs p
er d
ay
MILANO-COMO-CHIASSO Of which: S9
Structuring the Service - Year after Year
Line Milan-Chiasso 2003-2011
No need to explain!
Desio - 24/ 11/ 2003(verso Lissone-Muggio`)
.15.01 .59
.17 .47.33 .58
.37
.03.01
.01 .32
.04.00 .45
.43
.00 .57
56
78
910
111213
1415
161718
1920
2122
2324
R D/ IR S IC/ EC ES EN
Desio - 23/ 11/ 2005(verso Lissone-Muggio`)
.43
.43 .51
.16 .31 .43 .55.22 .39
.00 .45.51
.48.00 .44.00 .44
.00 .41
.00 .39
.00 .51 .59.43 .54
.02 .43 .54
.00 .51 .59.43
.41.53
.40
56
78
910
111213
1415
161718
1920
2122
2324
R D/ IR S IC/ EC ES ENDesio - 23/ 11/ 2007
(verso Lissone-Muggio`)
.42
.42 .50
.09 .16 .31 .42 .55.25 .39 .55
.45.52
.49 .55.25 .42 .55
.42 .55
.25 .42 .55
.25 .42 .55
.50 .56.42 .52
.00 .28 .43 .54
.00 .25 .51 .58.42 .58
.41.53
.39
56
78
910
111213
1415
161718
1920
2122
2324
R D/ IR S IC/ EC ES EN
Desio - 23/ 11/ 2009(verso Lissone-Muggio`)
.57.40 .57
.02 .10 .27 .40 .57.10 .27 .40 .57
.10 .57.57
.40 .57.10 .40 .57.10 .40 .57
.10 .40 .57
.10 .40 .57
.10 .40 .57
.10 .40 .57
.10 .27 .40 .57
.10 .27 .40 .57
.10 .57
.57
.57
.57
56
78
910
111213
1415
161718
1920
2122
2324
R D/ IR S IC/ EC ES EN
Desio - 23/ 11/ 2011(verso Lissone-Muggio`)
.56.39 .56
.02 .09 .26 .39 .56.09 .26 .39 .56
.09 .26 .39 .56
.09 .39 .56
.09 .39 .56
.09 .39 .56
.09 .39 .56
.09 .39 .56
.09 .39 .56
.09 .39 .56
.09 .39 .56
.09 .26 .39 .56
.09 .26 .39 .56
.09 .26 .39 .56
.26 .56
.26 .56
.56
56
78
910
111213
1415
161718
1920
2122
2324
R D/ IR S IC/ EC ES EN
S9 S9S11 S11
S9 S9S11 S11
S9 S9
Train journey is related with number of stops
In 1987-2005, Direct trains connected Milan with Bologna, and had exceptionally good performance (number of passengers)In 2005, trains were limited to Milan-Parma journey. The number of passengers decreased dramatically.
• The more a train is direct (fewer stops), the more it requires a “minimum journey” to capture enough people
Saturday, 2005 winter time: Milan-Bologna
MILANO CENTRALE
MILANO ROGOREDO
Lodi
CASALPUSTERLENGO
CODOGNO
PIACENZA
Fiorenzuola
FIDENZA
PARMA
REGGIO EMILIA
MODENA
BOLOGNA C.LE
gen05 45
21
23
21
25
21
27
21
29
21
31
21
33
21
35
21
37
21
39
21
41
21
20
21
22
21
24
21
26
21
28
21
30
21
32
21
34
21
36
21
38
gen06 45
22
71
22
73
22
75
22
77
22
79
22
81
22
83
22
85
22
87
22
89
22
72
22
74
22
76
22
78
22
80
22
82
22
84
22
86
22
88
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
600 300 150 75
Saturday, 2006 winter time: Milan-Parma
MI.P.GENOVA
MI.S.CRISTOFOROCorsico
Trezzano S.N.
Gaggiano
Abbiategrasso
Vigevano
Parona Lomellina
MORTARA
ALESSANDRIA
D
4701
P
4702
4724
4727
1050
2
1050
3
1050
4
1050
5
1050
9
1051
3
1051
7
1051
8
1051
9
1052
1
1052
3
1052
4
1052
6
1052
8
1052
9
1053
0
1053
2
1053
5
1053
6
1053
8
1054
1
1054
610
549
1055
0
1055
6
1055
8
1055
9
1060
1
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
20 10 5 2.5
Delays (another use of timetable charts)
Line Milan-Mortara, June 2004, Sundays• Thickness represents the average delay (minutes)
Propagation of delay from one trip to the next!(with progressive increase of average delay)
Propagation of delay due to the crossing
36
Learning more:
www.miol.it/stagniweb
Thank you for your kind attention and... have a nice trip!
