Present SA performance vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

56
Present SA performance vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

description

Present SA performance vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group. Passive Attenuation. 2 Hz. Long Pendula. Ground. Resonances. f -2N. Transmission. Frequency (Hz). Soft Springs. Mirror. Magnetic Antisprings. 8 m. Blade Springs. Rumore Termico. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Present SA performance vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

Page 1: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

Present SA performance vs. AdV & ET Specs

S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

Page 2: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

Passive Attenuation

Page 3: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group
Page 4: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

Ground

Mirror

Resonances

f-2N

Long Pendula

2 Hz

Tran

smis

sion

Soft Springs

Frequency (Hz)

Page 5: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

Blade Springs

MagneticAntisprings

8 m

Page 6: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

Ground Seismic NoiseMirror Seismic Noise

Rumore Termico

Page 7: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group
Page 8: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

DL(f) = h(f) / 3000

Page 9: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

TFmax = DL(f) /(LSD Ground Seismic Noise)

LSD Ground Seismic Noise = 5 x 10 -7/ f 2

Page 10: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

Same Exercise for ET sensitivity

Page 11: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

DL(f) = h(f) / 10000

Page 12: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

TFmax = DL(f) /(LSD Under-Ground Seismic Noise)

LSD Ground Seismic Noise (Kamioka) - 5 x 10 -9/ f 2

(Duzel Mine much better)

Page 13: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

Same Exercise for ET-Xylophone sensitivity

Page 14: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

DL(f) = h(f) / 10000

Page 15: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

TFmax = DL(f) /(LSD Ground Seismic Noise)

LSD Ground Seismic Noise (Kamioka) - 5 x 10 -9/ f 2

Page 16: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

Valid both for horizontal and vertical seismic noise

Page 17: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

SA designe freccette

Filter Chain TF measurements(without Pre-Isolator !)

Page 18: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

SA designe freccette

@ 4.1 Hz< 6 ×10e-8

CITF Measurements around 2, 4, 9 Hz

Page 19: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

SA designe freccette

CITF Measurements around 2, 4, 9 Hz

@ 2.25 Hz5 ×10e-6

Page 20: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

High Sens Range

Larger stabilityallows longer measurements

Page 21: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

SA designe freccette

frequency (Hz)

Displacement (m .Hz-1/2)

Top

Mirror

Transfer Function < 10-10

Page 22: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

StressedMeasurement

T = 41943 sHigh Sens Range

TOP

MIRROR

2 x 10-18 m Hz-1/2

1.2 x 10-6 m Hz-1/2

TF < 1.7 x 10-12

Page 23: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

!!

TF = 1.26 x 10-11

Page 24: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

ET-Xylophone AdV

1.26 x 10-11

+ Pre-Isolator

Page 25: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

SA designe freccette

X-excitation

SA designe freccette

Possible Bypass

Page 26: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

Bypass Indication ?

X - Excitation Results

Page 27: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

HORIZONTAL

Integration Time Kind of Measurement FrequencyDisp Top

(Lines LSD) Disp Mirror Upper Limit (LSD) TF(s) (Hz) (m Hz^-1/2) (m Hz^-1/2)

10485 Central interferometer 2,30 4,80E-05 2,50E-10 5,21E-0610485 Central interferometer 4,10 3,30E-05 2,00E-12 6,06E-08

About 20000 s West Input Cavity Mirror 4,30 4,31E-06 3,6E-14 8,36E-09About 20000 s West Input Cavity Mirror 6,30 6,02E-06 5,4E-14 8,97E-09

10485 Central interferometer 9,80 5,70E-06 4,10E-13 7,19E-08About 20000 s West Input Cavity Mirror 10,30 3,00E-06 1,8E-16 6,00E-11About 20000 s West Input Cavity Mirror 18,30 2,85E-06 4,8E-17 1,68E-11

41943 North Input Cavity Mirror 29,30 2,95E-06 1,50E-17 5,08E-1241943 West Input Cavity Mirror 30,30 9,39E-07 6,00E-17 6,39E-1141943 North End Cavity Mirror 31,30 1,42E-06 1,80E-17 1,26E-1141943 West End Cavity Mirror 32,30 1,22E-06 2,4E-18 1,97E-12

VERTICALIncluded H-V Coupling

Integration Time Kind of Measurement FrequencyDisp Top

(Lines LSD) Disp Mirror Upper Limit (LSD) TF(s) (Hz) (m Hz^-1/2) (m Hz^-1/2)

2620 Central Interferometer 2,25 1,70E-04 2,60E-10 1,53E-062620 Central Interferometer 4,10 3,00E-04 3,00E-12 1,00E-08

25165 North Input Cavity Mirror 29,30 1,22E-06 3,00E-18 2,47E-1225165 West Input Cavity Mirror 30,30 3,88E-06 3,00E-18 7,73E-1325165 North End Cavity Mirror 31,30 4,14E-06 3,00E-18 7,24E-1325165 West End Cavity Mirror 32,30 4,43E-06 3,00E-18 6,77E-13

X-AXIS8388 North Input Cavity Mirror 29,30 1,18E-06 3,9E-17 3,30E-118388 West Input Cavity Mirror 30,30 6,08E-07 1,26E-17 2,07E-118388 North End Cavity Mirror 31,30 6,3E-07 3,9E-18 6,19E-128388 West End Cavity Mirror 32,30 7,53E-07 2,31E-17 3,07E-11

Red = Line DetectedBlue = Line Not Detected

Purple = Upper Limitnot useful (too large)

Page 28: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

ET-Xylophone AdV

Upper Limit Detected

Without Pre-Isolator (Just filter chain !)

53113

IP Guarantees for this !Already compliant for ET

(Remind that we are speaking of Upper Limits !)

Page 29: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

Vertical TF measurements(Coupling included in the measurement)

Page 30: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

Vertical Measurements

Page 31: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

ET-Xylophone AdV

Without Filter Zero (Just filter chain !)

60

F0 Guarantees for thisUPPER LIMIT (!) compliant for ET

Vertical Upper Limit Vertical Detected

Page 32: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

Preisolator makes safetymargin wide in AdV

Page 33: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

SA are compliant also for ET starting from 4 Hz....

What happens below?

Page 34: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

@ 2.25 Hz5 ×10e-6

Remarkable Attenuation also at 2.25 Hz

HORIZONTAL

Page 35: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

@ 2.25 Hz1.5 ×10e-6

Remarkable Attenuation also at 2.25 Hz

VERTICAL

Page 36: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

Yes

No

Maybe

423

TF

f

ModelMeas.

Stage by Stage Measurement (and Model)

Page 37: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

ET Design Programme

Cut-off 3-4 Hz No Design Study

Cut-off 1-2 Hz Design Study

SCIENCE CASE & NEWTONIAN NOISETO BE DISCUSSED AT ERICE MEETING

Page 38: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

N 1 Hz 2 Hz ------------------------- {3, 1.6*10-7, 5.4*10-10} {4, 4.8*10-8, 3.3*10-11} {5, 2.6*10-8, 3.4*10-12} {6, 2.3*10-8, 6.7*10-12} {7, 2.1*10-8, 2.6*10-12}

Optimized at 1Hz

Courtesy G. Cella

Horizontal

~50 m

G.Cella

Page 39: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

2 Independent full simulations in progress

Page 40: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

Actuation Noise

Page 41: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

Bobina

MagneteVV

-0.2

0.2

V

Lunghezza cavità

V

-0.2

0.2

l/100

Locking

Page 42: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group
Page 43: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

M

GiuntoFlessibile

g

30 mHz

PendoloInvertito

Page 44: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

ADC DSP DAC

Actuators

Accelerometers

RESIDUAL SWING < 0.1 mm

Page 45: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

CPU

PPC

Motor

Driver

Dual

Port

RAM

DAC-D-

ADC-D-

DSP-D-

DSP-L-

Timing

DOL DAC-L-

DAC-L-

Dual

Port

RAM

ADC-D-

ADC-D-

VME bus

VSB bus 1 VBeX bus 1 VSB bus 2

VBeX bus 2

Superattenuatore

Sensors

Coil Drivers

Motors

Sensors

Sensors

Coil Drivers

Coil Drivers

Position &

Damping

DSP:- 96 bit- 60 MFLOPs

DAC:- 8 Chan.- 20 bit- 500 KHz

ADC:- 8 Chan.- 16 bit

SAR- 200 KHz

Acc. Sens:- 10-9 m/s2

- 0 – 100Hz- f.s. 1g

Control Electronics System

Page 46: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

Hierarchical Control

Page 47: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

WIND SEAMIRROR

ACTUATION

Page 48: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

Tilt

Page 49: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

Direct Measurement on the ITF !!

A.Gennai (VIR 029-A09)

Page 50: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

Distribution and (its integral) of the maximum of the absolute values of marionettacorrection voltage computed on 200 s-long interval

(all VSR1 run, itf in science mode)

Page 51: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

Calm Any

Page 52: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

Calm Any

Page 53: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

Setting the marionetta actuation range to 2.2 V we “risk” 1% of duty cycle(techical solutions to avoid unlocks available)

Calm Any

Actuation Noise Reduction by

a factor 4 immediatelyavailable !

Page 54: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

Reduction factor

3-4 Wind (5%)

7-8 Calm (95%)

Direct Meas. Now

Calm

Wind

AdV

Many other possibility to reduce noise

Page 55: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

AdV: SA performance are compliant with AdVboth for passive isolation and actuation noise

ET: Safety margin guarantees present SA attenuation goodalso for the ET project (not too demanding above a few Hz)

Passive isolation compliant above about 3-4 HzOptimization necessary if lower frequency will be investigated

Actuation Noise is the major concern

AdV: Upgrades provide additional safety margin.......

Page 56: Present SA performance  vs. AdV & ET Specs S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group

Recent upgrades (each requiring a separate talk)

Gyrolaser: A.Di Virgilio’s group provided an instrument able to monitor ground tilt with the required sensitivity (close to 10-9 rad/Hz1/2) with high duty cycle.

Tiltmeters: The flex-joint solution was killed. A new prototype concevied by A.Giazotto based on a complete different design was assembled (excellent mechanical performance).

Piezo Actuation: The entire electro-mechanical system was assembled by F.Frasconi on SAFE bottom ring and monitored by LVDT. Preliminary tests are very encouraging.

Vertical to Horizontal Coupling: The MSC group measured the coupling factor exciting marionetta in vertical and looking at the itf with a “surprising result” (TBC).