KSK Thesis.doc - pdfMachine from Broadgun Software, http...
Transcript of KSK Thesis.doc - pdfMachine from Broadgun Software, http...
CHAPTER � 8
Influence of temperature on thermodynamic and transport properties of acid- base liquid
mixtures: an ultrasonic, volumetric and viscometric study
Influence of temperature on thermodynamic and transport
properties of acid- base liquid mixtures: an ultrasonic, volumetric
and viscometric study
8.1 Introduction
Studies on liquid mixtures using thermodynamic and transport properties
enables much information about the molecular interactions exist in the liquid
mixtures. The present work supplements the further investigations of molecular
interactions in the mixtures containing commercially important alcohols like
isopropyl/isobutyl/isoamyl alcohols and ethanol that are mixed in equimolar ratio.
Further such equimolar mixtures of ethanol + isopropyl alcohol/isobutyl
alcohol/isoamyl alcohols and N,N-dimethyl acetamide were added. The study of
thermodynamic and transport properties of these multi component liquid mixtures
and data on the analysis in terms of various models are important for industrial
and pharmaceutical applications1-6 such as solvents for gums, oils, alkaloids, urea
resins, for milk testing and for fibers.
A literature survey reveals that Liisa Pikka Rainen7 and Jan Zielkeiwicz8
reported density and viscosity data for binary mixtures of N, N-dimethyl acetamide
as one component aliphatic alcohols is another component at 303.15 K. Amalendu
Pal and Rakesh Kumar Bhardwaj9 also reported densities and viscosities for the
binary mixtures N,N-dimethyl acetamide with 2�propoxy ethanol and 2-isopropoxy
ethanol at 298.15 K. Density and viscosity data in the mixtures of N, N�dimethyl
acetamide with diethyl carbonate and dimethyl carbonate at 298.15 K were
reported by Iloukhani et al10. Rafiqul Islam and Quadri11 reported density and
viscosity of binary mixtures of benzyl alcohol with isoamyl alcohol and isopropyl
alcohol. Sravana kumar et al12 reported densities and viscosities of mixtures of 2-
chloroaniline with equimolar mixture of methanol and isopropanol/isobutanol at
308.15 K.
In this chapter, we have reported the ultrasonic, volumetric and viscometric
studies of molecular interactions at three different spot temperatures T = (308.15,
313.15 and 318.15) K in equimolar mixture of ethanol and isopropyl
alcohol/isobutyl alcohol/isoamyl alcohol as one component and N,N-dimethyl
acetamide as other component.
The deviation in ultrasonic velocity (∆u), excess molar volume ( EVm ),
deviation in isentropic compressibility (∆ks), excess inter molecular free length
( ELf ), excess acoustic impedance (ZE), deviation in viscosity ( ), and excess
Gibb�s free energy of activation of viscous flow ( *EÄG ) are calculated using the
experimental results of ultrasonic velocity (u), density (ñ) and viscosity (ç). The
variation of these properties over the entire composition range yields the
information about molecular interaction in the liquid systems. The excess/deviation
properties are fitted to Redlich-Kister type polynomial equation. Besides, the
experimental values of ultrasonic velocity for all the liquid mixtures measured and
compared with the theoretically estimated values using different empirical relations
such as Nomoto�s, Van Dael and Vangeel�s ideal mixing relation, Junjie�s relation.
The percentage deviations of theoretical velocities from experimental values are
calculated. The deviation of ultrasonic velocity from its experimental value is
further utilized to study molecular interactions. The experimental data of viscosity is
used to test the applicability of empirical relations of Gruenberg-Nissan, Hind-
McLaughlin, Katty-Chaudhary and Heric-Brewer for the systems studied.
8.2 Experimental
Ethanol�absolute (mass fraction purity 0.99) changshu yang yuan
chemicals � China make and N,N-dimethyl acetamide (mass fraction purity 0.99),
isopropyl alcohol (mass fraction purity 0.99), isobutyl alcohol (mass fraction purity
0.99), isoamyl alcohol (mass fraction purity 0.99) used in the present study are
Graded Reagent (G.R) obtained from LOBA Chemicals, Mumbai, INDIA.
Equimolar mixture of ethanol (EOH) and isopropyl alcohol (IPA)/isobutyl alcohol
(IBA)/isoamyl alcohol (IAA) is first prepared and this solution has been used to
prepare the liquid mixtures with N,N-dimethyl acetamide (DMA) so that over the
entire composition range covered (i.e 0-100% of DMA). The weighing of solutions
has been made using a METTLER TOLEDO (Switzerland make) ABB5-S/FACT
digital balance with an accuracy of 0.01 mg.
8.3 Results
The experimentally measured values of ultrasonic velocity, u, density, ñ and
viscosity, ç with mole fraction of DMA for three systems, (EOH+IPA)+DMA,
(EOH+IBA)+DMA and (EOH+IAA)+DMA are reported in Tables 8.1.A � 8.1.C
respectively. From these tables it has been observed that u and ñ increase linearly
and ç decreases non-linearly at all temperatures in the systems investigated.
The deviation in ultrasonic velocity (∆u), excess molar volume ( EVm ),
deviation in isentropic compressibility (∆ks), excess inter molecular free length
Table 8.1.A Experimental results of ultrasonic velocity (u), density (ñ) and viscosity (ç) for (EOH+IPA)+DMA system with mole fraction (x) of DMA at T = (308.15, 313.15 and 318.15) K
T = 308.15 K T = 313.15 K T = 318.15 K x u/ ñ/ ç/ u/ ñ/ ç/ u/ ñ/ ç/ m.s-1 kg.m-3 10-3 N.s.m-2 m.s-1 kg.m-3 10-3 N.s.m-2 m.s-1 kg.m-3 10-3 N.s.m-2
0.0000 1108.62 773.62 1.1862 1091.98 769.87 1.0663 1076.53 764.92 0.9542
0.0750 1143.50 792.30 1.0518 1122.93 783.97 0.9512 1104.98 764.81 0.8550
0.2350 1206.94 823.49 0.9337 1182.48 810.85 0.8424 1162.72 786.74 0.7490
0.3344 1242.50 840.80 0.8933 1215.99 826.97 0.8071 1195.78 801.30 0.7205
0.4279 1273.55 855.70 0.8673 1245.58 841.01 0.7861 1224.52 816.20 0.7063
0.5252 1302.23 870.30 0.8469 1275.02 854.80 0.7687 1252.85 831.42 0.6958
0.6300 1330.96 884.60 0.8309 1305.28 870.30 0.7595 1283.22 847.70 0.6909
0.7693 1367.21 902.20 0.8176 1344.46 890.00 0.7552 1322.84 869.20 0.6896
0.8686 1393.05 913.75 0.8194 1372.20 903.30 0.7632 1351.51 887.50 0.6982
0.9143 1404.60 918.78 0.8204 1385.17 910.07 0.7662 1365.23 898.00 0.7026
1.0000 1425.16 927.70 0.8279 1410.30 923.11 0.7721 1391.30 917.65 0.7090
Table 8.1.B Experimental results of ultrasonic velocity (u), density (ñ) and viscosity (ç) for (EOH+IBA)+DMA system with mole fraction (x) of DMA at T = (308.15, 313.15 and 318.15) K
T = 308.15 K T = 313.15 K T = 318.15 K x u/ ñ/ ç/ u/ ñ/ ç/ u/ ñ/ ç/ m.s-1 kg.m-3 10-3 N.s.m-2 m.s-1 kg.m-3 10-3 N.s.m-2 m.s-1 kg.m-3 10-3 N.s.m-2
0.0000 1139.46 782.14 1.5984 1134.85 780.18 1.4792 1111.23 775.12 1.3076
0.0687 1170.72 797.14 1.2707 1159.86 792.50 1.1723 1135.38 783.50 1.0485
0.1604 1203.45 816.25 1.1350 1192.03 810.80 1.0368 1167.72 796.00 0.9090
0.2520 1234.25 834.10 1.0489 1220.76 827.72 0.9550 1196.80 810.89 0.8398
0.3312 1260.49 847.54 0.9920 1244.08 840.59 0.9080 1220.83 823.10 0.8030
0.4118 1285.95 859.92 0.9448 1266.86 852.66 0.8689 1242.90 834.70 0.7750
0.5406 1321.60 878.70 0.8890 1300.46 870.70 0.8260 1276.57 854.36 0.7450
0.6697 1351.40 896.00 0.8651 1332.07 887.54 0.8044 1308.50 874.12 0.7230
0.7645 1372.30 907.70 0.8474 1354.09 899.22 0.7870 1331.44 886.26 0.7130
0.8754 1396.27 920.00 0.8291 1379.85 911.51 0.7733 1359.13 900.80 0.7093
1.0000 1425.16 927.70 0.8279 1410.30 923.11 0.7721 1391.30 917.65 0.7090
Table 8.1.C Experimental results of ultrasonic velocity (u), density (ñ) and viscosity (ç) for (EOH+IAA)+DMA system with mole fraction (x) of DMA at T = (308.15, 313.15 and 318.15) K
T = 308.15 K T = 313.15 K T = 318.15 K x u/ ñ/ ç/ u/ ñ/ ç/ u/ ñ/ ç./ m.s-1 kg.m-3 10-3 N.s.m-2 m.s-1 kg.m-3 10-3 N.s.m-2 m.s-1 kg.m-3 10-3 N.s.m-2
0.0000 1162.12 789.62 1.7469 1142.12 783.89 1.5185 1128.30 780.04 1.3721
0.0941 1204.10 817.12 1.3980 1181.21 808.65 1.2120 1164.34 796.50 1.1300
0.1874 1237.05 835.00 1.2440 1213.27 827.14 1.0950 1194.94 811.77 1.0000
0.2810 1266.82 850.50 1.1417 1242.48 843.04 1.0142 1223.78 826.57 0.9248
0.3795 1296.59 865.91 1.0630 1271.80 858.64 0.9502 1251.67 841.71 0.8690
0.4785 1321.55 880.67 1.0008 1297.18 873.26 0.9020 1276.49 856.07 0.8218
0.5689 1342.45 893.39 0.9600 1317.96 886.10 0.8690 1297.23 868.84 0.7922
0.6801 1366.85 908.06 0.9171 1343.50 900.00 0.8328 1322.11 883.74 0.7665
0.7834 1388.88 919.72 0.8815 1366.21 909.70 0.8067 1344.43 896.11 0.7428
0.8914 1410.07 928.50 0.8431 1389.79 916.38 0.7860 1368.20 907.00 0.7270
1.0000 1425.16 927.70 0.8279 1410.30 923.11 0.7721 1391.30 917.65 0.7090
( ELf ), excess acoustic impedance (ZE), deviation in viscosity ( ), and excess
Gibb�s free energy of activation of viscous flow ( *EÄG ) are calculated from the
experimental values of u, ñ and ç using the equations described in chapter 3.
The deviation/excess properties like ∆u, ELf , ZE, Äç and ÄG*E with mole
fraction of DMA at all temperatures for all the systems are presented in
Tables 8.2.A � 8.2.C. The variation of EVm with mole fraction of DMA at all
temperatures for all the systems is shown in figures 8.1 � 8.3. Where as the
figures 8.4 � 8.6 represent the variation of ∆ks with volume fraction of DMA at
all temperatures for all the systems respectively.
The values of Äu, Äks, EVm , Äç and ÄG*E are fitted to Redlich-Kister
type polynomial equation13,14 3.16. The co-efficients in the Redlich-Kister
polynomial and the corresponding standard deviations calculated using the
equation 3.17 are compiled in Table 8.3.
8.4 Discussion
From figures 8.1 � 8.3 it is observed that (a) EVm are negative at T =
308.15 K and positive at 313.15 K, 318.15 K for (EOH+IPA)+DMA mixture (b)
for (EOH+IBA)+DMA mixture EVm are negative at T = 308.15 K, 313.15 K
and positive at 318.15 K (c) excess molar volumes are negative for
(EOH+IAA)+DMA mixture at all temperatures respectively. As the
temperature increases, it has been observed that, the negative EVm values
Table 8.2.A Calculated properties of deviation in ultrasonic velocity, Äu,
excess intermolecular free length, ELf , excess acoustic impedance, ZE,
deviation in viscosities, Äç, and excess Gibb�s free energy of activation
of viscous flow, ÄG*E with mole fraction of DMA, x for (EOH+IPA)+DMA
system at T = (308.15, 313.15 and 318.15) K
x Ô Äu/ ELf / ZE/ Äç/ ÄG*E/
m.s-1 10-10m 106kg.m-2.s-1 10-3N.s.m-2 kJ.mol-1 T = 308.15 K 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0750 0.0746 11.15 -0.0138 0.0135 -0.1075 -0.2400 0.2350 0.2338 23.92 -0.0283 0.0271 -0.1683 -0.3861 0.3344 0.3326 28.04 -0.0321 0.0317 -0.1731 -0.4031 0.4279 0.4258 29.50 -0.0329 0.0334 -0.1656 -0.3893 0.5252 0.5229 27.36 -0.0307 0.0317 -0.1511 -0.3596 0.6300 0.6277 22.93 -0.0262 0.0271 -0.1296 -0.3124 0.7693 0.7674 15.08 -0.0179 0.0185 -0.0930 -0.2299 0.8686 0.8672 9.50 -0.0110 0.0119 -0.0556 -0.1380 0.9143 0.9133 6.57 -0.0075 0.0082 -0.0382 -0.0960 1.0000 1.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 T = 313.15 K 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0750 0.0751 7.09 -0.0100 0.0051 -0.0930 -0.2206 0.2350 0.2363 15.68 -0.0218 0.0097 -0.1548 -0.3778 0.3344 0.3365 17.57 -0.0248 0.0107 -0.1608 -0.3978 0.4279 0.4311 17.40 -0.0250 0.0095 -0.1543 -0.3827 0.5252 0.5297 15.85 -0.0233 0.0070 -0.1431 -0.3566 0.6300 0.6349 12.76 -0.0199 0.0047 -0.1215 -0.3048 0.7693 0.7741 7.60 -0.0134 0.0011 -0.0848 -0.2139 0.8686 0.8729 3.74 -0.0076 -0.0018 -0.0476 -0.1142 0.9143 0.9175 2.15 -0.0049 -0.0018 -0.0312 -0.0739 1.0000 1.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 T = 318.15 K 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0750 0.0765 4.86 -0.0026 -0.0124 -0.0808 -0.1664 0.2350 0.2420 12.20 -0.0129 -0.0153 -0.1476 -0.3482 0.3344 0.3451 14.00 -0.0159 -0.0169 -0.1517 -0.3608 0.4279 0.4415 13.31 -0.0167 -0.0180 -0.1430 -0.3393 0.5252 0.5413 11.00 -0.0155 -0.0199 -0.1296 -0.3059 0.6300 0.6479 8.39 -0.0130 -0.0212 -0.1088 -0.2518 0.7693 0.7879 4.16 -0.0077 -0.0223 -0.0760 -0.1672 0.8686 0.8832 1.59 -0.0040 -0.0177 -0.0430 -0.0845 0.9143 0.9243 0.91 -0.0027 -0.0119 -0.0274 -0.0523 1.0000 1.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Table 8.2.B Calculated properties of deviation in ultrasonic velocity, Äu,
excess intermolecular free length, ELf , excess acoustic impedance, ZE,
deviation in viscosities, Äç, and excess Gibb�s free energy of activation
of viscous flow, ÄG*E with mole fraction of DMA, x for (EOH+IBA)+DMA
system at T = (308.15, 313.15 and 318.15) K
x Ô Äu/ ELf / ZE/ Äç/ ÄG*E/
m.s-1 10-10m 106kg.m-2.s-1 10-3N.s.m-2 kJ.mol-1 T = 308.15 K 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0687 0.0684 11.64 -0.0116 0.0124 -0.2748 -0.4781 0.1604 0.1591 18.16 -0.0201 0.0220 -0.3398 -0.6203 0.2520 0.2491 22.80 -0.0256 0.0297 -0.3553 -0.6739 0.3312 0.3271 26.41 -0.0286 0.0344 -0.3512 -0.6842 0.4118 0.4067 28.83 -0.0299 0.0372 -0.3363 -0.6722 0.5406 0.5340 27.69 -0.0282 0.0371 -0.2929 -0.6104 0.6697 0.6621 20.60 -0.0225 0.0311 -0.2173 -0.4622 0.7645 0.7567 14.42 -0.0171 0.0250 -0.1619 -0.3545 0.8754 0.8682 6.72 -0.0098 0.0162 -0.0948 -0.2220 1.0000 1.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 T = 313.15 K 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0687 0.0686 6.10 -0.0075 0.0052 -0.2584 -0.4872 0.1604 0.1597 13.00 -0.0162 0.0143 -0.3290 -0.6577 0.2520 0.2502 16.50 -0.0212 0.0201 -0.3460 -0.7204 0.3312 0.3287 18.00 -0.0233 0.0224 -0.3370 -0.7178 0.4118 0.4087 18.57 -0.0239 0.0233 -0.3190 -0.6946 0.5406 0.5368 16.70 -0.0221 0.0218 -0.2709 -0.6070 0.6697 0.6656 12.75 -0.0179 0.0179 -0.2012 -0.4568 0.7645 0.7604 8.66 -0.0136 0.0138 -0.1516 -0.3535 0.8754 0.8722 3.88 -0.0075 0.0078 -0.0870 -0.2108 1.0000 1.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 T = 318.15 K 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0687 0.0690 4.92 -0.0057 -0.0003 -0.2180 -0.4506 0.1604 0.1616 11.57 -0.0126 0.0016 -0.3026 -0.6637 0.2520 0.2538 14.99 -0.0174 0.0045 -0.3170 -0.7222 0.3312 0.3335 16.84 -0.0197 0.0060 -0.3063 -0.7112 0.4118 0.4149 16.32 -0.0199 0.0051 -0.2861 -0.6732 0.5406 0.5437 13.93 -0.0187 0.0048 -0.2390 -0.5750 0.6697 0.6717 9.70 -0.0153 0.0043 -0.1837 -0.4562 0.7645 0.7669 6.10 -0.0111 0.0011 -0.1370 -0.3432 0.8754 0.8773 2.74 -0.0060 -0.0006 -0.0743 -0.1860 1.0000 1.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Table 8.2.C Calculated properties of deviation in ultrasonic velocity, Äu,
excess intermolecular free length, ELf , excess acoustic impedance, ZE,
deviation in viscosities, Äç, and excess Gibb�s free energy of activation
of viscous flow, ÄG*E with mole fraction of DMA, x for (EOH+IAA)+DMA
system at T = (308.15, 313.15 and 318.15) K
x Ô Äu/ ELf / ZE/ Äç/ ÄG*E/
m.s-1 10-10m 106kg.m-2.s-1 10-3N.s.m-2 kJ.mol-1 T = 308.15 K 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0941 0.0926 17.23 -0.0179 0.0282 -0.2624 -0.4317 0.1874 0.1835 25.64 -0.0257 0.0395 -0.3307 -0.5633 0.2810 0.2746 30.79 -0.0298 0.0462 -0.3470 -0.6082 0.3795 0.3705 34.65 -0.0321 0.0516 -0.3351 -0.6053 0.4785 0.4668 33.56 -0.0313 0.0527 -0.3063 -0.5719 0.5689 0.5550 30.69 -0.0290 0.0516 -0.2641 -0.5057 0.6801 0.6639 25.84 -0.0248 0.0485 -0.2049 -0.4089 0.7834 0.7667 20.69 -0.0197 0.0429 -0.1454 -0.3067 0.8914 0.8775 13.47 -0.0123 0.0311 -0.0846 -0.2003 1.0000 1.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 T = 313.15 K 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0941 0.0929 13.86 -0.0159 0.0216 -0.2363 -0.4541 0.1874 0.1840 20.89 -0.0238 0.0320 -0.2836 -0.5672 0.2810 0.2752 25.00 -0.0279 0.0379 -0.2946 -0.6074 0.3795 0.3713 27.91 -0.0302 0.0424 -0.2850 -0.6064 0.4785 0.4679 26.73 -0.0293 0.0429 -0.2594 -0.5688 0.5689 0.5563 23.27 -0.0268 0.0412 -0.2249 -0.5067 0.6801 0.6661 19.00 -0.0225 0.0373 -0.1781 -0.4178 0.7834 0.7709 14.00 -0.0166 0.0290 -0.1271 -0.3071 0.8914 0.8845 8.61 -0.0091 0.0158 -0.0671 -0.1639 1.0000 1.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 T = 318.15 K 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0941 0.0938 11.29 -0.0117 0.0100 -0.1797 -0.3501 0.1874 0.1865 17.35 -0.0183 0.0156 -0.2478 -0.5119 0.2810 0.2793 21.58 -0.0226 0.0200 -0.2610 -0.5576 0.3795 0.3767 23.56 -0.0247 0.0229 -0.2515 -0.5530 0.4785 0.4747 22.34 -0.0240 0.0229 -0.2330 -0.5296 0.5689 0.5642 19.31 -0.0219 0.0214 -0.2027 -0.4708 0.6801 0.6745 14.95 -0.0180 0.0186 -0.1546 -0.3654 0.7834 0.7782 10.10 -0.0131 0.0140 -0.1098 -0.2663 0.8914 0.8885 5.45 -0.0070 0.0073 -0.0540 -0.1289 1.0000 1.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
/10
-5m
3 .mo
l -1
Mole fraction, x
Fig. 8.1 Variation of excess molar volume, EVm with mole fraction of DMA, x for (EOH+IPA)+DMA mixture at T = 308.15 K ( ), 313.15 K ( ) and 318.15 K ( )
-0.12
-0.1
-0.08
-0.06
-0.04
-0.02
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Mole fraction, x
/10
-5m
3 .mo
l -1
Fig. 8.2 Variation of excess molar volume, EVm with mole fraction of DMA, x for (EOH+IBA)+DMA mixture at T = 313.15 K ( ), 313.15 K ( ) and 318.15 K ( )
-0.25
-0.2
-0.15
-0.1
-0.05
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Mole fraction, x
/10
-5m
3 .mo
l -1
Fig. 8.3 Variation of excess molar volume, EVm with mole fraction of DMA, x for (EOH+IAA)+DMA mixture at T = 318.15 K ( ), 313.15 K ( ) and 318.15 K ( )
-1.2
-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Volume fraction, Ö
Äk s
/10
-10 P
a-1
Fig. 8.4 Variation of deviation in isentropic compressibility, ∆ks with volume fraction of DMA, Ö for (EOH+IPA)+DMA mixture at T = 308.15 K ( ), 313.15 K ( ) and 318.15 K ( )
-1.2
-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
00 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Volume fraction, Ö
Äk s
/10
-10 P
a-1
Fig. 8.5 Variation of deviation in isentropic compressibility, ∆ks with volume fraction of DMA, Ö for (EOH+IBA)+DMA mixture at T = 308.15 K ( ), 313.15 K ( ) and 318.15 K ( )
-1.2
-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Volume fraction, Ö
Äk s
/10
-10 P
a-1
Fig. 8.6 Variation of deviation in isentropic compressibility, ∆ks with volume fraction of DMA, Ö for (EOH+IAA)+DMA mixture at T = 308.15 K ( ), 313.15 K ( ) and 318.15 K ( )
Table 8.3 Coefficients Ai of Redlich-Kister type polynomial equation and the corresponding Standard deviations (ó) of all the systems under investigation
property A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 ó
(EOH+IPA)+DMA
T = 308.15 K
Äu/m.s-1 112.98 48.57 -31.03 -8.39 63.06 0.17 Äks/10-10Pa-1 -4.1740 -1.8494 -0.2646 -0.4884 -1.1817 0.0040
EVm /10-5m3.mol-1 -0.1492 -0.0565 -0.0023 -0.1477 -0.2413 0.0008
Äç/10-3N.s.m-2 -0.6234 -0.2848 -0.2855 -0.4505 -0.3545 0.0018 ÄG*E/kJ.mol-1 -1.4779 -0.5906 -0.6796 -0.9650 -0.6893 0.0044
T = 313.15 K
Äu/m.s-1 65.42 39.91 -0.16 6.42 -2.05 0.03 Äks/ 10-10Pa-1 -3.3619 -1.5328 -0.5533 -0.3833 0.0359 0.0031
EVm /10-5m3.mol-1 0.2669 -0.0757 -0.0443 -0.1085 0.1331 0.0026
Äç/10-3N.s.m-2 -0.5856 -0.2641 -0.2468 -0.3962 -0.1908 0.0012 ÄG*E/kJ.mol-1 -1.4579 -0.6162 -0.6356 -0.9691 -0.2241 0.0038
T = 318.15 K
Äu/m.s-1 47.40 47.01 0.01 -16.44 -15.25 0.15 Äks/10-10Pa-1 -2.3587 -1.3159 0.3075 1.0125 1.1588 0.0084
EVm /10-5m3.mol-1 1.0196 -0.0454 0.6571 0.5488 0.4055 0.0068
Äç/10-3N.s.m-2 -0.5323 -0.3082 -0.3422 -0.2400 0.0523 0.0006 ÄG*E/kJ.mol-1 -1.2555 -0.8378 -0.8220 -0.3158 0.6575 0.0024 (EOH+IBA)+DMA T = 308.15 K
Äu/m.s-1 115.25 30.03 -90.82 47.18 132.77 0.33 Äks/10-10Pa-1 -3.7555 -1.3910 0.3561 -0.3709 -1.770 0.0058
EVm /10-5m3.mol-1 -0.4191 -0.0615 -0.3120 0.3438 0.0550 0.0016
Äç/10-3N.s.m-2 -1.2619 -0.6642 0.2233 -1.4133 -2.7465 0.0100 ÄG*E/kJ.mol-1 -2.5800 -1.1329 0.5830 -2.0644 -4.9414 0.0147 T = 313.15 K
Äu/m.s-1 69.96 35.41 0.35 9.67 -14.26 0.20 Äks/10-10Pa-1 -3.0662 -1.2980 -0.7080 0.1394 0.7479 0.0043
EVm /10-5m3.mol-1 -0.2437 -0.1001 -0.2727 0.2851 0.4562 0.0013
Äç/10-3N.s.m-2 -1.1729 -0.7052 -0.0530 -1.2723 -2.2105 0.0090 ÄG*E/kJ.mol-1 -2.5888 -1.4172 -0.0961 -1.9667 -3.9479 0.0148
T = 318.15 K
Äu/m.s-1 59.59 49.02 0.73 -17.41 -19.79 0.23 Äks/10-10Pa-1 -2.6903 -1.0606 -0.4494 0.1785 0.8837 0.0052
EVm /10-5m3.mol-1 0.2116 0.2093 -0.0382 -0.0516 0.4612 0.0044
Äç/10-3N.s.m-2 -1.0323 -0.6657 -0.4628 -1.1036 -1.1851 0.0353 ÄG*E/kJ.mol-1 -2.4582 -1.4272 -1.2574 -2.0883 -1.6580 0.0082 (EOH+IAA)+DMA T = 308.15 K
Äu/m.s-1 133.01 45.87 -2.94 -21.24 96.20 0.45 Äks/10-10Pa-1 -3.8360 -1.2732 -0.7594 -0.6490 -1.9330 0.0079
EVm /10-5m3.mol-1 -0.8788 0.1138 -0.5086 -0.2239 -0.8826 0.0013
Äç/10-3N.s.m-2 -1.1920 -0.7752 -0.3249 -0.8115 -1.3166 0.0031 ÄG*E/kJ.mol-1 -2.2353 -1.1725 -0.4380 -0.8964 -2.4620 0.0036 T = 313.15 K
Äu/m.s-1 104.54 50.92 -13.99 -15.25 72.53 0.42 Äks/10-10Pa-1 -3.7116 -1.3485 -0.5919 -0.8576 -0.8641 0.0064
EVm /10-5m3.mol-1 -0.8034 0.1085 -0.4538 -0.6967 0.2024 0.0012
Äç/10-3N.s.m-2 -1.0137 -0.5850 -0.3017 -0.9598 -1.1757 0.0051 ÄG*E/kJ.mol-1 -2.2330 -0.9731 -0.6331 -1.7491 -1.9357 0.0095 T = 318.15 K
Äu/m.s-1 87.43 50.86 -18.20 -10.31 42.36 0.27 Äks/10-10Pa-1 -3.1218 -1.2018 -0.2633 -0.2098 -0.4061 0.0050
EVm /10-5m3.mol-1 -0.2920 0.1244 -0.1467 -0.1557 0.1963 0.0011
Äç/10-3N.s.m-2 -0.9002 -0.5851 -0.3942 -0.5639 -0.4078 0.0017 ÄG*E/kJ.mol-1 -2.0505 -1.0942 -0.7304 -0.9696 -0.4641 0.0057
are found to decrease. The above EVm values indicate that strong specific
interactions are predominant in the mixtures rather than dispersion forces.
The deviation in isentropic compressibility, ∆ks (see figures 8.4 � 8.6) values
are negative for all the systems at investigated temperatures, this indicate
the strong interactions are found to exist in the mixtures.
The sign of EVm depends upon the relative magnitude of expansion
and contractions of liquids during mixing process. The factors that mainly
responsible for the expansion of volume leads to the positive values of EVm
are (i) Breaking of one or both of the components in a mixture (ii) The
geometry of molecular structure which does not favor fitting of the molecules
of one component in to the voids created by another molecule of second
component in the mixture due to considerable change in molar volumes (iii)
Steric hindrance of the constituent molecules. The negative values of EVm
are due to strong specific interactions such as (iv) Chemical interaction
between constituent molecules such as formation of H-bond (v) Association
through weaker physical forces such as dipolar force (vi) Accommodation of
one component molecules into the interstitial positions of the structural
network of other component molecules. In the investigation of present
systems the observed EVm values can be ascribed to the dipole-dipole
interactions, H-bond formation between alcohol and amide molecules and
geometrical fitting of molecules of one component into the voids created by
the molecules of other component.
Alcohol molecules are self associated liquid molecules through inter
and intra molecular H-bonding15-17. N,N-dimethylacetamide has no significant
intermolecular hydrogen bond18,19 but it possesses highly polar in nature with
larger percentage of ionic character20 making oxygen of the carbonyl group
(C = O) of amide molecules is strong negative. As a result of above, it is
reasonable to exist the hydrogen bond ( >C=O�.H-O) between the oxygen
atom on the carbonyl group (C = O) of amide molecules and hydrogen atom
(O-H) of alcohol molecules. The observed negative values of EVm and ∆ks
suggest that the interaction between alcohol and amide molecules are
predominant than those between alcohol molecules. Such interactions may
be considered as reaction between alcohol molecules and amide molecules
as Lewis acid-base interaction. The addition of amide molecules to the
alcohol molecules can disrupt the associated structures and it causes the
free alcohol molecules which interact through dipole-dipole interactions
because the dipole moments of EOH,IPA,IBA and DMA molecules are 1.69,
1.56, 2.75 and 3.7 respectively ( all expressed in Debye units) besides to the
formation of hydrogen bond between alcohol and amide molecules.
On the examination of EVm and ∆ks values it has been observed that
the interaction between secondary alcohols and amide molecules decreases
as we move from IPA to IAA due to increase of chain length. Generally, the
existence of hydrogen bond between oxygen of methyl alcohol and hydrogen
atom of secondary alcoholic groups gradually decreases due to the increase
of methylene (-CH2) groups in secondary alcohols (IPA-(CH3)2-CH-OH, IBA-
(CH3)2-CH-CH2-OH, IAA-(CH3)2-CH-CH2-CH2-OH) and steric crowding on �
OH group. Therefore, the reaction between amide and alcohol molecules
also decreases when we move from IPA to IAA. As the temperature
increases the interaction between amide and alcohol molecules decreases
and follows the order (308.15>313.15>318.15) K.
The values presented in tables 8.2A � 8.2C of ∆u and ZE are positive
and ELf ,Äç and ÄG*E are negative at all temperatures in the present
investigated systems. The observed positive values of ∆u, ZE and negative
values of ELf suggest that strong interactions exist in the liquid mixtures,
which further supports the conclusions drawn from EVm and ∆ks. Dispersion
forces are primarily responsible for the negative deviations21 in Äç. However,
the observed negative values in Äç are not only due to the dispersion forces
but also due to the difference in molar masses (difference in size of
molecules) of the components of liquid mixtures21,22. Such argument for
negative values of Äç was also reported by several researchers7,23-26. From
tables 8.2A � 8.2C it can be seen that Äç values are less negative as
temperature increases from 308.15 to 318.15 K. From the analysis of the
data obtained in the present systems it is concluded that the liquid mixtures
under investigation move towards ideal behavior (interaction decreases) as
the temperature increases. The ÄG*E values are negative; also support the
conclusions drawn from Äç.
Theoretical ultrasonic velocities are evaluated by considering DMA as
one component and (EOH+IPA/IBA/IAA) as the other component in the
mixture. The theories due to Nomoto27, Van Dael and Vangeel28 and Junjie29
are employed and percentage deviations are calculated. These values for the
mixtures (EOH+IPA)+DMA, (EOH+IBA)+DMA and (EOH+IAA)+DMA are
compiled in tables 8.4A � 8.4C respectively at all temperatures. The
percentage deviations shown in the above tables are very small. On
comparison, the Nomoto�s relation is found to give good estimate of
experimental values of sound velocities in all the systems at all temperatures.
The dynamic viscosities of the liquid mixtures are calculated using the
empirical relations such as Grunberg and Nissan30, Hind and Ubbelohde31
and Katti and Chaudari32. The theoretical values of viscosity of the liquid
mixtures calculated using these relations are reported in tables 8.5A � 8.5C
for all the systems at all temperatures. The terms G12, H12, and Wvis are
adjustable parameters representing the binary interactions. Table 8.6
presents the values of these interaction parameters along with the standard
deviations, ó. The estimated values of ó are smaller indicating that the
present mixtures viscosities are well correlated by all the four viscosity
models.
Conclusions
1. The ultrasonic velocities, densities and viscosities of liquid mixtures of
N,N-dimethyl acetamide with equimolar mixture of ethanol and
isopropyl alcohol/isobutyl alcohol/isoamyl alcohol are measured over
the entire composition range at T = (308.15, 313.15 and 318.15) K
and ∆u, ∆ks, Äç, EVm and ÄG*E have been calculated from these
values.
2. The values of ∆ks, Äç and ÄG*E are found to negative, ∆u are positive
at every temperature studied, indicating the presence of specific
interactions between amide and alcohol molecules. The reason for
existence of specific interactions is attributed to the formation of
hydrogen bond (>C=O�.H-O) between the oxygen atom on the
Table 8.4.A Theoretical ultrasonic velocities and corresponding percentage
deviations with mole fraction of DMA, x for (EOH+IPA)+DMA at T = (308.15,313.15
and 318.15) K
X UExp UN UV UJUN % UN % UV % UJUN
T = 308.15 K 0.0000 1108.62 1108.62 1108.62 1108.62 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0750 1143.50 1137.86 1109.48 1125.95 -0.493 -2.975 -1.535 0.2350 1206.94 1196.83 1119.91 1166.21 -0.838 -7.211 -3.375 0.3344 1242.50 1231.20 1132.65 1193.41 -0.910 -8.841 -3.951 0.4279 1273.55 1262.10 1149.53 1220.59 -0.899 -9.738 -4.159 0.5252 1302.23 1292.88 1172.83 1250.59 -0.718 -9.937 -3.966 0.6300 1330.96 1324.51 1205.63 1284.90 -0.485 -9.417 -3.461 0.7693 1367.21 1364.32 1265.01 1334.00 -0.211 -7.475 -2.429 0.8686 1393.05 1391.24 1322.02 1371.61 -0.130 -5.099 -1.539 0.9143 1404.60 1403.26 1353.73 1389.75 -0.095 -3.622 -1.057 1.0000 1425.16 1425.16 1425.16 1425.16 0.000 0.000 0.000
T = 313.15 K 0.0000 1091.98 1091.98 1091.98 1091.98 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0750 1122.93 1121.35 1092.97 1109.33 -0.141 -2.668 -1.211 0.2350 1182.48 1180.60 1103.62 1149.65 -0.159 -6.669 -2.776 0.3344 1215.99 1215.14 1116.46 1176.92 -0.070 -8.185 -3.213 0.4279 1245.58 1246.21 1133.41 1204.19 0.051 -9.005 -3.323 0.5252 1275.02 1277.16 1156.78 1234.32 0.168 -9.274 -3.192 0.6300 1305.28 1308.98 1189.65 1268.81 0.284 -8.859 -2.794 0.7693 1344.46 1349.05 1249.21 1318.25 0.341 -7.085 -1.950 0.8686 1372.20 1376.15 1306.46 1356.19 0.288 -4.790 -1.167 0.9143 1385.17 1388.25 1338.35 1374.50 0.222 -3.380 -0.770 1.0000 1410.30 1410.30 1410.30 1410.30 0.000 0.000 0.000
T = 318.15 K 0.0000 1076.53 1076.53 1076.53 1076.53 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0750 1104.98 1105.55 1077.53 1093.65 0.052 -2.484 -1.025 0.2350 1162.72 1164.11 1088.08 1133.45 0.120 -6.419 -2.517 0.3344 1195.78 1198.26 1100.78 1160.38 0.207 -7.945 -2.960 0.4279 1224.52 1228.98 1117.53 1187.32 0.364 -8.737 -3.038 0.5252 1252.85 1259.59 1140.64 1217.10 0.538 -8.956 -2.854 0.6300 1283.22 1291.06 1173.13 1251.21 0.611 -8.579 -2.495 0.7693 1322.84 1330.70 1232.00 1300.13 0.594 -6.867 -1.717 0.8686 1351.51 1357.50 1288.60 1337.69 0.443 -4.654 -1.023 0.9143 1365.23 1369.48 1320.13 1355.83 0.311 -3.303 -0.689
1.0000 1391.30 1391.30 1391.30 1391.30 0.000 0.000 0.000
Table 8.4.B Theoretical ultrasonic velocities and corresponding percentage
deviations with mole fraction of DMA, x for (EOH+IBA)+DMA at T = 308.15,313.15
and 318.15) K
x UExp UN UV UJUN % UN % UV % UJUN
T = 308.15 K 0.0000 1139.46 1139.46 1139.46 1139.46 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0687 1170.72 1161.48 1144.45 1152.97 -0.789 -2.244 -1.516 0.1604 1203.45 1190.30 1153.40 1172.22 -1.093 -4.159 -2.595 0.2520 1234.25 1218.41 1165.10 1192.83 -1.283 -5.603 -3.356 0.3312 1260.49 1242.19 1177.65 1211.82 -1.452 -6.572 -3.861 0.4118 1285.95 1265.93 1192.97 1232.33 -1.557 -7.231 -4.170 0.5406 1321.60 1302.82 1223.46 1267.66 -1.421 -7.426 -4.081 0.6697 1351.40 1338.63 1262.96 1306.58 -0.945 -6.544 -3.317 0.7645 1372.30 1364.20 1299.00 1337.61 -0.590 -5.341 -2.528 0.8754 1396.27 1393.34 1350.73 1376.83 -0.210 -3.262 -1.392 1.0000 1425.16 1425.16 1425.16 1425.16 0.000 0.0000 0.000
T = 313.15 K 0.0000 1134.85 1134.85 1134.85 1134.85 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0687 1159.86 1156.17 1139.59 1148.07 -0.318 -1.748 -1.017 0.1604 1192.03 1184.05 1148.15 1166.86 -0.669 -3.681 -2.112 0.2520 1220.76 1211.22 1159.42 1186.93 -0.782 -5.025 -2.771 0.3312 1244.08 1234.19 1171.53 1205.39 -0.795 -5.832 -3.110 0.4118 1266.86 1257.09 1186.33 1225.27 -0.771 -6.357 -3.283 0.5406 1300.46 1292.66 1215.83 1259.44 -0.600 -6.508 -3.154 0.6697 1332.07 1327.14 1254.02 1296.94 -0.370 -5.859 -2.637 0.7645 1354.09 1351.73 1288.84 1326.74 -0.174 -4.819 -2.100 0.8754 1379.85 1379.74 1338.74 1364.27 -0.008 -2.979 -1.129 1.0000 1410.30 1410.30 1410.30 1410.30 0.000 0.000 0.000
T = 318.15 K 0.0000 1111.23 1111.23 1111.23 1111.23 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0687 1135.38 1132.84 1116.13 1124.54 -0.224 -1.696 -0.955 0.1604 1167.72 1161.13 1124.91 1143.48 -0.564 -3.666 -2.076 0.2520 1196.80 1188.71 1136.39 1163.74 -0.676 -5.047 -2.762 0.3312 1220.83 1212.04 1148.69 1182.39 -0.720 -5.909 -3.148 0.4118 1242.90 1235.31 1163.70 1202.52 -0.611 -6.372 -3.249 0.5406 1276.57 1271.48 1193.58 1237.17 -0.399 -6.501 -3.086 0.6697 1308.50 1306.57 1232.27 1275.30 -0.148 -5.826 -2.537 0.7645 1331.44 1331.61 1267.59 1305.68 0.013 -4.797 -1.935 0.8754 1359.13 1360.15 1318.31 1344.06 0.075 -3.003 -1.109
1.0000 1391.30 1391.30 1391.30 1391.30 0.000 0.000 0.000
Table 8.4.C Theoretical ultrasonic velocities and corresponding percentage
deviations with mole fraction of DMA, x1for (EOH+IAA)+DMA at T = 308.15,313.15
and 318.15) K
x UExp UN UV UJUN % UN % UV % UJUN
T = 308.15 K 0.0000 1162.12 1162.12 1162.12 1162.08 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0941 1204.10 1187.56 1173.40 1178.39 -1.374 -2.550 -2.135 0.1874 1237.05 1212.66 1186.49 1195.91 -1.972 -4.087 -3.326 0.2810 1266.82 1237.70 1201.70 1214.91 -2.299 -5.140 -4.098 0.3795 1296.59 1263.90 1220.20 1236.59 -2.521 -5.892 -4.626 0.4785 1321.55 1290.07 1241.70 1260.26 -2.382 -6.042 -4.638 0.5689 1342.45 1313.82 1264.21 1283.68 -2.133 -5.828 -4.378 0.6801 1366.85 1342.85 1296.26 1315.08 -1.756 -5.164 -3.788 0.7834 1388.88 1369.63 1331.15 1347.16 -1.386 -4.157 -3.004 0.8914 1410.07 1397.43 1373.99 1384.08 -0.896 -2.559 -1.843 1.0000 1425.16 1425.16 1425.16 1425.16 0.000 0.000 0.000
T = 313.15 K 0.0000 1142.12 1142.12 1142.12 1142.08 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0941 1181.21 1167.95 1153.61 1158.48 -1.123 -2.337 -1.924 0.1874 1213.27 1193.45 1166.92 1176.12 -1.634 -3.820 -3.062 0.2810 1242.48 1218.92 1182.37 1195.31 -1.896 -4.838 -3.796 0.3795 1271.80 1245.59 1201.16 1217.25 -2.061 -5.554 -4.289 0.4785 1297.18 1272.27 1223.01 1241.26 -1.920 -5.718 -4.311 0.5689 1317.96 1296.49 1245.89 1265.07 -1.629 -5.468 -4.013 0.6801 1343.50 1326.12 1278.51 1297.11 -1.294 -4.837 -3.453 0.7834 1366.21 1353.48 1314.08 1329.95 -0.932 -3.816 -2.654 0.8914 1389.79 1381.91 1357.86 1367.89 -0.567 -2.298 -1.576 1.0000 1410.30 1410.30 1410.30 1410.30 0.000 0.000 0.000
T = 318.15 K 0.0000 1128.30 1128.30 1128.30 1128.25 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0941 1164.34 1153.67 1139.57 1144.41 -0.916 -2.127 -1.712 0.1874 1194.94 1178.70 1152.63 1161.78 -1.359 -3.541 -2.775 0.2810 1223.78 1203.69 1167.79 1180.65 -1.642 -4.575 -3.524 0.3795 1251.67 1229.87 1186.24 1202.21 -1.742 -5.227 -3.952 0.4785 1276.49 1256.03 1207.68 1225.80 -1.603 -5.391 -3.971 0.5689 1297.23 1279.78 1230.13 1249.16 -1.345 -5.173 -3.706 0.6801 1322.11 1308.82 1262.13 1280.58 -1.005 -4.537 -3.141 0.7834 1344.43 1335.64 1297.02 1312.74 -0.654 -3.526 -2.357 0.8914 1368.20 1363.50 1339.93 1349.86 -0.344 -2.066 -1.340 1.0000 1391.30 1391.30 1391.30 1391.30 0.000 0.000 0.000
Table 8.5.A Calculated values of the viscosity (ç /10-3 N.s.m-2) from Eqs.
[(3.35) - (3.38)] with mole fraction of DMA, x for (EOH+IPA)+DMA at T =
(308.15,313.15 and 318.15) K
Mole fraction Grunberg Hind Katti (x) & & & Nissan Ubbelohde Chaudari
T = 308.15 K 0.0000 1.1862 1.1862 1.1862 0.0750 1.1000 1.1084 1.1025 0.2350 0.9613 0.9700 0.9618 0.3344 0.9003 0.9030 0.9000 0.4279 0.8571 0.8532 0.8562 0.5252 0.8249 0.8150 0.8239 0.6300 0.8035 0.7894 0.8023 0.7693 0.7946 0.7803 0.7936 0.8686 0.8014 0.7912 0.8008 0.9143 0.8083 0.8011 0.8080 1.0000 0.8279 0.8279 0.8279 T = 313.15 K 0.0000 1.0663 1.0663 1.0663 0.0750 0.9913 0.9986 0.9918 0.2350 0.8712 0.8788 0.8713 0.3344 0.8187 0.8214 0.8192 0.4279 0.7821 0.7792 0.7824 0.5252 0.7554 0.7476 0.7553 0.6300 0.7387 0.7275 0.7390 0.7693 0.7343 0.7231 0.7345 0.8686 0.7435 0.7356 0.7429 0.9143 0.7513 0.7457 0.7509 1.0000 0.7721 0.7721 0.7721 T = 318.15 K 0.0000 0.9542 0.9542 0.9542 0.0750 0.8881 0.8940 0.8796 0.2350 0.7826 0.7881 0.7809 0.3344 0.7370 0.7380 0.7385 0.4279 0.7055 0.7016 0.7098 0.5252 0.6832 0.6750 0.6887 0.6300 0.6700 0.6591 0.6754 0.7693 0.6689 0.6585 0.6714 0.8686 0.6795 0.6724 0.6803 0.9143 0.6877 0.6827 0.6887 1.0000 0.7090 0.7090 0.7090
Table 8.5.B Calculated values of the viscosity (ç /10-3 N.s.m-2) from Eqs.
[(3.35) - (3.38)] with mole fraction of DMA, x for (EOH+IBA)+DMA at T =
(308.15,313.15 and 318.15) K
Mole fraction Grunberg Hind Katti (x) & & & Nissan Ubbelohde Chaudari
T = 308.15 K 0.0000 1.5984 1.5984 1.5984 0.0687 1.4089 1.4351 1.4089 0.1604 1.2127 1.2423 1.2130 0.2520 1.0666 1.0788 1.0671 0.3312 0.9710 0.9608 0.9706 0.4118 0.8969 0.8629 0.8955 0.5406 0.8177 0.7531 0.8160 0.6697 0.7774 0.7005 0.7764 0.7645 0.7695 0.6986 0.7695 0.8754 0.7826 0.7356 0.7842 1.0000 0.8279 0.8279 0.8279 T = 313.15 K 0.0000 1.4792 1.4792 1.4792 0.0687 1.3012 1.3251 1.2994 0.1604 1.1176 1.1434 1.1179 0.2520 0.9814 0.9898 0.9828 0.3312 0.8928 0.8792 0.8937 0.4118 0.8245 0.7880 0.8249 0.5406 0.7523 0.6868 0.7521 0.6697 0.7167 0.6404 0.7166 0.7645 0.7111 0.6413 0.7113 0.8754 0.7260 0.6801 0.7263 1.0000 0.7721 0.7721 0.7721 T = 318.15 K 0.0000 1.3076 1.3076 1.3076 0.0687 1.1519 1.1734 1.1493 0.1604 0.9916 1.0154 0.9884 0.2520 0.8730 0.8822 0.8721 0.3312 0.7961 0.7867 0.7963 0.4118 0.7372 0.7082 0.7377 0.5406 0.6758 0.6222 0.6776 0.6697 0.6474 0.5845 0.6503 0.7645 0.6451 0.5877 0.6471 0.8754 0.6622 0.6247 0.6632 1.0000 0.7090 0.7090 0.7090
Table 8.5.C Calculated values of the viscosity (ç /10-3 N.s.m-2) from Eqs.
[(3.35) - (3.38)] with mole fraction of DMA, x for (EOH+IAA)+DMA at T =
(308.15,313.15 and 318.15) K
Mole fraction Grunberg Hind Katti (x) & & & Nissan Ubbelohde Chaudari
T = 308.15 K 0.0000 1.7469 1.7469 1.7469 0.0941 1.5032 1.5330 1.5116 0.1874 1.3166 1.3470 1.3188 0.2810 1.1717 1.1867 1.1684 0.3795 1.0550 1.0461 1.0488 0.4785 0.9670 0.9341 0.9602 0.5689 0.9075 0.8575 0.9016 0.6801 0.8572 0.7967 0.8541 0.7834 0.8300 0.7733 0.8300 0.8914 0.8199 0.7830 0.8227 1.0000 0.8279 0.8279 0.8279 T = 313.15 K 0.0000 1.5185 1.5185 1.5185 0.0941 1.3147 1.3400 1.3204 0.1874 1.1586 1.1851 1.1619 0.2810 1.0377 1.0521 1.0376 0.3795 0.9406 0.9360 0.9386 0.4785 0.8681 0.8443 0.8654 0.5689 0.8199 0.7823 0.8178 0.6801 0.7807 0.7344 0.7795 0.7834 0.7616 0.7182 0.7606 0.8914 0.7584 0.7302 0.7568 1.0000 0.7721 0.7721 0.7721 T = 318.15 K 0.0000 1.3721 1.3721 1.3721 0.0941 1.1967 1.2176 1.1967 0.1874 1.0610 1.0832 1.0606 0.2810 0.9549 0.9674 0.9543 0.3795 0.8690 0.8659 0.8685 0.4785 0.8040 0.7850 0.8036 0.5689 0.7603 0.7297 0.7603 0.6801 0.7238 0.6859 0.7244 0.7834 0.7050 0.6692 0.7057 0.8914 0.6998 0.6764 0.6998 1.0000 0.7090 0.7090 0.7090
Table 8.6 Various interaction parameters calculated from viscosity relations
and the corresponding standard deviations (ó/10-3 N.s.m-2)
G12 ó H12 ó Wvis/RT ó
(EOH+IPA)+DMA
T = 308.15 K -0.6991 0.0302 0.0006 0.0411 -0.6732 0.0315 T = 313.15 K -0.7022 0.0266 0.0006 0.0353 -0.6196 0.0268 T = 318.15 K -0.7143 0.0261 0.0005 0.0338 -0.5122 0.0227
(EOH+IBA)+DMA
T = 308.15 K -1.2668 0.0906 0.0004 0.1435 -1.3043 0.0910 T = 308.15 K -1.3074 0.0887 0.0003 0.1411 -1.3161 0.0883 T = 308.15 K -1.3251 0.0790 0.0003 0.1229 -1.2711 0.0767
(EOH+IAA)+DMA
T = 308.15 K -0.9381 0.0683 0.0005 0.1125 -1.0605 0.0725 T = 308.15 K -0.9438 0.0637 0.0005 0.0980 -1.0414 0.0667 T = 308.15 K -0.8758 0.0490 0.0005 0.0776 -0.9047 0.0487
carbonyl group of amide molecules (C = O) and hydrogen atom of hydroxyl
group (O-H) of alcohol molecules and dipole-dipole interactions. The
difference in molar masses of the liquid molecules is also responsible to the
existing specific interactions between the molecules of the component
liquids.
3. The interaction between the amide and alcohol molecules decreases as the
temperature increases in all the systems studied. The interactions follow the
order T = (308.15>313.15>318.15) K and DMA+,(EOH+IPA>EOH+IBA>
EOH+IAA).
4. Besides, the computed ultrasonic velocities from different velocity theories
are correlated with the experimentally measured values. Among these
theories, Nomoto�s relation gives the good agreement between the
theoretical and experimental ultrasonic velocity values.
5. The experimental viscosity values are compared with the viscosity values
obtained from different empirical relations and these are in good agreement
with the experimental values.
References 1. Resa J M, Gonzalez C, Goenaga J M and Iglesias M, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim, 87 (2007) 237.
2. Ali A and Soghra H, Indian J. Phys., 76B(1) (2002) 23. 3. Ali A, Abida, Hyder S and Nain A K, Indian J.Phys., 76B (2002) 661. 4. Singh S, Prasd N, Kushwaha R M, Sivanarayana K and Prakash S, Indian J. Pure & Appl. Phys., 18 (1980) 254. 5. Anwar Ali, Anil Kumar Nain, Naremder Kumar and Mohammad Ibrahim, J. Pure and Appl. Ultrasonics, 24 (2002) 27. 6. Ali A, Yasmin Y and Nain A K, Indian J. Pure & Appl. Phys., 40 (2002) 315. 7. Liisa Pikkarainen, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 28 (1983) 344. 8. Jan Zielkiewicz, J. Chem. Thermodyn, 40 (2008) 431. 9. Pal A and Bhardwaj R K, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 47 (2002) 1128. 10. Iloukhani H, Zarei H A, and Behroozi M, J. Mol. Liq, 135 (2007) 141. 11. Rafiqul Islam M and Quadri S K, Thermochim. Acta, 115 (1987) 335. 12. Sravana kumar D, Sreekanth K and Krishna Rao D, J. Mol. Liq, 136 (2007) 90. 13. Iloukhani H and Rostami Z, J. Solution. Chem, 32 (2003) 451. 14. Redlich O and Kister A T, Ind. Eng. Chem, 40 (1948) 345. 15. Caminati W and Wilson E B, J. Mol. Spectroscop, 81 (1980) 356. 16. Frank F and Ives D J G, Quart. Rev. Chem. Soc, 20 (1966) 1. 17. Miura T and Nakamura, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn, 50 (1977) 2528. 18. Peterson R C, J. Phys. Chem, 64 (1960) 184. 19. Christian S D, Tucker E E and Brandt D R, J. Phys. Chem, 82 (1978) 1707. 20. Pauling L, The Nature of the Chemical Bond 2nd ed. Cornell Univ. Press. Ithaca, New York. 21. Fort R J and Moore W R, Trans. Faraday. Soc, 62 (1966) 1112.
22. Solimo H N, Riggio R, Davolio F and Katz M, Can. J. Chem, 53 (1974) 1258. 23 Ali A, Nain A K, Chand D and Ahmad R, J. Mol. Liq, 128 (2006) 32. 24 Ali A, Fidosa N, Firdos A I and Shadma T, J. Mol. Liq, 143 (2008) 141. 25. Nikam P S and Kharat S J, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 50 (2005) 455. 26. Ranjith Kumar B, Murali Krishna P, Asra Banu S, Amara Jyothi K, Savitha Jyostna T and Satyanarayana N, Phy. Chem. Liq, 48 (2010) 79. 27. Nomoto O, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn, 13 (1958) 1528. 28. Van Dael W, Thermodynamic Properties and Velocity of Sound. Chap. 5. Butterworth, London,1975. 29. Junjie Z, J. China. Univ. Sci. Techn, 14 (1984) 298. 30. Gurnberg L and Nissan A H, Nature, 164 (1949) 799. 31. Hind R K, Mc. Laughlin E and Ubbelohde A R, Trans. Faraday. Soc. 56 (1960) 328. 32. Katti P K and Chaudhari M M, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 9 (1964) 442.
Future plan of work
To understand the molecular interactions between substituted pyridine with
alkaline earth halides of ionic liquids (ILs), we measure the thermo physical
properties such as density (ñ), viscosity (ç) and ultrasonic velocity (u) over the
entire range of composition at different temperatures (30, 40 and 50 0C) under
atmospheric pressure. From these measured parameters excess molar volume
( EVm ), deviation in isentropic compressibility (Äks) and deviation in viscosity (Äç)
may be evaluated as a function of the concentration of IL. Further, these
parameters may be fitted to the Redlich � Kister type polynomial and the
corresponding standard deviations may be evaluated. The intermolecular
interactions and structural effects may be analysed based on the measured and
derived properties. A qualitative analysis of the results may be discussed in terms
of ion-dipole, ion-pair interactions and hydrogen bonding between ILs and
substituted pyridine molecules.