Gravi ragioni di Stato en - catolicosalerta.com.ar · DIRETTORE responsabile: dott. Franco Adessa...

MENSILE DI FORMAZIONE E CULTURADIRETTORE responsabile: dott. Franco AdessaDirezione - Redazione - Amministrazione:Operaie di Maria Immacolata e Editrice CiviltàVia G. Galilei, 121 - 25123 BresciaTel. e fax 030 3700003www.chiesaviva.comAutor. Trib. Brescia n. 58/1990 - 16-11-1990Fotocomposizione in proprio Stampa: Com&Print srl (BS)contiene I. R.www.chiesaviva.come-mail: [email protected]

ChiesavivaPoste Italiane S.p.a. - Spedizione in Abbonamento Postale

D.L. 353/2003(conv. L. 27/02/2004 n° 46) art. 1, comma 2, DCB Brescia.

Abbonamento annuo:ordinario Euro 40, sostenitore Euro 65 una copia Euro 3,5, arretrata Euro 4

(inviare francobolli). Per l’estero Euro 65 + sovrattassa postaleLe richieste devono essere inviate a:

Operaie di Maria Immacolata e Editrice Civiltà25123 Brescia, Via G. Galilei, 12 C.C.P. n. 11193257

I manoscritti, anche se non pubblicati, non vengono restituiti

Ogni Autore scrive sotto la sua personale responsabilità

«TRUTH WILL MAKE YOU FREE» (Jo. 8, 32)

YEAR XLV - N° 484JULY-AUGUST 2015

The Apostolate of Our Lady of Good Success1288 Summit Ave Suite 107 - Oconomowoc, WI. 53066 - phone 262-567-0920 - www.ourladyofgoodsuccess.com

2 “Chiesa viva” *** July-August 2015

– The remnant Catholic Church clings to lifedespite her exile of nearly six decades –

«GRAVE REAsons

of sTATE»THE AToMIC BoMB AnD THE ECLIPsE

of THE TRUE VICAR of CHRIsT

smoke signals which had em-anated from the Sistine Chapelstovepipe, alerting 300,000faithful in the piazza below, andfrom Vatican Radio which for20 minutes had broadcast confi-dent announcements that a popehad indeed been elected –which were echoed by the secu-lar media around the globe.However, within a half-hour,there was an unprecedented,second announcement that a“mistake” in the smoke signalshad triggered a pre-mature re-port of the election of a newPope. No figure in a white cas-sock would appear on the papalbalcony for another 48 hours,when on 28 October 1958, theFeast of Saint Simon and SaintJude, Angelo Roncalli, a closetFreemason, suddenly burstupon the world scene as“Pope” John XXIII.This would be the first timesince 1378 that the cardinalswould mislead those outside theconclave regarding the identity

of the prelate they had elected Pope, with the unintendedconsequences of launching the Great Western Schismwhich lasted 40 years and created four antipopes.

Was the threat of a hy-drogen bomb used bythe Masonic world

powers to drive a newly-electedRoman Pontiff off the Chair ofPeter in October 1958? Sincethat time, persistent reports andtestimonies of former Vaticanofficials and secretaries of thecardinals have indicated that, at5:55 P.M., on 26 October1958, the papal princes of theChurch first elected GiuseppeCardinal Siri of Genoa as suc-cessor to Pope Pius XII. Thenew Pope-elect reportedly ac-cepted office and thereuponbecame the 262nd Vicar ofChrist, and informed the car-dinals that he would assumethe name of “GregoriusXVII.” But the new Pope failedto appear at the papal balcony,and two nights later someoneentirely different was spotlight-ed before St. Peter’s Square asthe choice of the cardinal-elec-tors to head the Church.Although conducted within theenclosed chambers of the papal conclave, the earlier elec-tion of the new pontiff on 26 October 1958 was almost im-mediately apparent to the outside world due to the white

by Gary Giuffré

Giuseppe Siri in 1955.

Proving to be far worse, the cardinals’ capitulation to Ron-calli’s externally-imposed usurpation of the papacy in1958 would be the “enabling act” for a monstrous schis-matic sect to become ensconced in the Vatican that was atonce an enemy of God and man, and would soon wield abludgeon of heresy known as the “Second Vatican Coun-cil” against the faithful, championed by six anti-popesand counting.The Catholic Church (together with her rightful pontiff)would be evicted from her visible structures in Rome andconsigned to “the wilderness,”resulting in horrific sufferingsfor the faithful for over a half-century.

Recorded testimonies, some ofwhich have been published, in-dicate that Siri’s overturnedelection was repeated again in1963 and perhaps at twomore papal conclaves held in1978. These events were a cul-mination of Masonic threats toannihilate the Vatican that wereopenly brought against PopePius XII, during World War II.Before the war’s end, Britishauthor and perennialspokesman for the anti-Catholicestablishment, H.G. Wells,published his book, “CruxAnsata,” in which he blatantlyadvocated the destruction ofthe Vatican. In his openingchapter, Wells completely dis-torted the Pope’s neutralityduring the war, and de-nounced Pius XII as “an openally of the Nazi-Fascist-ShintoAxis.”

The Pope had simply agreed toallow a delegation of the Japan-ese government to present anappeal for the end of the war tothe Vatican to be passed on tothe Allies, with whom Japanhad no other means of commu-nications.

Wells concluded his tiradeagainst the Vatican with a men-acing proposal:«Why do we not bomb Rome?«On June 1st, l942, the enemy bombed Canterbury and asnear as possible got the Archbishop of Canterbury. Butwhat is a mere Protestant archbishop against His Holinessthe Pope? In March l943 Rome was still unbombed.«Now consider the following facts:

«We are at war with the Kingdom of Italy, which made aparticularly cruel and stupid attack upon our allies Greeceand France; which is the homeland of Fascism; and whose“Duce” Mussolini begged particularly for the privilege ofassisting in the bombing of London.«There are also Italian troops fighting against our al-lies the Russians. A thorough bombing (a la Berlin) ofthe Italian capital seems not simply desirable but nec-essary. At present a common persuasion that Rome will belet off lightly by our bombers is leading to a great conges-

tion of the worst elements ofthe Fascist order in and aroundRome.«Not only is Rome the sourceand center of Fascism, but ithas been the seat of a pope,who, as we shall show, hasbeen an open ally of the Nazi-Fascist-Shinto Axis since hisenthronement. He has neverraised his voice against thatAxis, he has never denouncedthe abominable aggressions,murder and cruelties they haveinflicted upon mankind, and thepleas he is now making forpeace and forgiveness are man-ifestly designed to assist the es-cape of these criminals, so thatthey may presently launch afresh assault upon all that is de-cent in humanity. The Papacy isadmittedly in communicationwith the Japanese, and main-tains in the Vatican an activeJapanese observation post. [Itmust be pointed out that by thistime, Japan’s defeat was al-ready certain, as its largecities were being reduced toashes by American incendi-ary bombing. Japanese envoyswere in Rome begging the Vati-can’s assistance to contact theAmerican government in theirbehalf, so as to facilitate an endto the war. But the Rooseveltadministration wanted toprolong the war with Japanas long as possible, in orderto develop the atomic bomb,test it out on the yellow race,and thereby demonstrate

America’s power and destructive capabilities to thewhole world.] «No other capital has been spared the brunt of this war.«Why do we not bomb Rome? Why do we allow theseopen and declared antagonists of democratic freedom toentertain their Shinto allies and organize a pseudo-

“Chiesa viva” *** July-August 2015 3

Was the threat of an atomic bomb on the Vatican used to force Joseph Siri off the Chair of Peter?


Catholic destruction of democratic freedom? Why do we –after all the surprises and treacheries of this war – allowthis open preparation of an internal attack upon the reha-bilitation of Europe? The answer lies in the deliberateblindness of our Foreign Office and opens up a very seri-ous indictment of the mischievous social disintegration in-herent in contemporary Roman Catholic activities.”1

Indeed, Allied bombs did strike the Vatican twice duringWorld War II, and thereafterPope Pius XII assembled thecardinals to advise them to pre-pare for the election of a succes-sor pontiff outside of Italy,should he be killed. By May 1945, armed conflictin Europe had mostly con-cluded, but the tactics of viru-lent intimidation, attemptedby the enemies of the Churchagainst the Pope, did not stopat the end of the war.A preponderance of evidenceindicates that again, in 1949,the secular powers were open-ly bullying Pope Pius XII withthe threat of a nuclear bombon the Vatican in order toforce a change in Churchteachings that were in opposi-tion to the agenda of theemerging world governmentof antichrist.For, the Church’s social doc-trine, as promulgated by thePopes, from Pius IX to Pius XII,stood in the way of the estab-lishment of the Masonic, totali-tarian “One-World Govern-ment,” often referred to as the“New World Order” or the“New Age.” As part of Freema-sonry’s post-war offensive against the Church, the rabidlyanti-Catholic writer, Avro Manhattan, delivered a publicwarning against the Pope, in book form, by which he bold-ly announced:«… the Catholic Church is intruding in the affairs of bod-ies politic with the same energy, boldness, cunning and de-termination as it did in the period between the two worldwars«The Catholic Church is not easily deterred by defeats,setbacks, or dismal failures such as would break other, lessmajestic institutions. Like the phoenix, it rises after each

defeat stronger and more alive than before. Governmentsmay come and go, but the Catholic Church continues tostand more challenging than ever …«Being the relentless institution that it is, the CatholicChurch will not rest …«It is fully to be expected that instead of helping to avert athird world catastrophe, the Catholic Church, by continu-ing to align itself with unenlightened forces, will greatlycontribute to the widening of the gap already separating

two great portions of the world.But while so doing, theCatholic Church should keepin mind that it is endangeringnot only the lives of countlessmillions, but also its own exis-tence. A third world war, un-like the wars of the recent past,would spell irremediable de-struction not only of entire peo-ples, but also of ancient institu-tions, among which theCatholic Church would cer-tainly be one of the main suf-ferers.«Millions of thinking people aretoday striving to build a worldin which war is outlawed. Newand living forces are on themarch. Because the CatholicChurch has seen small countriesgrow into mighty empires andthen tumble, because it has be-held countless rulers rise andfall, ideologies come and go, letit not entertain vain illusionsthat it will also see the passingof the progressive forces whichare now sweeping the globe.«The atomic bombs which in afew seconds wiped Hiroshimaand Nagasaki from the face ofthe earth and brought Japan

to her knees should be a warning to all those forcesdealing with the future of mankind, that the methodsof uncompromising principles of past ages are foreverout-of-date. Unless new horizons are opened, newmethods devised, and a new spirit encouraged, eco-nomic systems, social doctrines, and political regimes,as well as religious institutions, will inevitably bringupon themselves and all mankind total and final anni-hilation. The Catholic Church would be no exception,and, like all other world-wide institutions, it shouldtake heed of the warning and, by keeping step with thespirit of the twentieth century, try to follow a newroad.»2

In her esoteric writings, the late Alice B. Bailey, the for-mer high-priestess of what is today known as the “NewAge Movement,” boastfully exposed the occult forces that

Pope Pius XII.

1 H.G. Wells, Crux Ansata; An Indictment of the Roman CatholicChurch, 1944, pp. 418-420.2 Avro Manhattan, The Vatican In World Politics, 1949, Gaer Associates,New York, pp. 418-420.

dominate the Masonic drive toward world government. In1957, one year before the death of Pope Pius XII, Baileybrazenly described how the world powers sought to terror-ize the Church with their nuclear weapons. This was topave the way for a “One-World Religion,” a necessaryingredient for the “One-World Government”:

«The atomic bomb (though used only twice destruc-tively) ended the resistance of the powers of evil. Its us-es are twofold at this time:

a. As the forerunner of that release of energy whichwill change the mode of human living and inauguratethe new age wherein we shall not have civilizations andtheir emerging cultures but a world culture and anemerging civilization, thus demonstrating the true syn-thesis which underlies humanity;

b. As a means in the hands of the United Nations to en-force the outer forms of peace. The atomic bomb doesnot belong to the three nations who perfected it and whoown the secrets at present – the United States of Ameri-ca, Great Britain and Canada. It belongs to the UnitedNations for use (or let us rather hope, simply for threat-ened use) when aggressive action on the part of anynation rears its ugly head. It does not essentially mat-

ter whether that aggression is the gesture of any particu-lar nation or group of nations or whether it is generatedby the political groups of any powerful religious or-ganization, such as the Church of Rome, who are asyet unable to leave politics alone and attend to thebusiness for which all religions are responsible – lead-ing human beings closer to the God of Love.»3

In light of the writings of Wells, Manhattan and Bailey,the timing of several nuclear weapons “tests” conduct-ed in 1958, now takes on great significance. The chartbelow, based upon data supplied by the U.S. Departmentof Energy, reveals that a huge increase in nuclear bombdetonations (by the U.S. and U.S.S.R.) occurred during1958, more than in any previous year. What the chart doesnot show is that there were more nuclear weapons ex-ploded during the 18 days, between the death of PopePius XII and the triumph of the Masonic forces at the con-clave which followed, than had occurred during any com-parable time period since the first atomic blast at the“Trinity” Test Site, on 16 July 1945.

3 Alice B. Bailey, The Externalization of the Hierarchy, 1957, Lucis Pub-lishing Co., New York, p. 548.


Moreover, the only other12-month period when the to-tal number of nuclear explosions was greater, was1962, the same year that the Masonic Second VaticanCouncil got underway. The implications are thus enormous, that a conspiracy ofthe Masonic political forces had been carried outagainst the Church during those two pivotal turningpoints in ecclesiastical history. This is further supported by documented evidence that theSoviet nuclear weapons program was facilitated almostfrom its inception by the transfer of vital technology andradioactive material from the U.S. to the U.S.S.R., duringthe 1940’s. This occurred with the full knowledge of thehighest authorities in the American government.

As if reflecting upon his own first-hand experience,Giuseppe Siri revealed, in 1972, the desire of the worldpowers to overturn the law governing the election ofthe Pope. He believed at the time that the absoluteseclusion of the conclave was essential if the cardinalswere to be free to conduct a legitimate papal election.Otherwise, external interference would result in thetakeover of Vatican structures by forces hostile to theChurch:«The law of the conclave rests on two principle points: theexclusive right of the sacred college, and seclusion. Thelatter did not come at once: it resulted from a response toobvious situations and to grave necessity. These two prin-ciple points support one another in the vicissitudes of anelection. It is obvious that an election entrusted to an elec-toral body too large, would be, humanly speaking, moredifficult and more impressionable and therefore, therewould be little guarantee of reasonableness for, and corre-spondence to the supreme interests of the Church. Onlywith a body of men, carefully selected, is it possible that inan election, as in human affairs, the criterion of the truegood will prevail. The seclusion of the conclave is evenmore necessary today; with modern means, with mod-ern techniques, without complete seclusion, it wouldnot be possible to gain an election against the pressuresfrom outside powers. Today some superpowers (andeven some lesser powers) have too great an interest inowning, for their part, through either compliance orweakness [by Church leaders], the greatest moral au-thority in the world. And they would do everything intheir power to accomplish this. The pressures to over-turn the substance of the law of the conclave would bedriven by the desire to obtain this very result.”4

But, before his death, Siri reversed himself and advocat-ed the abolition of the sealed conclave. He had apparent-ly realized that the closure of the conclave had outlived itsusefulness during the latter part of the 20th century. For itnow facilitated the plans of the enemies of the Church –who had “infiltrated” into the ranks of the cardinals – tovitiate the secret conclave process at will, with none of therestraints that would come from public scrutiny. A “30Days” report explained:«It was February 1988. Two 30 Days reporters were on

their way to the North Italian port city of Genoa to inter-view the Cardinal Archbishop Giuseppe Siri. It was theyear of the Popes – the 30th anniversary of the death ofPius XII and the election of John XXIII and the tenth an-niversary of the election of John Paul II. There was no bet-ter witness to the Pontifcates of these three successors ofPeter than Siri, who had been a papabile himself in thethree conclaves.«Siri was asked a question he did not expect, about thetruth of periodic allegations that Masonry had infiltratedthe Church. The elderly cardinal did not answer and, sug-gesting that he did not want to make any public declara-tion on the issue, he pointed to the tape recorder that wasswitched on. Then he made a gesture with his other handthat was very eloquent. What he meant was: “Of course,there was infiltration.”«The tape recorder was turned off and Siri added: “This isa very serious matter, and I have first-hand sources. Ihave written my record of this and other events in thelife of the Church, which will be published in 50 years’time. But for now, I would prefer not to say anythingmore.”

4 Giuseppe Siri, The Election of the Roman Pontiff, “Renovatio”, VII[1972], fasc. 2, pp. 155-156, republished in: Il Dovere Dell’Ortodossia,1991, Giardini Editori, Pisa, pp. 52-54.

The mushroom cloud of the explosion of the bomb dropped on Hiroshima.

«But the cardinal did confide in his great, personal friend,Raimondo Spiazzi, a Dominican theologian in the PiusXII mold who was the dean of the Angelicum’s Social Sci-ences faculty. Spiazzi reports part of the conversation inthe biography he recently dedicated to his late friend:“Siri said we had to pray for future Conclaves, forgrace so that those who would participate would be trulyfree of any type of conditioning or influence, not only inethical or political terms but also social. We had to praythat “there would be no manipulation by any sect.” Hewas referring to Masonry on the basis of direct infor-mation he had received from affiliates and of his knowl-edge of the ruses Masonry deployed to ensnare Vatican ex-ponents and their offices. He did not hesitate to namenames and he spoke of the danger even for the Con-clave. Perhaps this was why he proposed abolishing thesecrecy aspect so that events could take place in the lightof day.»5

ONLY AN ACCIDENT OF TIMING?

Thanks to the recent declassification of documents and theInternet, we are now able to examine the schedule of nu-clear tests that were being conducted by the U.S. and theU.S.S.R. just prior to the 1958 Conclave. Let us first re-view the table of known Russian nuclear bomb explosionsfor the time period that led up to the conclave, which hasbeen compiled by a Norwegian environmental group, theBelona Foundation:

Russian Nuclear Explosions 1957 - 1958

No. Date Time Power1 24 Septem. 1957 09.00 Megaton-sized [*]2 06 October 1957 08.58 Unknown3 10 October 1957 06.55 Small4 23 Februa. 1958 [n/a] Megaton-sized [*]5 27 Februa. 1958 07.59 Megaton-sized [*]6 27 Februa. 1958 10.24 Large7 14 March 1958 [n/a] Over 1 Megaton8 20 March 1958 [n/a] Small9 22 March 1958 [n/a] Medium10 20 Septem. 1958 [n/a] [n/a]11 30 Septem. 1958 07.50 Medium12 30 Septem. 1958 09.55 Medium13 02 October 1958 08.00 Moderate14 02 October 1958 09.01 Moderate15 05 October 1958 06.00 [n/a]16 10 October 1958 07.51 Large17 12 October 1958 07.53 Megaton-sized [*]18 15 October 1958 07.51 Megaton-sized [*]19 18 October 1958 09.51 Megaton-sized [*]20 19 October 1958 07.27 Small21 20 October 1958 08.20 Megaton-sized [*]22 22 October 1958 08.21 Megaton-sized [*]23 24 October 1958 08.03 Megaton-sized [*]24 25 October 1958 08.20 Large

[* 20-30 Megatons]

(Frederic Hauge, “Sources to radioactive contamination in Russian Countiesof Murmansk and Arkhangelsk; Nuclear Explosions”, Bellona Foundation,P.O.Box 2141 Grunerlokka, 0505 Oslo, Norway).5 “Infiltrators? Yes..,” 30 Days, November 1991, p. 55.

8

The reader may have noticed that after a sporadic patternof nuclear tests by the U.S.S.R., beginning on 24 Septem-ber 1957, there was a marked increase in their numberduring October 1958. The explosion of six massive Sovi-et atomic weapons, ranging between 20 and 30 megatons,and the detonation of two other nuclear devices classi-fied as “large,” were conducted during a fortnight plusone day, from 10 to 25 October 1958.This exactly coincided with the 15-day period begin-ning with the day after Pope Pius XII died, and endingon the afternoon that the cardinals were sealed away inthe Sistine Chapel to elect the new pope. Angelo Ron-calli, described by Avro Manhattan as “the Kremlin’scandidate,” appeared on the papal balcony on 28 Octo-ber.Three days later, on 31 October 1958, the Kremlin an-nounced a halt to its nuclear weapons testing program,to begin on 3 November, as if intended as a “gift” to Ron-calli, the day before the antipope’s coronation. Soviet nuclear tests would not be started up again for near-ly three years. In the meantime, the frequency of so manylarge nuclear explosions at one time, was protested as un-necessary by one of Russia’s leading scientists, AndreiSakharov, who obviously had no idea what had moti-vated the Kremlin’s repeated atomic tests, and was par-ticularly opposed to the ones that occurred just prior to theconclave:«The atmospherical test explosions over Novaya Zemlyawere performed during two periods. The first atmospher-ical test explosion over Novaya Zemlya was undertakenon the 24th of September 1957. By the 10th of Octoberthat year, three bombs had been detonated. During Feb-ruary and March 1958, six bombs were detonated. This isthe only time nuclear bombs have been detonated on No-vaya Zemlya during the first six months of the year. Fromthe 20th of September to 25th of October 1958, 15more bombs were detonated. Resistance to atmospherictest explosions increased among Russian arms engineersafter 1958. Andrei Sakharov was one of the most notedopponents of atmospheric test explosions. He claimedthere were no scientific reasons to perform repeated testexplosions of bombs of megaton-sized [20-30 megatons]explosive forces... [thereafter] No Soviet test explosionstook place between the 3rd of November 1958 and the 1stof September 1961…” (Ibid.)

Not to be outdone, the Americans did their part to keepup the level of nuclear terror right up until the momentof the election of the new Pope. During the same time pe-riod, the U.S. conducted nuclear tests that were unprece-dented as to type and number. The following tables anddescriptions of U.S. nuclear tests, from 28 May 1957 to 29October 1958, were obtained from the online document,“U.S. Nuclear Testing From Project Trinity to thePlowshare Program”:

«… 4.14 OPERATION PLUMBBOB.«Conducted at the Nevada Test Site from 28 May to 7 Oc-tober 1957, Operation PLUMBBOB included the 24 nu-

clear detonations summarized in the accompanying table.The series also included six safety experiments, conductedto ensure that no nuclear reaction would occur if the highexplosive components of the device were accidentally det-onated during storage or transport (18: 1, 6, 7). These testsare discussed with the subsequent safety experiments insection 4.18.

«Operation PLUMBBOB Weapon-Related Events, 1957

Event Date Type YieldBOLTZMANN 28 May Tower 12 kilotonsFRANKLIN 02 June Tower 140 tons.LASSEN 05 June Balloon 0.5 tons.WILSON 18 June Balloon 10 kilotonsPRISCILLA 24 June Balloon 37 kilotonsHOOD 05 July Balloon 74 kilotonsDIABLO 15 July Tower 17 kilotonsJOHN 19 July Air to air bissile About 2 kilotonsKEPLER 24 July Tower 10 kilotonsOWENS 25 July Balloon 9.7 kilotonsSTOKES 07 August Balloon 19 kilotonsSHASTA 18 August Tower 17 kilotonsDOPPLER 23 August Balloon 11 kilotonsFRANKLIN PRIME 30 August Balloon 4.7 kilotonsSMOKY 31 August Tower 44 kilotonsGALILEO 02 Septem. Tower 11 kilotonsWHEELER 06 Septem. Balloon 197 tonsLAPLACE 08 Septem. Balloon 1 kilotonsFIZEAU 14 Septem. Tower 11 kilotonsNEWTON 16 Septem. Balloon 12 kilotonsRAINIER 19 Septem. Tunnel 1.7 kilotonsWHITNEY 23 Septem. Tower 19 kilotonsCHARLESTON 28 Septem. Balloon 12 kilotonsMORGAN 07 October Balloon 8 kilotons

Mushroom cloud of an explosion of Operation HARDTACK.

«4.15 OPERATION HARDTACK I«HARDTACK was the designation for U.S. nuclear testingin both the Pacific and in Nevada during 1958. Phase I,discussed in this section, consisted of 34 Pacific nucleardetonations, which was as many as had been fired in allprior oceanic tests. The series encompassed a wide varietyof events, as indicated in the accompanying table (19: 23,24)

«Operation HARDTACK I Nuclear Events, 1958

Event Date Type YieldYUCCA 28 April High Altit. (balloon) 1.7 kilotons [*]CACTUS 06 May Surface 18 kilotonsFIR 12 May Barge 1.36 megatonsBUTTERNUT 12 May Barge 81 kilotonsKOA 13 May Surface 1.37 megatonsWAHOO 16 May Under water 9 kilotonsHOLLY 21 May Barge 5.9 kilotonsNUTMEG 22 May Barge 25.1 kilotonsYELLOWWOOD 26 May Barge 330 kilotonsMAGNOLIA 27 May Barge 57 kilotonsTOBACCO 30 May Barge 11.6 kilotonsSYCAMORE 31 May Barge 92 kilotonsROSE 03 June Barge 15 kilotonsUMBRELLA 09 June Subac 8 kilotonsMAPLE 11 June Barge 213 kilotonsASPEN 15 June Barge 319 kilotonsWALNUT 15 June Barge 1.45 megatonsLINDEN 18 June Barge 11 kilotonsREDWOOD 28 June Barge 412 kilotonsELDER 28 June Barge 880 kilotonsOAK 29 June Barge 8.9 megatonsHICKORY 29 June Barge 14 kilotonsSEQUOIA 02 July Barge 5.2 kilotonsCEDAR 03 July Barge 220 kilotonsDOGWOOD 06 July Barge 397 kilotonsPOPLAR 12 July Barge 9.3 megatonsPISONIA 18 July Barge 255 kilotonsJUNIPER 22 July Barge 65 kilotonsOLIVE 23 July Barge 202 kilotonsPINE 27 July Barge 2 megatonsTEAK 31 July High Altit. (rocket) 3.8 megatonsQUINCE 06 August Surface zeroORANGE 11 August High Altit. (rocket) 3.8 megatonsFIG 18 August Surface 20 tons

«[*] Some yields marked “Not announced” in the original report have sincebeen declassified and are included in this online version.

«4.15.1 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES OF OPERATION HARDTACK I«HARDTACK I consisted of three parts. The first, aimed at thedevelopment of nuclear weapons, continued the type of testingthat had been conducted at Enewetak and Bikini during the ear-ly and mid-1950s. The AEC weapon development laboratories(LANL and LLNL) detonated experimental devices, with theDOD providing support and conducting experiments that didnot interfere with AEC activities (19: 1).

«The second part, sponsored by DOD, consisted of the un-derwater test shots, WAHOO and UMBRELLA, the firstin open ocean and the second within the lagoon at Enewe-tak. These tests, which furthered efforts undertaken withthe 1946 CROSSROADS and the 1955 WIGWAM series,were designed to gain additional data on the effects of un-derwater explosions on Navy ships and material (19: 1).«The third part, sponsored by DOD, addressed a militaryproblem that was newer: nuclear weapons in air and ballis-tic missile defense. Shots YUCCA, TEAK, and OR-ANGE, also called Operation NEWSREEL by DOD, weredirected to this concern (19: 3).

«4.15.2 HARDTACK I TEST OPERATIONS«The HARDTACK experimental program incorporatedtwo aspects, one being the development of the weaponsand the second being the measurement of the explosiveand radiation effects. The AEC was primarily interested inweapons development, and the DOD focused on weaponseffects, specifically concerning the military application ofthe weapons (19: 3).“Approximately 16,000 DOD personnel took part inHARDTACK I. They participated in the weapons develop-ment experiments by providing cloud-sampling aircraftand crews, along with ship patrols, instrument placementand recovery, and radioactive sample return. Their primaryparticipation, however, was in the effects experiments as-sociated with the underwater and the high altitude shots(19: 105).

«4.16 OPERATION ARGUS [1958]«ARGUS, the code name for the only atmospheric nucleartest operation in the Atlantic Ocean, consisted of the threehigh-altitude, low-yield detonations identified below. Thenuclear devices were lifted to about a 300-mile altitude byrockets fired from the missile trials ship USS NortonSound (AVM-1), one of the nine ships participating in theseries (20: 1).“The operation was based in the Atlantic at about 45 degsouth latitude [about 1100 miles southwest of Capetown,South Africa]. The location placed the task force outsideregular shipping lanes but kept the launch well within therange of U.S. military forces required for support of AR-GUS scientific projects (20: 19).

Event Date Type YieldARGUS I 27 August Rocket 1-2 kilotons

ARGUS II 30 August Rocket 1-2 kilotons

ARGUS III 6 Septem. Rocket 1-2 kilotons

«4.16.1 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES OF OPERATION ARGUS«ARGUS was unique among U.S. atmospheric nuclear testoperations in a number of respects. It was one of the mostexpeditiously planned and executed of all U.S. nucleartests, requiring just 5 months from inception to execution,in contrast to the normal period of 1 or more years. Be-sides TRINITY, it consisted of the only clandestine tests


conducted during the 18-year period of atmospheric testing.The intentions of all phases of the ARGUS operation wereconcealed not only from other nations but also from the ma-jority of DOD participants in the tests. In addition, ARGUSwas the first shipboard launch of a ballistic missile with anuclear warhead (20: 11, 18).«Most significant of all, the purpose of ARGUS did not fitthe usual categories: the ARGUS shots, strictly speaking,involved neither diagnostic tests of a weapon design nor ef-fects tests on military systems. The objective was to estab-lish the practicability of a theory, postulated by NicholasChristofilos, a physicist at LLNL, that a very-high-alti-tude nuclear detonation of proper yield would producephenomena of potentially significant military impor-tance by interfering with communications and weaponperformance. When the Eisenhower Administration offi-cially announced the occurrence of the tests on 19 March1959, the New York Times headlined ARGUS as the“Greatest Scientific Experiment Ever Conducted” (20:11,12). «The operation proved the validity of the Christofi-los theory. It not only provided data on military considera-tions, but also produced a great mass of geophysical infor-mation (20: 2).

«4.16.2 ARGUS TEST OPERATIONS«The series was conducted by Task Force 88, a naval orga-nization consisting of nine ships and approximately 4,500men. Coordinated measurement programs using satellite,rocket, aircraft, and surface stations were carried out by theservices and other Government agencies and contractorsthroughout the world. The ships of Task Force 88, in addi-tion to the USS Norton Sound, were the antisubmarine car-rier USS Tarawa, the destroyers USS Bearss and USSWarrington, the destroyer escorts USS Courtney and USSHammerberg, the fleet oilers USS Neosho and USS Sala-monie, and the seaplane tender USS Albemarle (20: 1).

«4.17 TESTS OF OPERATION HARDTACK II. «HARDTACK II was the continental phase of OperationHARDTACK. The oceanic phase, HARDTACK I, wasconducted in the Pacific from 28 April through 18 August1958, as noted in section 4.15. Phase II, conducted at theNevada Test Site from 12 September through 31 October1958, consisted of 19 nuclear weapons tests and 18 safetyexperiments (21: 1). The next section, 4.18, discusses thesafety experiments. This section concentrates on theweapons related tests, identified in the accompanyingtable.

«Operation HARDTACK II Nuclear Events, 1958

Evento Data Tipo PotenzaEDDY 19 Septem. Balloon 0.083 kilotonsMORA 29 Septem. Balloon 2 kilotonsTAMALPAIS 08 October Tunnel 0.072 kilotonsQUAY 10 October Tower 0.079 kilotonsLEA 13 October Balloon 1.04 kilotonsHAMILTON 15 October Tower 0.0012 kilotonsLOGAN 16 October Tunnel 5 kilotonsDONA ANA 16 October Balloon 0.037 kilotonsRIO ARRIBA 18 October Tower 0.090 kilotonsSOCORRO 22 October Balloon 6 kilotonsWRANGELL 22 October Balloon 0,079861111 kilotonsRUSHMORE 22 October Balloon 0,130555556 kilotonsSANFORD 26 October Balloon 4.09 kilotonsDE BACA 26 October Balloon 2.02 kilotonsEVANS 29 October Tunnel 0.055 kilotonsMAZAMA 29 October Tower NMY [*] kilotonsHUMBOLDT 29 October Tower 0.0078 kilotonsSANTA FE 30 October Balloon 1.03 kilotonsBLANCA 30 October Tunnel 22 kilotons

«[*] No measurable yield

«4.17.1 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES OF OPERATION HARDTACK II.«HARDTACK II was the last nuclear test series be-fore the United States adopted a nuclear test morato-rium, which had originally been intended to last 1year but continued until 1961. The nuclear weaponstests were conducted to evaluate the yield and effi-ciency of newly developed nuclear devices (21: 1, 7).“Concern about nuclear weapon proliferation intensi-fied throughout the 1950s, particularly after theBRAVO test of Operation CASTLE and the heavyfallout resulting from this shot. At that time, PrimeMinister Nehru of India proposed a cessation oftests. The call for a test ban figured repeatedly in disarma-ment discussions, most importantly, those of the Dis-armament Subcommittee of the U.N. DisarmamentCommission, in session from 18 March to 6 Septem-ber 1957. Continuing pressure on the nuclear powersto reach an agreement on limiting testing resulted inthe Conference on Discontinuance of Nuclear


Mushroom cloud of an explosion HARDTACK.

Weapons Tests, which began in Geneva on 31 October1958 and was attended by U.S., British, and Soviet dele-gates. On 1 November 1958, the U.S. unilaterally an-nounced a test moratorium to begin on 1 November 1958,declaring a cessation in nuclear testing if the Soviet Unionalso refrained (21: 28).«Because the testing and improvement of various nuclearweapons was crucial to American defense policy, a num-ber of tests needed to be conducted before the moratoriumbegan. On 28 August 1958, President Eisenhower ap-proved an accelerated series of nuclear tests code namedOperation MILLRACE to be completed at the NTS be-fore the start of the moratorium. On 29 August 1958, byAEC directive, the name of the series was changed to Op-eration HARDTACK, Phase II (21: 28,29).”6

According to former FBI consultant, Paul L. Williams,“declassified” U.S. intelligence documents allegedly con-firm that Giuseppe Siri was elected Pope in 1958, butafterwards was overthrown by a threat that wasbrought to bear against him before his election to thepapacy could be revealed to the world. While affirmingSiri’s election, Paul Williams was either unaware of the ac-tual nature of the threat used to force the new Pope off thepapal throne or purposely omitted any mention of it in hisbook: «In 1958, when the cardinals were locked away inthe Sistine Chapel to elect a new pope, mysterious eventsbegan to unfold. On the third ballot, Siri, according toFBI sources, obtained the necessary votes and was elect-ed as Pope Gregory XVII.7White smoke poured from the chimney of the chapel to in-form the faithful that a new pope had been chosen. Thenews was announced with joy at 6 P.M. on Vatican radio.The announcer said, “The smoke is white. There is ab-solutely no doubt. A pope has been elected.”8«But the new pope failed to appear. Questions began toarise whether the smoke was white or gray… By eveningVatican Radio announced that the results remained uncer-tain…But the reports had been valid. On the fourth ballot, ac-cording to FBI sources, Siri again obtained the neces-sary votes and was elected supreme pontiff. But theFrench cardinals annulled the results, claiming that theelection would cause widespread riots and the assassi-nation of several prominent bishops behind the IronCurtain.9The cardinals opted to elect Cardinal Frederico Tedes-chini as a “transitional pope,” but Tedeschini was too ill toaccept the position. Finally, on the third day of balloting,Roncalli received the necessary support to becomePope John XXIII…»10

In the “mainstream” account of the “election” of JohnXXIII, priest and historian, Father Paul Perrotta, mayhave inadvertently revealed his own knowledge that the1958 Conclave had been vitiated, by his surprising com-ment that the Vatican could become the target of nu-clear attack: «Should all the cardinals be killed, as is possible now inthe face of the atom bomb, the right to elect the Bish-ops of Rome will revert to the body which originallyenjoyed it and of which the cardinals are representa-tives, namely, the clergy of the Eternal City.»11

It would seem that the simultaneous killing of all thecardinals would only be possible on the limited occasionswhen the papal princes are all together in Rome, such as,during a council or a conclave. But what appears to haveescaped Fr. Perrotta, is that, if all the cardinal electorswere to die at once, as he suggested – by an atomic bombon the Vatican – then the ‘back-up” electors of the Pope,the Roman clergy, would likely all be wiped out at thesame time. Of course, the Masonic world powers wouldmake it look as if it had been an unfortunate “accident,”but the end result – the vaporizing of the Vatican – wouldbe the same as that inflicted by an overt, nuclear attack onRome. Giuseppe Siri would not have been oblivious tosuch a terrorizing prospect. For, he well knew that insuch an event, it would have been practically impossiblefor the Church to elect a new pope. Threats against Siri’sfamily, execution of the Bishops behind the “Iron Curtain”and even a schism by the French Church, were all rumoredto have caused Siri’s tacit abdication during one or moreof the conclaves at which he was elected Supreme Pontiff.But could anything less than his fear of the annihilation ofthe institution of the papacy have forced his silence forover three decades?Thus, Siri’s punch line is his 1972 essay, “The Election ofthe Roman Pontiff,” bears a second examination: «Today some superpowers have too great an interest inowning, for their part the greatest moral authority inthe world. And they would do everything in their pow-er to accomplish this. The pressures to overturn thesubstance of the law of the conclave would be driven bythe desire to obtain this very result.»

Before he died in July 1999, former Jesuit priest novelistand perennial Vatican “insider,” Malachi Martin, crypti-cally admitted that criminal “insider,” intervention hadoccurred during the 1963 Conclave, just after Siri’ssecond papal election, by means of a horrendous, exter-nal threat to annihilate the Vatican. Martin boastfullyasserted that:


6 Abby A. Johnson, et al, For the Record - A History of the Nuclear TestPersonnel Review Program, 1978-1986, Defense Nuclear Agency, DNA6041F, 1986, Digital version created by Gregory Walker,[email protected] Department of State secret dispatch, “John XXIII,” issue date: November20, 1958, declassified: November 11, 1974.8 The announcer’s words appeared in the London Tablet, November 1,1958, p. 387.

9 Department of State secret file, “Cardinal Siri,” issue date: April 10, 1961,declassified: February 28, 1994.10 Paul L. Williams, The Vatican Exposed, Prometheus Books, Amherst,NY, 2003, pp. 90-92.11 Paul Perrota, Pope John XXIII; His Life And Character, Thomas Nelsonand Sons, New York, 1959, p. 68.


«It is certain that within the 1963 Conclave voting, Sirihad garnered the required number of votes to makehim Pope-elect, but the Siri nomination and electionwere set aside by what has been called the “little bru-tality.” Once the Conclave area of the Vatican has beensealed off … there are supposedly no communicationswith the outside world except in the gravest necessity …Such grave necessity would be the physical needs of theelectors … or grave reasons of state – such as the verycontinued existence of the Vatican City State or itsmembers and dependents…«… at least one Cardinal Electordid have a conversation … withsomeone not participating in theConclave … the someone was anemissary of an internationallybased organization … the conver-sation did concern the Siri candi-dacy … What is certain is that theSiri candidacy was laid aside andmost probably in connection withthat conversation. The only otherviable candidacy available wasMontini’s. After a three-day conclave heemerged as Paul VI. Montiniwould give the anti-Church itshead.»12

Whatever threat had been sufficientto force Giuseppe Siri off the Chairof Peter in 1958 was evidently suffi-cient to keep him off the chair andto compel his nearly complete si-lence on the matter for anotherthree decades, until a few years be-fore his death in 1989. Siri’s decla-ration to the French journalist,Louis Hubert Remy, in 1985, con-cerning his pitiful dilemma, adds ad-ditional weight to the background in-formation above: «This secret [ofthe conclave] is horrible. I wouldhave books to write about the dif-ferent conclaves. Very seriousthings have taken place. But I cansay nothing.»13

Following the events of 11 Septem-ber 2001, veteran Newsweek re-porter, Hugh Sidey disclosed the astounding details of aconversation he had with President John F. Kennedy,during lunch at the White House, in late July 1961, justseven months into the president’s three-year term of office.

After a comment by Sidey to Kennedy about the huge staffthat the Soviets were housing in their Washington em-bassy, the president replied:«You know, they have an atom bomb on the third floorof the embassy ...»Sidey believed Kennedy to be joking, but the stoic-facedpresident quickly dispelled any notions of levity:«No, Kennedy countered, it was his understanding thatthe Soviets had brought the components of an atomicdevice into the building in inspection-free diplomatic

pouches and assembled it in anupstairs attic. “If things get toobad and war is inevitable,” hesaid, “they will set it off and that’sthe end of the White House andthe rest of the city. That’s whatI’ve been told. Do you know some-thing that I don’t?»Only then did it finally dawn onSidey that Kennedy was in dead-earnest, but then, the issue wasdropped: «No sign of mirth. Theconversation moved on …»It was another 40 years beforeSidey’s account of this exchangewould appear in Newsweek, but on-ly after he had met a former intelli-gence officer who was able and will-ing to corroborate the president’s as-sertion:«Five years ago, I was lecturing inStaunton, Virginia, and retold thestory. In the question session, a manin the audience rose and said, “Youmay not believe that story aboutthe bomb in the attic, but I do. Iworked for 25 years at the DefenseIntelligence Agency, and that wasour understanding.” And now Ican hear Kennedy asking again, “Doyou know something I don’t?”»14

President Kennedy had scarcelybeen sworn into office before beinginformed that an armed nuclearbomb was situated just a short dis-tance from the White House, whichwould guarantee the destruction ofthe seat of America’s government ifwar were to occur between the

U.S.A. and the U.S.S.R. This, of course, could only have occurred with the activecollaboration of sinister agents, right inside the powerstructures of Washington D.C., in order to force the new

Giuseppe Siri in 1978.

12 Malachi Martin, The Keys Of This Blood, 1991, Simon & Schuster, NewYork, pp. 607-09.13 Louis Remy, “The Pope: Could he be Cardinal Siri?”, Sous La Ban-niere No. 06 - July-August 1986; Editions Sainte Jeanne d’Arc, “Les Guil-

lots,” Villegenon, F-18260 Vailly-sur-Sauldre, France.14 Hugh Sidey, “Were the Russians Hiding a Nuke in D.C.?”, Newsweek,12 November 2001.


president to become an impotent slave of the “invisiblegovernment” of the New World Order.Considering the security in and around Washington, evenin 1961, and the comparative lack thereof in Rome, itwould have been very easy for these same agents tobring a nuclear device into Communist-infested Italy,and place it at the doorstep of the Vatican. The questionthus arises – if the newly-inaugurated Catholic Presidentof the United States had been made aware that he was be-ing blackmailed into submission to dark forces beyond hiscontrol, by a hydrogen bomb set to go off in WashingtonD.C. at any moment—would thenewly-elected pope, in the defense-less environs of Vatican City, havebeen treated any less harshly bythe same enemies of Christ justthree years before?Once Giuseppe Siri had been re-placed by Angelo Roncalli to sit up-on the Chair of Peter, the Vaticanstructures were brought totally underthe heel of the Masonic world pow-ers. Within 48 hours, both the U.S.and the U.S.S.R. simultaneouslyannounced the suspension of theirrespective nuclear testing pro-grams. The conjunction of the twoevents speaks volumes when viewedin the context of what happened tothe Church immediately after the ‘58Conclave.

The next time that the terror of nu-clear weapons would be held like adagger against the throat of the Vati-can was in October 1962. In 1957, Alice Bailey had suggestedthat the “threatened use” of theatomic bomb would be enough tointimidate the “Church of Rome,”to do the bidding of the worldpowers. Nuclear tests conducted bythe U.S. and the U.S.S.R. in 1962,were more numerous than duringany other calendar year, before orsince. As a show of their might, theMasonic and Communist powersdetonated several hydrogen bombsin outer space, each time with a dis-play of piercing brightness in the sky, appearing like a“second sun” as if to rival the omnipotence of the Creator.This time, the bomb scare coincided with the second weekof Vatican II, when not just the cardinals, but most of theworld’s bishops were assembled in Rome.Then, on 15 October 1962, just four days after the openingof the council, American reconnaissance aircraft “discov-ered” several installations of Soviet medium-range mis-siles in Cuba that were reported to be capable of deliveringa nuclear first-strike to dozens of US cities. On 22 Octo-

ber, just eleven days into the council, President Kennedyrevealed the presence of the offensive missiles to theAmerican people on nationwide television. The world became frozen in suspense over the carefullychoreographed “stand-off” between Washington and theKremlin, today known as the “Cuban Missile Crisis.”What the American people did not know, however, wasthat there would have been no Russian missiles in Cubacapable of hitting US cities were it not for the fact that theball-bearing technology to build guidance systems forthose missiles had been supplied to the USSR by the

American company that developedthe technology, with the approval ofthe U.S. Department of Commerce. In his third book exposing Westerntechnology transfers to the Sovietmilitary, investigative journalist,Antony Sutton, revealed that:«The Bryant Chucking GrinderCompany accepted a Soviet orderfor thirty-five Centalign-B ma-chines for processing miniatureball bearings. All such precisionball bearings in the United States,used by the Department of Defensefor missile guidance systems, wereprocessed on seventy-two BryantCentalign Model-B machines.«In 1961 the Department of Com-merce approved export of thirty-five such machines to the USSR,which would have given the Sovi-ets capability about equal to 50percent of the U.S. capability.«The Soviets had no equipment forsuch mass production processing,and neither the USSR nor any Euro-pean manufacturer could manufac-ture such equipment …»15

Prior to the delivery of this key com-ponent in US missile guidance tech-nology to the Kremlin, the only de-livery platform for Russia’s nuclearweapons were the Soviet Air Force’sponderous, propeller-drivenbombers that could be easily shotout of the sky by U.S. interceptorjets, way before they could enter

American air space. But with the help of the US govern-ment, the Soviet Communists suddenly had ballisticmissiles with nuclear payload capabilities parked just90 miles south of Key West, Florida. Thus, the techno-logically-primitive Soviet military of 1960 was instantly“brought up to speed” by its pretended adversary, the

J.F. Kennedy in 1962.

15 Antony C. Sutton, The Best Enemy Money Can Buy, 1986, 2000, p. 19.


U.S.A., and became a far morefrightening “bogeyman” than ithad been up to that point. If theAmerican people were terrifiedat the prospect of nuclear war,so much more so were the Euro-peans, who still had vivid mem-ories of obliterated cities andmillions of incinerated bodies ofinnocent women, children andthe elderly in the wake of Alliedsaturation bombing duringWorld War II. With good reasonto be especially afraid were thepeople of Rome when theylearned that U.S. medium-rangemissiles had been installed atthe American Air Force base atGioia del Colle, just 300 milessouth of the Eternal City, there-by guaranteeing that the capitalof Italy would be one of the firsttargets of a Soviet retaliatorystrike in an all-out nuclear war.

Virtually unnoticed by the faith-ful during this orchestrated“Cold War” showdown be-tween its two primary actors,the USSR and the USA, wasthe other showdown unfoldingin the first days of Vatican II.The council’s initial, traditionalpreparatory schemas that hadbeen painstakingly organizedfor two years by a team of or-thodox prelates under the guid-ance of Archbishop Domenico Tardini were dumped inthe waste bin to make way for a radical, revolutionaryagenda. A whole new set of schemas, tailor-made forthe anti-church, and secretly drafted by the agents ofthe Synagogue of Satan, well in advance of the councilwere then rolled out – with the connivance of John XXIII. Despite Roncalli’s remaining in the background duringthis treachery, his part in the sabotage of the authenticschemas for the council was not lost on the traditionalistand conservative cardinals, particularly those who knewthat his imposition upon the Chair of Peter by the in-terference of the secular powers from outside theChurch had spoiled the conclave and produced an anti-pope.But Roncalli’s betrayal of the council fathers was to beglossed over almost as soon as it happened by his re-in-troduction onto the world stage as the great “peace-maker” and negotiator for ending the Cuban Missile“Crisis,” further reinforcing the title bestowed upon himby the controlled media: “Good ‘Pope’ John.” Obviouslycoached by his handlers and press agents, Roncalli pro-posed first to the Kremlin, then to Washington that The

American missiles at Gioia delColle, Italy (which had been aUS provocation against theUSSR that led to the installationof Russian missiles in Cuba as acounter-balance) made Italy aprime target for a Russian nu-clear strike. Obviously coached by his han-dlers and press agents, Roncalliproposed first to the Kremlin,then to Washington that themissiles in Italy be removed inreturn for the dismantling ofSoviet missiles in Cuba.Throughout the crisis, the Amer-ican people were informed onlyabout the removal of US mis-siles in Turkey as the trade-offoffered to the Russians. But inItaly, the faithful and councilfathers who had been wary ofRoncalli were suddenly reluc-tant to criticize the peacemak-er “Pope” who had “saved”Italy and the Western Worldfrom nuclear destruction. To-day, periodicals and TV docu-dramas portray the “Good‘Pope’ John” as the saintly me-diator between the super-powerswho would ultimately be award-ed the Soviet “Balzan PeacePrize.” The American govern-ment, which had forty-five yearsbefore rejected a legitimatepeace plan, proposed by an au-

thentic Roman Pontiff, Benedict XV, to bring an early-endto the killing fields of World War I, now found in the an-tipope, whom it had just recently helped to impose uponthe papal throne, to be an acceptable go-between to defusethe most hyped crisis of its manufactured “Cold War” withits bought-and-paid-for “enemy,” the USSR, which it hadbeen arming and equipping with technological assistancethroughout World War II, right up to the Cuban Missile“Crisis,” and beyond. The real war being conducted by the Masonic cabalthat ran the government in Washington, D.C., hadbeen a covert war against the Church and an overt waragainst Catholic states since at least 1845. The Ameri-can government’s hatred for all things Catholic wasmatched only by that of its protégés in the Kremlin,which had murdered thousands of Catholic priests andfaithful (not to mention, millions of Russian OrthodoxChristians) since 1917. The acceptance by the fake bel-ligerents of the “Pope of Rome” as a trusted negotiator toavert World War III made no sense unless the “Pope” wasno pope at all but an agent of the twin governments ofAntichrist, which had been jointly set up by the Syna-

The Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.


gogue of Satan to suppress the rightful pontiff, eclipsethe Church and pave the way for the unveiling of the“man of sin.” But to accomplish their satanic end-game ofpreparing the world for Antichrist, the world powerswould next have to darken the intellects of half a billionCatholics by depriving them of Sanctifying Grace at itssource – the Sacraments of the Church.

Besides the papacy, the principal target of the adver-saries of the Church has always been the grace-givingHoly Sacrifice of the Mass. In retrospect, the rapid demo-lition of the Mass by the usurpers in the Vatican soon afterthe overthrow of Pope GregoriusXVII calls to mind the Latin ax-iom: “Tolle Papam; Tolle Mis-sam” (“Take away the Pope andthe Mass will be suppressed.”) In-deed the connection between theobscuration of the Pope and thedisappearance of the Mass waspredicted by Melanie Calvat ofLa Salette not long before herdeath in 1903:

«The Church will be eclipsed.At first, we will not know whichis the true pope. Then secondly,the Holy Sacrifice of the Masswill cease to be offered inchurches and houses; it will besuch that, for a time, there willnot be public services any more.But I see that the Holy Sacrificehas not really ceased: it will beoffered in barns, in alcoves, incaves, and underground.»16

There could be no greater cata-strophe for the Church than forher to be deprived of her head. Inhis 1888 “Prayer to St.Michael,” Pope Leo XIII seemedto be warning a future generationof Catholics of the consequencesthat would befall the Church oncedispossessed of her sovereignpontiff, and of the devilish spiritsthat would inspire the evil worldpowers to bring about such direevents: «O GLORIOUS Archangel St.Michael, Prince of heavenly host,

be our defense in the terrible warfare which we carry onagainst principalities and powers, against the rulers of thisworld of darkness, spirits of evil … These most craftyenemies have filled and inebriated with gall and bitter-ness the Church, the spouse of the immaculate Lamb,and have laid impious hands on her most sacred pos-sessions. In the Holy Place itself, where has been set upthe See of the most holy Peter and the Chair of Truthfor the light of the world, they have raised the throneof their abominable impiety, with the iniquitous designthat when the Pastor has been struck, the sheep may bescattered …»17

The mechanism for “scatteringthe sheep” was the council –convoked, corrupted and rati-fied by the antipopes whousurped the Chair of Peteragainst the authority of thelawful Pope. The remnantChurch must come to gripswith the reality that the falsecouncil was the brainchild offalse shepherds who broke intothe Vatican like “thieves androbbers,” with the help of theanti-Catholic secular powers.The path to the Church’s restora-tion, to her rightful, visible struc-tures will be by means of re-es-tablishing her connection to theauthentic Roman Pontiff, whomust at some point reemerge on-to the world stage, but only withcontinuity to (and successionfrom) St. Peter. As explained bythe “Catholic Encyclopedia”:

«A council in opposition to thepope is not representative of thewhole Church, for it neither rep-resents the pope who opposes it,nor the absent bishops, who can-not act beyond the limits of theirdioceses except through thepope. A council not only acting inde-pendently of the Vicar of Christ,but sitting in judgment over him,is unthinkable in the constitutionof the Church; in fact, such as-semblies have only taken place

in times of great constitutional disturbances, when ei-ther there was no pope or the rightful pope was indis-tinguishable from antipopes. In such abnormal times the safety of the Church be-comes the supreme law, and the first duty of the aban-doned flock is to find a new shepherd, under whose di-rection the existing evils may be remedied.»18

16 Abbe Paul Combe: The Secret of Melanie and the Actual Crisis, 1906,Rome, p.137.17 “#407 Prayer to St. Michael,” The Raccolta, 1930; Benziger Brothers, p.314-15.18 “Councils,” The Catholic Encyclopedia, Vol. 4, 1908, p. 426.

«Now is the time; theabyss is opening. Here isthe King of Kings ofdarkness; here is theBeast with his subjects,calling himself the Sa-viour of the world. Hewill rise proudly intothe air to go to Heaven.He will be smothered by

the breath of the Archangel Saint Mi-chael. He will fall, and the earth, whichwill have been in a continuous series ofevolutions for three days, will open upits fiery bowels; and he will have plun-ged for all eternity with all his fol-lowers into the everlasting chasms ofhell. And then water and fire will pur-ge the earth and consume all the worksof men’s pride and all will be renewed.God will be served and glorified.»

(Our Lady of La Salette)

Gravi ragioni di Stato en - catolicosalerta.com.ar · DIRETTORE responsabile: dott. Franco Adessa...

Documents

Transcript of Gravi ragioni di Stato en - catolicosalerta.com.ar · DIRETTORE responsabile: dott. Franco Adessa...