Colleen CampbellOpen Access 2020 Initiative │ Max Planck Digital Library

L’evoluzione del mercato dell’editorial scientifica e il ruolo dellacontrattazione nazionale21 maggio 2019│ Sapienza Università di Roma

Transformative Agreements per Open Access: nuovi principi per le negozazioni

@oa2020ini

@oa2020ini

Australasian Open Access Strategy Group (AOASG)Australia

University of Abomey-CalaviBenin

CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior)Brazil

University of Library Studies and Information Technologies (UniBIT)Bulgaria

National Taiwan Normal University LibraryChinese Taipei

Royal Danish LibraryDenmark

European University Association (EUA)Europe

Hellenic Academic Libraries LinkGreece

1

Technical University of KenyaKenya

Covenant University, OtaNigeria

JiscUnited Kingdom

Max Planck Society (MPG)Germany

Institute of Health Carlos IIISpain

https://oa2020.org/mission/#eois

@oa2020ini

2

Qatar National LibraryQatar

The Association of Swedish Higher Education (SUHF)Sweden

European Geosciences Union (EGU)Europe

Researchers Group of Solid State Physics JapanJapan

UKB (Consortium of Dutch University Libraries and the National Library of the Netherlands)Netherlands

National Science and Technology Library (NSTL)P. R. China

University of Witwatersrand, JohannesburgSouth Africa

KISTI (Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information)South Korea

Stiftelsen Riksbankens JubileumsfondSweden

National Library of SwedenSweden

Swiss National Science Foundation SNSFSwitzerland

University of California Los AngelesUnited States of America

https://oa2020.org/mission/#eois

@oa2020ini

3

National Electronic Information Consortium (NEICON)Russian Federation

Busitema UniversityUganda

Seoul National University Library (SNU Library)South Korea

Denmark′s Electronic Research Library (DEFF)Denmark

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)Germany

Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN)Italy

Fudan University LibraryP. R. China Wayne State University

United States of America

University of California San FranciscoUnited States of America

University of California BerkeleyUnited States of America

National and University Library of IcelandIceland

Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)Spain

https://oa2020.org/mission/#eois

@oa2020ini

4

FinELib consortiumFinland

JUSTICE: Japan Alliance of University Library Consortia for E-ResourcesJapan

King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) University LibraryKingdom of Saudi Arabia

Foundation for Science and Technology FCTPortugal

South African National Library and Information Consortium (SANLiC)South Africa

ANKOS (Anatolian University Libraries Consortium)Turkey

Pontifical Academies of Sciences and Social SciencesVatican City

Institute of Science and Technology Austria (IST Austria)Austria

Helmholtz AssociationGermany

Tsinghua University LibraryP. R. China

Belgorod State UniversityRussian Federation

Iowa State University LibraryUnited States of America

Hungarian Electronic Information Service National ProgrammeHungary

ShanghaiTech University LibraryP. R. China

https://oa2020.org/mission/#eois

@oa2020ini

5

Austrian Science Fund (FWF)Austria

Universidad de Santiago de Chile (USACH)Chile

German Rectors′ Conference (HRK)Germany

Association of Universities in the Netherlands (VSNU)Netherlands

Current Research Information System In Norway (CRIStin)Norway

Peking University LibraryP. R. China

swissuniversitiesSwitzerland

National Library of KoreaSouth Korea

The Czech Academy of SciencesCzech Republic

World Meteorological Organization (WMO)International

The Conference of Italian University Rectors (CRUI)Italy

Université des Montagnes (UdM)Cameroon

Open Access IndiaIndia

Leibniz AssociationGermany

https://oa2020.org/mission/#eois

@oa2020ini

6

La necessità di una strategia open access per i nostri fondi

The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articlesdoi:10.7717/peerj.4375.

@oa2020ini

7

Obiettivo: accesso completo ed immediato

https://www.coalition-s.org/oa2020-and-coalition-s/

@oa2020ini

8

Le aspettatative dei ricercatori e della ricerca

doi:10.1126/science.aaf5664

@oa2020ini

0,00 500,00 1.000,00 1.500,00 2.000,00 2.500,00 3.000,00 3.500,00

C2C9C1

C14C18

C20**C17****

C5C11C24C8

C7****C21C28C19

C6****C10C25C4

C13C3***

C30C32**

C16C31****C15***

C12

Person/tear

Un mercato editoriale trasparente

https://eua.eu/downloads/publications/2019%20big%20deals%20report.pdf

Calculation: Annual spend on 5 big publishers / GDP per capita

Interpretation: the result represents the number of people that need to work for one year (person/year), given a certain GDP per capita, in order to reach the same monetary value as the cost with the 5 big publishers in that country.

GDP per capita: source Eurostat (data from 2017)

@oa2020ini

Rapporto costo vs. pubblicazioni

https://eua.eu/downloads/publications/2019%20big%20deals%20report.pdf

56%

17%

16%

7%3% Elsevier (incl. Cell Press)

WileySpringer (incl. Nature)Taylor & FrancisAmerican Chemical Society

Overview of subscription costs by publisherTotal reported = 440 805 816 EUR data for 28 countries)

17%

6%

10%

4%2%

Share of global scholarly publishing market measured in published articles

@oa2020ini

11

https://www.slideshare.net/HenrikKarlstrm1/expanded-usage-metrics-for-literature-resources-105601917

Statistiche d‘uso non rappresentano ilquadro completo

@oa2020ini

12

Conoscere l‘utente non soltanto comelettore ma come autore

Big three

Internal analysis by Max Planck Digital Library, based on WoS data, showing development of publishing trends of Max Planck Society corresponding authors

@oa2020ini

13

Conoscere l‘utente non soltanto comelettore ma come autore

Internal analysis by Max Planck Digital Library, based on WoS data, showing development of publishing trends of Max Planck Society corresponding authors

Big three

@oa2020ini

La pubblicazione open access è in crescita, e questo significa…

@oa2020ini

Il rischio degli APC fuori controllo

Average list APCFully OA: $1600Hybrid: $2900

Average payment tracked by OpenAPC: Fully OA: €1488Hybrid €2445

With permission from Delta Think Open Access Data & Analytics tool. Analysis 15.09.2018

APC vs. SNIP for Publishers by Fully OA/Hybrid:All publishers (2017-2018)

15

@oa2020ini

http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0026-C274-7

Gli investimenti sono già sufficienti

€ 7.6 bn € 4.0 bn

High estimate per-article cost

to publish OA

scholarly articlesscholalry articles

Current global subscription

spending

Estimated global spend after transition to OA

# 2m# 2m

45% buffer

€ 2,000 x 2m

Current cost per article via subscription

7.6 bn/2mGlobal subscription

journal market

@oa2020ini

17

L‘impegno degli atenei

We are all committed to authors retaining their copyrights. We are all committed to complete and immediate open access.

We are all committed to accelerating the progress of open access through transformative agreements…that should, at least initially, be cost-neutral, with the expectation that economic adjustments will follow as the markets transform.

https://oa2020.org/b14-conference/final-statement/

@oa2020ini

Transformative agreements

https://esac-initiative.org/about/transformative-agreements/

Transformative agreements are those contracts negotiated between institutions (libraries, national and regional consortia) and publishers that transform the business model underlying scholarly journals from subscription to open access.

They aim to constrain costs of scholarly communication and foster sustainability and equity in scholarly publishing

@oa2020ini

Linee guida di Transformative Agreements

https://esac-initiative.org/about/transformative-agreements/guidelines-for-transformative-agreements/

• Transformative agreements are temporary and transitional• Authors retain copyright• Agreements must be transparent• Transformative agreements aim to constrain costs of

scholarly communication and foster equity in scholarly publishing

• Transformative agreements should govern service and workflow requirements for publishers to ensure that the needs of authors and administrators are addressed

@oa2020ini

20

Linee guida di Transformative Agreements

https://esac-initiative.org/guidelines/

United KingdomJISC Collection Requirements

1: Journal Agreements must be transitional…

USA: California Call to ActionCancelled Elsevier

We will prioritize making immediate open access publishing available to UC authors as part of our negotiated agreements.

We will prioritize agreements that lower the cost of research access and dissemination, with sustainable, cost-based fees for OA publication.

Payments for OA publication should reduce the cost of subscriptions at UC and elsewhere.

SOUTHERN EUROPEAN LIBRARIES (SELL)- Journal subscription current spending must be used to fund

the transition to open access at no cost increase

Japan (JUSTICE)Transformation from subscription model toward OA publishing model - JUSTICE OA2020 Roadmap

- Expansion toward OA publishing model

- Flipping the subscription cost& grant…

@oa2020ini

Editori con una strategia di transizione

https://esac-initiative.org/about/transformative-agreements/agreement-registry/

@oa2020ini

Come funzionano?

http://esac-initiative.org/

@oa2020ini

23

Case study: Projekt DEAL - Wiley

https://www.projekt-deal.de/faq-wiley-contract/

@oa2020ini

24

~10.000 articles a year complete and immediate open accessAuthors are guaranteed freedom of choice in publishing venueAuthors retain copyright, can use and re-use their workScholars and society learn from and build on the latest research

Departure from the subscription logicCosts are transparent and transactions at the article level

Operational compliance with open access workflowsForward-looking processes and systemsPrepare for transition at scale

Case study: Projekt DEAL – WileyIn che modo „trasformativo“

https://www.projekt-deal.de/faq-wiley-contract/

@oa2020ini

25

Euro 2750 PAR fee (bridge)No cap on # of articlesPreference for CC-BYRisk sharing: pay based on article outputPure gold OA 20% discount on list APCRead access to full journal portfolio

Extended to ~700 public and privately funded research institutionsIncludes permanent access to full backfile from 1997One-time fee of 2MInternal cost model to ease the transition

Case study: Projekt DEAL – WileyDettagli contratto & Read (PAR) model

https://www.projekt-deal.de/faq-wiley-contract/

@oa2020ini

~ 3.800 € per article

Pay subscription fees for reading access

~ 6.800 € per article

Pay subscription fees for reading access AND Pay to publish articles Open Access on top“double dipping”

~ 3.800 € per article

Pay subscription fees; get credits for certain # of APCs“offsetting”

2.750 € per article PAR fee

Pay for OA publishing of all articles & for reading (PAR)“transformative agreements”

< 2.000 € per article

Pay for OA publishing services only

Case study: Projekt DEAL – Wiley

Timeline

Transparent costs and pricing/discounting that responds to market pressure

@oa2020ini

27

Adesso è il momento di agireDopo Austria, i Paesi Bassi, Gran Bretagna, Svezia, Norvegia, Germania, Svizzera…Adesso Spagna, Grecia, Ungheria, Slovenia e gli StatiUniti. E l’Italia?

@oa2020ini

28

Raccomadazioni EUA: • Gli atenei devono esercitare una pressione di

mercato commisurato al loro investimento• Data l’entità del loro investimento, le negozazioni

necessitano di un impegno politico (rettorato) e tecnico (biblioteca)

• Necessita la trasparenza nei contratti: vedi ESAC Registry

• Gli atenei devono migliorare le loro capacità di monitorare tutti i costi della communicazionescientifica, vedi Open APC https://treemaps.intact-project.org/

https://esac-initiative.org/about/transformative-agreements/agreement-registry/

https://eua.eu/downloads/publications/2019%20big%20deals%20report.pdf

@oa2020ini

29

Grazie!

Colleen CampbellOpen Access 2020 InitiativeMax Planck Digital Library

campbell@mpdl.mpg.de@ColleenCampbe11

https://oa2020.org

Participate in OA2020

Acceleratethe transition