Rethinking the role of hyponatremia in metastatic cancer...
Transcript of Rethinking the role of hyponatremia in metastatic cancer...
Giovanni Fucà, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Italy
Rethinking the role of hyponatremia in
metastatic cancer patients:
the HYPNOSIS and the i-HYPNOSIS studies
TERAPIE DI SUPPORTO IN ONCOLOGIA:
STRATEGIA “SISTEMICA” AL SERVIZIO DEL PAZIENTE
2a EDIZIONE
Milano, 5 ottobre 2018 - Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori
Fucà G et al. submitted – Please, do not post
The HYPNOSIS STUDY
BACKGROUND
• Regardless of the etiology, hyponatremia has been associated with high mortality risk
in cancer pts1
• The association between hyponatremia and poor prognosis in the metastatic setting
has been extrapolated from studies intrinsically biased by small sample size, inclusion
of mixed stages or restriction to terminally-ill pts2-4
• We aimed at weighing the prognostic impact of hyponatremia in hospitalized pts with metastatic solid tumors
1. Mohan et al. Am J Med (2013)2. Castillo et al. BMC Cancer (2016)3. Berardi et al. Support Care Cancer (2015)4. Yoon et al. Support Care Cancer (2015)
The HYPNOSIS STUDY
METHODS• Retrospective, cohort analysis
• Pts with metastatic solid tumors admitted to our Medical Oncology Department from
January 2014 to December 2015
• Hyponatremia cohort: at least one finding of baseline hyponatremia at any admission
during the study period
• Control cohort: no evidence of hyponatremia at any admission during the study
period
• Hyponatremia: serum sodium concentration < 135 mEq/l
Fucà G et al. submitted – Please, do not post
The HYPNOSIS STUDY
RESULTS
Admissions identified through
registries searching(n = 2166)
- Admissions with evidence of hyponatremia at hospitalization
(n = 402)
- Admissions with no evidence of hyponatremia at hospitalization
(n = 1764)
Patients screened for
the hyponatremia cohort(n = 319)
Patients screened
for the control cohort(n = 1054)
Patients included in
the control cohort (n = 746)
Patients excluded:
- Hematologic malignancies (n = 2)- Early stage/locally advanced (n = 38)
Patients excluded: -No oncologic disease (n = 12)
- Hematologic malignancies (n = 12)- Early stage/locally advanced (n = 270)
- No data available (n = 14)
Fucà G et al. submitted – Please, do not post
The HYPNOSIS STUDY
RESULTS
Characteristic
Association with
hyponatremia
(P)
Gender <0.001
Age (years) 0.30
ECOG PS <0.001
Histology <0 .001
Metastatic sites (N) <0.001
Liver metastases 0.001
Lung metastases 0.50
Bone metastases 0.01
Brain metastases 0.02
Adrenal metastases 0.03
Pleural metastases 0.10
Lymphnodal metastases <0.001
Completed lines of treatment (N) <0.001
Other electrolyte imbalances <0.001
Fucà G et al. submitted – Please, do not post
The HYPNOSIS STUDY
RESULTS
Biliary tract 51%
Prostate cancer 45%
SCLC 38,9%
GE cancer 34,5%
Pancreatic cancer 34%
Melanoma 32,2%
RCC 28,2%
NSCLC 25,3%
NET 25%
CRC 22,2%
Breast cancer 20,7%
Other 20,7%
Pre
vale
nce
of
hyp
on
atre
mia
39/176 pts
44/174 pts
35/169 pts
30/87 pts
19/59 pts
18/53 pts
25/49 pts
11/39 pts
14/36 pts
7/28 pts
9/20 pts
28/135 pts
Fucà G et al. submitted – Please, do not post
The HYPNOSIS STUDY
RESULTS
Control cohort 13.2 months (4.1-35.4)Hyponatremia cohort 2.0 months (0.7-8.2)
Unadjusted HR 2.65 (95% CI 2.26-3.11)P < 0.001
Adjusted HR 1.66 (95%CI 1.38-2.01)P <0.001
Median OS (IQR)
Fucà G et al. submitted – Please, do not post
The HYPNOSIS STUDY
RESULTS
Log-rank test P < 0.001
Fucà G et al. submitted – Please, do not post
Control cohortMild hyponatremia (Na 134-130 mEq/L)Moderate hyponatremia (Na 129-125 mEq/L)Profound hyponatremia (Na <125 mEq/L)
The HYPNOSIS STUDY
RESULTS
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36
Months
Su
rviv
al P
rob
ab
ility
Ctrl
ipoNA
137 114 95 79 70 61 52 42 32 22 14 14 8
39 19 11 11 9 6 4 3 3 3 3 2 2
No. pts at risk
Histology Colorectal: raw and adjusted OS, according to cohort
Ctrl, raw OS
ipoNA, raw OS
Ctrl, adjusted OS
ipoNA, adjusted OS
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36
Months
Su
rviv
al P
rob
ab
ility
Ctrl
ipoNA
130 85 70 54 43 37 33 25 19 16 9 8 4
44 16 9 7 5 5 4 4 4 2 2 1 1
No. pts at risk
Histology NSCLC: raw and adjusted OS, according to cohort
Ctrl, raw OS
ipoNA, raw OS
Ctrl, adjusted OS
ipoNA, adjusted OS
Unadjusted HR 2.94 (95%CI 1.96-4.41)P < 0.001
Adjusted HR 1.52 (95% CI1.00-2.32)P = 0.05
Unadjusted HR 2.65 (95%CI 1.80-3.90)P < 0.001
Adjusted HR 1.97 (95%CI 1.31-2.95)P = 0.001
CRC NSCLC
Fucà G et al. submitted – Please, do not post
Control cohortHyponatremia cohort
Control cohortHyponatremia cohort
The HYPNOSIS STUDY
RESULTS
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36
Months
Su
rviv
al P
rob
ab
ility
Ctrl
ipoNA
134 104 92 84 78 73 63 55 44 32 25 21 15
35 17 13 11 9 8 7 7 5 5 3 1 1
No. pts at risk
Histology Breast: raw and adjusted OS, according to cohort
Ctrl, raw OS
ipoNA, raw OS
Ctrl, adjusted OS
ipoNA, adjusted OS
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36
Months
Su
rviv
al P
rob
ab
ility
Ctrl
ipoNA
57 43 29 20 15 12 7 6 5 3 2 2 1
30 11 10 8 5 4 4 4 4 3 2 1 1
No. pts at risk
Histology Gastroesophageal: raw and adjusted OS, according to cohort
Ctrl, raw OS
ipoNA, raw OS
Ctrl, adjusted OS
ipoNA, adjusted OS
Unadjusted HR 2.70 (95%CI 1.80-4.06)P < 0.001
Adjusted HR 1.70 (95%CI 1.10-2.61)P = 0.02
Unadjusted HR 1.72 (95%CI 1.06-2.80)P = 0.03
Adjusted HR 0.88 (95%CI 0.53-1.47)P = 0.63
Breastcancer
GEcancer
Fucà G et al. submitted – Please, do not post
Control cohortHyponatremia cohort
Control cohortHyponatremia cohort
The HYPNOSIS STUDY
RESULTS
Fucà G et al. submitted – Please, do not post
The HYPNOSIS STUDY
RESULTS
Fucà G et al. submitted – Please, do not post
The HYPNOSIS STUDY
RESULTS
T1T2T3
Validation set (N = 87)
Fucà G et al. submitted – Please, do not post
The HYPNOSIS STUDY
TAKE HOME MESSAGE
• In this large cohort study including 1025 hospitalized pts with metastatic solidtumors, hyponatremia was independently associated with poor OS (adjusted HR 1.66; 95% CI 1.38-2.01; P < 0.001)
• Serum sodium assessment can be exploited to design integrated prognostic tools
• A strong clinical and translational effort is needed to characterize the biological role of extracellular sodium levels and the interplay with ion channels located on tumor cell membranes in promoting cancer initiation, progression and resistance to treatment
Fucà G et al. submitted – Please, do not post
Cancer immunotherapy comes of age…
Giovanni Fucà, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Italy
Fucà G et al. Target Oncol. 2018
The i-HYPNOSIS STUDY
BACKGROUND
• A complex interaction between genetic and acquired factors contribute to the inter-patient
heterogeneity of IO efficacy in metastatic NSCLC
• Sodium pumps and ion channels participate in the modulation of immune cells activity1
• Hyponatremia has been associated with poor prognosis in pts with NSCLC2
• We aimed at assessing the association between pre-treatment serum sodium
concentration and clinical outcomes in metastatic NSCLC pts treated with IO
1. Ramirez et al. Cells (2018)2. Castillo et al. BMC Cancer (2016)
The i-HYPNOSIS STUDY
METHODS
• Retrospective, cohort analysis
• Pts treated from April 2013 to April 2018 (APOLLO institutional
prospective registry)
• Low-sodium cohort: pre-treatment serum sodium concentration
≤ 135 mEq/l (institutional lab lower limit of normal)
Fucà G et al. Target Oncol. 2018
The i-HYPNOSIS STUDY
RESULTS
Characteristic
Total
(N = 197)
N (%)
Control
(N = 171)
N (%)
Low-sodium
(N = 26)
N (%)
p
Age (years)
< 65
≥ 65
84 (43)
113 (57)
71 (42)100 (58)
13 (50)13 (50)
0.42
ECOG PS
0-1
≥ 2
175 (89)
22 (11)
154 (90)17 (10)
21 (81)5 (19)
0.18
M+ sites (N)1-2≥ 3
84 (43)
113 (57)
73 (43)98 (57)
11 (42) 15 (58)
0.97
IO regimen
Mono
Combo
191 (97)
6 (3)
166 (97)
5 (3)
25 (96)
1 (4)
0.58
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Controlcohort
Low-sodiumcohort
CR+PR+SD
PD
31%56%
44% 69%
P = 0.02
Fucà G et al. Target Oncol. 2018
The i-HYPNOSIS STUDY
RESULTS
171
26
68
4
37
1
17
0
8
0
171
26
28
1
14
0
8
0
3
0
mos mos
OS
(pts
pro
po
rtio
n)
PF
S (
pts
pro
po
rtio
n)
Fucà G et al. Target Oncol. 2018
Control cohort 11.6 months (9.3-15.2)Low-sodium cohort 2.8 months (1.8-6.2)
Unadjusted HR 3.00 (95%CI 1.80-4.80)P < 0.001
Adjusted HR 3.11 (95%CI 1.91-5.05)P < 0.001
Median OS (95% CI)
Control cohort 3.3 months (2.6-4.3)Low-sodium cohort 1.8 months (1.1-2.5)
Unadjusted HR 2.60 (95%CI 1.70-3.90)P < 0.001
Adjusted HR 1.69 (95%CI 0.85-3.38)P = 0.14
Median PFS (95%CI)
The i-HYPNOSIS STUDY
TAKE HOME MESSAGE
• Low pre-treatment sodium concentration was independently associated with
worse OS and disease control in metastatic NSCLC pts treated with IO
• Low pre-treatment sodium concentration was also associated with worse PFS,
but failed to confirm an independent association in the multivariable model
• The role of serum sodium concentration as prognostic and predictive factor in
this setting warrants further investigation
• Pharmacological modulation of sodium pumps/ion channels could be exploit to
improve IO efficacy in metastatic NSCLC pts
Fucà G et al. Target Oncol. 2018
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Giovanni Fucà, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Italy. Email: [email protected]
The authors would like to thank all the patients, their families, and the staff who contributed to these projects.