CAUTI TEAM
-
Upload
lee-hepper-scott -
Category
Documents
-
view
55 -
download
0
Transcript of CAUTI TEAM
© J
oint
Com
mis
sion
Res
ourc
es
CAUTI Reduction Team
1
© J
oint
Com
mis
sion
Res
ourc
es
CAUTI ReductionSWOT AnalysisTeam Review
2
© J
oint
Com
mis
sion
Res
ourc
es
CAUTI Reduction SWOT AnalysisStrengths
Only place caths when necessary (i.e. narcotic spinals, intubated ICU patients, TURPs)
Daily foley rounds (Leadership and Infection Prevention)
Preprinted Surgical Post-op orders specific to Foley discontinuation day
Physicians are very receptive to the implementation of renewing Foley orders every 24 hours and removing Foley as soon as they are no longer medically necessary.
CEO is SUPER supportive. Monday-Friday morning huddle includes
discussing every patient that has a Foley and assessing if the Foley is still needed.
Hospitalists agreeable to get Foleys out ASAP
Enthusiasm from Quality Leadership engagement Less insertion in ED already in place Criteria for insertion posted in ICU Everyone here today!
3
© J
oint
Com
mis
sion
Res
ourc
es
CAUTI Reduction SWOT AnalysisWeaknesses
Sterile technique New residents placing Foleys on patients
when they’ve never been educated on how
Broken/lack of sterile technique No nurse driven discontinuation protocol No pre-printed Foley orders for non-
surgical admissions Lack of physician champion. Some “old school” physicians are not as
interested in changing their catheter use.
Nurses feel it is safer to put a Foley in than leave a patient in a wet brief due to the shortage of staffing and not being able to get to the patient in a timely manner.
Lack of education for everyone Documentation on bag No foley review by quality on Saturday and
Sunday Poor documentation when foley discontinued Staff not aware of criteria for insertion Staffing when foley is for convenience
4
© J
oint
Com
mis
sion
Res
ourc
es
CAUTI Reduction SWOT AnalysisOpportunities
Sterile technique refresher – Foley insertion practice station
Education on why removal ASAP is so important Insert less catheters in the ED Catheters discontinued at the end of surgery
instead of the next day. Unit champions Nurse driven protocols Improve documentation for catheter care Education on proper cath size Evidence based practices for labor epidurals Competency checklists
Correct supplies available to staff when inserting a Foley.
Not break drainage system to change catheter size.
Securement devices used on all Foleys Keep collection bag below the bladder to
prevent backflow. Increase # and availability of bladder scanners Consistent charting of initiation date and time Review with bedside nurses foley placement
on patient Evaluate and standardize supplies
5
© J
oint
Com
mis
sion
Res
ourc
es
CAUTI Reduction SWOT AnalysisThreats
Physician and staff education – when to insert, how to insert, when to remove
Lack of support from Urology staff Keeping supplies filled Adequate staffing so nurses are
not rushed while performing catheter insertion
Staff no accepting change
Nurses too busy to participate in successful implementation.
MDs and RNs taking short cuts with sterile technique
Lots of new nurses and new grads
Catheter occasionally inserted prior to obtaining order
6
© J
oint
Com
mis
sion
Res
ourc
es
Trace your process to visualize what really happens!
7
• System-level tracer questions• Patient-level tracer questions•Interview staff•Review patient records•Talk to patient and family if possible
© J
oint
Com
mis
sion
Res
ourc
es
Tracer FindingsGood Physicians aware of “Foley
Nazi” Awareness of foley need and
need for CAUTI reduction Starting to use checklist for
order Decrease use in OR
Inconsistent Dependent loops Bag higher than foley No stabilizer Communication with patient not
appropriate or adequate Documentation of insertion,
maintenance, DC Breaks in technique Use for nurse convenience,
criteria inappropriate Assistance use to maintain sterile
field
8
© J
oint
Com
mis
sion
Res
ourc
es
Process Mapping
© J
oint
Com
mis
sion
Res
ourc
es
Process Map of Current State with Risk Points
EducationMaintenance Discontinue/MonitorReview of NecessityInsertion
-Get order-Report off onother patients-collect supplies-educate patient-wash hands-position andundress patient-establish sterilefield and glove-check equipmentand set up kit-drape patient-wash meatus-insertfoley-get urine return-blow up balloon-secure tube-document insertion timeon bag-send urine for analysisif ordered-placefoley below bladder-discard trash-document in medical record-wash hands
-hand hygiene-sterile field set up-patient education-sequencing of events-insertion may be difficult-supplies not appropriate-no criteria for order orcriteria not met-order obtained afterprocedure-documentation not complete-labeling placement info notconsistent
-Every morning, quality runs areport of patients withfoleys tosee if it matches documentationand core measures-Hospitalists discuss necessity oftheir patients'foleys at 7:15 (~90%)-Charge nurse identifies patientson their unit that havefoleys andreview for necessity. hold unitbased huddle with staff nurses,charge nurses and director-at 9:00 the directors and leadershave a safety huddle to discussthese patients.-Nurse leaders go back to unit anddiscuss necessity with staff andpatients' physician if leaders feelit should be removed-if leadership determinesfoleynot necessary, there is followup to see if removed and if not, why not.-Feedback to private physicianswho do not removefoleys-checklist is signed by physicians
-No standardized time forreview-May be signed by MD > 24 hrs.-Review by quality M-F-Foley report accurate for dayprior but not morning of review-ICU uses standardized criteria,but not all units use it. ICU notconsistently using criteria-L&D uses pre-printed ordersfor necessity-No medical staff approvedcriteria forFoleys-Feedback to private MDsnot consistent-checklist not consistently used-does 24 hour start on orderor on insertion?
-Implement bundles(peri care,stabilization,no dependentloops, bag below bladder,individual emptyingcontainers, do nottouch spout whenemptying)-Document maintenance
-formal bundles notdefined and implemented;no bundle checklist-charting not consistent
-criteria for removalmet-removefoley-monitor patient forresidual if ableto void with bladderscanner. Document-Check patient withbladder scanner if notable to void. Document-straightcath patientif needed and ordered-document removal
-multiple straightcaths-not enough bladderscans-no criteria for straightcath-no defined # straightcaths
-Patient and familyeducation-competency determinations(nursing,techs, physicians,residents)-ancillary staff education(related to dependent loops,etc)
-do we have all of the appropriatepolicies to build education-competencies not well defined-preceptors/educators (in someareas) not well defined-inexperienced nurses (new grads)-resident turnover-no defined education process forresidents/oversight-no simulation lab-not sure what ancillary staff getrelated toCAUTI-patients not being educated priorto insertion to advocate for self-patients not consistently getting handout-families not being present for educationor understanding education
© J
oint
Com
mis
sion
Res
ourc
es
Gallery Walk InstructionsPurpose: To Create the Cause and Effect Diagram
1. Assemble a few people at each flip chart
2. 2 minutes at each chart until you get to your originating chart (consultant is timing
and will instruct you to move to the next chart).
3. Silently write one factor per post it note and write as many factors related to the
topic in 2 minutes as you can. Try to state the factor in neutral terms (for
example, rather than say physicians “lack of knowledge about ABC”, say
“Physicians’ knowledge about ABC”)
4. Move to the next flip chart when the facilitator tells you to and read the Post it
notes already there. Do not repeat
5. When you return to your original flip chart, group can talk and arrange post it
notes into common themes and then name each group (what is the theme?) 11
© J
oint
Com
mis
sion
Res
ourc
es
Gallery Walk
12
© J
oint
Com
mis
sion
Res
ourc
es
CAUTI Reduction Cause & Effect Diagram
13
use checklists
Reasons forplacement
reasonsto discontinue
Use STAR andARCC if needed
When to question
clear communicationof when to keep
current andavailable
physicianchampions
when to replace
when to usestraightcath
and how often (limits)
when to drawurinalysis
checklist
evidence basedcontraindications
supportstaff
Evidence basedbest practices New Infection
Preventionist
when to call MD
Friendly competition
Knowledge andUse of criteria
Rep visitsto learn
Ancillary stafftraining/crosstraining
Unit champions
Physicianchampions
Nurse drivenprotocols/empowerment
Competency/Education (insertiontechnique, bundles,criteria)
provide unitspecificCAUTI data
(rates and cost) Staff involvement inCAUTI prevention
staff follow up whenpolicy/documentation
complete/accurate/correctMonitoringof Ancillary staff
committeesreported to
consistency
Unit champions
rewards
physician followupwhen criteria not met
daily review
physicianchampion
Rates (outcome/process)
resident involvementand accountability
Software -accuracy ofcerner reports, data mining who conducts
chart audits
Assistance andsupplies available
Bladder scan preprocedure
Bladder scanfor monitoringpost procedure
No interruptions
Handwashing
positioning
checklists
Privacy
Appropriateorders (criteria)
Patient educationSterile technique
Surveillance
Procedure
Indications
Staff
CatheterAssociatedUTI
Prevention
Patient
Consistent
Include MD inpatient education
Advocacy(when to tell there
is a problem,sharing of experiences,patient onCAUTI team)
Level ofunderstanding
postcath(how to void,s/s of infection,when to call MD/RN)
Hydration
Education(bundles, whyinserted, whenDC, discomfort,when to call RN,hydration,alternatives, etc)
Supplies andEquipment
Appropriate for unit
vendor aspartner
suppliesstandardized
urimeters
set up area
educationon appropriateness
discardingwaste
availability
Fit on bed
adequate # ofbladder scanners
(one/unit)
Evidence basedcriteria
Adequate # onunits
Adequatesizes
© J
oint
Com
mis
sion
Res
ourc
es
Solution Generation
14
Potential Solutions Votes
Revise and consistently implement Foley order form, including definition for "strict I&O" 4Develop standardized bundles and checklist 3Improve physician accountability and responsiveness 2Revise policy - evidence based and available 1Work with Vendor to evaluate supplies and develop criteria for us of urometer 1Define and implement competencies 1Develop and implement nurse driven foley catheter removal protocols 1Improve nurse accountability, especially in relation to incontinence 1Scripting responses as part of rounding in relation to toileting 0Implement bladder scanners on each unit 0Unit based champions 0Provide unit specific rates 0Build alerts in Omnicell for medications that may cause retention 0
© J
oint
Com
mis
sion
Res
ourc
es
Writing a 3 W Workplan When writing the action plans each ‘what’ should start with a verb, such as
“Collate all forms currently used to teach heart failure to the patient.”
The ‘who’ can be anyone on the team, not just the subgroup working on the
particular issue. This is the name of person on this performance improvement
team who will be responsible for seeing that this action item gets completed.
The assigned “who” does not necessarily DO all the work associated with the
action item, rather – they assure that it is done and may participate in the work
too.
Allow time for each subgroup to present to each other, for any additional tips,
editing, points of clarification etc. Good practice prior to leadership
presentation too.
15
© J
oint
Com
mis
sion
Res
ourc
es
CAUTI Reduction Deployment– 3W Plan
16
WHAT WHO WHEN
Revise and consistently implement Foley order form, define “strict I&O”
Heather/Debra Sept. 30
Standardize bundles and implement checklist Educator/Project List
Jan. 1
Improve physician accountability and responsiveness-Use ARCC-Define chain of command for Foleys
Dr. Mehta Sept. 30
© J
oint
Com
mis
sion
Res
ourc
es
CAUTI Reduction Deployment– 3W Plan
17
WHAT WHO WHEN
Use vendor to evaluate supplies and develop criteria for urometer use
Becky/Sheila Sept. 30
Define and implement competencies Educator TBD
Develop and implement nurse driven foley catheter removal protocols
Anabelle/Susan
Jan. 1
Improve nurse accountability-removal-incontinence management
Nursing Directors
Sept. 1
Revise policy Cynthia/Becky Ongoing
© J
oint
Com
mis
sion
Res
ourc
es
Deployment Planning
18
© J
oint
Com
mis
sion
Res
ourc
es
Outcome Metric CAUTI for ICU patients
19
© J
oint
Com
mis
sion
Res
ourc
es
Possible Leading metrics (Process metrics) Urinary catheter removed post op day 1 or 2
Time delay of removal identification and removal
20
© J
oint
Com
mis
sion
Res
ourc
es
Parking Lot Monitoring of Intake and Output
21
© J
oint
Com
mis
sion
Res
ourc
es
CAUTI ReductionPlus/Delta EvaluationPLUS Gallery walk – great way to
generate ideas Allowing free and safe
conversation Great presentation to C-Suite Very interactive – action taken
towards goal Great start for the leadership Learning lots of new techniques Great techniques to use with
other projects and department meeting issues
DELTA None
22
© J
oint
Com
mis
sion
Res
ourc
es
Summary
The PfP Campaign is a national, high-priority effort to prevent harm to inpatients
The JCR HEN is prepared to assist you achieve the “40/20 by ’14” goal
Your PfP project infrastructure will serve as a foundation for strong PI work
You will be successful and your results will be sustainable!
23