Avian Influenza
Massi PaolaSezione di Forlì
IZSLER
Santa Sofia,26.10.2006
La letalità media del virus dell’influenza aviaria H5N1 (OMS)
• Dal 2003 a giugno 2006 registrati presso l’OMS 205 casi di infezione con 113 decessi
La letalità media del virus dell’influenza aviaria H5N1 (OMS)
• L’OIE segnala focolai epizootici negli uccelli domestici e selvatici in una cinquantina di Paesi
La letalità media del virus dell’influenza aviaria H5N1 (OMS)
• Per il 50% i casi di contaminazione sono stati registrati nei soggetti con meno di 20 anni, il 90%in quelli con meno di 40 anni
La letalità media del virus dell’influenza aviaria H5N1 (OMS)
• Quanto ai bambini colpiti dall’infezione, 21 avevano meno di 5 anni e 32 tra 5 e 9 anni.
La letalità media del virus dell’influenza aviaria H5N1 (OMS)
• Il fatto che la maggior parte dei casi interessa soggetti di età compresa tra i 10 e i 29 anni potrebbe spiegare la loro presenza nei Paesi dove la popolazione è giovane
La letalità media del virus dell’influenza aviaria H5N1 (OMS)
• Per esempio, Egitto e Indonesia, nel 2005, dove rispettivamente il 34 e il 28% della popolazione ha meno di 15 anni.
La letalità media del virus dell’influenza aviaria H5N1 (OMS)
• Inoltre, i comportamenti legati all’età o al sesso (es.lo spiumaggio,la macellazione e la preparazione degli alimenti vengono effettuati dalle giovani donne e i bambini giocano con volatili infetti) aumentano il rischio di esposizione prolungata e di stretto contatto con i volatili infetti.
La letalità media del virus dell’influenza aviaria H5N1 (OMS)
• Tuttavia, nessuna differenza statisticamente significativa è stata evidenziata fra gli uomini e le donne quanto al rischio dell’infezione
La letalità media del virus dell’influenza aviaria H5N1 (OMS)
• Il livello generale di mortalità si assesta al 56%.E’ elevato per tutte le età anche se raggiunge il 73% dai 10 ai 39 anni
• Il livello più basso (18%) si registra negli over 50.
• Il livello di letalità differisce da quello dell’influenza stagionale”tradizionale”per la quale la mortalità più elevata si registra nelle persone più anziane.
La letalità media del virus dell’influenza aviaria H5N1 (OMS)
• Il livello generale più elevato di mortalità si è raggiunto nel 2004 con il 73%
• Durante gli ultimi tre anni, l’incidenza di mortalità ha raggiunto il picco nel corso del periodo inverno-primavera dell’emisfero nord
DIAGNOSIS
• Clinical, gross amd microscopic findings
• Laboratory diagnosis
Meat-type and breeder turkeys
Before 1999
• We known H6 and H9 in turkeys • Respiratory signs• Inactivated vaccines
H7N1 LPAI1999 Year
Low pathogenicity avian influenza (LPAI)
Clinical findings• Mortality rates ranging from 5 to 97%
• Depending of the age, on a series of environmental factors (temperature,ventilation,hygienic conditions) and the presence of infectious agents
Low pathogenicity avian influenza (LPAI)
• During the fase acute of the disease, depression,ruffled feathers and congiuntivitis
• Swelling of infraorbital sinuses with caseous clots
• Egg production dropped from 30 to 80%
Swelling of infraorbital sinuses
Low pathogenicity avian influenza (LPAI
• Swelling of infraorbital sinuses with caseous clots
Low pathogenicity avian influenza (LPAI
Haemorrhagic tracheitis
Lungs congested and haemorragic
H7N1 HPAI 2000 Year
Severe depression in preagonic phase and dead birds on their back due to nervous signs and spastic contractions prior to death
Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI)
• In meat-type and breeder turkeys, 100% mortality 48-72 hours from the onset of the first clinical signs.
• Drop in food consumption and nervous signs
Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI)
• Post mortem findings
Haemorrhagic tracheitis with caseus clots
Pancreatitis and duodenitis
Necrosis of pancreas
Haemorrhages on the caecal tonsils
Polmonite acuta
Chicken
LPAI
Broilers and broilers breedersClinical findings
• In the majority of flocks, LPAI did not cause any clinical signs
• In a limited number of outbreaks was characterised by anorexia and mild respiratory signs, with low mortality, in the order of 2-3%
LPAI
• Post mortem findings
• Polmonary and tracheal congestion with cattarrhal tracheitis
• Ovarian follicles haemorrhagic and oedematous
LPAI
Caged layersClinical findings• Only 10-20%of the birds with loss of appetite and
depression, with very mild respiratory signs and congestion of combs
• Drop in egg from 2 to 10% until 30%• Mortality between 0.5 and 2%
LPAI
• Post mortem findings
• The lungs and tracheas were congested
• The ovary and oviduct edematous and haemorrhagic
Lungs and trachea congested
HPAI
• Chickens reared on litter• Clinical findings• 100% mortality 48-96 h.from the onset of the
first clinical signs• Anorexia, depression and cessation of egg-
laying were followed by complete reluctance to move and tremors of the head and paralysis of the wing and legs
HPAI
• Caged layers• Clinical findings• The disease moved more slowly within the
flock• Sonnolence, cessation of egg-laying and
feed consumption.• Cianotic coombs with tremors of the head
HPAI
• Post-mortem findings
• Pancreatitis, caecal tonsils haemorrhagic• Internal organs appeared congested• Urate deposits in the kidney
Duck and goose
HPAI
Clinical findings• Incoordination and tremors and mortality 50-
60%
Post mortem findings• Pancreatic lesions• Heart congested• Duodenum congested
Japanese quail(coturnix coturnix japonica)
HPAI
• Severe respiratory condition, prostration and diarrhoa
• Nervous signs with torticollis and opistothonus
• High mortality
Ostrich (struthio camelus)
Ostrich (struthio camelus)
• Clinical signs were observed only in juvenile (7-9 months of age)
• anorexia, depression• Feed consuption dropped• Nervous signs• haemorrhagic faeces• Mortality 1-20%
H7N3 LHAI 2002 year
Laboratory diagnosis
A presumptive diagnosis can be made by
• Detecting antibodies
A definitive diagnosis of AI is established by:
1. Direct detection of AI viral proteins or genes in specimens such as tissues, swab, cellculture or embryonating eggs
2. Isolation and identification of AI virus
Sample selection and storage
• Tracheal and cloacal swabs or tissues collected
• If the samples can be tested within 48h. After collection they may be kept at 4°C; if over 48-72 h., storage at -70°C
Direct detection of AI viral protein or Nucleic acid
• Antigen capture ELISA to detect viral antigens in samples
Elisa sandwich virologicaCon Mab anti NPA (HB65)
Direct detection of AI viral protein or Nucleic acid
• a human influenza test (Directigen Becton-Dickinsos) used to detect influenza viral antigen
• This antigen capture enzyme immunoassay was found to be specific and sensitive in tracheal swabs
KIT IMMUNOENZIMATICO
Kit immunoenzimatico
Tamponi ed estratti d’organo per kit rapido
Commercial Rapid Ag Tests
• Advantages • 1. Rapid• 2. User-friendly• 3. On farm test
• Disadvantages• 1. Very high cost• 2. Poor sensitivity
Direct detection of AI viral protein or Nucleic acid
• Polymerase chain reaction methods used are more sensitive than virus isolation procedures
RT-PCRRT-PCR
H7H5 M
M ctrl+ 1 2 3 4 Ctrl-
H5+ H7+
Metodo identificativo del genoma virale
PCR-Real Time
Quantitative real time PCRQuantitative real time PCR
Allows detection of the amplicon as it Allows detection of the amplicon as it accumulates by measuring light emission accumulates by measuring light emission via a specific probe. This light emission is via a specific probe. This light emission is linked to amplicon productionlinked to amplicon production
PCR
• Advantages
Sensitivity/ specifity Rapid test
• Disadvantages
• High cost
Virus isolation
• Chicken embryos,10-11 days old,inoculated via the allantoic cavity
Virus isolation
• The presence of virus is demostrated by chicken erythrocyte haemagglutinating activity (HA) in the allantoic fluid
Virus isolation
• Plaque assay on cell monolayers (MDCK)
MDCKMadin Darby Canine
Kidney Cells
Virus identification
• 1) H.I. assay against NDV and other paramixo
Virus identification
• 2) Double immunodiffusion test AGP to dectect the type-specific NP and matrix proteins
Virus identification
• 3) ELISA with monoclonal antibodies reacts with the nucleoprotein or matrix proteins
Virus identification
• 4) The next spet is to determine the antigenic subtype of the surface antigens: HA and NA
• The HA is identified in the HI test using a panel of antisera prepared against the distinct HAs
VIRUS ISOLATION
• Disadvantages
No rapid Cost
• Advantages
• Virus isolation is important for patogenicity studies
Serology
Specific antibodies detect as earlyas seven days after infection
Serology
• In serological surveillance programs:
• A) AGP test is used for the detection of anti-NP antibodies
• Group specific
Serology
• B) ELISA assays have been developed to detect antibodies AI virus
Serology
• C ) Once influenza is detected by AGP or ELISA, HI test and ELISA with Mabs can be used to determine the HA subtype
• Subtype specific
Paolo Cordioli
Top Related