Nevo New Formula

download Nevo New Formula

of 4

Transcript of Nevo New Formula

  • 8/3/2019 Nevo New Formula

    1/4

    A NEW FORMULA FOR THE NATURAL LOGARITHM OF A

    NATURAL NUMBER

    SHAHAR NEVO

    Abstract. For every natural number T, we write Ln T as a series, generalizing the

    known series for Ln 2.

    1. Introduction

    The Euler-Mascheroni constant , [1, p. 18], is given by the limit

    (1) = limn

    An,

    where for every n 1, An := 1 + 12 + + 1n Ln n. An elementary way to show theconvergence of{An}n=1 is to consider the series

    n=0(An+1An). (Here A0 := 0.) Indeed,by Lagranges Mean Value Theorem, there exists for every n 1 a number n, 0 < n < 1such that

    An+1 An = 1n + 1

    Ln(n + 1) + Ln n = 1n + 1

    1n + n

    =n 1

    (n + 1)(n + n),

    and thus 0 > An+1 An > 1n(n+1) and the series converges to some limit .

    2. The new formula

    Let T 2 be an integer. We have

    (2) AnT =n1k=0

    Tj=1

    1

    kT + j Ln(nT)

    n.

    By subtracting (1) from (2) and using Ln(nT) = Ln n + Ln T, we get

    n1k=0

    Tj=1

    1

    kT + j 1

    k + 1 n Ln T,

    that is,

    (3) Ln T =k=0

    1

    kT + 1+

    1

    kT + 2+ + 1

    kT + (T 1) (T 1)kT + T

    .

    We observe that (3) generalizes the formula Ln 2 = 1 12

    + 13 1

    4+ . . . .

    2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 26A09, 40A05, 40A30.

    This research is part of the European Science Foundation Networking Programme HCAA..

    1

  • 8/3/2019 Nevo New Formula

    2/4

    2 SHAHAR NEVO

    We can write (3) also as

    (4) Ln T =

    1 +

    1

    2+

    1

    3+ + 1

    T 1

    +

    1

    T + 1+

    1

    T + 2+ + 1

    2T 1

    2

    + . . .

    and this gives Ln T as a rearrangement of the conditionally convergent series 11+ 12 1

    2+

    13 1

    3+ . . . . The formula (4) holds also for T = 1. Formulas (3) and (4) can be applied also

    to introduce Ln Q as a series for any positive rational Q = ML

    since Ln ML

    = Ln MLn L.Now, for any k 0, the nominators of the k-th element in (3) are the same and their

    sum is 0. This fact is not random. For every constant a1, a2, . . . aT, the sum

    (5) ST(a1, . . . , aT) :=

    k=0

    a1kT + 1 +

    a2

    kT + 2 + +aT

    (k + 1)T

    converges if and only a1 + a2 + + aT = 0. This follows by comparison to the series

    k=11k2

    < . By (3) and the notation (5), Ln T = ST(1, 1, . . . , 1, T 1).For T 2, let us denote by (T) the collection of all sums of rational series of type

    (5), i.e.,

    (T) = ST(a1, . . . , aT) : ai Q, 1 i T, a1 + + aT = 0.The collection (T) is a linear space of real numbers over Q (or over the field of algebraicnumbers if we would define (T) to be with algebraic coefficients instead of rationalcoefficients), and dim (T) T 1. A spanning set of T 1 elements of (T) is

    ST(1,1, 0, 0, . . . , 0), ST(0, 1,1, 0, 0, . . . , 0), . . . , S T(0, . . . , 0, 1,1)

    .

    Also, if T is not a prime number, then dim (T) < T

    1. If Q = M

    Lis a positive

    rational number and P1, P2, . . . , P k are all the prime factors of M and L together, thenLn Q (P1P2 . . . P k).

    We can get a non-trivial series for x = 0: Ln 4 = 2 Ln 2 = S2(2,2) = S4(2,2, 2,2),and also Ln(4) = S4(1, 1, 1,3). Hence

    0 = S4(2,2, 2,2) S4(1, 1, 1 3) = S4(1,3, 1, 1)

    =

    1

    1 3

    2+

    1

    3+

    1

    4

    +

    1

    5 3

    6+

    1

    7+

    1

    8

    + . . . .

  • 8/3/2019 Nevo New Formula

    3/4

    THE NATURAL LOGARITHM OF A NATURAL NUMBER 3

    3. The integral approach

    The formula (3) can as well be deduced in the following way.

    Ln T = limx1

    Ln(1 + x +

    + xT1) = lim

    x1Ln

    1 xT

    1 x = lim

    x1(Ln(1 xT) Ln(1 x)) = lim

    x1

    x0

    T uT1

    uT 1 +1

    1 u

    du

    = limx1

    x0

    T uT1 (1 + u + + uT1)uT 1 du

    = limx1

    x0

    1 u u2 uT2 + (T 1)uT1uT 1 du

    = limx1

    1 x0

    u 1uT 1du + 2

    x0

    u2 uuT 1du + 3

    x0

    u3 u2uT 1 du + . . .

    + (T 2) x0

    uT2

    uT3

    uT 1 du + (T 1)x0

    uT1

    uT2

    uT 1 du

    .(6)

    For every 1 j T 1,

    limx1

    x0

    uj uj1uT 1 du = limx1

    x0

    uj1

    k=0

    ukT ujk=0

    ukT

    du

    = limx1

    x0

    k=0

    ukT+j1 k=0

    ukT+j

    du = limx1

    k=0

    xkT+j

    kT + j x

    kT+j+1

    kT + j + 1

    .

    The series in the last expression converges at x = 1, and thus it defines a continuousfunction in [0, 1] and so the limit is

    (7)

    10

    uj uj1uT 1 du =

    k=0

    1

    kT + j 1

    kT + j + 1

    = ST(0, . . . , 0,

    j

    1,1, 0, . . . , 0).

    By (6), we now get that

    Ln T =k=0

    1

    kT + 1 1

    kT + 2

    + 2

    k=0

    1

    kT + 2 1

    kT + 3

    + . . .

    + (T 2)k=0

    1kT + T 1

    1

    kT + T 1+ (T 1)k=0

    1kT + T 1

    1

    (k + 1)T

    =k=0

    1

    kT + 1+

    1

    kT + 2+ + 1

    kT + T 1 (T 1)

    (k + 1)T

    ,

    and this is formula (3).

    If we put T = 3, j = 1 into (7), we get that

    (8)

    10

    u 1u3 1du =

    k=0

    1

    3k + 1 1

    3k + 2

    = S3(1,1, 0).

  • 8/3/2019 Nevo New Formula

    4/4

    4 SHAHAR NEVO

    On the other hand, u 1

    u3 1 du =2

    3arctan

    2u + 1

    3

    ,

    and together with (8), this gives

    23

    arctan3 arctan

    13

    = S3(1,1, 0)or

    = 3

    3 S3(1,1, 0) = 3

    3

    1

    1 1

    2

    +

    1

    4 1

    5

    +

    1

    7 1

    8

    + . . .

    .

    This formula can also be deduced from Eulers formula [1, pp. 109,283].

    We can also arrive at a formula of as follows:

    arctan x =

    dx

    x2 + 1=

    x2 1x4 1dx =

    x2 xx4 1 dx +

    x 1

    x4 1 dx.Thus

    4=

    1

    0

    arctan xdx =

    1

    0

    x2 xx4 1 dx +

    1

    0

    x 1x4 1dx

    (7)= S4(0, 1,1, 0) + S4(1,1, 0, 0) = S4(1, 0,1, 0).

    We then get the well-known formula

    = 4

    1 1

    3+

    1

    5 1

    7+ . . .

    .

    By exploiting similarly suitable integrals with denominator xT1 for larger values ofT, wecan find corresponding formulas for as a member of (T) (with algebraic coefficients).

    It is an interesting question whether belongs to (2). Since dim (2) = 1, it occurs ifand only if Ln2

    is an algebraic number.

    References

    1. P. Eymard and J.-P. Lafon, The Number , Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2004.

    Bar-Ilan University, Department of Mathematics, Ramat-Gan 52900, Israel

    E-mail address: [email protected]