Innovazione sociale e generatività sociale Verso una nuova forma di legame sociale
-
Upload
iris-network -
Category
Economy & Finance
-
view
414 -
download
3
Transcript of Innovazione sociale e generatività sociale Verso una nuova forma di legame sociale
Innovazione sociale e
generatività sociale
Verso una nuova forma di legame sociale
Davide Lampugnani
1
Quattro approcci, più uno
SISTEMICO PRAGMATICO MANAGERIALE CRITICO GENERATIVITÀ SOCIALE
Waterloo Institute for
Social Innovation
and Resilience (Canada)
Nesta; The Young
Foundation (UK)
Center For Social
Innovation (Stanford Graduate School of
Business, USA)
/ ARC (Center for the
Anthropology of Religion and
Cultural Change,
Università Cattolica)
Frances Westley &
Nino Antadze
Geoff Mulgan James A. Phills, Kriss
Deiglmeier & Dale T. Miller
Frank Moulaert
Mauro Magatti
2
Approccio sistemico
“Social innovation is a complex process of introducing new products, processes or
programs that profoundly change the basic routines, resource and authority flows or beliefs of the social system in which the innovation occurs. Such succesfull social innovations have durability and broad
impact” (Westley & Antadze, 2010, p. 2)
3
Approccio pragmatico
“Our interest is in innovations that are social both in their ends and in their means. Specifically, we
define social innovations as new ideas (products, services and models) that simultaneously meet
social needs and create new social relationships or collaborations.
In other words, they are innovations that are both good for society and enhance society’s capacity
to act” (Murray et al., 2010, p. 3).
4
Approccio manageriale
“We define social innovation to mean: a novel solution to a social problem that is more
effective, efficient, sustainable or just than existing solutions and for which the value created accrues primarily to society as a whole rather than private individuals”
(Phills et al., 2008, p. 36).
5
Approccio critico
“[We define] social innovation as the satisfaction of alienated human needs through the transformation of social
relations: transformations which ‘improve’ the governance systems that guide and regulate
the allocation of goods and services meant to satisfy those needs, and which establish new
governance structures and organizations” (Moulaert, 2009, p. 12).
6
Generatività sociale
“There is social generativity when: an entrepreneurial initiative, in the economic, social political or cultural sphere, brings something ‘new’ into
the world or restore/regenerate/recover something already existing;
in so doing it is able to offer an original, distinguishable and sustainable contribution to the surrounding social
context and to effectively and consciously promote the
capacitation of others, through direct empowerment or the indirect improvement of contextual conditions, as its ultimate end” (Cappelletti et al., forthcoming).
7
ASPETTI COMUNI
APPROCCIO
Sistemico Pragmatico Manageriale Critico Generatività
Innovazione
Introducing new products, processes or programs
New ideas (products, services and models)
A novel solution […] that is more effective, efficient, sustainable or just than existing solutions
/ An entrepreneurial initiative brings something new into the world or restore/regenerate/recover something already existing
Capacità di rispondere a
bisogni sociali
/ That simultaneously meet social needs
To a social problem
The satisfaction of alienated human needs
(It emerges as an answer to an external stimulus)
Capacità di trasformare le
relazioni sociali
That profoundly change the basic routines, resource and authority flows or beliefs. […]
And create new social relationships and collaborations. […]
For which the value created accrues primarily to society as a whole rather than private individuals.
through the transformation of social relations […]
to effectively and consciously promote the capacitation of others, through direct empowerment or the direct empowerment of contextual conditions
8
Quale trasformazione delle relazioni sociali?
9
APPROCCIO
Sistemico Pragmatico Manageriale Critico Generatività
Re-engaging vulnerable populations in our mainstream economic, social and cultural institutions, not just as recipients of services or “transfer entitlements” but as active participants and contributors, is, therefore, intimately tied to social-ecological resilience. […] Social innovation not only serves vulnerable populations, but is served by them in turn (2010, p. 5).
We are interested here in innovations that have also changed the balance of power – giving the relatively poor and powerless more control over their own lives and advancing social justice (Mulgan et al., 2006, p. 9). In other words, they are innovations that are both good for society and enhance society’s capacity to act (Murray et al., 2010, p. 3).
According to our definition, an innovation is truly social only if the balance is tilted toward social value—benefits to the public or to society as a whole—rather than private value—gains for entrepreneurs, investors, and ordinary (not disadvantaged) consumers (Phills et al., 2008, p. 39)
[…] transformations which ‘improve’ the governance systems that guide and regulate the allocation of goods and services meant to satisfy those needs, and which establish new governance structures and organizations (Moulaert, 2009, p. 12).
Social generativity is thus a dynamic social process which takes place in a variety of social organizations and groups whose basic effort is to challenge institutionalization […]. A result that can be pursued in a variety of ways: directly by developing others' capabilities; indirectly, either by creating contextual conditions suitable to the development of personal initiative, or by stimulating imitation and mobilization.
Conclusione
Se risulta esserci sufficiente accordo sia riguardo al significato del termine “innovazione” sia riguardo alla capacità dell’innovazione sociale di rispondere a “bisogni sociali” insoddisfatti; più ambivalente è, invece, il riferimento alla capacità dell’innovazione sociale di trasformare le relazioni sociali implicate nella risposta ad un particolare bisogno sociale.
10
Verso un legame sociale “capacitante”
Da un’analisi congiunta delle definizioni di “innovazione sociale” e della definizione di “generatività sociale” emerge la possibilità di individuare l’approccio delle capacità (capabilities)(Sen, 1992, 1999; Nussbaum, 2000, 2006) quale interlocutore attraverso cui meglio qualificare la trasformazione delle relazioni sociali.
In questo senso, l’innovazione sociale potrebbe essere definita non solo come la capacità di rispondere in modo innovativo a un bisogno sociale ma anche come la capacità di trasformare le relazioni sociali alla base di quel bisogno in senso capacitante, cioè attribuendo (direttamente o indirettamente) delle capacità di essere o di agire ai beneficiari dell’innovazione stessa.
11
Riferimenti bibliografici
• Cappelletti, P., Gherardi, L., Giaccardi, C., Magatti, M., Martinelli, M. (di prossima pubblicazione) Social generativity: an open-ended social process. In Studies in social generativity.
• Moulaert, F. (2009). Social innovation: institutionally embedded, tereritorially (re)produced. In MacCallum, Moulaert, Hillier, Vicari Haddock (a cura di) (2009) Social innovation and territorial development, pp. 11-24.
• Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J., Mulgan, G. (2010). The open book of social innovation. The Young Foundation.
• Nussbaum, M. C. (2000). Women and human development : the capabilities approach. Cambridge University Press.
• Nussbaum, M. C. (2006). Frontiers of justice: disability, nationality, species membership. Harvard University Press.
• Phills, J. A., Deiglmeier, K., Miller, D. T. (2008). Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review.
• Sen, A. (1992). Inequality reexamined. Harvard University Press. • Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Knopf. • Westley F., Antadze N. (2010). Making a difference: strategies for scaling social
innovation for greater impact. The Innovation Journal: the Public Sector Innovation Journal, 15(2).
13