Advanced Biofuels Conference · 2018. 9. 21. · § Clariant § St1 Nordic Oy § Stena § Scania §...

20
Outlook on technology development and sustainability of biofuels Name: Patrik Klintbom, ETIP Bioenergy Chair Date: 20 th September 2018 Advanced Biofuels Conference

Transcript of Advanced Biofuels Conference · 2018. 9. 21. · § Clariant § St1 Nordic Oy § Stena § Scania §...

  • NOTA: Per modificare l'immagine su questa diapositiva, selezionarla ed eliminarla. Fare quindi clic sull'icona delle Immagini nel segnaposto per inserire l'immagine personale.

    Outlook on technology development and sustainability of biofuels

    Name: Patrik Klintbom, ETIP Bioenergy Chair

    Date: 20th September 2018

    Advanced Biofuels Conference

  • The European Technology and Innovation Platform Bioenergy…

    §  Bases on the European Commission’s Energy Union strategy §  Is a continuation of §  the European Biofuels Technology Platform (EBTP, launched 2006)

    and

    §  the European Industrial Bioenergy Initiative (EIBI, launched 2010)

    §  Established in April 2016

    2

  • ETIP Bioenergy has the role…

    3

    §  to bring together relevant actors from academia, industry and civil society engaged in the development of sustainable bioenergy and competitive biofuel technologies

    §  to represent the unbiased, united, and consolidated view of the renewable fuels and bioenergy industry in Europe

    §  to act as the main interlocutor for DG RTD to implement the Strategic Energy Technology Plan in the field of renewable fuels and bioenergy (Action 8)

  • ETIP Bioenergy Mission

    4

    §  to develop cost-competitive world-class bioenergy and renewable fuel value chains,

    §  to create a healthy bioenergy industry with well articulated goals as well as links to societal challenges and industrial transformation,

    §  to accelerate the sustainable deployment of renewable fuels and bioenergy in the EU,

    §  to promote knowledge based research, technology development and demonstration in the field of bioenergy and renewable fuels, and

    §  to assist in joint coordination of research and technology development for low carbon technologies

  • Organisation of ETIP Bioenergy

    5

  • Stakeholders of the ETIP Bioenergy

    6

  • Stakeholders of the ETIP Bioenergy

    7

    §  Institute of Industrial Organic Chemistry, Warsaw

    §  EuropaBio/SusChem

    §  European Biodiesel Board

    §  Bellona

    §  Ørsted

    §  SAFRAN Group

    §  Finnish Forestry Industries Federation

    §  Neste

    §  Fossil Free Fuel Centre

    §  IFPEn

    §  Volvo Technology Corporation

    §  SINTEF

    §  Pannonia Ethanol

    §  FZ Jülich/RWTH Aachen

    §  Wageningen Research

    §  ETIP RHC-Biomass

    §  EERA Bioenergy Joint Programme

    §  DI Energi

    §  BTG World

    §  Verbio

    §  E.ON Sweden

    §  Clariant

    §  St1 Nordic Oy

    §  Stena

    §  Scania

    §  National Laboratory of Energy and Geology (LNEG)

    §  Novozymes

    §  Total

    §  UPM

    §  VTT

  • Strong cooperation with a variety of different stakeholders

    8

    §  The European Energy Research Alliance (EERA) Bioenergy Joint Program (JP)

    §  The ETIP Renewable Heating and Cooling (ETIP RHC) Biomass Panel§  Sustainable Transport Forum (STF) §  The ART-Fuels Forum

    §  ERA-Net Bioenergy and the BESTF project consortia

    §  ERIG - European Research Institute for Gas and Innovation (ERIG)§  The SET Plan Governance bodies and other ETIPs and ETPs involved

    in elaborating SET Plan Implementation Plans for Key Action 8 §  IEA Bioenergy

  • Current focus of the ETIP Bioenergy Working Groups

    9

    §  Working Group 1: Biomass availability §  Biomass potential & biofuel quality §  Good practices for biomass supply and logistics §  Biofuels from marginal land §  Biomass supply cost §  Certification & standardisation

    §  Working Group 2: Conversion processes

    §  Thermochemical and chemical conversion

    §  Biochemical conversion

    §  Integration of biorefineries and bioenergy

  • Current focus of the ETIP Bioenergy Working Groups

    10

    §  Working Group 3: End Use

    §  Fuel properties and the actual requirements of the engines

    §  Understanding the interactions of fuel and engine, and when applied, exhaust after-treatment as well, thereby enabling co-optimisation of all elements in the system

    §  Working Group 4: Policy and Sustainability

    §  Revision of the Renewable Energy Directive and position of ETIP Bioenergy (REDII)

    §  Contribute to the discussion on biomass sustainability criteria and schemes, for solid biomass and liquid/gaseous biofuels, in the context of RED II and otherwise

    §  Implementation Plan for the SET-Plan Key Action 8 (Cross-cutting issue)

  • TheStrategicResearchandInnova3onAgenda

    §  Presents the most significant recent evolutions with relevance to the advancement of biofuels and bioenergy technologies and policies

    §  Highlights the corresponding research, development and demonstration activities and priorities for the next decades necessary to achieve long-term bioenergy policy goals

    §  Identifies the potential for biofuels and bioenergy technologies to contribute to the decarbonisiation of the current energy system and in particular the transport sector

    §  Brings together knowledge and expertise of a diversity of stakeholders (research und development, industry, NGOs)

  • SRIA 2016: statements still valid in 2018?

    §  Uncertainties and fragmentation of policies §  Volatile prices – mineral oil and biomass §  Policy shift from biofuels to decarbonization of transport sector §  A number of mature technologies for advanced biofuels - move from R&D to deployment §  Holistic view required – value chains, transport systems, sustainability, end markets §  The 2018 update is in its final steps of approval

    2010

    2018

    2016

  • Relevant developments for the SRIA 2018

    13

    §  Political framework post 2020: (Energy Union governance, RED II) §  Fossil energy prices: Continue to be low §  Biomass sustainability discussion: Ongoing and far from consensus §  Project/company failures since 2016 – but also successful pilots/demos §  Broadened scope of ETIP Bioenergy §  Significant need for bioenergy in most energy scenarios for 2030/2060 §  Market integration electricity/heating&cooling/transport §  Transport sector key market (aviation, maritime, heavy duty road) §  More prominence for gaseous fuels in public discussion §  Increasing market shares of other RES- integration crucial §  Considerable R&I investments (e.g. EU H2020 advanced bioenergy: 350 M€)

    §  Recommendations by other organisations/initiatives: IEA Bioenergy Roadmap, IRENA, EC ECORYS Study, SET-Plan TWG8, EERA, SGAB Technology Status Report

  • Key messages

    § Policies, market regulations and financing are constant issues to bring advanced biofuels and bioenergy to the market

    § Challenge of societal acceptance § Key criteria for economic viability: ideal locations / infrastructure, secure

    market for products and long-term raw material supply

    § Biomass supply and mobilisation is of paramount importance for biofuels/bioenergy to succeed at larger scale

    § “Agreeable corridor“ of sustainable global bioenergy use until 2030, e.g. 70 –90 EJ? (Fritsche 2018, based on IEA Roadmap)

    14

  • Key messages

    § There is no one-fits all situation as each biofuel/bioenergy plant requires its own specific plant design

    § Synergies with existing industrial production facilities deserve priority R&D attention, both for biofuels and other products

    § The key priorities for biofuel technologies are to improve environmental (GHG, energy balance, water, inputs…) and economic performance and bring flexibility as integrated biorefineries

    § Work to ensure a fair appreciation of CO2 emissions of vehicles running on biofuels (well-to-wheel approach, electric vehicles and vehicles running on renewable fuel should be treated using equal criteria)

    § Understanding the ‘best fit’ of alternatives in the various sectors of transport

    15

  • SET Plan Action 8 §  Bioenergy and Renewable Fuels for Sustainable Transport

    §  SET Plan has 10 Key Actions, under them 14 Implementation Plans (IPs)

    §  Temporary Working Groups (TWGs) prepare IPs ([½.]...1…1 ½ years)

    §  IPs are all individuals; same hat does not fit all

    §  After endorsement of IPs the real work starts; execution/enforcement of IPs §  Monitoring and disseminating activities progress and results (JRC) §  Post-endorsement: workshops for stakeholders, co-operation etc. §  ETIPs have strong role §  NOTE: SET Plan or Actions/IPs don’t have extra funding. All done with

    existing & future resources (EU, national, private) §  Not closed club: can join in (and step out) – but no free lunch…

    §  So far 11 IPs have been endorsed by the SET-Plan Steering Group (SG) including action 8 in June 2018

    16

  • 17

  • SET Plan Action 8

    18

    The structure of Action 8 is two-part: 1)  bioenergy for heating and cooling and 2)  renewable fuels for sustainable transport.

    §  The renewable transport is not only liquid biofuels but also biogas and hydrogen / fuel cells etc. NOTE: EVs not here!

    §  The Action 8 IP is prepared by a TWG: about 30 stakeholders and country representatives §  The IP covers and recalls the earlier set priorities and targets and overview the R&I

    activities. §  “The goal of the IP is to translate SET-Plan key actions into specific recommendations for

    R&I actions and/or policy measures related to innovation, identifying strategy and actions that need to be implemented to reach targets set in the Declaration of Intent (DoI), coordinating R&I activities and stimulate joint actions by funding actors, also considering international cooperation. “

    §  The estimated investment volume, to be provided by stakeholders, Member States and European Commission, amounts to 107 billion €

    §  All the energy technologies have different kind of barriers and obstacles, like public acceptance, high prices compared to common, fossil based solution and sustainability questions etc.

    §  These are all relevant, but in SET Plan it is question of technology development. Many bioenergy-related issues are in RED II etc.

  • RED II and SET-Plan targets

    §  The updated SET Plan puts very challenging targets for the specific cost, conversion efficiency and the overall installed capacity of advanced biofuels in 2030.

    §  The challenge to meet the RED II and the SET Plan targets, respectively, is to set the conditions to proceed with the available and more developed (higher TRL) advanced biofuel technologies into demonstrations and industrial deployment early in the next decade to achieve the build-up of capacity required by any of the targets discussed.

    §  Coordinated actions and cooperation is key

    §  No excuse to sit and wait…

    19

  • THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION