Plato’s Cave and The Matrix

8
Plato’s Cave and The Matrix 1. Obiettivi 2. Attività 3. Calendario 4. Setting Tecnologico 5. Ruoli 6. Valutazione A cura di Raffaele Nardella

description

Plato’s Cave and The Matrix. Obiettivi Attività Calendario Setting Tecnologico Ruoli Valutazione. A cura di Raffaele Nardella. Obiettivi del Progetto. Analizzare il film “The Matrix” per rintracciare elementi filosofici legati al mito della caverna di Platone - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Plato’s Cave and The Matrix

Page 1: Plato’s Cave and The Matrix

Plato’s Cave and The Matrix

1. Obiettivi2. Attività3. Calendario4. Setting Tecnologico5. Ruoli6. Valutazione

A cura di Raffaele Nardella

Page 2: Plato’s Cave and The Matrix

Obiettivi del Progetto Analizzare il film “The Matrix” per rintracciare elementi filosofici legati al mito della caverna di Platone Apprendere il lessico legato al mondo della cinematografia Progettare, creare e presentare un lavoro multimediale che dimostri il legame tra il film e il mito A cura di Raffaele Nardella

Page 3: Plato’s Cave and The Matrix

Attività1. Visione del film “The Matrix”2. Attività linguistiche online tramite

l’utilizzo dell’attività didattica “Cinema”

3. Ricerca sulla rete di materiali utili alla realizzazione del lavoro multimediale

4. Creazione della presentazione in Power Point sul legame tra il film e il mito

5. Presentazione del lavoroA cura di Raffaele Nardella

Page 4: Plato’s Cave and The Matrix

Prerequisiti Saper utilizzare software per l’elaborazione di testi per l’elaborazione di immagini e video per la creazione di presentazioni

multimediali Avere a disposizione a casa un computer collegato ad Internet

A cura di Raffaele Nardella

Page 5: Plato’s Cave and The Matrix

CalendarioAttività 1 dal 7 al 12 Marzo

Attività 2 dal 14 al 16 Marzo

Attività 3 + 4 dal 19 Marzo al 16 Aprile

Attività 5 dal 23 Aprile al 2 Maggio

A cura di Raffaele Nardella

Page 6: Plato’s Cave and The Matrix

Setting Tecnologico Hardware: Computer presso il Lab Multimediale

e presso casa degli studenti ScannerSoftware: Internet Browser Power Point Programma trattamento immagini e

videoA cura di Raffaele Nardella

Page 7: Plato’s Cave and The Matrix

Ruoli Costituire un gruppo di lavoro (max 3 persone) Ricercare e valutare i materiali proposti (film, siti web, materiale cartaceo, ecc) Progettare la presentazione (Word) Realizzare la presentazione (Power Point) Presentare il lavoro ultimato

A cura di Raffaele Nardella

Page 8: Plato’s Cave and The Matrix

Valutazione Rubrica

CATEGORY 4 3 2 1

Presentation

Well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention.

Rehearsed with fairly smooth delivery that holds audience attention most of the time.

Delivery not smooth, but able to maintain interest of the audience most of the time.

Delivery not smooth and audience attention often lost.

Sources

Source information collected for all graphics, facts and quotes. All documented in desired format.

Source information collected for all graphics, facts and quotes. Most documented in desired format.

Source information collected for graphics, facts and quotes, but not documented in desired format.

Very little or no source information was collected.

Attractiveness

Makes excellent use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance the presentation.

Makes good use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance to presentation.

Makes use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. but occasionally these detract from the presentation content.

Use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. but these often distract from the presenation content.

Mechanics No misspellings or grammatical errors.

Three or fewer misspellings and/or mechanical errors.

Four misspellings and/or grammatical errors.

More than 4 errors in spelling or grammar.

Content

Covers topic in-depth with details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent.

Includes essential knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge appears to be good.

Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors.

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors.

Organization

Content is well organized using headings or bulleted lists to group related material.

Uses headings or bulleted lists to organize, but the overall organization of topics appears flawed.

Content is logically organized for the most part.

There was no clear or logical organizational structure, just lots of facts.

Oral Presentation

Interesting, well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention.

Relatively interesting, rehearsed with a fairly smooth delivery that usually holds audience attention.

Delivery not smooth, but able to hold audience attention most of the time.

Delivery not smooth and audience attention lost.

Originality

Product shows a large amount of original thought. Ideas are creative and inventive.

Product shows some original thought. Work shows new ideas and insights.

Uses other people's ideas (giving them credit), but there is little evidence of original thinking.

Uses other people's ideas, but does not give them credit.

Workload

The workload is divided and shared equally by all team members.

The workload is divided and shared fairly by all team members, though workloads may vary from person to person.

The workload was divided, but one person in the group is viewed as not doing his/her fair share of the work.

The workload was not divided OR several people in the group are viewed as not doing their fair share of the work.

A cura di Raffaele Nardella