Abscisic acid receptors and coreceptors modulate plant water … · 2019. 3. 18. · 81 water...

37
1 Short title: ABA signaling modulates plant water productivity 1 2 Abscisic acid receptors and coreceptors modulate plant water use efficiency and 3 water productivity 4 5 Authors: Zhenyu Yang 1,6 , Jinghui Liu 1,6 , Fabien Poree 2 , Rudi Schaeufele 3 , Hendrik Helmke 4 , Jens 6 Frackenpohl 4 , Stefan Lehr 4 , Pascal von Koskull-Döring 4 , Alexander Christmann 1 , Hans Schnyder 3 , Urs 7 Schmidhalter 5 , and Erwin Grill 1, * 8 9 1 Lehrstuhl für Botanik, Technische Universität München, Emil-Ramann-Str. 4, 85354 Freising, Germany. 10 2 Bayer SAS, Toxicology, Toxicology Research, 355, Rue Dostoievski, CS 90153 Valbonne, 06906 Sophia- 11 Antipolis Cedex, France. 12 3 Lehrstuhl für Grünlandlehre, Technische Universität München, Alte Akademie 12, 85354 Freising, 13 Germany. 14 4 Research & Development, Weed Control Research, Bayer AG, Division Crop Science, Industriepark 15 Höchst, 65926 Frankfurt am Main, Germany. 16 5 Lehrstuhl für Pflanzenernährung, Technische Universität München, Emil-Ramann-Straße 2, 85354 17 Freising, Germany. 18 6 These authors contributed equally to the article 19 20 *Corresponding Author Erwin Grill, [email protected] 21 22 One-sentence Summary: Abscisic acid signaling can be exploited for generating plants with improved 23 water use efficiency, which were found to be resilient to water availability and light intensity but 24 sensitive to heat. 25 Author Contributions 26 E.G., F.P, P.v.K., H.S., and U.S conceived different parts of the research; H.H, S.L., A.C. supervised the 27 experiments; Z.Y. and J.L performed most of the experiments with contributions of R.S. and J.F. and 28 analyzed the data; Z.Y. wrote the article with contributions of all the authors; E.G. supervised and 29 Plant Physiology Preview. Published on March 18, 2019, as DOI:10.1104/pp.18.01238 Copyright 2019 by the American Society of Plant Biologists https://plantphysiol.org Downloaded on December 28, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Transcript of Abscisic acid receptors and coreceptors modulate plant water … · 2019. 3. 18. · 81 water...

Page 1: Abscisic acid receptors and coreceptors modulate plant water … · 2019. 3. 18. · 81 water deficit by reducing transpiration (Munemasa et al., 2015), protecting photosynthesis

1

Short title: ABA signaling modulates plant water productivity 1

2

Abscisic acid receptors and coreceptors modulate plant water use efficiency and 3

water productivity 4

5

Authors: Zhenyu Yang1,6, Jinghui Liu1,6, Fabien Poree2, Rudi Schaeufele3, Hendrik Helmke4, Jens 6

Frackenpohl4, Stefan Lehr4, Pascal von Koskull-Döring4, Alexander Christmann1, Hans Schnyder3, Urs 7

Schmidhalter5, and Erwin Grill1,* 8

9

1 Lehrstuhl für Botanik, Technische Universität München, Emil-Ramann-Str. 4, 85354 Freising, Germany. 10

2 Bayer SAS, Toxicology, Toxicology Research, 355, Rue Dostoievski, CS 90153 Valbonne, 06906 Sophia-11

Antipolis Cedex, France. 12

3 Lehrstuhl für Grünlandlehre, Technische Universität München, Alte Akademie 12, 85354 Freising, 13

Germany. 14

4 Research & Development, Weed Control Research, Bayer AG, Division Crop Science, Industriepark 15

Höchst, 65926 Frankfurt am Main, Germany. 16

5 Lehrstuhl für Pflanzenernährung, Technische Universität München, Emil-Ramann-Straße 2, 85354 17

Freising, Germany. 18

6 These authors contributed equally to the article 19

20

*Corresponding Author Erwin Grill, [email protected] 21

22

One-sentence Summary: Abscisic acid signaling can be exploited for generating plants with improved 23

water use efficiency, which were found to be resilient to water availability and light intensity but 24

sensitive to heat. 25

Author Contributions 26

E.G., F.P, P.v.K., H.S., and U.S conceived different parts of the research; H.H, S.L., A.C. supervised the 27

experiments; Z.Y. and J.L performed most of the experiments with contributions of R.S. and J.F. and 28

analyzed the data; Z.Y. wrote the article with contributions of all the authors; E.G. supervised and 29

Plant Physiology Preview. Published on March 18, 2019, as DOI:10.1104/pp.18.01238

Copyright 2019 by the American Society of Plant Biologists

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 28, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Page 2: Abscisic acid receptors and coreceptors modulate plant water … · 2019. 3. 18. · 81 water deficit by reducing transpiration (Munemasa et al., 2015), protecting photosynthesis

2

completed the writing. E.G. agrees to serve as the author responsible for contact and ensures 30

communication. 31

Key words: Regulatory Components of ABA Receptors, Pyrabactin Resistance Protein1/PYR-like proteins, 32

clade A protein phosphatase of type 2C, drought, abscisic acid, water use efficiency 33

Abstract 34

Improving the water use efficiency (WUE) of crop plants without trade-offs in growth and yield is 35

considered a utopic goal. However, recent studies on model plants show that partial restriction of 36

transpiration can occur without a reduction in CO2 uptake and photosynthesis. In this study, we analyzed 37

the potentials and constraints of improving WUE in Arabidopsis thaliana and in wheat (Triticum aestivum 38

L.). We show that the analyzed Arabidopsis wild-type plants consume more water than is required for 39

unrestricted growth. WUE was enhanced without a growth penalty by modulating abscisic acid (ABA) 40

responses via either using overexpression of specific ABA receptors or deficiency of ABA coreceptors. 41

Hence, the plants showed higher water productivity compared to wild-type plants, i.e. equal growth with 42

less water. The high WUE trait was resilient to changes in light intensity and water availability but was 43

sensitive to the ambient temperature. ABA application to plants generated a partial phenocopy of the 44

water-productivity trait. ABA application, however, was never as effective as genetic modification in 45

enhancing water productivity, probably because ABA indiscriminately targets all ABA receptors. ABA 46

agonists selective for individual ABA receptors might offer an approach to phenocopy the water-47

productivity trait of the high WUE lines. ABA application to wheat grown under near-field conditions 48

improved WUE without detectable growth trade-offs. Wheat yields are heavily impacted by water deficit 49

and our identification of this crop as a promising target for WUE improvement may help contribute to 50

greater food security. 51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

61

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 28, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Page 3: Abscisic acid receptors and coreceptors modulate plant water … · 2019. 3. 18. · 81 water deficit by reducing transpiration (Munemasa et al., 2015), protecting photosynthesis

3

62

63

64

Introduction 65

Plant growth requires the fixation of CO2, which diffuses from the atmosphere into leaf chloroplasts. The 66

influx of CO2 shares the stomatal diffusion pathway with the efflux of water vapor (Farquhar et al., 1989; 67

Franks et al., 2013), which results in an inevitable water loss during CO2 uptake. Terrestrial gross 68

photosynthesis captures approximately 440 gigatons annually. Conversely, an estimated 62 megatons of 69

water are annually released into the atmosphere by plants, mostly via stomatal transpiration 70

(Hetherington and Woodward, 2003). The plant-driven mobilization of water from the soil to the 71

atmosphere accounts for up to 80% of continental evapotranspiration (Jasechko et al., 2013). The large 72

demand of plants for water imposes a world-wide challenge on fresh water resources for food and feed 73

production. Current use of groundwater by agriculture is not sustainable and exacerbates the gradual 74

depletion of groundwater tables (Wada et al., 2010). Hence, agriculture is facing a major challenge to 75

provide yield stability and food security under limiting and depleted fresh water resources. Crops more 76

resilient against water deficit and more efficient in their water use are urgently needed (Blum, 2005; 77

Morison et al., 2008; Hall and Richards, 2013). However, progress towards these goals has been slow, 78

even though there are numerous claims of engineered drought resistance in plants (Nuccio et al., 2018). 79

The phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA) is a key signaling molecule that mediates acclimation of plants to 80

water deficit by reducing transpiration (Munemasa et al., 2015), protecting photosynthesis (Yang et al., 81

2006), and by triggering other metabolic adjustments, including the induction of stress proteins and 82

osmolytes (Finkelstein, 2013). As a consequence, fine-tuning and modulating ABA responses has the 83

promise to pre-adjust plants to drought by changes in both short-term and long-term physiology. 84

ABA regulates the protein phosphatase activity of receptor complexes consisting of the ABA-Binding 85

Regulatory Component (RCAR)/Pyrabactin Resistance 1-(like) (PYR1/PYL), sensu stricto the ABA receptor, 86

and an associated clade A protein phosphatase of type 2C (PP2C) whose interaction is stabilized by ABA 87

(Ma et al., 2009; Melcher et al., 2009; Miyazono et al., 2009; Park et al., 2009; Moreno-Alvero et al., 88

2017). In Arabidopsis thaliana there are fourteen RCARs and nine clade A PP2Cs proteins, which are able 89

to form more than 100 different functional binary receptor complexes (Fuchs et al., 2014; Tischer et al., 90

2017). ABA- and RCAR-mediated inactivation of the PP2C allows activation of OPEN STOMATA1 91

(OST1/SRK2E/SnRK2.6) and other related SnRK2 protein kinases to phosphorylate downstream targets 92

(Cutler et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2013). Primary targets are ion channels involved in stomatal closure 93

(Munemasa et al., 2015), aquaporin (Grondin et al., 2015), and ABA-responsive bZip transcription 94

factors, which are master regulators in the transcriptional ABA response network (Lumba et al., 2014; 95

Yoshida et al., 2014; Song et al., 2016). 96

Already decades ago, attempts were undertaken to enhance WUE and to confer drought resistance by 97

activating ABA responses. Foliar administration of ABA and ABA agonists resulted in higher WUE of 98

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 28, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Page 4: Abscisic acid receptors and coreceptors modulate plant water … · 2019. 3. 18. · 81 water deficit by reducing transpiration (Munemasa et al., 2015), protecting photosynthesis

4

barley (Hordeum vulgare) and wheat (Triticum sp.) (Mizrahi et al., 1974; Rademacher et al., 1987) and 99

increased ABA sensitivity improved the drought resistance of Arabidopsis and rapeseed (Brassica napus) 100

by downregulation of a farnesyltransferase (Pei et al., 1998; Wang et al., 2005). More recently, 101

application of ABA and ABA agonists (Okamoto et al., 2013; Park et al., 2015; Cao et al., 2017), ectopic 102

expression of ABA receptors (Santiago et al., 2009; González-Guzmán et al., 2014; Yang et al., 2016; Zhao 103

et al., 2016; Mosquna et al., 2011; Pizzio et al., 2013) and reduced expression of ABA coreceptors (Rubio 104

et al., 2009; Antoni et al., 2012) have been shown to minimize plant transpiration, and in several cases to 105

boost survival rates under severe water deficit. A plethora of ABA agonists (Wilen et al., 1993; Benson et 106

al., 2015; Vaidya et al., 2017; Frackenpohl et al., 2018a; Frackenpohl et al., 2018b; Nemoto et al., 2018) 107

and antagonists (Takeuchi et al., 2014; Ito et al., 2015; Rajagopalan et al., 2016; Ye et al., 2017) were 108

developed that allow the modulation of ABA responses. 109

Reducing stomatal aperture affects plant’s gas exchange and ultimately limits CO2 influx for 110

photosynthesis and growth. The diffusion of CO2 and water vapor across the stomatal pore is driven by 111

the differences in partial gas pressures. The intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) of plants is under 112

homeostatic control via regulation of stomatal conductance (gs) according to photosynthetic demand 113

(Franks et al., 2013). Hence, the ratio of net photosynthesis (An) to gs, referred to as intrinsic WUE (iWUE) 114

and equivalent to the CO2 gradient between the ambient CO2 level (Ca) and Ci at a given leaf-to-air water 115

vapor pressure deficit (VPD), is fairly constant for a plant at different light intensities and under well-116

watered conditions (Wong et al., 1979; Ubierna and Farquhar, 2014). Facing water deficit, plants are able 117

to sustain photosynthesis at lower Ci values and increase iWUE, i.e. CO2 influx per water unit becomes 118

more efficient at a given VPD. Lowering gs and Ci in response to water deficit imposes constraints on the 119

CO2 level in the chloroplasts and potentially increases photorespiration and reduces net photosynthesis 120

(Franks et al., 2013). The association of elevated iWUE and whole plant WUE with trade-offs in growth 121

and yield potential is well-known (Blum, 2005). 122

In different natural accessions of Arabidopsis, iWUE (An/gs) varied and higher iWUEs were associated 123

with reduced rates of net photosynthesis (Easlon et al., 2014). However, several reports show increased 124

iWUE in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), barley, and Arabidopsis without a reduction in photosynthesis 125

and growth by reducing stomatal density (Yoo et al., 2011; Franks et al., 2015; Hughes et al., 2017), and 126

aperture via stimulating ABA biosynthesis (Thompson et al., 2007) or signaling (Yang et al., 2016). These 127

plants have a moderately reduced gs and Ci without reduction in An and growth. The physiological basis 128

of the compensatory adjustments that sustain higher iWUE and growth are unknown but might involve 129

enhanced refixation of CO2 in roots and translocation to leaves (Hibberd and Quick, 2002), and induced 130

C4-metabolic enzymes in Arabidopsis under CO2 limitation (Li et al., 2014). Such plants consume less 131

water per biomass gain but the trait might inflict trade-offs including compromised evaporative cooling 132

and reduced thermo-tolerance, and growth penalties under higher light intensities. These potential 133

limitations are not investigated yet for those plant lines. In the ecosystem, reduced water consumption 134

of a high iWUE plant would save water and provide it to neighboring plants without a major advantage 135

for the water-efficient plant (Nicotra and Davidson, 2010). However, such a trait is expected to be 136

beneficial in crop fields by saving soil moisture and mitigating yield limitations by water deficit (Yang et 137

al., 2016). Our previous study demonstrated that overexpression of ABA receptor members from 138

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 28, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Page 5: Abscisic acid receptors and coreceptors modulate plant water … · 2019. 3. 18. · 81 water deficit by reducing transpiration (Munemasa et al., 2015), protecting photosynthesis

5

subfamily II, like RCAR6 and RCAR10, resulted in plants growing without trade-offs in the water-efficient 139

mode, which is normally induced by water deficit. These plants had increased WUE, higher water 140

productivity (increased WUE per time), and produced more biomass per unit of water under progressive 141

drought (Yang et al., 2016). In the current study, we compared transgenic Arabidopsis RCAR-142

overexpressing lines with Arabidopsis accessions for their efficiency of water use, and examined the 143

effect of temperature and higher photosynthetic irradiance on the WUE of a RCAR6-overexpressing line 144

(RCAR6 line). Arabidopsis mutants with a deficiency in ABA coreceptors, single and multiple, were 145

analyzed to identify which PP2Cs are potential targets for iWUE improvement. In addition, foliar 146

application of ABA was examined to increase WUE of Arabidopsis and wheat, and to explore the 147

possibility of conferring the iWUE trait of RCAR6 plants to a crop species. 148

149

Results 150

Growth and leaf surface temperatures among Arabidopsis accessions and ABA receptor lines 151

In natural Arabidopsis accessions, higher iWUE was associated with lower An (Easlon et al., 2014). 152

Reduction of An negatively impacts growth and biomass accumulation; however, several ABA receptor-153

overexpressing Arabidopsis lines (ABA receptor lines) had higher iWUE without reduced An and growth 154

(Yang et al., 2016). These lines revealed a strong positive correlation of growth capacity at elevated leaf 155

surface temperature, i.e. reduced transpiration, with WUE at the intrinsic, integrated (based on 13C 156

discrimination), or whole plant levels. We examined a limited number of Arabidopsis accessions to see if 157

variation in growth and transpiration occurs frequently by analyzing leaf temperature and increases in 158

leaf area as approximations for transpiration and biomass accumulation, respectively. Growth was 159

assessed over four weeks under well-watered conditions with a relative soil water content (SWC, v/v) ≥ 160

60% and a soil water potential Ψ≥ −0.08 MPa (Suppl. Fig. S1). Columbia (Col-0) and five other natural 161

accessions (Mr-0, Mt-0, Sorbo, Tu-0, and Ws-0) had similar leaf temperatures (22.7 °C ± 0.1 °C) with the 162

exceptions of Cvi-0 and Van-0, which had lower leaf temperatures by 1.3 °C ± 0.1 °C and 0.6 °C ± 0.1 °C, 163

respectively, compared to Col-0 (Fig. 1). Leaf rosette sizes of the natural accessions were similar or 164

somewhat smaller than Col-0, except for the outlier Cvi-0, which was severely impaired in growth. 165

Extending the analysis to 46 independently generated ABA receptor lines showed substantial variation in 166

growth and leaf temperature compared to the parental Col-0 plant (Fig. 1). Leaf temperatures 167

significantly higher than Col-0 (> 0.5 °C; P<0.01) were primarily found in plants overexpressing ABA 168

receptors of subfamily II. The average temperature increase was approximately 0.5 °C across all 39 169

analyzed subfamily II lines (inset in Fig. 1, representing 22 independent lines), while the mean leaf 170

temperature of subfamily III lines was close to the reference (+ 0.05 °C). Several subfamily I lines showed 171

significantly higher leaf temperatures with an average increase of 0.3 °C above Col-0. 172

The analysis indicates a boundary function between high leaf temperature and trade-offs in maximum 173

attainable growth. Close to or at the boundary line were RCAR8 lines with 1.8 °C higher leaf 174

temperatures associated with major growth reduction as well as RCAR6 and RCAR10 lines with leaf 175

rosette areas similar to Col-0 and about 1 °C elevated leaf temperatures. Among these plants were the 176

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 28, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Page 6: Abscisic acid receptors and coreceptors modulate plant water … · 2019. 3. 18. · 81 water deficit by reducing transpiration (Munemasa et al., 2015), protecting photosynthesis

6

previously characterized RCAR6-3 and RCAR10-4 water-productive lines, i.e. combining high WUE with 177

high growth performance (Yang et al., 2016). Crossing RCAR6-3 and RCAR10-4 and analyzing homozygous 178

plants revealed that pyramiding of the two RCAR expression cassettes did not further improve WUE 179

efficiency consistent with the boundary function (Suppl. Fig. S2). We conclude from the experiments that 180

none of the analyzed natural accessions grew at the optimal water use delineated by the boundary 181

function. Hence, the examined wild-type accessions probably can be improved in their iWUE, WUE, and 182

water productivity, similar to RCAR6 and RCAR10 lines compared to Col-0. 183

184

WUE of ABA-receptor lines under various environmental conditions 185

The enhanced transpiration efficiency of RCAR6-3 and RCAR10-4 lines was associated with An 186

comparable to Col-0 at well-watered conditions (Yang et al., 2016). To examine the robustness of the 187

improved iWUE trait at water limitations, plants were grown at different SWCs of approximately 60%, 188

40%, and 20% corresponding to no (Ψ≥ −0.08 MPa), mild (-0.1 MPa ≤ Ψ≤ −0.08 MPa), and moderate (-189

0.21 MPa ≤ Ψ≤ −0.1 MPa) water deficit, respectively (Suppl. Fig. S1, Fig. 2A-C). The growth of the RCAR6-190

3 lines as indicated by the increase in leaf area was comparable to Col-0, while the growth of RCAR10-4 191

was somewhat reduced, notably at 20% SWC (Fig. 2C). The plants responded to the imposed water 192

restriction at mild and moderate water deficit by increasing the leaf temperature (Fig. 2D). At 20% SWC, 193

leaf temperature was 0.9 °C and approximately 0.4 °C higher for Col-0 and the ABA receptor lines, 194

respectively, compared to the well-watered condition. The iWUE-improved lines had significantly higher 195

leaf temperatures compared to wild-type plants at all SWCs, indicating a reduced transpiration (Fig. 2D). 196

After five weeks of growth, water consumption of the RCAR6-3 and RCAR10-4 lines was about half that 197

of Col-0 at 60% and 40% SWC, and was reduced by 35% and 50% compared to Col-0 at 20% SWC, 198

respectively (Fig. 2E). The above-ground biomass of all lines was reduced at 20% SWC compared to the 199

well-watered and mild deficit conditions (Fig. 2E). The RCAR lines showed a tendency towards a growth 200

trade-off at 60% SWC and at 20% SWC, notably the RCAR10-4 line (Fig. 2E). The WUE of the ABA receptor 201

lines were, however, clearly higher in comparison to Col-0 by up to 90% at no or mild water restriction 202

(Fig. 2F). Hence, the RCAR lines produced more biomass per unit of transpired water and time, i.e. were 203

more water-productive than the parental plant, irrespective of the soil water availability. 204

Drought frequently occurs in combination with heat (Zandalinas et al., 2018). The combined effects of 205

drought and high ambient temperatures may offset the increased biomass and enhanced WUE found for 206

the ABA receptor lines. Temperature affects gas diffusion and VPD (Urban et al., 2017), and the reduced 207

transpirational cooling of RCAR lines might impair their performance under heat. To explore the impact 208

of temperature on the WUE and growth, the plants were grown at different ambient temperatures from 209

17-32 °C in 5 °C increments. Plantlets were exposed to a slowly increasing water deficit starting from 210

well-watered to terminal drought, which required 40-70 days depending on the temperature (Fig. 3). The 211

plants were kept in a vegetative state by short-day light conditions. At 17 °C, plant development was 212

retarded compared to plants grown at higher temperatures clearly visible after 18 days of growth (Fig. 213

3A,B). Leaf temperature of Col-0 at 17 °C was almost 3 °C higher than the ambient temperature but this 214

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 28, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Page 7: Abscisic acid receptors and coreceptors modulate plant water … · 2019. 3. 18. · 81 water deficit by reducing transpiration (Munemasa et al., 2015), protecting photosynthesis

7

difference decreased with increasing ambient temperature and became negative at 32 °C (Fig. 3C), 215

indicating the demand for enhanced transpirational cooling under heat. Both ABA receptor lines showed 216

higher leaf temperatures than Col-0 at all temperature regimes. At the end of the progressive drought 217

experiment, the available water was consumed (Fig. 3D) and the RCAR6-3 and RCAR10-4 lines acquired 218

approximately 40% more biomass than Col-0 grown at 22 °C (Fig. 3E). The gains were lower at 27 °C and 219

32 °C. Both temperatures led to a reduction in total biomass in all plants, and the WUE of Col-0 dropped 220

from 2.1 ± 0.1 g L-1 at 22 °C to 0.9 ± 0.1 g L-1 at 32 °C (Fig. 3F). The WUE benefit of the RCAR6-3 and 221

RCAR10-4 lines was lowered to 17% and 19% at 32 °C. At the cooler growth temperature of 17 °C, 222

however, the advantage in WUE of both RCAR lines was increased to 70 - 80% and more shoot biomass 223

was harvested compared to Col-0 (Fig. 3F). This analysis supports the notion that the ambient 224

temperature is a critical parameter for the iWUE trait of ABA receptor lines. The combination of drought 225

and heat compromises the WUE benefit of the RCAR lines. 226

As a next step, the photosynthetic CO2 demand was stimulated by increasing the photosynthetically-227

active radiation (PAR) from 0.15 to 0.5 mmol m-2 s-1 and growth of Col-0 and the RCAR6-3 line were 228

compared under well-watered conditions and at 21 °C ambient temperature. There was no significant 229

difference in accumulated biomass after 30 days of growth (Fig. 4A,B). The leaf surface temperature was 230

clearly elevated in the ABA receptor line (Fig. 4B) and analysis of leaf material for carbon isotope 231

discrimination and carbon-nitrogen ratios (Fig. 4C) corroborated a reduced transpiration by showing a 43% 232

higher integrated WUE for the RCAR6 line (Fig. 4D). Interestingly, there was the tendency of reduced 233

carbon-nitrogen ratios in the RCAR6 plants compared to Col-0 (Fig. 4C). 234

235

ABA co-receptors as targets for enhanced WUE and water productivity 236

The ABA receptors inhibit the PP2C activity of ABA coreceptors in concert with ABA. The PP2Cs targeted 237

by RCAR6 and RCAR10 and conferring the WUE trait are unknown. A systematic analysis of ABA 238

receptors revealed that both receptors are able to regulate all coreceptors, with the exception of ABA 239

Hypersensitive Germination1 (AHG1) (Tischer et al., 2017). Multiple deficiencies in ABA coreceptors can 240

reduce leaf transpiration, and triple mutants deficient in the PP2Cs Hypersensitive to ABA1 (HAB1), ABA 241

Insensitive1 (ABI1), and ABI2 or/and PP2CA/AHG3 were impaired in growth performance (Rubio et al., 242

2009; Antoni et al., 2013). To elucidate potential PP2C targets of RCAR6 and RCAR10 contributing to 243

enhanced WUE under well-watered conditions, Arabidopsis lines deficient in single ABA coreceptors 244

were analyzed for growth and leaf temperature. Leaf temperatures were only significantly (P<0.01) 245

higher for plants deficient in ABI1 (abi1) or ABI2 (abi2 (Fig. 5A,B, Suppl. Fig. S3A). Both mutants showed 246

no reduction in rosette leaf area compared to Col-0 after 48 days of growth (Fig. 5A,B), while 247

pp2ca/ahg3, ahg1 or hai1 (Highly ABA-induced1) to hai3 mutants were smaller than the parental line 248

and produced less above-ground biomass (Suppl. Fig. S3B-D). The double mutant abi1abi2 showed a leaf 249

temperature similar to that of the RCAR6 line and higher order combinations with hab1 or pp2ca 250

including the quadruple mutant abi1abi2hab1pp2ca resulted in even higher leaf surface temperatures 251

(Fig. 5C,D, Suppl. Fig. S4A). Other combinations of PP2C deficiency such as hab1hab2 or abi1hab1pp2ca 252

mutants resulted in no or increased leaf temperatures compared to Col-0, respectively (Suppl. Fig. S4A). 253

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 28, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Page 8: Abscisic acid receptors and coreceptors modulate plant water … · 2019. 3. 18. · 81 water deficit by reducing transpiration (Munemasa et al., 2015), protecting photosynthesis

8

Growth of abi1abi2 and abi1abi2hab1 mutants was comparable to that of wild type (Fig. 5E); however, 254

growth of the other double and triple mutants was reduced (Suppl. Fig. S4B,C). 255

256

The two higher-order PP2C-deficient mutants abi1abi2 and abi1abi2hab1, which combined unimpaired 257

growth with elevated leaf temperatures, were subjected to progressive drought to examine their growth 258

performance and WUE under water deficit. Growth of both PP2C-deficient lines was similar to the RCAR6 259

line as indicated by the congruent increase in leaf area over six weeks (Fig. 5F) and outperformed Col-0 260

resulting in larger leaf areas when water became growth-limiting for Col-0. The improved efficiency of 261

water use was evident in the sixth week of the drought experiment; at this point in time the leaves of 262

Col-0 plants were wilted and rosettes were shrunken, while the PP2C-deficient and the RCAR6 lines had 263

turgescent, large rosettes (Fig. 5G). The rate of water use in these lines was clearly lower in relation to 264

wild type (Fig. 5H), and biomass and WUE were higher at the end of the drought experiment when the 265

plant-available water was consumed (Fig. 5I,J). In terms of WUE, the triple deficient mutant 266

abi1abi2hab1 was even better than the RCAR6 line with an increase in WUE of 48% compared to 40% 267

over the wild type, respectively. The abi1abi2 double mutant was less water-use efficient but clearly 268

more than Col-0. Although other PP2C deficiencies did not appear to affect water use under well-269

watered conditions, they might contribute to minimize water use under drought as indicated by the 270

analysis of hab1hab2, abi1hab1pp2ca, and abi1abi2hab1pp2ca mutants under progressive drought 271

(Suppl. Fig. S4D-F). The pp2ca allele further increased the WUE of the abi1abi2hab1 mutant from 3.2 ± 272

0.1 g L-1 to 3.9 ± 0.1 g L-1 in the quadruple mutant abi1abi2hab1pp2ca (Fig. 5J, Suppl. Fig. S4F). Taken 273

together, the single deficiency in ABI1 and ABI2 led to increased leaf temperatures, and combining the 274

deficiencies with HAB1 resulted in plants that fully mimic the RCAR6 line by providing similarly enhanced 275

WUE without trade-offs in growth performance. 276

277

Transpiration efficiency affected by ABA administration 278

Our results indicate that inactivation of unique PP2Cs can result in water use-efficient plants, similar to 279

RCAR6 overexpression. The higher water-productivity of these plants can be attributed to a subtle 280

activation of ABA signaling (Rubio et al., 2009; Yang et al., 2016). It is not known to what extent ABA is 281

sufficient to mimic the water use-efficient trait of the Arabidopsis lines and whether the WUE of the 282

RCAR6 line can be further optimized by higher endogenous ABA levels. Pioneering work on tomato has 283

revealed that enhanced expression of an ABA biosynthesis enzyme can lead to higher ABA levels and 284

improved iWUE, suggesting that ABA might be sufficient to confer a water use-efficient trait (Thompson 285

et al., 2007). However, the requirement for specific RCARs or PP2C deficiencies for generating the 286

improved iWUE trait in Arabidopsis argues against it. Previous analysis in wheat and barley using 287

exogenous ABA application revealed an increase in WUE (Mizrahi et al., 1974; Rademacher et al., 1987). 288

We used administration of aqueous ABA solutions to Arabidopsis leaves to analyze the increase in leaf 289

surface temperature. Foliar ABA treatment at different concentrations starting from 0.1 µM ABA raised 290

the leaf temperature and increases above 1 °C were observed at 10 µM and higher ABA levels (Suppl. Fig. 291

S5A,B). The rise in leaf temperature continued for several hours after ABA administration and the 292

maximum effect lasted for several days (Suppl. Fig. S5C). We decided to use 10 μM and 30 μM ABA for 293

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 28, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Page 9: Abscisic acid receptors and coreceptors modulate plant water … · 2019. 3. 18. · 81 water deficit by reducing transpiration (Munemasa et al., 2015), protecting photosynthesis

9

leaf application owing to the effect on wild type in which Col-0 reached similar leaf temperatures as 294

observed in untreated RCAR6 plants (Fig. 6A). Administration of these ABA concentrations also increased 295

leaf temperatures of the RCAR6 line and had a moderate negative effect on growth (Fig. 6A,B). The 296

transpiration efficiency of Col-0 and the RCAR6 lines was enhanced by ABA application and resulted in a 297

concomitant reduction of An (Fig. 6C) and Ci (Fig. 6D). The lowered Ci leads to an enhanced iWUE based 298

on the direct relationship of Ca - Ci and iWUE at constant temperature and VPD (Farquhar et al., 1989), 299

while a lowered An would impinge biomass growth. The differently ABA-treated plants were subjected to 300

progressive drought. The water consumption of wild-type plants challenged with 30 µM ABA matched 301

the water use of mock-treated RCAR6 plants over the course of the drought experiment (Fig. 6E). ABA 302

application to RCAR6-overexpressing plants further minimized transpiration but also impaired growth 303

while Col-0 was only significantly affected in growth at 30 µM ABA (Fig. 6E,F). Wild-type plants had 304

increased biomass and WUE in response to ABA administration, which were up to 26% higher than the 305

mock-challenged Col-0 (Fig. 6G,H). The RCAR6 line had an approximately 50% higher WUE compared to 306

Col-0 without ABA treatment, but provision of exogenous ABA curtailed the benefit. The results indicated 307

that ABA application to wild-type plants improved WUE, though it was associated with a reduction in An 308

and growth at the higher ABA level. ABA application to the RCAR6 line further elevated the leaf 309

temperature but negatively affected growth and WUE, consistent with a supra-optimal activation of ABA 310

signaling. 311

312

ABA-mediated increase of WUE and water productivity in wheat 313

The above experiments showed that foliar administration of ABA can improve WUE in Arabidopsis. 314

However, in our hands this chemical treatment was not as efficient as genetic modulation of ABA 315

signaling using ectopic RCAR expression or PP2C deficiencies. Whether these genetic approaches can be 316

successfully translated into a C3 crop such as wheat is a tempting speculation. To explore the potential 317

for improving WUE in wheat, we analyzed the change in growth and water use of the crop in response to 318

ABA application under near-field conditions. 319

Application of different ABA concentrations to wheat plantlets increased the leaf surface temperatures 320

in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 7A,B). Administration of 30 µM ABA enhanced the leaf temperature of 321

wheat by approximately 1 °C, similar to the response of Arabidopsis towards 10 µM ABA (Fig. 7B, Suppl. 322

Fig. S5B). We decided to use 30 and 100 µM concentrations of ABA for reducing transpiration of wheat 323

grown under near-field conditions. The plants were grown in large pots and were exposed to full sunlight 324

and vapor pressure deficits similar to the nearby field (Suppl. Fig. S6). The wheat seedlings were allowed 325

to develop their root system in 1.1 m long cylinders containing 19 liters of soil for 33 days prior to ABA 326

administration, mock treatment, or drought onset. ABA was repeatedly provided by foliar spraying and 327

both biomass increase and water consumption were gravimetrically monitored over the course of the 328

experiment (Fig. 7C,D). Growth among the well-watered control and ABA-treated plants did not 329

statistically differ while the drought-exposed wheat plants showed an approximately 25% reduced 330

biomass in the tillers after 23 days (P<0.01, one-way ANOVA). The rate of water consumption, i.e. 331

evapotranspiration, was reduced in ABA-challenged plants and even more diminished under drought 332

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 28, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Page 10: Abscisic acid receptors and coreceptors modulate plant water … · 2019. 3. 18. · 81 water deficit by reducing transpiration (Munemasa et al., 2015), protecting photosynthesis

10

compared to the control. However, total harvested above-ground biomass was similar between the 333

control and ABA-treated plants but significantly differed for plants exposed to drought (Fig. 7E). The ABA 334

application resulted in approximately 20% higher WUE values similar to the effect of drought, albeit 335

without the negative impact on biomass (Fig. 7F). The enhanced WUE induced by ABA administration 336

was corroborated by carbon isotope analysis of the same wheat plants and determination of 13C-derived 337

integrated WUE values (Fig. 7G,H). Hence, wheat plants can respond positively to ABA administration by 338

enhancing WUE without detectable growth trade-offs when cultivated under near-field conditions. The 339

results indicate the suitability of this crop for iWUE improvement. 340

341

Discussion 342

The homeostasis of a plant’s water status is a delicate balance between water acquisition and water loss 343

during CO2 uptake for carbon assimilation. Terrestrial plants evolved ABA-regulated stomata for 344

optimizing and fine-tuning gas exchange of leaves (Hetherington and Woodward, 2003; Negin and 345

Moshelion, 2016). Plants have evolved a number of strategies to avoid or tolerate water deficit. These 346

include deep rooting systems, succulent organs, or true drought tolerance. However, at the level of gas 347

exchange in leaves, the strategies are limited. The net flux of CO2 and water vapor across the stomatal 348

pore are driven by the respective partial pressure gradients (Franks et al., 2013). As a consequence, 349

plants can only improve the exchange rate of CO2 for water vapor by favorably changing the stomatal 350

gradients of the two gases, i.e. lowering Ci and lowering VPD (Cernusak et al., 2018) at a given ambient 351

condition. 352

The water use-efficient RCAR lines have lowered Ci and unchanged An hallmarks of improved plant water 353

productivity (Yang et al., 2016). The analysis also showed that differences in leaf temperature and 354

rosette area among Arabidopsis lines grown under well-watered conditions correlated closely with 355

changes in iWUE, and WUE. Using differences in leaf temperature and rosette area as approximations for 356

differences in transpiration and growth, our study indicates that the Col-0 accession and other analyzed 357

wild-type accessions of Arabidopsis do not grow with the minimal transpiration required to sustain full 358

growth (Fig. 1). Seven accessions including Col-0 examined had similar growth performances and 359

transpirational cooling, with the exception of the clear outlier Cvi-0. The accession Cvi-0 is from the Cape 360

Verde islands close to the equator and is known to have larger stomata and higher transpiration caused 361

by a unique allele of the mitogen-activated protein kinase 12 (Koornneef et al., 2004; Des Marais et al., 362

2014). No natural accession was found to be more water-use efficient than Col-0 in our study, which 363

does not exclude the existence of natural Arabidopsis accessions with high WUE. In fact, a considerable 364

variation in WUE among Arabidopsis natural accessions was reported, and a positive correlation 365

between WUE and reduced An was observed (Easlon et al., 2014). Several accessions such as Kas-1 and 366

Et-0 exhibited higher integrated WUE (McKay et al., 2003; McKay et al., 2008; Easlon et al., 2014). 367

However, data on growth performance and biomass acquisition were not provided and, hence, the 368

studies do not allow us to conclude that these plants are improved in water productivity. In our 369

comparative analysis with ABA receptor lines the leaf temperature could be shifted by at least 1oC to 370

higher temperatures compared to wild-type accessions without growth penalties. A higher leaf 371

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 28, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Page 11: Abscisic acid receptors and coreceptors modulate plant water … · 2019. 3. 18. · 81 water deficit by reducing transpiration (Munemasa et al., 2015), protecting photosynthesis

11

temperature means a lower transpiration rate and, in combination with unimpaired growth, indicates an 372

improved iWUE and WUE as observed in certain ABA receptor lines. The dissociation of WUE and trade-373

offs in growth is in agreement with the results of a large-scale study in which wheat plants grown under 374

variable environmental conditions achieved considerable variations in WUE and showed a boundary 375

function for optimized water consumption and yield (Sadras et al., 2010). 376

The less-efficient water use of wild-type Arabidopsis in our experiment is not surprising given that water 377

was not the limiting factor for growth. More transpiration means more cooling, higher Ci values at a 378

given An, and probably fewer constraints on photorespiration. Moreover, more water flux through plants 379

results in more water uptake and possibly in better acquisition of dissolved nutrients. The iWUE trait of 380

RCAR6 plants was strongly dependent on the ambient temperature and was minimized at 27 °C and 32 381

°C whereas at 17 °C iWUE and WUE were clearly higher than at 22 °C. The relative humidity in this 382

analysis was kept constant, however, VPD increases with temperature and was more than doubled 383

between 17 °C and 32 °C (Farquhar and Sharkey, 1982). The enhanced demand for transpirational 384

cooling during heat is evident from the lowering of leaf surface temperatures below the ambient 385

temperature at 32 °C, which caused a reduction of WUE for Col-0 by 65%. Nevertheless, the RCAR lines 386

had approximately 15% higher WUE and biomass. Heat stress seems to partly override the restriction in 387

gas exchange of the ABA receptor lines similar to the response in pine (Pinus taeda), in which heat 388

induced stomatal opening even in the presence of water deficit (Urban et al., 2017). In regards to gene 389

expression, the response of Arabidopsis to drought differs largely from the combined stress of heat and 390

drought (Rizhsky et al., 2004; Prasch and Sonnewald, 2013). 391

The water use-efficient trait of RCAR6 plants was not negatively affected by increasing the light intensity 392

from 0.15 to 0.5 mmol m-2 s-1. The higher radiation is closer to the light saturation point of 0.9 mmol m-2 393

s-1 for Arabidopsis (Flexas et al., 2007), and supports higher photosynthesis rates and therefore an 394

enhanced CO2 demand compared to our standard light conditions. The RCAR6 plants still showed the 395

iWUE trait without growth penalty and outperformed the wild type with respect to biomass and WUE 396

under high PAR (Fig. 4). Surprisingly, there was a tendency towards lower C/N ratios of the RCAR6 line in 397

the shoot biomass, indicating that the plants combined reduced transpiration with efficient uptake of N 398

sources. A higher nitrogen acquisition may contribute to increased CO2 uptake and increased WUE by the 399

beneficial effect of nitrate reduction involved in the photorespiratory pathway (Busch et al., 2018). The 400

increased nitrogen content might be caused by changes in root architecture or in the upregulation of N 401

acquisition. Grafting experiments indicated that the root system of RCAR lines contributes to WUE (Yang 402

et al., 2016). Interestingly, the ABA coreceptors ABI1 and ABI2 were identified as regulators of the C/N 403

response (Léran et al., 2015; Lu et al., 2015). Both PP2Cs are controlled by RCAR6 and RCAR10 (Tischer et 404

al., 2017) and might specifically affect N acquisition because water use-efficient Arabidopsis plants with 405

reduced stomatal density were not changed in nutrient uptake (Hepworth et al., 2015). 406

The ABA receptor lines RCAR6 and RCAR10 outperformed the parental genotype Col-0 in terms of WUE 407

and water productivity, irrespective of the water potential (Fig. 2), though growth of the RCAR10 line 408

was somewhat impaired. The water content of the soil was maintained at conditions of moderate water 409

deficit and in this respect the analysis resembled deficit irrigation practices in which a growth-limiting 410

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 28, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Page 12: Abscisic acid receptors and coreceptors modulate plant water … · 2019. 3. 18. · 81 water deficit by reducing transpiration (Munemasa et al., 2015), protecting photosynthesis

12

supply of water maximizes WUE (Monaghan et al., 2013). Wild-type plants showed a 46% increase in 411

WUE and a growth reduction of approximately 26% at 20% SWC compared to the well-watered 412

conditions. Water consumption of the ABA receptor lines at 40% SWC was similar to that of Col-0 at 20% 413

SWC, however, with only a marginal growth reduction. As a consequence, WUE was almost doubled 414

compared to Col-0 at well-watered conditions. The rice (Oryza sativa) OsPYL4 to OsPYL6 genes are close 415

homologs of RCAR6 and RCAR10 (Umezawa et al., 2010) and deficiency in these ABA receptors resulted 416

in higher transpiration and higher yielding rice under non-water-limited conditions (Miao et al., 2018), 417

supporting the notion that these ABA receptors regulate stomatal conductance. The analyses of the 418

water use-efficient Arabidopsis lines revealed a robust increase in WUE that was resilient to changes in 419

water availability and light intensity but negatively affected by heat. The temperature is a major factor 420

influencing WUE and variations in temperature together with VPD may explain largely the variation of 421

WUE observed in field trials (Sadras et al., 2010). RCAR6 consistently combined high WUE with no or 422

marginal growth penalty relative to the wild type. As a consequence, the physiological features of RCAR6 423

plants provide a model for improvement of WUE in C3 plants. 424

On the molecular level, the question remains as to the identity of the ABA coreceptors regulated by 425

RCAR6 and contributing to the water-productive phenotype. Analysis of all nine ABA coreceptors 426

revealed that a single deficiency in ABI1 or ABI2 resulted in elevated leaf temperatures without a 427

negative impact on growth (Fig. 5A,B and Suppl. Fig. S3A,C,D). Clade A PP2Cs are negative regulators of 428

ABA signaling and their deficiency is associated with ABA hypersensitivity (Saez et al., 2006; Rubio et al., 429

2009; Bhaskara et al., 2012; Antoni et al., 2013; Fuchs et al., 2013). Deficiency in HAI1 to HAI3 and PP2CA 430

did not detectably affect transpiration at well-watered growth conditions but resulted in minor growth 431

trade-offs, pointing to a role of these PP2Cs in growth maintenance under non-stress conditions (Suppl. 432

Fig. S3). HAI1 to HAI3 are upregulated in plants at low water potential (Bhaskara et al., 2012) and may 433

affect WUE under water deficit. Pyramiding loss-of-function alleles of ABI1 and ABI2 with PP2CA/AHG3 434

and HAB1 showed that the triple abi1abi2hab1 mutant best reduced transpiration with efficient growth 435

similar to the RCAR6 line (Fig. 4). Several PP2C deficiency combinations including pp2ca revealed 436

improved WUE but were impaired in growth, consistent with previous results (Rubio et al., 2009). Our 437

data support the notion that the ABA coreceptors ABI1, ABI2, and HAB1 are major negative players in 438

controlling iWUE under well-watered conditions in accordance with the gain-of-function mutants abi1-1 439

and abi2-1, which have a wilty phenotype (Koornneef et al., 1984). ABI1, ABI2, and HAB1 are moderately 440

inhibited by RCAR6 at basal ABA levels (Tischer et al., 2017) and, hence, could be the key targets for 441

generating the iWUE and WUE trait. 442

The specificity of ABA receptors and coreceptors required for generating the improved water 443

productivity in Arabidopsis implies that exogenous ABA application would not be selective enough to 444

specifically target ABA receptors such as RCAR6 and the downstream acting PP2Cs. Nevertheless, foliar 445

application of ABA has a long history of being used to improve WUE of plants, though with negative 446

impact on growth performance (Mizrahi et al., 1974; Rademacher et al., 1987). In our study, we applied 447

exogenous ABA to Arabidopsis with the objectives of assessing to what extent this can phenocopy the 448

iWUE trait of the RCAR6 line and whether the RCAR6 plants can be further improved in their water use. 449

We also explored the potential of improving WUE in an elite wheat variety by activating ABA responses. 450

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 28, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Page 13: Abscisic acid receptors and coreceptors modulate plant water … · 2019. 3. 18. · 81 water deficit by reducing transpiration (Munemasa et al., 2015), protecting photosynthesis

13

Repeated administration of ABA to Arabidopsis and wheat elevated leaf temperature, reduced water 451

consumption, and enhanced WUE. Arabidopsis wild-type plants responded positively to ABA 452

administration by increasing transpiration efficiency and iWUE, thereby partially phenocopying the iWUE 453

trait of the RCAR6 line but the growth was reduced and the WUE was less enhanced compared to the 454

RCAR6 line under drought. The RCAR6 line responded negatively towards ABA administration consistent 455

with the supra-optimal activation of ABA signaling. In response to exogenous ABA, wheat increased WUE 456

by approximately 20% without a detectable growth penalty similar to or even better than Arabidopsis 457

wild type. The wheat analysis under near-field conditions supports the conclusion that this C3 crop is also 458

amenable to improvement of iWUE and WUE. However, in other studies, selection of a high WUE trait in 459

wheat was associated with reduced growth and yield in favorable environments (Condon et al., 2004; 460

Morgan et al., 1993; Fischer et al., 1998) though introgression of a genomic region conferred high WUE 461

and increased biomass production in water-limited environments (Rebetzke et al., 2002). Considerable 462

genetic variations in WUE were reported in other C3 crops, such as rice (Laza et al., 2006), cotton 463

(Gossypium Sp.) (Saranga et al., 2004), tomato (Martin et al., 1999), and rapeseed (Pater et al., 2017). 464

The studies show substantial variation in WUE and yield with no strict correlation, indicating the 465

potential to increase water productivity of crops. The physiological response of C3 plants to increase 466

WUE under water deficit, e.g. durum wheat (Rizza et al., 2012), has not yet been explored for the 467

generation of crops with a constitutive water-use efficient trait comparable to the RCAR6 line. The C4 468

crop maize (Zea mays) seems to be less promising for such an approach because in this C4 plant a 469

reduction of the Ci level, which is much lower compared to that in C3 plants, sensitively affects 470

photosynthesis (Blankenagel et al., 2018). The improvement of iWUE in C3 crops like wheat could be 471

achieved either by genetic means or by using ABA agonists selective for distinct ABA receptors. 472

A number of ABA agonists have been identified with preferential binding to distinct ABA receptors 473

(Benson et al., 2015; Helander et al., 2016; Vaidya et al., 2017; Frackenpohl et al., 2018a; Frackenpohl et 474

al., 2018b). Engineering of ABA receptors for novel ligands offers another approach to activate a unique 475

ABA receptor (Park et al., 2015), or the modulated expression of ABA receptor components as shown for 476

Arabidopsis. The challenge will be to identify the key ABA receptors or coreceptors of crops (Gordon et 477

al., 2016) that need to be targeted for enhancing water use without impinging on growth potential. 478

479

Conclusion 480

Our study shows that the Arabidopsis wild-type plants analyzed can grow optimal with less water . 481

Hence, water use could be minimized without growth penalty by modulating ABA responses using 482

specific ABA receptors and coreceptors. The more efficient water use of Arabidopsis conferred by 483

enhanced ABA receptor expression was resilient to changes in light intensity and water availability but 484

was reduced by high ambient temperatures. ABA application to wild-type plants partially mimicked the 485

water-efficient trait generated by modifying the expression of ABA signaling components. However, ABA 486

administration to plants was never as effective as the genetic approach probably because ABA targets all 487

ABA receptors. ABA agonists selective for the receptors that are positive regulators of water productivity 488

might allow us to phenocopy the genetically engineered water-productive trait. ABA application to 489

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 28, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Page 14: Abscisic acid receptors and coreceptors modulate plant water … · 2019. 3. 18. · 81 water deficit by reducing transpiration (Munemasa et al., 2015), protecting photosynthesis

14

wheat under near-field conditions showed that wheat is amenable to both iWUE and WUE improvement. 490

Considering the importance of wheat in global caloric supply and the high yield loss imposed by water 491

deficit, this crop is a promising target for an enhancement of water productivity. 492

493

Materials and Methods 494

Plant Materials and Chemicals. Chemicals were obtained from SigmaAldrich (www.sigmaaldrich.com), J. 495

T. Baker (www.avantormaterials. com), and (S)-ABA from CHEMOS (www.chemos.de). The Arabidopsis 496

thaliana accessions Cvi-0 (N902), Mr-0 (N6795), Mt-0 (N6799), Sorbo (N931), Tu-0 (N1566), Van-0 497

(N6884), and Ws-0 (N6891) and the PP2C T-DNA lines were received from the Nottingham Arabidopsis 498

Stock Center. The T-DNA lines and the primers used to identify homozygous knockout plants are listed in 499

Supplemental Table S1. Homozygous lines with ectopic expression of specific RCARs were established by 500

transferring an expression cassette for RCARs under the control of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S 501

promoter into Arabidopsis wild type Col-0 as reported (Yang et al., 2016). RCARs-overexpressing lines of 502

T3 and T4 generations were used in this study. Transgenic lines harboring both RCAR6 and RCAR10 503

expression cassettes, double, and quadruple mutants of PP2Cs were generated by crossing and screening 504

for homozygosity. The triple mutants of abi1,abi2,hab1 and abi1,hab1,pp2ca were kindly provided by 505

Pedro Luis Rodriguez (Rubio et al., 2009). The wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivar, Westonia (W3900) is 506

an elite wheat line (El-Hendawy et al., 2005). 507

508

Plant growth conditions. Arabidopsis seeds were allowed to germinate (day 0) and to grow for seven 509

days on agar plates with solidified 0.5 x MS medium and at 0.06 mmol m-2 s-1 PAR prior to transfer of 510

single seedlings to 0.2 L pots filled with soil (Classic Profi Substrate Einheitserde Werkverband, Sinntal-511

Altengronau, Germany), containing 3 mg nitrogen fertilizer per gram of dry soil. Unless otherwise 512

described, plants were grown under an eight-hour light regime, 0.15 mmol m-2 s-1 PAR, 22 °C and 50% 513

relative humidity during the day, and 17 °C and 60% at night in plant growth cabinets (Conviron E15, 514

Conviron, Winnipeg, Canada) or at 0.5 mmol m-2 s-1 PAR, 21 °C at the TUM Model EcoSystem Analyser 515

(TUMmesa) facility with LED light equipment. The ambient CO2 concentration was approximately 0.42 516

mmol mol-1 and 0.5 mmol mol-1 in the Conviron growth chamber and at TUMmesa, respectively. Wheat 517

plants were grown in a rainout-shelter facility of TUM in Dürnast in cylinders of 1.1 m x 0.15 m filled with 518

19 L of sandy-loamy soil with online recording of the climatic conditions (temperature, PAR, relative 519

humidity). 520

521

Water deficit assays. The progressive drought assay was performed as described (Yang et al., 2016). 522

Briefly, established Arabidopsis plantlets (day 18) were exposed to a slowly increasing water deficit by 523

preventing evaporation and withholding watering. SWC levels of 60% and higher provided well-watered 524

conditions with a water potential Ψ≥ −0.08 MPa (Suppl. Fig. S1). The soil water potential was 525

determined by using a psychrometer (Wescor, Logan, USA). Repetitions of the experiment were 526

conducted independently over the course of 16 months. The projected leaf area of Arabidopsis rosettes 527

was analyzed by using Photoshop Elements software (Adobe, San Jose, USA). Above-ground material was 528

harvested for determination of biomass after drying the material for 3 d at 60 °C to achieve constant 529

weight. For the analysis of Arabidopsis at different ambient temperatures, the plants were established at 530

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 28, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Page 15: Abscisic acid receptors and coreceptors modulate plant water … · 2019. 3. 18. · 81 water deficit by reducing transpiration (Munemasa et al., 2015), protecting photosynthesis

15

standard conditions until day 18, then temperatures were stepwise changed to reach the target 531

temperature between 17 °C and 32 °C (± 0.1 °C) within four days. The relative humidity and night/day 532

differences were kept constant. Calculation of VPD was according to VPD = ((100 - RH)/100) x SVP, in 533

which RH is the relative humidity to saturation vapor pressure (SVP) at a given ambient temperature, 534

vapor pressure inside the leaf is assumed as saturation (Farquhar and Sharkey, 1982), and SVP inside the 535

leaf is calculated according to the Goff-Gratch formula (List, 1984). 536

537

Foliar administration of ABA and thermo-imaging. An aqueous solution of 1% (v/v) dimethylsulfoxide and 538

0.01% (v/v) Tween 20 with or without ABA was applied to leaves by spraying until run-off of droplets. 539

The leaf temperature was recorded one day after administration. Thermal imaging was carried out as 540

mentioned earlier (Yang et al., 2016) using the InfraTec instrument (Dresden, Germany). Plants were 541

grown in trays containing 24 pots at randomized positions and the trays were analyzed within the 542

environmentally controlled plant growth cabinet. 543

544

Gas exchange analysis. Gas exchange measurements were used to determine An, Ci, gs, and transpiration 545

efficiency (TE) in the whole plant configuration using the GFS-3000 gas exchange system equipped with 546

custom-built cuvettes (Heinz Walz, Effeltrich, Germany) routinely at 150 μmol m-2 s-1 PAR, 400 μmol mol-1 547

external CO2, and a VPD of 19 ± 1 Pa kPa-1 using the software of the instrument supplier. 548

549 13C analysis and integrated WUE. Carbon isotope composition (δ13C) of whole-shoot biomass was 550

analyzed as described (Yang et al., 2016). 13C discrimination (Δ13C, in ‰) was calculated as Δ13C = (δ13Cair 551

− δ13Cplant)/(1 + δ13Cplant/1000) (Farquhar, 1989). Intrinsic WUE has been defined as: iWUE = An/gs = 0.625 552

(Ca − Ci) = 0.625 Ca (1 − Ci/Ca), where An is the net CO2 assimilation rate and gs the stomatal conductance 553

(Franks et al., 2013). The factor 0.625 gives the ratio of the diffusivities of CO2 and H2O in air, and Ca and 554

Ci designate the CO2 concentrations in ambient air and intercellular space. In the growth cabinet, Ca was 555

500 ± 54 μmol mol−1 with an approximated δ13C air value of −14.5 ‰. In the rainout-shelter, Ca was 400 556

μmol·mol−1 with an approximated δ13C air value of −9.7 ‰. The “simplified” Farquhar model based on 557

nonlimiting mesophyll conductance was applied to estimate Ci/Ca: Δ13C = a + (b − a) Ci/Ca. The term a 558

(4.4‰) denotes the fractionation of 13CO2 relative to 12CO2 during diffusion through the stomatal pores 559

and b (27.6‰), the net fractionation during carboxylation reactions. 560

561

Statistical analysis. Data were analyzed by using one-way ANOVA and linear regression analysis with the 562

SPSS version 16.0 software for Windows. The linear regression in Fig. 1 was conducted on the data points 563

with more than 1 °C higher leaf temperature than Col-0 (p< 0.001). 564

Accession Numbers 565

The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative locus identifiers for RCAR6, RCAR10, ABI1, ABI2, HAB1, HAB2, AHG1, PP2CA, 566

HAI1, HAI2, and HAI3 are AT5G45870, AT2G38310, AT4G26080, AT5G57050, AT1G72770, AT1G17550, AT5G51760, 567

AT3G11410, AT5G59220, AT1G07430, and AT2G29380, respectively. 568

569

570

571

572

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 28, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Page 16: Abscisic acid receptors and coreceptors modulate plant water … · 2019. 3. 18. · 81 water deficit by reducing transpiration (Munemasa et al., 2015), protecting photosynthesis

16

Acknowledgments 573

We are grateful to Johanna Berger and Claudia Buchhart for technical assistance and to Farhah Assaad 574

and Michael Papacek for comments on the manuscript. We thank Pedro Luis Rodriguez, Valencia, for 575

providing triple PP2C-deficient Arabidopsis mutants and the Nottingham Arabidopsis Stock Center for 576

Arabidopsis material. We are also grateful to Sharon Zytynska and Roman Meier for their help in using 577

the TUMmesa plant growth facility, funded with support of the German Science Foundation (DFG, INST 578

95/1184-1 FUGG). We thank the DFG for financial support (EG938) and SFB924, ‘Molecular mechanisms 579

regulating yield and yield stability in plants`. 580

581

582

Supplemental Data 583

Supplemental Figure S1. The dependence of soil water potential Ψ on soil water content. 584

Supplemental Figure S2. No further improvement of water productivity by combining the water-use efficient traits 585

of R6-3 and R10-4. 586

Supplemental Figure S3. Leaf temperature and growth of PP2C-deficient mutants. 587

Supplemental Figure S4. Enhanced WUE at terminal drought of PP2C-deficient mutants and growth trade-offs 588

under well-watered conditions. 589

Supplemental Figure S5. Changes in evaporative cooling of Arabidopsis leaves in response to foliar administration of 590

ABA. 591

Supplemental Figure S6. Wheat plants grown in a rainout shelter under near-field conditions. 592

593

Tables 594

Supplemental Table S1. List of primers used for analysis of RCAR-overexpressing lines and T-DNA insertion lines. 595

596

Figure Legends 597

Figure 1. Variation in rosette leaf area and leaf surface temperatures in Arabidopsis accessions and Arabidopsis 598 lines ectopically expressing different ABA receptors. The Arabidopsis accessions (Acc) analyzed are Col-0, Cvi-0, Mr-599 0, Mt-0, Sorbo, Tu-0, Van-0, and Ws-0 and the data are expressed relative to Col-0 as reference. The wild type 600 plants (black symbols) and Col-0 lines with ectopic expression of single subfamily I receptors including the members 601 RCAR1-RCAR4 (I, yellow symbols), subfamily II receptors RCAR5-RCAR10 (II, red) and subfamily III RCAR11-RCAR14 602 (III, blue) were analyzed with 2-5 independent lines per receptor. The trendline for the border function (R=0.8, 603 P<0.001, linear regression analysis) between maximum growth versus reduced transpiration is depicted as a dotted 604 line by using data points with more than 1 °C higher leaf temperature than Col-0 (p<0.001, one-way ANOVA), 605 shown as square symbols. The leaf area of 18-day-old plantlets at the onset of the experiment was 0.6 ± 0.1 cm2 606 and Col-0 plants increased the leaf area to 30.6 cm2 ± 2.1 cm2 after 22 days. Data from this study (filled symbols) 607 were combined with data from Yang et al. (2016) (open symbols). The inset displays the leaf temperature 608 difference (T in °C) to Col-0 (22.7 °C) as the average value for Arabidopsis accessions without the outlier Cvi-0, and 609 for RCAR subfamilies including the numbers of independent lines on the top of the columns. Plants were grown 610 under well-watered (Ψ ≥ -0.08 MPa) conditions with a light-humidity regime of 8 hours light per day at 0.15 mmol 611 m-2 s-1 photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), 21.5 °C, 50% relative humidity in daytime, and 17 °C, 60% relative 612 humidity at night. n=4 biological replicates per data point, SE ± 7% for leaf area, SE ± 0.08 °C for leaf temperature, 613 inset mean ± SEM. 614

Figure 2. Growth and water productivity of RCAR6- and RCAR10-overexpressing Arabidopsis under controlled soil 615 water levels. Plant growth was assessed by the increase in leaf area at different water regimes with A) 60% (Ψ = -616 0.08 MPa), B) 40% (Ψ = -0.10 MPa) and C) 20% (Ψ = -0.21 MPa) relative soil water content (v/v, SWC) for wild type 617

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 28, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Page 17: Abscisic acid receptors and coreceptors modulate plant water … · 2019. 3. 18. · 81 water deficit by reducing transpiration (Munemasa et al., 2015), protecting photosynthesis

17

Col-0 (Col), RCAR6-3 lines (R6) and RCAR10-4 (R10). D) Leaf temperature of plants at day 18, E) consumed water 618 and final above-ground dry matter, and F) water use efficiency (WUE). Plantlets were grown for 25 days under 619 short-day conditions and pots were allowed to reach the designated SWC by evaporation prior to the onset of the 620 experiment. At this stage, the plants had a leaf area of 1.7 ± 0.1 cm2, 1.8 ± 0.1 cm2, 2.0 ± 0.1 cm2 for Col, R6, and 621 R10, respectively. Water was administrated in intervals of three days to adjust the water content to the target 622 SWCs. The lowest SWC values reached during the experiment were approximately 45%, 25%, and 15% SWC for the 623 water regime of 60%, 40%, and 20% SWC, respectively. n=4 biological replicates for each data point, mean ± SEM. 624 ***P<0.001 (One-way ANOVA) compared to wild type Col-0. 625

Figure 3. High ambient temperature reduces WUE and the WUE advantage of RCAR lines. A) Representative 626 pictures, B) rosette leaf areas, and C) leaf temperature differences to ambient target temperature of 36-day-old 627 Col-0, RCAR6-3 (R6), and RCAR10-4 (R10) grown at different temperatures and under well-watered conditions. The 628 growth condition was as described in Fig. 1 except that temperature during the day was 22 °C. Both day- and 629 nighttime temperatures were shifted in 5 °C increments from this condition, keeping the relative humidity values 630 constant. D) Consumed water, E) above-ground biomass and F) WUE at the end of the terminal drought which took 631 70 days, 60 days, 50 days, and 40 days for 17 °C, 22 °C, 27 °C, and 32 °C, respectively. Single plantlets were 18-day-632 old and had a leaf area of 0.7 cm2 ± 0.1 cm2 at the beginning of the drought experiments. E,F) The numbers above 633 the columns indicate the difference to Col-0. The scale bar in A) represents 2 cm. A-E) n=5 biological replicates, 634 mean ± SEM, ***P<0.001 (One-way ANOVA) compared to Col-0. 635

Figure 4. Differences in water productivity and carbon-nitrogen ratios between the ABA receptor line RCAR6-3 and 636 wild type Col-0 at higher PAR. A) Representative wild type Columbia (Col) plants and RCAR6-overexpressing line 637 RCAR6-3 (R6) grown at PAR of 0.5 mmol m-2 s-1 and under well-watered conditions for 30 days. B) Above-ground 638 dry biomass (white columns) of 30-day-old plants and leaf temperature (black columns) of 25-day-old plants. C) 639 Association of δ13C composition in above-ground biomass with the ratio of carbon to nitrogen (C/N). D) Integrative 640 WUE based on δ13C shown in C). Growth conditions as in Fig. 1, with the exception of light intensity and 21 °C 641 temperature. The scale bar in A) denotes 2 cm. n=10 biological replicates, mean ± SEM, ***P<0.001 (One-way 642 ANOVA) compared to Col-0. 643

Figure 5. Water use efficiency conferred by deficiency in ABA co-receptors. A) Thermogram of 43-day-old wild type 644 Col-0 and Arabidopsis mutants deficient of ABI1 (abi1) and ABI2 (abi2). B) The averaged leaf temperature from A) 645 and the leaf area of the plants at day 48 grown under well-watered conditions. C-J) Analysis of the double mutant 646 abi1abi2 and the triple mutant abi1abi2hab1 in comparison to Col-0 (Col) and the RCAR6-3 line (R6) under 647 progressive drought. C) Thermogram, D) leaf temperature, and E) leaf area at day 22 (open column) of the 648 progressive drought experiment. At day 22, the plants were grown 40 days at well-watered conditions (SWC≥ 60%, 649 Ψ≥ -0.08 MPa). The size of the plantlets at day 0 of the experiment is indicated by filled columns in E). F) Growth of 650 the plants expressed as an increase in the projected leaf area. Note the decrease in leaf area caused by wilting and 651 starting for Col-0 from day 40. G) Wilted Col-0 and turgescent rosettes of other plant lines at day 46. H) Consumed 652 water, I) above-ground dry matter and J) WUE at the end of the terminal drought at day 58. The values above the 653 columns in I) indicate the percentage gain in WUE compared to Col-0. A-I) n=4 biological replicates per line, mean ± 654 SEM. **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 (One-way ANOVA) compared to Col-0. The size bars in A, C), and G) indicate 2 cm, 2 655 cm, and 4 cm, respectively. 656

Figure 6. Foliar application of ABA to wild type Arabidopsis provides a partial phenocopy of the water-use efficient 657 trait of the RCAR6-3 line. A) Increase of leaf surface temperatures in response to mock treatment or ABA 658 application to 36-day-old Col-0 and RCAR6-3 (R6) plants. The panel above depicts representative thermograms of 659 leaf rosettes treated as indicated below. The analysis was performed 24 hours after treatment and changes are 660 expressed as the difference of the leaf surface temperature relative to Col-0 without exogenous ABA application, 661 22.5 °C ± 0.1 °C. B) Growth is indicated by the leaf area increase of 36-day-old (black columns) to 50-day-old (white 662 columns) plants in the well-watered phase (Ψ≥ -0.08 MPa) of the progressive drought experiment. C) Transpiration 663 efficiency (TE; white columns), net carbon assimilation rate (An, black columns), and D) intercellular CO2 664 concentration (Ci) of Col-0 and R6 were assessed using whole rosettes of 31 ± 1-day-old plants. E) Water 665 consumption and F) leaf area of Col-0 (solid line) and R6 (interrupted line) plants over the 60 days of the 666 progressive drought experiment. The time points of the mock and ABA treatments are indicated by red arrows. G) 667

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 28, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Page 18: Abscisic acid receptors and coreceptors modulate plant water … · 2019. 3. 18. · 81 water deficit by reducing transpiration (Munemasa et al., 2015), protecting photosynthesis

18

Final above-ground biomass as dry matter and H) WUE. The percentage increase of WUE relative to mock-treated 668 Col-0 is shown by the values above the columns. TThe scale bar in A) depicts 2 cm. A-B) and E-G) n=4 biological 669 replicates, C-D) n=3 biological replicates, mean ± SEM; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 (One-way ANOVA) 670 compared to Col-0 without exogenous ABA. 671

Figure 7. Foliar application of ABA enhances the water productivity of wheat in near-field conditions. A-B) Changes 672 of leaf temperature in response to ABA application. A) Wheat plants are shown 24 hours after ABA application (left 673 panel) and in a thermogram (right panel). Half of the plants grown for 30 days in single pots (n=3) were exposed to 674 100 μM ABA solution or mock-treated with aqueous solution containing 1% dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO). The inner 675 center of the treated plants as indicated by the box in the thermogram was used to determine the leaf surface 676 temperature and temperature differences were expressed in comparison to the mock-treated plants of the same 677 pot. The scale bar represents 2 cm. B) Leaf temperature increase in response to different ABA concentrations was 678 assessed 24 hours after treatment. Wheat plants were grown under near-field conditions and treated with ABA or 679 exposed to drought. The well-watered plants (33-day-old) were treated with either mock or ABA solutions (30 and 680 100 µM) at time points indicated by red arrows. Eight to nine plants were cultivated in cylinders (n=4 per 681 treatment) with a diameter of 0.15 m, length of 1.1 m and soil volume of 19 L. Three, two or three, and three plants 682 were harvested in the first, the second, and the third week, respectively. C) Dry biomass per shoot, D) water 683 consumption by evapotranspiration, E) total dry biomass increase, and F) WUE (biomass increase per 684 evapotranspired water) during 23 days. G) 13C composition and H) 13C-derived integrative WUE of wheat plants 685 conferred by exogenous ABA application or drought. Three 40-day-old wheat plants per cylinder analyzed in C-D) 686 were harvested for each treatment to determine the carbon isotope composition. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 687 0.001 (One-way ANOVA) compared to plants without exogenous ABA, mean ± SEM. 688

689

690

Literature Cited 691

Antoni R, Gonzalez-Guzman M, Rodriguez L, Rodrigues A, Pizzio GA, Rodriguez PL (2012) Selective inhibition of 692 clade A phosphatases type 2C by PYR/PYL/RCAR abscisic acid receptors. Plant physiology 158: 970–980 693

Benson CL, Kepka M, Wunschel C, Rajagopalan N, Nelson KM, Christmann A, Abrams SR, Grill E, Loewen MC 694 (2015) Abscisic acid analogs as chemical probes for dissection of abscisic acid responses in Arabidopsis 695 thaliana. Phytochemistry 113: 96–107 696

Bhaskara GB, Nguyen TT, Verslues PE (2012) Unique drought resistance functions of the highly ABA-induced clade 697 A protein phosphatase 2Cs. Plant physiology 160: 379–395 698

Blankenagel S, Yang Z, Avramova V, Schön C-C, Grill E (2018) Generating Plants with Improved Water Use 699 Efficiency. Agronomy 8: 194 700

Blum A (2005) Drought resistance, water-use efficiency, and yield potential—are they compatible, dissonant, or 701 mutually exclusive? Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56: 1159-1168 702

Busch FA, Sage RF, Farquhar GD (2018) Plants increase CO2 uptake by assimilating nitrogen via the 703 photorespiratory pathway. Nature Plants 4: 46–54 704

Cao M-J, Zhang Y-L, Liu X, Huang H, Zhou XE, Wang W-L, Zeng A, Zhao C-Z, Si T, Du J, Wu W-W, Wang F-X, Xu HE, 705 Zhu J-K (2017) Combining chemical and genetic approaches to increase drought resistance in plants. Nature 706 Communications 8: 1183 707

Cernusak LA, Ubierna N, Jenkins MW, Garrity SR, Rahn T, Powers HH, Hanson DT, Sevanto S, Wong SC, McDowell 708 NG, Farquhar GD (2018) Unsaturation of vapour pressure inside leaves of two conifer species. Scientific 709 reports 8: 7667 710

Condon AG, Richards RA, Rebetzke GJ, Farquhar GD (2004) Breeding for high water-use efficiency. Journal of 711 experimental botany 55: 2447–2460 712

Cutler SR, Rodriguez PL, Finkelstein RR, Abrams SR (2010) Abscisic acid. Emergence of a core signaling network. 713 Annual review of plant biology 61: 651–679 714

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 28, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Page 19: Abscisic acid receptors and coreceptors modulate plant water … · 2019. 3. 18. · 81 water deficit by reducing transpiration (Munemasa et al., 2015), protecting photosynthesis

19

Des Marais DL, Auchincloss LC, Sukamtoh E, McKay JK, Logan T, Richards JH, Juenger TE (2014) Variation in MPK12 715 affects water use efficiency in Arabidopsis and reveals a pleiotropic link between guard cell size and ABA 716 response. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111: 2836–2841 717

Easlon HM, Nemali KS, Richards JH, Hanson DT, Juenger TE, McKay JK (2014) The physiological basis for genetic 718 variation in water use efficiency and carbon isotope composition in Arabidopsis thaliana. Photosynthesis 719 research 119: 119–129 720

El-Hendawy SE, Hu Y, Schmidhalter U (2005) Growth, ion content, gas exchange, and water relations of wheat 721 genotypes differing in salt tolerances. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56: 123–134 722

Farquhar GD, Ehleringer JR, Hubick KT (1989) Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Photosynthesis. Annual Review of 723 Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 40: 503–537 724

Farquhar GD, Sharkey TD (1982) Stomatal Conductance and Photosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 33: 725 317–345 726

Finkelstein R (2013) Abscisic Acid synthesis and response. The arabidopsis book 11: e0166 727 Fischer RA, Rees D, Sayre KD, Lu Z-M, Condon AG, Saavedra AL (1998) Wheat Yield Progress Associated with 728

Higher Stomatal Conductance and Photosynthetic Rate, and Cooler Canopies. Crop Science 38: 1467 729 Flexas J, Ortuño MF, Ribas-Carbo M, Diaz-Espejo A, Flórez-Sarasa ID, Medrano H (2007) Mesophyll conductance to 730

CO2 in Arabidopsis thaliana. The New phytologist 175: 501–511 731 Frackenpohl J, Bojack G, Baltz R, Bickers U, Busch M, Dittgen J, Franke J, Freigang J, Grill E, Gonzalez S, Helmke H, 732

Hills MJ, Hohmann S, Koskull-Döring P von, Kleemann J, Lange G, Lehr S, Schmutzler D, Schulz A, Walther K, 733 Willms L, Wunschel C (2018a) Potent Analogues of Abscisic Acid - Identifying Cyano-Cyclopropyl Moieties as 734 Promising Replacements for the Cyclohexenone Headgroup. European Journal of Organic Chemistry 2018: 735 1416–1425 736

Frackenpohl J, Grill E, Bojack G, Baltz R, Busch M, Dittgen J, Franke J, Freigang J, Gonzalez S, Heinemann I, Helmke 737 H, Hills M, Hohmann S, Koskull-Döring P von, Kleemann J, Lange G, Lehr S, Müller T, Peschel E, Poree F, 738 Schmutzler D, Schulz A, Willms L, Wunschel C (2018b) Insights into the in Vitro and in Vivo SAR of Abscisic 739 Acid - Exploring Unprecedented Variations of the Side Chain via Cross-Coupling-Mediated Syntheses. European 740 Journal of Organic Chemistry 2018: 1403–1415 741

Franks PJ, Adams MA, Amthor JS, Barbour MM, Berry JA, Ellsworth DS, Farquhar GD, Ghannoum O, Lloyd J, 742 McDowell N, Norby RJ, Tissue DT, Caemmerer S von (2013) Sensitivity of plants to changing atmospheric CO2 743 concentration. From the geological past to the next century. The New phytologist 197: 1077–1094 744

Franks PJ, W Doheny-Adams T, Britton-Harper ZJ, Gray JE (2015) Increasing water-use efficiency directly through 745 genetic manipulation of stomatal density. The New phytologist 207: 188–195 746

Fuchs S, Grill E, Meskiene I, Schweighofer A (2013) Type 2C protein phosphatases in plants. The FEBS journal 280: 747 681–693 748

Fuchs S, Tischer SV, Wunschel C, Christmann A, Grill E (2014) Abscisic acid sensor RCAR7/PYL13, specific regulator 749 of protein phosphatase coreceptors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of 750 America 111: 5741–5746 751

González-Guzmán M, Rodríguez L, Lorenzo-Orts L, Pons C, Sarrión-Perdigones A, Fernández MA, Peirats-Llobet M, 752 Forment J, Moreno-Alvero M, Cutler SR, Albert A, Granell A, Rodríguez PL (2014) Tomato PYR/PYL/RCAR 753 abscisic acid receptors show high expression in root, differential sensitivity to the abscisic acid agonist 754 quinabactin, and the capability to enhance plant drought resistance. Journal of experimental botany 65: 4451–755 4464 756

Gordon CS, Rajagopalan N, Risseeuw EP, Surpin M, Ball FJ, Barber CJ, Buhrow LM, Clark SM, Page JE, Todd CD, 757 Abrams SR, Loewen MC (2016) Characterization of Triticum aestivum Abscisic Acid Receptors and a Possible 758 Role for These in Mediating Fusairum Head Blight Susceptibility in Wheat. PloS one 11: e0164996 759

Grondin A, Rodrigues O, Verdoucq L, Merlot S, Leonhardt N, Maurel C (2015) Aquaporins Contribute to ABA-760 Triggered Stomatal Closure through OST1-Mediated Phosphorylation. The Plant cell 27: 1945–1954 761

Hall AJ, Richards RA (2013) Prognosis for genetic improvement of yield potential and water-limited yield of major 762 grain crops. Field Crops Research 143: 18–33 763

Helander JDM, Vaidya AS, Cutler SR (2016) Chemical manipulation of plant water use. Bioorganic & medicinal 764 chemistry 24: 493–500 765

Hepworth C, Doheny-Adams T, Hunt L, Cameron DD, Gray JE (2015) Manipulating stomatal density enhances 766 drought tolerance without deleterious effect on nutrient uptake. The New phytologist 208: 336–341 767

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 28, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Page 20: Abscisic acid receptors and coreceptors modulate plant water … · 2019. 3. 18. · 81 water deficit by reducing transpiration (Munemasa et al., 2015), protecting photosynthesis

20

Hetherington AM, Woodward FI (2003) The role of stomata in sensing and driving environmental change. Nature 768 424: 901–908 769

Hibberd JM, Quick WP (2002) Characteristics of C4 photosynthesis in stems and petioles of C3 flowering plants. 770 Nature 415: 451–454 771

Hughes J, Hepworth C, Dutton C, Dunn JA, Hunt L, Stephens J, Waugh R, Cameron DD, Gray JE (2017) Reducing 772 Stomatal Density in Barley Improves Drought Tolerance without Impacting on Yield. Plant physiology 174: 773 776–787 774

Ito T, Kondoh Y, Yoshida K, Umezawa T, Shimizu T, Shinozaki K, Osada H (2015) Novel Abscisic Acid Antagonists 775 Identified with Chemical Array Screening. Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology 16: 2471–776 2478 777

Jasechko S, Sharp ZD, Gibson JJ, Birks SJ, Yi Y, Fawcett PJ (2013) Terrestrial water fluxes dominated by 778 transpiration. Nature 496: 347–350 779

Koornneef M, Alonso-Blanco C, Vreugdenhil D (2004) Naturally occurring genetic variation in Arabidopsis thaliana. 780 Annual review of plant biology 55: 141–172 781

Koornneef M, Reuling G, Karssen CM (1984) The isolation and characterization of abscisic acid-insensitive mutants 782 of Arabidopsis thaliana. Physiologia Plantarum 61: 377–383 783

Laza MR, Kondo M, Ideta O, Barlaan E, Imbe T (2006) Identification of Quantitative Trait Loci for δC and 784 Productivity in Irrigated Lowland Rice. Crop Science 46: 763 785

Léran S, Edel KH, Pervent M, Hashimoto K, Corratgé-Faillie C, Offenborn JN, Tillard P, Gojon A, Kudla J, Lacombe B 786 (2015) Nitrate sensing and uptake in Arabidopsis are enhanced by ABI2, a phosphatase inactivated by the 787 stress hormone abscisic acid. Science signaling 8: ra43 788

Li Y, Xu J, Haq NU, Zhang H, Zhu X-G (2014) Was low CO2 a driving force of C4 evolution. Arabidopsis responses to 789 long-term low CO2 stress. Journal of experimental botany 65: 3657–3667 790

List RJ (1984) Smithsonian meteorological tables, Ed. 6vol 114. Smithsonian Institution, Washington 791 Lu Y, Sasaki Y, Li X, Mori IC, Matsuura T, Hirayama T, Sato T, Yamaguchi J (2015) ABI1 regulates carbon/nitrogen-792

nutrient signal transduction independent of ABA biosynthesis and canonical ABA signalling pathways in 793 Arabidopsis. Journal of experimental botany 66: 2763–2771 794

Lumba S, Toh S, Handfield L-F, Swan M, Liu R, Youn J-Y, Cutler SR, Subramaniam R, Provart N, Moses A, Desveaux 795 D, McCourt P (2014) A mesoscale abscisic acid hormone interactome reveals a dynamic signaling landscape in 796 Arabidopsis. Developmental cell 29: 360–372 797

Ma Y, Szostkiewicz I, Korte A, Moes D, Yang Y, Christmann A, Grill E (2009) Regulators of PP2C phosphatase 798 activity function as abscisic acid sensors. Science (New York, N.Y.) 324: 1064–1068 799

Martin B, Tauer CG, Lin RK (1999) Carbon isotope discrimination as a tool to improve water-use efficiency in 800 tomato. Crop Science 39: 1775–1783 801

McKay JK, Richards JH, Mitchell-Olds T (2003) Genetics of drought adaptation in Arabidopsis thaliana. I. Pleiotropy 802 contributes to genetic correlations among ecological traits. Molecular ecology 12: 1137–1151 803

McKay JK, Richards JH, Nemali KS, Sen S, Mitchell-Olds T, Boles S, Stahl EA, Wayne T, Juenger TE (2008) Genetics 804 of drought adaptation in Arabidopsis thaliana II. QTL analysis of a new mapping population, KAS-1 x TSU-1. 805 Evolution; international journal of organic evolution 62: 3014–3026 806

Melcher K, Ng L-M, Zhou XE, Soon F-F, Xu Y, Suino-Powell KM, Park S-Y, Weiner JJ, Fujii H, Chinnusamy V, Kovach 807 A, Li J, Wang Y, Li J, Peterson FC, Jensen DR, Yong E-L, Volkman BF, Cutler SR, Zhu J-K, Xu HE (2009) A gate-808 latch-lock mechanism for hormone signalling by abscisic acid receptors. Nature 462: 602–608 809

Miao C, Xiao L, Hua K, Zou C, Zhao Y, Bressan RA, Zhu J-K (2018) Mutations in a subfamily of abscisic acid receptor 810 genes promote rice growth and productivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United 811 States of America 115: 6058–6063 812

Miyazono K-i, Miyakawa T, Sawano Y, Kubota K, Kang H-J, Asano A, Miyauchi Y, Takahashi M, Zhi Y, Fujita Y, 813 Yoshida T, Kodaira K-S, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Tanokura M (2009) Structural basis of abscisic acid signalling. 814 Nature 462: 609-614 815

Mizrahi Y, Scherings SG, Arad SM, Richmond AE (1974) Aspects of the effect of ABA on the water status of barley 816 and wheat seedlings. Physiologia Plantarum 31: 44-50 817

Monaghan JM, Daccache A, Vickers LH, Hess TM, Weatherhead EK, Grove IG, Knox JW (2013) More 'crop per 818 drop'. Constraints and opportunities for precision irrigation in European agriculture. Journal of the science of 819 food and agriculture 93: 977–980 820

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 28, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Page 21: Abscisic acid receptors and coreceptors modulate plant water … · 2019. 3. 18. · 81 water deficit by reducing transpiration (Munemasa et al., 2015), protecting photosynthesis

21

Moreno-Alvero M, Yunta C, Gonzalez-Guzman M, Lozano-Juste J, Benavente JL, Arbona V, Menéndez M, 821 Martinez-Ripoll M, Infantes L, Gomez-Cadenas A, Rodriguez PL, Albert A (2017) Structure of Ligand-Bound 822 Intermediates of Crop ABA Receptors Highlights PP2C as Necessary ABA Co-receptor. Molecular plant 10: 823 1250–1253 824

Morgan JA, LeCain DR, McCaig TN, Quick JS (1993) Gas Exchange, Carbon Isotope Discrimination, and Productivity 825 in Winter Wheat. Crop Science 33: 178-186 826

Morison JIL, Baker NR, Mullineaux PM, Davies WJ (2008) Improving water use in crop production. Philosophical 827 transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences 363: 639–658 828

Mosquna A, Peterson FC, Park S-Y, Lozano-Juste J, Volkman BF, Cutler SR (2011) Potent and selective activation of 829 abscisic acid receptors in vivo by mutational stabilization of their agonist-bound conformation. Proceedings of 830 the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108: 20838–20843 831

Munemasa S, Hauser F, Park J, Waadt R, Brandt B, Schroeder JI (2015) Mechanisms of abscisic acid-mediated 832 control of stomatal aperture. Current opinion in plant biology 28: 154–162 833

Negin B, Moshelion M (2016) The evolution of the role of ABA in the regulation of water-use efficiency. From 834 biochemical mechanisms to stomatal conductance. Plant science : an international journal of experimental 835 plant biology 251: 82–89 836

Nemoto K, Kagawa M, Nozawa A, Hasegawa Y, Hayashi M, Imai K, Tomii K, Sawasaki T (2018) Identification of 837 new abscisic acid receptor agonists using a wheat cell-free based drug screening system. Scientific reports 8: 838 4268 839

Nicotra AB, Davidson A (2010) Adaptive phenotypic plasticity and plant water use. Functional Plant Biology 37: 840 117-127 841

Nuccio ML, Paul M, Bate NJ, Cohn J, Cutler SR (2018) Where are the drought tolerant crops? An assessment of 842 more than two decades of plant biotechnology effort in crop improvement. Plant science : an international 843 journal of experimental plant biology 273: 110–119 844

Okamoto M, Peterson FC, Defries A, Park S-Y, Endo A, Nambara E, Volkman BF, Cutler SR (2013) Activation of 845 dimeric ABA receptors elicits guard cell closure, ABA-regulated gene expression, and drought tolerance. 846 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110: 12132–12137 847

Park S-Y, Fung P, Nishimura N, Jensen DR, Fujii H, Zhao Y, Lumba S, Santiago J, Rodrigues A, Chow T-FF, Alfred SE, 848 Bonetta D, Finkelstein R, Provart NJ, Desveaux D, Rodriguez PL, McCourt P, Zhu J-K, Schroeder JI, Volkman 849 BF, Cutler SR (2009) Abscisic acid inhibits type 2C protein phosphatases via the PYR/PYL family of START 850 proteins. Science (New York, N.Y.) 324: 1068–1071 851

Park S-Y, Peterson FC, Mosquna A, Yao J, Volkman BF, Cutler SR (2015) Agrochemical control of plant water use 852 using engineered abscisic acid receptors. Nature 520: 545–548 853

Pater D, Mullen JL, McKay JK, Schroeder JI (2017) Screening for Natural Variation in Water Use Efficiency Traits in a 854 Diversity Set of Brassica napus L. Identifies Candidate Variants in Photosynthetic Assimilation. Plant & cell 855 physiology 58: 1700–1709 856

Pei ZM, Ghassemian M, Kwak CM, McCourt P, Schroeder JI (1998) Role of Farnesyltransferase in ABA Regulation of 857 Guard Cell Anion Channels and Plant Water Loss. Science 282: 287–290 858

Pizzio GA, Rodriguez L, Antoni R, Gonzalez-Guzman M, Yunta C, Merilo E, Kollist H, Albert A, Rodriguez PL (2013) 859 The PYL4 A194T mutant uncovers a key role of PYR1-LIKE4/PROTEIN PHOSPHATASE 2CA interaction for 860 abscisic acid signaling and plant drought resistance. Plant physiology 163: 441–455 861

Prasch CM, Sonnewald U (2013) Simultaneous application of heat, drought, and virus to Arabidopsis plants reveals 862 significant shifts in signaling networks. Plant physiology 162: 1849–1866 863

Rademacher W, Maisch R, Liessegang J, Jung J (1987) Water consumption and yield formation in crop plants under 864 the influence of synthetic analogues of abscisic acid. Plant Growth Regulators for Agricultural and Amenity Use 865 36: 53–66 866

Rajagopalan N, Nelson KM, Douglas AF, Jheengut V, Alarcon IQ, McKenna SA, Surpin M, Loewen MC, Abrams SR 867 (2016) Abscisic Acid Analogues That Act as Universal or Selective Antagonists of Phytohormone Receptors. 868 Biochemistry 55: 5155–5164 869

Rebetzke GJ, Condon AG, Richards RA, Farquhar GD (2002) Selection for Reduced Carbon Isotope Discrimination 870 Increases Aerial Biomass and Grain Yield of Rainfed Bread Wheat. Crop Science 42: 739-745 871

Rizhsky L, Liang H, Shuman J, Shulaev V, Davletova S, Mittler R (2004) When defense pathways collide. The 872 response of Arabidopsis to a combination of drought and heat stress. Plant physiology 134: 1683–1696 873

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 28, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Page 22: Abscisic acid receptors and coreceptors modulate plant water … · 2019. 3. 18. · 81 water deficit by reducing transpiration (Munemasa et al., 2015), protecting photosynthesis

22

Rizza F, Ghashghaie J, Meyer S, Matteu L, Mastrangelo AM, Badeck F-W (2012) Constitutive differences in water 874 use efficiency between two durum wheat cultivars. Field Crops Research 125: 49–60 875

Rubio S, Rodrigues A, Saez A, Dizon MB, Galle A, Kim T-H, Santiago J, Flexas J, Schroeder JI, Rodriguez PL (2009) 876 Triple loss of function of protein phosphatases type 2C leads to partial constitutive response to endogenous 877 abscisic acid. Plant physiology 150: 1345–1355 878

Sadras VO, Grassini P, Steduto P (2010) Status of water use efficiency of main crops. SOLAW Background Thematic 879 Report TR07. FAO. Rome. 880

Saez A, Robert N, Maktabi MH, Schroeder JI, Serrano R, Rodriguez PL (2006) Enhancement of abscisic acid 881 sensitivity and reduction of water consumption in Arabidopsis by combined inactivation of the protein 882 phosphatases type 2C ABI1 and HAB1. Plant physiology 141: 1389–1399 883

Santiago J, Rodrigues A, Saez A, Rubio S, Antoni R, Dupeux F, Park S-Y, Márquez JA, Cutler SR, Rodriguez PL 884 (2009) Modulation of drought resistance by the abscisic acid receptor PYL5 through inhibition of clade A 885 PP2Cs. The Plant journal: for cell and molecular biology 60: 575–588 886

Saranga Y, Jiang C-X, Wright RJ, Yakir D, Paterson AH (2004) Genetic dissection of cotton physiological responses 887 to arid conditions and their inter-relationships with productivity. Plant, Cell and Environment 27: 263–277. 888

Song L, Huang S-SC, Wise A, Castanon R, Nery JR, Chen H, Watanabe M, Thomas J, Bar-Joseph Z, Ecker JR (2016) 889 A transcription factor hierarchy defines an environmental stress response network. Science 354. aag1550 890

Takeuchi J, Okamoto M, Akiyama T, Muto T, Yajima S, Sue M, Seo M, Kanno Y, Kamo T, Endo A, Nambara E, Hirai 891 N, Ohnishi T, Cutler SR, Todoroki Y (2014) Designed abscisic acid analogs as antagonists of PYL-PP2C receptor 892 interactions. Nature chemical biology 10: 477–482 893

Thompson AJ, Andrews J, Mulholland BJ, McKee JMT, Hilton HW, Horridge JS, Farquhar GD, Smeeton RC, Smillie 894 IRA, Black CR, Taylor IB (2007) Overproduction of abscisic acid in tomato increases transpiration efficiency and 895 root hydraulic conductivity and influences leaf expansion. Plant physiology 143: 1905–1917 896

Tischer SV, Wunschel C, Papacek M, Kleigrewe K, Hofmann T, Christmann A, Grill E (2017) Combinatorial 897 interaction network of abscisic acid receptors and coreceptors from Arabidopsis thaliana. Proceedings of the 898 National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114: 10280–10285 899

Ubierna N, Farquhar GD (2014) Advances in measurements and models of photosynthetic carbon isotope 900 discrimination in C3 plants. Plant, cell & environment 37: 1494–1498 901

Umezawa T, Nakashima K, Miyakawa T, Kuromori T, Tanokura M, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2010) 902 Molecular basis of the core regulatory network in ABA responses. Sensing, signaling and transport. Plant & cell 903 physiology 51: 1821–1839 904

Urban J, Ingwers MW, McGuire MA, Teskey RO (2017) Increase in leaf temperature opens stomata and decouples 905 net photosynthesis from stomatal conductance in Pinus taeda and Populus deltoides x nigra. Journal of 906 experimental botany 68: 1757–1767 907

Vaidya AS, Peterson FC, Yarmolinsky D, Merilo E, Verstraeten I, Park S-Y, Elzinga D, Kaundal A, Helander J, 908 Lozano-Juste J, Otani M, Wu K, Jensen DR, Kollist H, Volkman BF, Cutler SR (2017) A Rationally Designed 909 Agonist Defines Subfamily IIIA Abscisic Acid Receptors As Critical Targets for Manipulating Transpiration. ACS 910 chemical biology 12: 2842–2848 911

Wada Y, van Beek LPH, van Kempen CM, Reckman JWTM, Vasak S, Bierkens MFP (2010) Global depletion of 912 groundwater resources. Geophysical Research Letters 37: L20402 913

Wang P, Xue L, Batelli G, Lee S, Hou Y-J, van Oosten MJ, Zhang H, Tao WA, Zhu J-K (2013) Quantitative 914 phosphoproteomics identifies SnRK2 protein kinase substrates and reveals the effectors of abscisic acid action. 915 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110: 11205–11210 916

Wang Y, Ying J, Kuzma M, Chalifoux M, Sample A, McArthur C, Uchacz T, Sarvas C, Wan J, Dennis DT, McCourt P, 917 Huang Y (2005) Molecular tailoring of farnesylation for plant drought tolerance and yield protection. The Plant 918 journal: for cell and molecular biology 43: 413–424 919

Wilen RW, Hays DB, Mandel RM, Abrams SR, Moloney MM (1993) Competitive Inhibition of Abscisic Acid-920 Regulated Gene Expression by Stereoisomeric Acetylenic Analogs of Abscisic Acid. Plant physiology 101: 469–921 476 922

Wong SC, Cowan IR, Farquhar GD (1979) Stomatal conductance correlates with photosynthetic capacity. Nature 923 282: 424-426 924

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 28, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Page 23: Abscisic acid receptors and coreceptors modulate plant water … · 2019. 3. 18. · 81 water deficit by reducing transpiration (Munemasa et al., 2015), protecting photosynthesis

23

Yang Y, Sulpice R, Himmelbach A, Meinhard M, Christmann A, Grill E (2006) Fibrillin expression is regulated by 925 abscisic acid response regulators and is involved in abscisic acid-mediated photoprotection. Proceedings of the 926 National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103: 6061–6066 927

Yang Z, Liu J, Tischer SV, Christmann A, Windisch W, Schnyder H, Grill E (2016) Leveraging abscisic acid receptors 928 for efficient water use in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of 929 America 113: 6791–6796 930

Ye Y, Zhou L, Liu X, Liu H, Li D, Cao M, Chen H, Xu L, Zhu J-K, Zhao Y (2017) A Novel Chemical Inhibitor of ABA 931 Signaling Targets All ABA Receptors. Plant physiology 173: 2356–2369 932

Yoo CY, Hasegawa PM, Mickelbart MV (2011) Regulation of stomatal density by the GTL1 transcription factor for 933 improving water use efficiency. Plant signaling & behavior 6: 1069–1071 934

Yoshida T, Mogami J, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2014) ABA-dependent and ABA-independent signaling in response 935 to osmotic stress in plants. Current opinion in plant biology 21: 133–139 936

Zandalinas SI, Mittler R, Balfagón D, Arbona V, Gómez-Cadenas A (2018) Plant adaptations to the combination of 937 drought and high temperatures. Physiologia plantarum 162: 2–12 938

Zhao Y, Chan Z, Gao J, Xing L, Cao M, Yu C, Hu Y, You J, Shi H, Zhu Y, Gong Y, Mu Z, Wang H, Deng X, Wang P, 939 Bressan RA, Zhu J-K (2016) ABA receptor PYL9 promotes drought resistance and leaf senescence. Proceedings 940 of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113: 1949–1954 941

942

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 28, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Page 24: Abscisic acid receptors and coreceptors modulate plant water … · 2019. 3. 18. · 81 water deficit by reducing transpiration (Munemasa et al., 2015), protecting photosynthesis

Figure 1. Variation in rosette leaf area and leaf surface temperatures in Arabidopsis accessions and Arabidopsis lines ectopically expressing different ABA receptors. The Arabidopsis accessions (Acc) analyzed are Col-0, Cvi-0, Mr-0, Mt-0, Sorbo, Tu-0, Van-0, and Ws-0 and the data are expressed relative to Col-0 as reference. The wild type plants (black symbols) and Col-0 lines with ectopic expression of single subfamily I receptors including the members RCAR1-RCAR4 (I, yellow symbols), subfamily II receptors RCAR5-RCAR10 (II, red) and subfamily III RCAR11-RCAR14 (III, blue) were analyzed with 2-5 independent lines per receptor. The trendline for the border function (R=0.8, P<0.001) between maximum growth versus reduced transpiration is depicted as a dotted line by using data points with more than 1 °C higher leaf temperature than Col-0 (p<0.001), shown as square symbols. The leaf area of 18-day-old plantlets at the onset of the experiment was 0.6 ± 0.1 cm

2 and

Col-0 plants increased the leaf area to 30.6 cm2 ± 2.1 cm

2 after 22 days. Data from this study (filled

symbols) were combined with data from Yang et al. (2016) (open symbols). The inset displays the leaf temperature difference (T in °C) to Col-0 (22.7 °C) as the average value for Arabidopsis accessions without the outlier Cvi-0, and for RCAR subfamilies including the numbers of independent lines on the top of the columns. Plants were grown under well-watered (Ψ ≥ -0.08 MPa) conditions with a light-humidity regime of 8 hours light per day at 0.15 mmol m

-2 s

-1 photosynthetically active radiation

(PAR), 21.5 °C, 50% relative humidity in daytime, and 17 °C, 60% relative humidity at night. n=4 biological replicates per data point, SE ± 7% for leaf area, SE ± 0.08 °C for leaf temperature, inset mean ± SEM.

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 28, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Page 25: Abscisic acid receptors and coreceptors modulate plant water … · 2019. 3. 18. · 81 water deficit by reducing transpiration (Munemasa et al., 2015), protecting photosynthesis

Figure 2. Growth and water productivity of RCAR6- and RCAR10-overexpressing Arabidopsis under controlled soil water levels. Plant growth was assessed by the increase in leaf area at different water regimes with A) 60% (Ψ = -0.08 MPa), B) 40% (Ψ = -0.10 MPa) and C) 20% (Ψ = -0.21 MPa) relative soil water content (v/v, SWC) for wild type Col-0 (Col), RCAR6-3 lines (R6) and RCAR10-4 (R10). D) Leaf temperature of plants at day 18, E) consumed water and final above-ground dry matter, and F) water use efficiency (WUE). Plantlets were grown for 25 days under short-day conditions and pots were allowed to reach the designated SWC by evaporation prior to the onset of the experiment. At this stage, the plants had a leaf area of 1.7 ± 0.1 cm

2, 1.8 ± 0.1 cm

2, 2.0 ± 0.1 cm

2 for Col, R6, and R10,

respectively. Water was administrated in intervals of three days to adjust the water content to the target SWCs. The lowest SWC values reached during the experiment were approximately 45%, 25%, and 15% SWC for the water regime of 60%, 40%, and 20% SWC, respectively. n=4 biological replicates for each data point, mean ± SEM. ***P<0.001 compared to wild type Col-0.

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 28, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Page 26: Abscisic acid receptors and coreceptors modulate plant water … · 2019. 3. 18. · 81 water deficit by reducing transpiration (Munemasa et al., 2015), protecting photosynthesis

Figure 3. High ambient temperature reduces WUE and the WUE advantage of RCAR lines. A) Representative pictures, B) rosette leaf areas, and C) leaf temperature differences to ambient target temperature of 36-day-old Col-0, RCAR6-3 (R6), and RCAR10-4 (R10) grown at different temperatures and under well-watered conditions. The growth condition was as described in Fig. 1 except that temperature during the day was 22 °C. Both day- and nighttime temperatures were shifted in 5 °C increments from this condition, keeping the relative humidity values constant. D) Consumed water, E) above-ground biomass and F) WUE at the end of the terminal drought which took 70 days, 60 days, 50 days, and 40 days for 17 °C, 22 °C, 27 °C, and 32 °C, respectively. Single plantlets were 18-day-old and had a leaf area of 0.7 cm2 ± 0.1 cm2 at the beginning of the drought experiments. E,F) The numbers above the columns indicate the difference to Col-0. The scale bar in A) represents 2 cm. A-E) n=5 biological replicates, mean ± SEM, ***P<0.001 compared to Col-0.

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 28, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Page 27: Abscisic acid receptors and coreceptors modulate plant water … · 2019. 3. 18. · 81 water deficit by reducing transpiration (Munemasa et al., 2015), protecting photosynthesis

Figure 4. Differences in water productivity and carbon-nitrogen ratios between the ABA receptor line RCAR6-3 and wild type Col-0 at higher PAR. A) Representative wild type Columbia (Col) plants and RCAR6-overexpressing line RCAR6-3 (R6) grown at PAR of 0.5 mmol m-2 s-1 and under well-watered conditions for 30 days. B) Above-ground dry biomass (white columns) of 30-day-old plants and leaf temperature (black columns) of 25-day-old plants. C) Association of δ13C composition in above-ground biomass with the ratio of carbon to nitrogen (C/N). D) Integrative WUE based on δ13C shown in C). Growth conditions as in Fig. 1, with the exception of light intensity and 21 °C temperature. The scale bar in A) denotes 2 cm. n=10 biological replicates, mean ± SEM, ***P<0.001 compared to Col-0.

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 28, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Page 28: Abscisic acid receptors and coreceptors modulate plant water … · 2019. 3. 18. · 81 water deficit by reducing transpiration (Munemasa et al., 2015), protecting photosynthesis

Figure 5. Water use efficiency conferred by deficiency in ABA co-receptors. A) Thermogram of 43-day-old wild type Col-0 and Arabidopsis mutants deficient of ABI1 (abi1) and ABI2 (abi2). B) The averaged leaf temperature from A) and the leaf area of the plants at day 48 grown under well-watered conditions. C-J) Analysis of the double mutant abi1,abi2 and the triple mutant abi1,abi2,hab1 in comparison to Col-0 (Col) and the RCAR6-3 line (R6) under progressive drought. C) Thermogram, D) leaf temperature, and E) leaf area at day 22 (open column) of the progressive drought experiment. At day 22, the plants were grown 40 days at well-watered conditions (SWC≥ 60%, Ψ≥ -0.08 MPa). The size of the plantlets at day 0 of the experiment is indicated by filled columns in E). F) Growth of the plants expressed as an increase in the projected leaf area. Note the decrease in leaf area caused by wilting and starting for Col-0 from day 40. G) Wilted Col-0 and turgescent rosettes of other plant lines at day 46. H) Consumed water, I) above-ground dry matter and J) WUE at the end of the terminal drought at day 58. The values above the columns in I) indicate the percentage gain in WUE compared to Col-0. A-I) n=4 biological replicates per line, mean ± SEM. **P<0.01 ***P<0.001 compared to Col-0. The size bars in A, C), and G) indicate 2 cm, 2 cm, and 4 cm, respectively.

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 28, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Page 29: Abscisic acid receptors and coreceptors modulate plant water … · 2019. 3. 18. · 81 water deficit by reducing transpiration (Munemasa et al., 2015), protecting photosynthesis

Figure 6. Foliar application of ABA to wild type Arabidopsis provides a partial phenocopy of the water-use efficient trait of the RCAR6-3 line. A) Increase of leaf surface temperatures in response to mock treatment or ABA application to 36-day-old Col-0 and RCAR6-3 (R6) plants. The panel above depicts representative thermograms of leaf rosettes treated as indicated below. The analysis was performed 24 hours after treatment and changes are expressed as the difference of the leaf surface temperature relative to Col-0 without exogenous ABA application, 22.5 °C ± 0.1 °C. B) Growth is indicated by the leaf area increase of 36-day-old (black columns) to 50-day-old (white columns) plants in the well-watered phase (Ψ≥ -0.08 MPa) of the progressive drought experiment. C) Transpiration efficiency (TE; white columns), net carbon assimilation rate (An, black columns), and D) intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) of Col-0 and R6 were assessed using whole rosettes of 31 ± 1-day-old plants. E) Water consumption and F) leaf area of Col-0 (solid line) and R6 (interrupted line) plants over the 60 days of the progressive drought experiment. The time points of the mock and ABA treatments are indicated by red arrows. G) Final above-ground biomass as dry matter and H) WUE. The percentage increase of WUE relative to mock-treated Col-0 is shown by the values above the columns. The scale bar in A) depicts 2 cm. A-B) and E-G) n=4 biological replicates, C-D) n=3 biological replicates, mean ± SEM; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 compared to Col-0 without exogenous ABA.

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 28, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Page 30: Abscisic acid receptors and coreceptors modulate plant water … · 2019. 3. 18. · 81 water deficit by reducing transpiration (Munemasa et al., 2015), protecting photosynthesis

Figure 7. Foliar application of ABA enhances the water productivity of wheat in near-field conditions. A-B) Changes of leaf temperature in response to ABA application. A) Wheat plants are shown 24 hours after ABA application (left panel) and in a thermogram (right panel). Half of the plants grown for 30 days in single pots (n=3) were exposed to 100 μM ABA solution or mock-treated with aqueous solution containing 1% dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO). The inner center of the treated plants as indicated by the box in the thermogram was used to determine the leaf surface temperature and temperature differences were expressed in comparison to the mock-treated plants of the same pot. The scale bar represents 2 cm. B) Leaf temperature increase in response to different ABA concentrations was assessed 24 hours after treatment. Wheat plants were grown under near-field conditions and treated with ABA or exposed to drought. The well-watered plants (33-day-old) were treated with either mock or ABA solutions (30 and 100 µM) at time points indicated by red arrows. Eight to nine plants were cultivated in cylinders (n=4 per treatment) with a diameter of 0.15 m, length of 1.1 m and soil volume of 19 L. Three, two or three, and three plants were harvested in the first, the second, and the third week, respectively. C) Dry biomass per shoot, D) water consumption by evapotranspiration, E) total dry biomass increase, and F) WUE (biomass increase per evapotranspired water) during 23 days. G) 13C composition and H) 13C-derived integrative WUE of wheat plants conferred by exogenous ABA application or drought. Three 40-day-old wheat plants per cylinder analyzed in C-D) were harvested for each treatment to determine the carbon isotope composition. One-way ANOVA, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 compared to plants without exogenous ABA, mean ± SEM.

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 28, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Page 31: Abscisic acid receptors and coreceptors modulate plant water … · 2019. 3. 18. · 81 water deficit by reducing transpiration (Munemasa et al., 2015), protecting photosynthesis

Parsed CitationsAntoni R, Gonzalez-Guzman M, Rodriguez L, Rodrigues A, Pizzio GA, Rodriguez PL (2012) Selective inhibition of clade Aphosphatases type 2C by PYR/PYL/RCAR abscisic acid receptors. Plant physiology 158: 970–980

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Benson CL, Kepka M, Wunschel C, Rajagopalan N, Nelson KM, Christmann A, Abrams SR, Grill E, Loewen MC (2015) Abscisic acidanalogs as chemical probes for dissection of abscisic acid responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Phytochemistry 113: 96–107

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Bhaskara GB, Nguyen TT, Verslues PE (2012) Unique drought resistance functions of the highly ABA-induced clade A proteinphosphatase 2Cs. Plant physiology 160: 379–395

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Blankenagel S, Yang Z, Avramova V, Schön C-C, Grill E (2018) Generating Plants with Improved Water Use Efficiency. Agronomy 8: 194Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Blum A (2005) Drought resistance, water-use efficiency, and yield potential-are they compatible, dissonant, or mutually exclusive?Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56: 1159-1168

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Busch FA, Sage RF, Farquhar GD (2018) Plants increase CO2 uptake by assimilating nitrogen via the photorespiratory pathway. NaturePlants 4: 46–54

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Cao M-J, Zhang Y-L, Liu X, Huang H, Zhou XE, Wang W-L, Zeng A, Zhao C-Z, Si T, Du J, Wu W-W, Wang F-X, Xu HE, Zhu J-K (2017)Combining chemical and genetic approaches to increase drought resistance in plants. Nature Communications 8: 1183

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Cernusak LA, Ubierna N, Jenkins MW, Garrity SR, Rahn T, Powers HH, Hanson DT, Sevanto S, Wong SC, McDowell NG, Farquhar GD(2018) Unsaturation of vapour pressure inside leaves of two conifer species. Scientific reports 8: 7667

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Condon AG, Richards RA, Rebetzke GJ, Farquhar GD (2004) Breeding for high water-use efficiency. Journal of experimental botany 55:2447–2460

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Cutler SR, Rodriguez PL, Finkelstein RR, Abrams SR (2010) Abscisic acid. Emergence of a core signaling network. Annual review ofplant biology 61: 651–679

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Des Marais DL, Auchincloss LC, Sukamtoh E, McKay JK, Logan T, Richards JH, Juenger TE (2014) Variation in MPK12 affects wateruse efficiency in Arabidopsis and reveals a pleiotropic link between guard cell size and ABA response. Proceedings of the NationalAcademy of Sciences of the United States of America 111: 2836–2841

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Easlon HM, Nemali KS, Richards JH, Hanson DT, Juenger TE, McKay JK (2014) The physiological basis for genetic variation in wateruse efficiency and carbon isotope composition in Arabidopsis thaliana. Photosynthesis research 119: 119–129

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

El-Hendawy SE, Hu Y, Schmidhalter U (2005) Growth, ion content, gas exchange, and water relations of wheat genotypes differing insalt tolerances. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56: 123–134

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Farquhar GD, Ehleringer JR, Hubick KT (1989) Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Photosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Physiologyand Plant Molecular Biology 40: 503–537

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Farquhar GD, Sharkey TD (1982) Stomatal Conductance and Photosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 33: 317–345Pubmed: Author and Title https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 28, 2020. - Published by

Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Page 32: Abscisic acid receptors and coreceptors modulate plant water … · 2019. 3. 18. · 81 water deficit by reducing transpiration (Munemasa et al., 2015), protecting photosynthesis

Google Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Finkelstein R (2013) Abscisic Acid synthesis and response. The arabidopsis book 11: e0166Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Fischer RA, Rees D, Sayre KD, Lu Z-M, Condon AG, Saavedra AL (1998) Wheat Yield Progress Associated with Higher StomatalConductance and Photosynthetic Rate, and Cooler Canopies. Crop Science 38: 1467

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Flexas J, Ortuño MF, Ribas-Carbo M, Diaz-Espejo A, Flórez-Sarasa ID, Medrano H (2007) Mesophyll conductance to CO2 in Arabidopsisthaliana. The New phytologist 175: 501–511

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Frackenpohl J, Bojack G, Baltz R, Bickers U, Busch M, Dittgen J, Franke J, Freigang J, Grill E, Gonzalez S, Helmke H, Hills MJ,Hohmann S, Koskull-Döring P von, Kleemann J, Lange G, Lehr S, Schmutzler D, Schulz A, Walther K, Willms L, Wunschel C (2018a)Potent Analogues of Abscisic Acid - Identifying Cyano-Cyclopropyl Moieties as Promising Replacements for the CyclohexenoneHeadgroup. European Journal of Organic Chemistry 2018: 1416–1425

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Frackenpohl J, Grill E, Bojack G, Baltz R, Busch M, Dittgen J, Franke J, Freigang J, Gonzalez S, Heinemann I, Helmke H, Hills M,Hohmann S, Koskull-Döring P von, Kleemann J, Lange G, Lehr S, Müller T, Peschel E, Poree F, Schmutzler D, Schulz A, Willms L,Wunschel C (2018b) Insights into the in Vitro and in Vivo SAR of Abscisic Acid - Exploring Unprecedented Variations of the Side Chainvia Cross-Coupling-Mediated Syntheses. European Journal of Organic Chemistry 2018: 1403–1415

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Franks PJ, Adams MA, Amthor JS, Barbour MM, Berry JA, Ellsworth DS, Farquhar GD, Ghannoum O, Lloyd J, McDowell N, Norby RJ,Tissue DT, Caemmerer S von (2013) Sensitivity of plants to changing atmospheric CO2 concentration. From the geological past to thenext century. The New phytologist 197: 1077–1094

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Franks PJ, W Doheny-Adams T, Britton-Harper ZJ, Gray JE (2015) Increasing water-use efficiency directly through genetic manipulationof stomatal density. The New phytologist 207: 188–195

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Fuchs S, Grill E, Meskiene I, Schweighofer A (2013) Type 2C protein phosphatases in plants. The FEBS journal 280: 681–693Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Fuchs S, Tischer SV, Wunschel C, Christmann A, Grill E (2014) Abscisic acid sensor RCAR7/PYL13, specific regulator of proteinphosphatase coreceptors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111: 5741–5746

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

González-Guzmán M, Rodríguez L, Lorenzo-Orts L, Pons C, Sarrión-Perdigones A, Fernández MA, Peirats-Llobet M, Forment J,Moreno-Alvero M, Cutler SR, Albert A, Granell A, Rodríguez PL (2014) Tomato PYR/PYL/RCAR abscisic acid receptors show highexpression in root, differential sensitivity to the abscisic acid agonist quinabactin, and the capability to enhance plant droughtresistance. Journal of experimental botany 65: 4451–4464

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Gordon CS, Rajagopalan N, Risseeuw EP, Surpin M, Ball FJ, Barber CJ, Buhrow LM, Clark SM, Page JE, Todd CD, Abrams SR, LoewenMC (2016) Characterization of Triticum aestivum Abscisic Acid Receptors and a Possible Role for These in Mediating Fusairum HeadBlight Susceptibility in Wheat. PloS one 11: e0164996

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Grondin A, Rodrigues O, Verdoucq L, Merlot S, Leonhardt N, Maurel C (2015) Aquaporins Contribute to ABA-Triggered StomatalClosure through OST1-Mediated Phosphorylation. The Plant cell 27: 1945–1954

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Hall AJ, Richards RA (2013) Prognosis for genetic improvement of yield potential and water-limited yield of major grain crops. FieldCrops Research 143: 18–33

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Helander JDM, Vaidya AS, Cutler SR (2016) Chemical manipulation of plant water use. Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry 24: 493–500https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 28, 2020. - Published by

Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Page 33: Abscisic acid receptors and coreceptors modulate plant water … · 2019. 3. 18. · 81 water deficit by reducing transpiration (Munemasa et al., 2015), protecting photosynthesis

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Hepworth C, Doheny-Adams T, Hunt L, Cameron DD, Gray JE (2015) Manipulating stomatal density enhances drought tolerance withoutdeleterious effect on nutrient uptake. The New phytologist 208: 336–341

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Hetherington AM, Woodward FI (2003) The role of stomata in sensing and driving environmental change. Nature 424: 901–908Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Hibberd JM, Quick WP (2002) Characteristics of C4 photosynthesis in stems and petioles of C3 flowering plants. Nature 415: 451–454Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Hughes J, Hepworth C, Dutton C, Dunn JA, Hunt L, Stephens J, Waugh R, Cameron DD, Gray JE (2017) Reducing Stomatal Density inBarley Improves Drought Tolerance without Impacting on Yield. Plant physiology 174: 776–787

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Ito T, Kondoh Y, Yoshida K, Umezawa T, Shimizu T, Shinozaki K, Osada H (2015) Novel Abscisic Acid Antagonists Identified withChemical Array Screening. Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology 16: 2471–2478

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Jasechko S, Sharp ZD, Gibson JJ, Birks SJ, Yi Y, Fawcett PJ (2013) Terrestrial water fluxes dominated by transpiration. Nature 496:347–350

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Koornneef M, Alonso-Blanco C, Vreugdenhil D (2004) Naturally occurring genetic variation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Annual review ofplant biology 55: 141–172

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Koornneef M, Reuling G, Karssen CM (1984) The isolation and characterization of abscisic acid-insensitive mutants of Arabidopsisthaliana. Physiologia Plantarum 61: 377–383

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Laza MR, Kondo M, Ideta O, Barlaan E, Imbe T (2006) Identification of Quantitative Trait Loci for δC and Productivity in IrrigatedLowland Rice. Crop Science 46: 763

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Léran S, Edel KH, Pervent M, Hashimoto K, Corratgé-Faillie C, Offenborn JN, Tillard P, Gojon A, Kudla J, Lacombe B (2015) Nitratesensing and uptake in Arabidopsis are enhanced by ABI2, a phosphatase inactivated by the stress hormone abscisic acid. Sciencesignaling 8: ra43

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Li Y, Xu J, Haq NU, Zhang H, Zhu X-G (2014) Was low CO2 a driving force of C4 evolution. Arabidopsis responses to long-term low CO2stress. Journal of experimental botany 65: 3657–3667

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

List RJ (1984) Smithsonian meteorological tables, Ed. 6vol 114. Smithsonian Institution, WashingtonPubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Lu Y, Sasaki Y, Li X, Mori IC, Matsuura T, Hirayama T, Sato T, Yamaguchi J (2015) ABI1 regulates carbon/nitrogen-nutrient signaltransduction independent of ABA biosynthesis and canonical ABA signalling pathways in Arabidopsis. Journal of experimental botany66: 2763–2771

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Lumba S, Toh S, Handfield L-F, Swan M, Liu R, Youn J-Y, Cutler SR, Subramaniam R, Provart N, Moses A, Desveaux D, McCourt P(2014) A mesoscale abscisic acid hormone interactome reveals a dynamic signaling landscape in Arabidopsis. Developmental cell 29:360–372

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Ma Y, Szostkiewicz I, Korte A, Moes D, Yang Y, Christmann A, Grill E (2009) Regulators of PP2C phosphatase activity function asabscisic acid sensors. Science (New York, N.Y.) 324: 1064–1068 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 28, 2020. - Published by

Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Page 34: Abscisic acid receptors and coreceptors modulate plant water … · 2019. 3. 18. · 81 water deficit by reducing transpiration (Munemasa et al., 2015), protecting photosynthesis

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Martin B, Tauer CG, Lin RK (1999) Carbon isotope discrimination as a tool to improve water-use efficiency in tomato. Crop Science 39:1775–1783

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

McKay JK, Richards JH, Mitchell-Olds T (2003) Genetics of drought adaptation in Arabidopsis thaliana. I. Pleiotropy contributes togenetic correlations among ecological traits. Molecular ecology 12: 1137–1151

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

McKay JK, Richards JH, Nemali KS, Sen S, Mitchell-Olds T, Boles S, Stahl EA, Wayne T, Juenger TE (2008) Genetics of droughtadaptation in Arabidopsis thaliana II. QTL analysis of a new mapping population, KAS-1 x TSU-1. Evolution; international journal oforganic evolution 62: 3014–3026

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Melcher K, Ng L-M, Zhou XE, Soon F-F, Xu Y, Suino-Powell KM, Park S-Y, Weiner JJ, Fujii H, Chinnusamy V, Kovach A, Li J, Wang Y, LiJ, Peterson FC, Jensen DR, Yong E-L, Volkman BF, Cutler SR, Zhu J-K, Xu HE (2009) A gate-latch-lock mechanism for hormonesignalling by abscisic acid receptors. Nature 462: 602–608

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Miao C, Xiao L, Hua K, Zou C, Zhao Y, Bressan RA, Zhu J-K (2018) Mutations in a subfamily of abscisic acid receptor genes promote ricegrowth and productivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 115: 6058–6063

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Miyazono K-i, Miyakawa T, Sawano Y, Kubota K, Kang H-J, Asano A, Miyauchi Y, Takahashi M, Zhi Y, Fujita Y, Yoshida T, Kodaira K-S,Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Tanokura M (2009) Structural basis of abscisic acid signalling. Nature 462: 609-614

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Mizrahi Y, Scherings SG, Arad SM, Richmond AE (1974) Aspects of the effect of ABA on the water status of barley and wheat seedlings.Physiologia Plantarum 31: 44-50

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Monaghan JM, Daccache A, Vickers LH, Hess TM, Weatherhead EK, Grove IG, Knox JW (2013) More 'crop per drop'. Constraints andopportunities for precision irrigation in European agriculture. Journal of the science of food and agriculture 93: 977–980

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Moreno-Alvero M, Yunta C, Gonzalez-Guzman M, Lozano-Juste J, Benavente JL, Arbona V, Menéndez M, Martinez-Ripoll M, InfantesL, Gomez-Cadenas A, Rodriguez PL, Albert A (2017) Structure of Ligand-Bound Intermediates of Crop ABA Receptors Highlights PP2Cas Necessary ABA Co-receptor. Molecular plant 10: 1250–1253

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Morgan JA, LeCain DR, McCaig TN, Quick JS (1993) Gas Exchange, Carbon Isotope Discrimination, and Productivity in Winter Wheat.Crop Science 33: 178-186

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Morison JIL, Baker NR, Mullineaux PM, Davies WJ (2008) Improving water use in crop production. Philosophical transactions of theRoyal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences 363: 639–658

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Mosquna A, Peterson FC, Park S-Y, Lozano-Juste J, Volkman BF, Cutler SR (2011) Potent and selective activation of abscisic acidreceptors in vivo by mutational stabilization of their agonist-bound conformation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences ofthe United States of America 108: 20838–20843

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Munemasa S, Hauser F, Park J, Waadt R, Brandt B, Schroeder JI (2015) Mechanisms of abscisic acid-mediated control of stomatalaperture. Current opinion in plant biology 28: 154–162

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Negin B, Moshelion M (2016) The evolution of the role of ABA in the regulation of water-use efficiency. From biochemical mechanismsto stomatal conductance. Plant science : an international journal of experimental plant biology 251: 82–89

Pubmed: Author and Title https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 28, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Page 35: Abscisic acid receptors and coreceptors modulate plant water … · 2019. 3. 18. · 81 water deficit by reducing transpiration (Munemasa et al., 2015), protecting photosynthesis

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Nemoto K, Kagawa M, Nozawa A, Hasegawa Y, Hayashi M, Imai K, Tomii K, Sawasaki T (2018) Identification of new abscisic acidreceptor agonists using a wheat cell-free based drug screening system. Scientific reports 8: 4268

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Nicotra AB, Davidson A (2010) Adaptive phenotypic plasticity and plant water use. Functional Plant Biology 37: 117-127Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Nuccio ML, Paul M, Bate NJ, Cohn J, Cutler SR (2018) Where are the drought tolerant crops? An assessment of more than two decadesof plant biotechnology effort in crop improvement. Plant science : an international journal of experimental plant biology 273: 110–119

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Okamoto M, Peterson FC, Defries A, Park S-Y, Endo A, Nambara E, Volkman BF, Cutler SR (2013) Activation of dimeric ABA receptorselicits guard cell closure, ABA-regulated gene expression, and drought tolerance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences ofthe United States of America 110: 12132–12137

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Park S-Y, Fung P, Nishimura N, Jensen DR, Fujii H, Zhao Y, Lumba S, Santiago J, Rodrigues A, Chow T-FF, Alfred SE, Bonetta D,Finkelstein R, Provart NJ, Desveaux D, Rodriguez PL, McCourt P, Zhu J-K, Schroeder JI, Volkman BF, Cutler SR (2009) Abscisic acidinhibits type 2C protein phosphatases via the PYR/PYL family of START proteins. Science (New York, N.Y.) 324: 1068–1071

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Park S-Y, Peterson FC, Mosquna A, Yao J, Volkman BF, Cutler SR (2015) Agrochemical control of plant water use using engineeredabscisic acid receptors. Nature 520: 545–548

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Pater D, Mullen JL, McKay JK, Schroeder JI (2017) Screening for Natural Variation in Water Use Efficiency Traits in a Diversity Set ofBrassica napus L. Identifies Candidate Variants in Photosynthetic Assimilation. Plant & cell physiology 58: 1700–1709

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Pei ZM, Ghassemian M, Kwak CM, McCourt P, Schroeder JI (1998) Role of Farnesyltransferase in ABA Regulation of Guard Cell AnionChannels and Plant Water Loss. Science 282: 287–290

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Pizzio GA, Rodriguez L, Antoni R, Gonzalez-Guzman M, Yunta C, Merilo E, Kollist H, Albert A, Rodriguez PL (2013) The PYL4 A194Tmutant uncovers a key role of PYR1-LIKE4/PROTEIN PHOSPHATASE 2CA interaction for abscisic acid signaling and plant droughtresistance. Plant physiology 163: 441–455

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Prasch CM, Sonnewald U (2013) Simultaneous application of heat, drought, and virus to Arabidopsis plants reveals significant shifts insignaling networks. Plant physiology 162: 1849–1866

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Rademacher W, Maisch R, Liessegang J, Jung J (1987) Water consumption and yield formation in crop plants under the influence ofsynthetic analogues of abscisic acid. Plant Growth Regulators for Agricultural and Amenity Use 36: 53–66

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Rajagopalan N, Nelson KM, Douglas AF, Jheengut V, Alarcon IQ, McKenna SA, Surpin M, Loewen MC, Abrams SR (2016) Abscisic AcidAnalogues That Act as Universal or Selective Antagonists of Phytohormone Receptors. Biochemistry 55: 5155–5164

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Rebetzke GJ, Condon AG, Richards RA, Farquhar GD (2002) Selection for Reduced Carbon Isotope Discrimination Increases AerialBiomass and Grain Yield of Rainfed Bread Wheat. Crop Science 42: 739-745

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Rizhsky L, Liang H, Shuman J, Shulaev V, Davletova S, Mittler R (2004) When defense pathways collide. The response of Arabidopsisto a combination of drought and heat stress. Plant physiology 134: 1683–1696

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Rizza F, Ghashghaie J, Meyer S, Matteu L, Mastrangelo AM, Badeck F-W (2012) Constitutive differences in water use efficiencyhttps://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 28, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Page 36: Abscisic acid receptors and coreceptors modulate plant water … · 2019. 3. 18. · 81 water deficit by reducing transpiration (Munemasa et al., 2015), protecting photosynthesis

between two durum wheat cultivars. Field Crops Research 125: 49–60Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Rubio S, Rodrigues A, Saez A, Dizon MB, Galle A, Kim T-H, Santiago J, Flexas J, Schroeder JI, Rodriguez PL (2009) Triple loss offunction of protein phosphatases type 2C leads to partial constitutive response to endogenous abscisic acid. Plant physiology 150:1345–1355

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Sadras VO, Grassini P, Steduto P (2010) Status of water use efficiency of main crops. SOLAW Background Thematic Report TR07. FAO.Rome.

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Saez A, Robert N, Maktabi MH, Schroeder JI, Serrano R, Rodriguez PL (2006) Enhancement of abscisic acid sensitivity and reductionof water consumption in Arabidopsis by combined inactivation of the protein phosphatases type 2C ABI1 and HAB1. Plant physiology141: 1389–1399

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Santiago J, Rodrigues A, Saez A, Rubio S, Antoni R, Dupeux F, Park S-Y, Márquez JA, Cutler SR, Rodriguez PL (2009) Modulation ofdrought resistance by the abscisic acid receptor PYL5 through inhibition of clade A PP2Cs. The Plant journal: for cell and molecularbiology 60: 575–588

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Saranga Y, Jiang C-X, Wright RJ, Yakir D, Paterson AH (2004) Genetic dissection of cotton physiological responses to arid conditionsand their inter-relationships with productivity. Plant, Cell and Environment 27: 263–277.

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Song L, Huang S-SC, Wise A, Castanon R, Nery JR, Chen H, Watanabe M, Thomas J, Bar-Joseph Z, Ecker JR (2016) A transcriptionfactor hierarchy defines an environmental stress response network. Science 354. aag1550

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Takeuchi J, Okamoto M, Akiyama T, Muto T, Yajima S, Sue M, Seo M, Kanno Y, Kamo T, Endo A, Nambara E, Hirai N, Ohnishi T, CutlerSR, Todoroki Y (2014) Designed abscisic acid analogs as antagonists of PYL-PP2C receptor interactions. Nature chemical biology 10:477–482

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Thompson AJ, Andrews J, Mulholland BJ, McKee JMT, Hilton HW, Horridge JS, Farquhar GD, Smeeton RC, Smillie IRA, Black CR,Taylor IB (2007) Overproduction of abscisic acid in tomato increases transpiration efficiency and root hydraulic conductivity andinfluences leaf expansion. Plant physiology 143: 1905–1917

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Tischer SV, Wunschel C, Papacek M, Kleigrewe K, Hofmann T, Christmann A, Grill E (2017) Combinatorial interaction network ofabscisic acid receptors and coreceptors from Arabidopsis thaliana. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the UnitedStates of America 114: 10280–10285

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Ubierna N, Farquhar GD (2014) Advances in measurements and models of photosynthetic carbon isotope discrimination in C3 plants.Plant, cell & environment 37: 1494–1498

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Umezawa T, Nakashima K, Miyakawa T, Kuromori T, Tanokura M, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2010) Molecular basis of thecore regulatory network in ABA responses. Sensing, signaling and transport. Plant & cell physiology 51: 1821–1839

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Urban J, Ingwers MW, McGuire MA, Teskey RO (2017) Increase in leaf temperature opens stomata and decouples net photosynthesisfrom stomatal conductance in Pinus taeda and Populus deltoides x nigra. Journal of experimental botany 68: 1757–1767

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Vaidya AS, Peterson FC, Yarmolinsky D, Merilo E, Verstraeten I, Park S-Y, Elzinga D, Kaundal A, Helander J, Lozano-Juste J, Otani M,Wu K, Jensen DR, Kollist H, Volkman BF, Cutler SR (2017) A Rationally Designed Agonist Defines Subfamily IIIA Abscisic AcidReceptors As Critical Targets for Manipulating Transpiration. ACS chemical biology 12: 2842–2848

Pubmed: Author and Title https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 28, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Page 37: Abscisic acid receptors and coreceptors modulate plant water … · 2019. 3. 18. · 81 water deficit by reducing transpiration (Munemasa et al., 2015), protecting photosynthesis

Google Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Wada Y, van Beek LPH, van Kempen CM, Reckman JWTM, Vasak S, Bierkens MFP (2010) Global depletion of groundwater resources.Geophysical Research Letters 37: L20402

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Wang P, Xue L, Batelli G, Lee S, Hou Y-J, van Oosten MJ, Zhang H, Tao WA, Zhu J-K (2013) Quantitative phosphoproteomics identifiesSnRK2 protein kinase substrates and reveals the effectors of abscisic acid action. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciencesof the United States of America 110: 11205–11210

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Wang Y, Ying J, Kuzma M, Chalifoux M, Sample A, McArthur C, Uchacz T, Sarvas C, Wan J, Dennis DT, McCourt P, Huang Y (2005)Molecular tailoring of farnesylation for plant drought tolerance and yield protection. The Plant journal: for cell and molecular biology43: 413–424

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Wilen RW, Hays DB, Mandel RM, Abrams SR, Moloney MM (1993) Competitive Inhibition of Abscisic Acid-Regulated Gene Expressionby Stereoisomeric Acetylenic Analogs of Abscisic Acid. Plant physiology 101: 469–476

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Wong SC, Cowan IR, Farquhar GD (1979) Stomatal conductance correlates with photosynthetic capacity. Nature 282: 424-426Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Yang Y, Sulpice R, Himmelbach A, Meinhard M, Christmann A, Grill E (2006) Fibrillin expression is regulated by abscisic acid responseregulators and is involved in abscisic acid-mediated photoprotection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the UnitedStates of America 103: 6061–6066

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Yang Z, Liu J, Tischer SV, Christmann A, Windisch W, Schnyder H, Grill E (2016) Leveraging abscisic acid receptors for efficient wateruse in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113: 6791–6796

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Ye Y, Zhou L, Liu X, Liu H, Li D, Cao M, Chen H, Xu L, Zhu J-K, Zhao Y (2017) A Novel Chemical Inhibitor of ABA Signaling Targets AllABA Receptors. Plant physiology 173: 2356–2369

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Yoo CY, Hasegawa PM, Mickelbart MV (2011) Regulation of stomatal density by the GTL1 transcription factor for improving water useefficiency. Plant signaling & behavior 6: 1069–1071

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Yoshida T, Mogami J, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2014) ABA-dependent and ABA-independent signaling in response to osmotic stress inplants. Current opinion in plant biology 21: 133–139

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Zandalinas SI, Mittler R, Balfagón D, Arbona V, Gómez-Cadenas A (2018) Plant adaptations to the combination of drought and hightemperatures. Physiologia plantarum 162: 2–12

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Zhao Y, Chan Z, Gao J, Xing L, Cao M, Yu C, Hu Y, You J, Shi H, Zhu Y, Gong Y, Mu Z, Wang H, Deng X, Wang P, Bressan RA, Zhu J-K(2016) ABA receptor PYL9 promotes drought resistance and leaf senescence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of theUnited States of America 113: 1949–1954

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 28, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.