A di F R da O. Min5 Tavole sinottiche Quaestionespraeambulae

5 - INDEX GENERALIS 947

5. Index generalis

Alcune notizie sulla vita e sulle opere di Francesco Rossida Appignano O. Min.........................................................................................5

Tavole sinottiche...............................................................................................................131. Confronto tra le redazioni e le edizioni delle Quaestionespraeambulae...........13

2. Confronto tra le redazioni del Commento al I libro delle Sentenze................ 14

Abbreviazioni.............................................................................................................16

Opere di Francesco della Marca edite da Nazareno Mariani....................................17

Editio textus.............................................................................................................19

Quaestiones praeambulae................................................................................ 21

Quaestio praeambula I: Utrum ens simpliciter simplex possitESSE SUBIECTUM ALICUIUS SCIENTIAE IN INTELLECTU VIATORIS ..............23

Positio quaestionis [1-4]................................................................................................23

Status quaestionis [5] .....................................................................................................24

Articulus I. Quid vocatur ens simpliciter simplex............................... 24

Definitio [6]....................................................................................................................24

Duo corollaria [7-11].....................................................................................................24

Articulus II. Tale simplex compatitur secum aliquam nonIDENTITATEM SECUNDUM QUID ET HOC EST EX NATURA REI .................25

Introductio [12-14] ....................................................................................................... 25

Sed dicunt aliqui quod non [15] ................................................................................. 25

Iste modus est proprius unitati [16-22].......................................................................25

Resumo rationem [23]...................................................................................................26

Contra [24] .....................................................................................................................26

Responsio [25-30] ..........................................................................................................26

948 5 - INDEX GENERALIS

Quoad secundum corollarium [31-45] ........................................................

Contra [46-50]..............................................................................................Responsio [51-54] .........................................................................................

Dico aliter [55]..............................................................................................Articulus III. Utrum tale ens compatiatur secum aliquam

NON IDENTITATEM EX NATURA REI .....................................................

Dico duas conclusiones [56-57] ...................................................................Sed contra [58-76].........................................................................................Aliqua distinctio potest concludi [77-82] ....................................................

Contra [83-85]..............................................................................................Articulus IV. Utrum talis distinctio secundum quid suffi-

CIAT AD SCIENTIAM .................................................................................

Quaerenda sunt quattuor [86] ......................................................................

Membrum I. Utrum distinctio talis secundum quid vel non identitatis salvet illudprincipium in divinis................................................................

Positio quaestionis [87] .................................................................................Contra [88] ....................................................................................................Solutio quaestionis et divisio videndorum [89] ...........................................Quaesitum 1. De forma istius principii: “Quaecumque uni et eidem sunt ea-

dem inter se sunt eadem”........................................................................

Tres conclusiones [91-93] .............................................................................Quaesitum 2. Quando istudprincipium per se notum valet..........................Corpus quaesiti [94-98] ................................................................................Responsio [99-100] .......................................................................................

Quaesitum 3. Quomodo hoc principium tenet in divinis................................Corpus quaesiti [101-102]............................................................................Membrum III. Utrum salvet medium syllogisticum in divinis ....................

Positio quaestionis [103-104] .......................................................................Duo videnda [105] ........................................................................................Quaesitum 1. Quomodo illud principium teneat in se...................................Duplex ordo terminorum [106-108]............................................................

Sed contra [ 109-110] ....................................................................................

27

28

29

29

30

30

31

33

34

34

34

35

35

3536

36

36

37

37

38

38

38

39

39

39

39

39

40


Responsio [111-114]............................................................................................... 41

Quaesitum 2. Quomodo illudprincipium teneatin divinis..................................... 41Numquam in divinis tenet forma syllogistica [115-123] ...................................... 41

Membrum IV. Utrum salveturgeneraliter medius syllogisticus per modifi-cationem vel impedimento................................................................................. 43

Modificano est duplex [124-132]............................................................................43

Quaestio praeambula II: Utrum theologia sit de DeoTAMQUAM DE PRIMO SUBIECTO .................................................................. 45

Positio quaestionis [1]..............................................................................................45Contra [2].................................................................................................................45

Respondeo [3] ......................................................................................................... 45Solutio et divisio videndorum [4] ...........................................................................45

Membrum I. Quid sitprimum subiectum in natura et qualiterse habeat............46

Quantum ad primum [5] ........................................................................................ 46

Duplex corollarium [6-8] ........................................................................................46

Quod probo [9-12]..................................................................................................47Sed contra [13-16]...................................................................................................48Corollarium [17-21] ............................................................................................... 48

Sequuntur conclusiones [22-29]............................................................................. 50

Intentio Philosophi [30].........................................................................................51

Dubia et responsiones [31-33]................................................................................ 52Hic est duplex dubium [34-35] .............................................................................. 52

Responsio ad dubia [36-37].....................................................................................53

Tertium dubium [38] ...............................................................................................53Responsio [39-40] ................................................................................................... 53

Membrum IL Quid sitprimum subiectum in scientia...... ..................................... 54

Primum contentum in scientia est prius omnibus contentis in illa scientia[41-50]............................................................................................................. 54

Membrum III. Deus est primum subiectum theologiae.......................................... 56

Positio quaestionis [51-58] ..................................................................................... 56

Tria dubia [59-60]....................................................................................................57


Adrationes [61-63] ................................................................................................. 58

Ideo dico aliter [64-65]............................................................................................58

Quaestio praeambula III: Utrum aliqua scientia ab ista sitDE DeO TAMQUAM DE PRIMO SUBIECTO .................................................. 59

Quaestionem ponit [1] ............................................................................................ 59

Contra [2]................................................................................................................. 59

Respondeo [3-5] ...................................................................................................... 59Pono sex conclusiones.................................................................................................60

Prima conclusio [6-12] ............................................................................................ 60

Secunda conclusio [13-17] ......................................................................................61

Tertia conclusio [18-25] .......................................................................................... 62Quarta conclusio [26-34]........................................................................................ 64

Quinta conclusio [35-37]........................................................................................ 66

Sexta conclusio [38-47] ........................................................................................... 66

Ens potest accipi quadrupliciter................................................................................. 68

Distinguo de ente [48-54]....................................................................................... 68

De ente: quid est?......................................................................................................70

Metaphysica est una vel duplex? [56-59] ................................................................70

Sed hic est dubium [60]...........................................................................................71

Responsio ad dubium [61]...................................................................................... 71

Duplex est metaphysica .............................................................................................72

De ente separato secundum rem et separato secundum rationem [62-66]..........72

Hoc probo [67-68] .................................................................................................. 73

Hoc confirmatur [69-71] ........................................................................................ 73

Forte dices: Haec est quaedam pars metaphysicae [72] .........................................74

Contra [73] ..............................................................................................................74

Forte dices quod est scientia divina [74].................................................................74

Sed contra: duplex est metaphysica [75-78] .......................................................... 75

Quomodo se habet ista scientia de Deo ad theologiam nostram? [79-82]........... 75

Et cum dicitur... [83]............................................................................................... 76


Duo dubia [84-87] ..................................................................................................76

Responsio [88-90] ...................................................................................................77

Aliterpotest dici [91].............................................................................................. 78

Exemplum [92]........................................................................................................ 79

Quaestio praeambula IV: Utrum theologia nobis revelataa Deo sit scientia proprie dicta............................................................. 81

Quaestionem ponit [1] ............................................................................................81

Contra [2].................................................................................................................81

Solutio [3].................................................................................................................81

Prima quaestio [4].................................................................................................... 81

Contra [5].................................................................................................................82

Secunda quaestio [6] ................................................................................................ 82

Contra [7-9]............................................................................................................. 82

Alius dicit [10-11] ................................................................................................... 83

Responsio [12]..........................................................................................................83

Tres opiniones [13-16].............................................................................................83

Contra [17-23] .........................................................................................................84

Secundo, ad principale [24-25]............................................................................... 85

Item, tertio [26]........................................................................................................85

Responsio ad istas rationes [27-28].........................................................................86

Contra [29-31] ........................................................................................................ 86

Reduco ultimam rationem [32] .............................................................................. 87

Contra [33] ..............................................................................................................87

Probatio [34-41] ......................................................................................................87

Responsio propria [42-44]...................................................................................... 89

Quadruplex genus scientiae...................................................................................... 90

Positio quaestionis [45-50] ..................................................................................... 90

Hoc patet multipliciter [51-57]..............................................................................91

Tria dubia [58-62]................................................................................................... 93

Solutio trium dubiorum [63-66] ............................................................................93


Contra [67] .............................................................................................................. 95Respondeo [68]........................................................................................................95Respondeo aliter [69-71] .........................................................................................95

Quaestio praeambulaV: De scientia practica.....................................97Art. I. Utrum scientia dicaturpractica ab operatione elicita intellectus vel ab

operatione imperata.......................................................................................... 97

Positio quaestionis [1-2].......................................................................................... 97Contra [3-4]............................................................................................................. 97Responsio aliquorum [5-8]......................................................................................98

Operano intellectus quadrupliciter [9-17]............................................................. 98Aliqua veritas et intellectus [18-21]..................................................................... 100

Scientia non dicitur speculativa a veritate [22-25]............................................... 101Conclusio [26]....................................................................................................... 101

Quinque corollaria [27]......................................................................................... 102Primum corollarium [28]...................................................................................... 102Secundum corollarium [29-32] ............................................................................ 102Tertium corollarium [33-34] ................................................................................ 103

Quartum corollarium [35]................................................................................... 103Quintum corollarium [36] ................................................................................... 104

Ad rationes in oppositum [37]............................................................................. 104Contra [38-40] ...................................................................................................... 104

Dico aliter [41-46]................................................................................................. 104Art. IL Utrum scientia practica et speculativa distinguantur per se et primo

ex obiecto vel ex fine....................................................................................... 105Positio quaestionis [47-48] ................................................................................... 105

Contra [49] ........................................................................................................... 106Respondeo [50-51]................................................................................................ 106

Hic sunt tria [52-57] ............................................................................................. 106Dico hic duas conclusiones [58-64]..................................................................... 107Respondeo dupliciter [65-66].............................................................................. 108

Contra [67-68] ...................................................................................................... 108


Contra [69-80] ........................................................................................................... 109

Contraista [81-86].................................................................................................... Ili

Ad istas rationes ......................................................................................................... 112

Adprimum [87-88]................................................................................................... 112

Ad secundum [89-93]................................................................................................ 113

Ad tertium [94] .......................................................................................................... 114

Dico hic tria [95-97] ................................................................................................. 114

Ad dictum Philosophi [98]....................................................................................... 115

Ad rationem primam [99]......................................................................................... 115

Duae responsiones [100-101] .................................................................................. 115

Si autem quaeras [102-103] ...................................................................................... 116

Quaestio praeambula VI: Utrum theologia nobis revelataSIT PRACTICA VEL SPECULATIVA ................................................................. 117

Positio quaestionis [1-3]............................................................................................ 117

Contra [4-5]................................................................................................................ 118

Responsio ad ista [6-7].............................................................................................. 118

Membrum I. Utrum sit unus habitus velplures..................................................... 118

Theologia est unus habitus [8-12] ........................................................................... 118

Membrum II. Utrum habitus theologiae sitpracticus vel speculativus................. 119

Dico hic tres conclusiones [13]................................................................................ 119

Tres conclusiones probo [14-16] ............................................................................. 119

Ad propositum [17-23] ............................................................................................. 120

Sed contra [24-25]..................................................................................................... 122

Responsio tribus rationibus [26-34] ........................................................................ 122

Ad istas rationes [35-39] ........................................................................................... 124

Liber primus Sententiarum........................................................................... 127

Distinctio 1............................................................................................................ 129

Quaestio I. Utrum actus volendi et actus nolendi diffe-rant specie....................................................................................................... 129

Positio quaestionis [1-2]........................................................................................... 129


Quaedam opimo exponitur [3-5]........................................................................ 129

Pro opinione arguitur [6-8] ...................................................................................130

Contra[9-ll] ...................................................................................................... 130Ad principale [12-14] .......................................................................................... 131

Dico aliter [15]..................................................................................................... 131

Ad rationes [16-17] ............................................................................................. 131

Unde differunt isti actus? [18-24]....................................................................... 132

Quaestio II. Utrum in voluntate sit aliquis actus tertiusPRAETER ACTUM VOLENDI ET NOLENDI REALITER DISTINCTUS ABUTROQUE .............................................................................................. 133

Ponit quaestionem [25] ....................................................................................... 133Contra [26] .......................................................................................................... 133

Respondeo: duplex est ordo actuum intellectus [27-29].................................... 133

Probatur ex dictis [30-33] .................................................................................... 134Forte dices quod non est simile [34]................................................................... 135

Istud non valetpropter duo [35-40]................................................................... 136Sequitur corollarium [41-44] .............................................................................. 137

Ad rationem in oppositum [45]........................................................................... 137

Quaestio III. Utrum prima libertas voluntatis consistat inACTU VOLENDI ET NOLENDI....................................................................... 138

Ponit quaestionem [46] ....................................................................................... 138

Contra [47] .......................................................................................................... 138

Duplex est libertas voluntatis [48-49] ...................................................................138

Libertas convenit duobus [50-58]....................................................................... 139

Confirmatur [59]................................................................................................. 141

Patet per Augustinum et Philosophum [60-64]................................................. 141

Ad rationes in contrarium [65]........................................................................... 142

Quaestio IV. Utrum libertas contradictionis primo respiciatACTUM VOLENDI PER MODUM ACTUS VEL PER MODUM OBIECTI ......... 143

Quaestionem ponit [66]...................................................................................... 143


Contra [67] ................................................................................................................ 143

Quaerit de libertate simpliciter voluntatis [68]..................................................... 143

Est hic una opinio [69] ............................................................................................. 143

Pro ista opinione [70-72] .......................................................................................... 144

Intendo Anseimi [73-74] .......................................................................................... 144

Contra istam opinionem [75-77]............................................................................ 145

Contra conclusionem arguo [78-80] ...................................................................... 145

Dico aliter [81-82]..................................................................................................... 146

Et quando arguitur [83-85] ...................................................................................... 147

Ad secundum dico [86] ............................................................................................ 147

Ad Anselmum [87-90].............................................................................................. 147

Quaestio V. Utrum libertas contradictionis voluntatis re-SPICIAT NECESSARIO ACTUM VOLENDI FINEM......................................... 148

Quaestionem ponit [91]............................................................................................ 148

Contra [92] ................................................................................................................. 148

Responsio [93]............................................................................................................ 148

Est hic una opinio [94] ............................................................................................. 149

Pro ista opinione arguitur [95-97] .......................................................................... 149

Una ratio prò ista opinione [98-99]........................................................................ 150

Intendo Philosophi deficit in tribus [100] ............................................................. 150

Ista opinio deficit in tribus [101-105] ..................................................................... 150

Sed contra [106-127] ................................................................................................ 151

Ideo dico aliter [128-130]......................................................................................... 156

Pono duas conclusiones [131-136] ......................................................................... 156

Ad oppositum [137-143] .......................................................................................... 158

Ad primam [144-145] .................................................................................................159

Quaestio VI. Utrum libertas contradictionis se extendatAD ACTUM VOLENDI ULTIMUM FINEM IN PATRIA ................................... 160

Quaestionem ponit [146] ........................................................................................ 160

Contra [147].............................................................................................................. 160


Respondeo [148] ................................................................................................. 160

Art. 1. Utrum voluntas creata necessitetur ab essentia divina visa per modani agentis................................................................................................... 160

Corpus articuli [149-151]......................................................................................160Respondeo dupliciter [152-154]......................................................................... 161

Art. 2. Utrum voluntas necessitaretur ab essentia divina, visa per modumfinis, licet non per modum agentis................................................................ 162

Corpus articuli [155-162]................................................................................... 162

Contra hoc arguo tripliciter [163] ...................................................................... 163Forte dices... [164]............................................................................................... 163

Responsio [165-170]........................................................................................... 163

Contra [171-172] ................................................................................................ 165

Dico aliter [173-176]........................................................................................... 165

Ad rationes in contrarium [177-179]................................................................. 166

Ad oppositum [180-183] .................................................................................... 167Contra [184]........................................................................................................ 168

Respondeo aliter [185-186] ................................................................................ 168

Contra solutionem [187] ...................................................................................... 169

Responsio [188] ................................................................................................... 169

Sed ista responsio non videtur sufficere [189-192]............................................ 169

Addictum Anseimi [193]................................................................................... 170

Art. 3. Utrum voluntas beata necessitetur ad actum diligendi Deum ex se etnatura sua intrinseca vela principio intrinseco............................................ 170

Una opimo valde probabile [195] ...................................................................... 170

Pro ista opinione arguì tur [196]......................................................................... 171

Pono duas propositiones [197-200].................................................................... 171

Secunda propositio ostensa [201-205]................................................................. 172

Sed contra [206].................................................................................................. 173

Responsio [207-208]........................................................................................... 173

Exemplum de pondere [209-210] ...................................................................... 174

Ad rationes praecedentes [211-212]................................................................... 175


Quaestio VII. Utrum voluntas creata viatoris eodem actuVELIT FINEM ET ILLUD QUOD EST AD FINEM ......................................... 175

Quaestionem ponit [213] ................................................................................... 175Contra [214]........................................................................................................ 176

Tria videnda [215] ............................................................................................... 176Membrum I. Utrum intellectus eodem actu numero quo apprehendit com-

positionem propositionis apprehendat extremapropositionis........................ 176

Prima operatio intellectus [216] ......................................................................... 176

Probatio [217-223].............................................................................................. 177Ad principale [224-227]...................................................................................... 178Contra conclusionem [228-229]........................................................................ 179Contra ista [230-232].......................................................................................... 179

Siquaeras... [233] ................................................................................................ 180

Respondeo dupliciter [234-239] ......................................................................... 180Arguo contra modum ponendi principaliter [240-244] ................................... 182

Contra istum modum arguo principaliter [245]................................................ 183Intellectus habet tres actus [246]......................................................................... 183

Quod probo [247-249] ....................................................................................... 184Ad rationes [250-258] ......................................................................................... 184

Membrum II. Utrum intellectus eodem actu numero quo assentit conclusioni propter prìncipium eodem actu assentiatprincipio vel alio actu.............. 186

Principium et conclusio possunt intellegi dupliciter [259-263] ........................ 186

Contra conclusionem [264-269]......................................................................... 187Responsio ad haec [270-271] .............................................................................. 189Ad secundam rationem [272] ............................................................................. 189

Contra istam viam arguo [273-277]................................................................... 190Quod sic declaro [278-279] ................................................................................ 191Tunc ad rationes [280-294] ................................................................................. 191Membrum III. Utrum actus volendi finem et illud quod est ad finem sit

idem actus numero ....................................................................................... 195Ratio intellegendi est duplex [295-300] ............................................................. 195Contra [301]........................................................................................................ 196


Quaestio Vili (vel occasionalis). Utrum intellectus in ultimo INSTANTI DISCURSUS SYLLOGISMI QUO INTELLEGIT CON- CLUSIONEM INTELLEGAT ACTU PRAEMISSAS ........................................ 197

Occasione dictorum, quaeritur [302]................................................................. 197

Contra [303]........................................................................................................ 197

Responsio [304] ................................................................................................... 197

Est hic opimo communis [305-313]................................................................... 198Arguo contra istam opinionem [314] ................................................................ 199

Respondetur [315] .............................................................................................. 200Contra [316-320] ................................................................................................ 200

Contra hoc dupliciter [321-322].......................................................................... 201

Ad principale [323] ............................................................................................. 202Ad haec respondetur tripliciter [324]................................................................. 202

Primo [325-326] ................................................................................................... 202

Secundo [327-329]................................................................................................203Tertio [330-332] ....................................................................................................203

Assentire et dissentire sunt contraria [333]..........................................................204

Veritas et falsitas intellectus consistit primo in actu iudicandi [334-335]........ 204

Hoc dicit Philosophus [336]................................................................................ 204

Conclusio non dependet a principio [337-339] ..................................................205

Corollarium [340] .................................................................................................205Contra [341]........................................................................................................ 205

Responsio [342] .................................................................................................... 206

Sequitur aliud corollarium [343-345]..................................................................206Circa difficultatem dicam duas conclusiones [346-351] ................................... 206

Responsio ad rationes [352-366]..........................................................................208

Ad propositum [367-368] ....................................................................................211Dico duas conclusiones [369-372]....................................................................... 211

Contra [373-378] ................................................................................................. 212

Responsio [379-381]........................................................................................... 212

Contra [382]..........................................................................................................213

Responsio [383-384].............................................................................................213

Respondeo [385-387]........................................................................................... 213

Quaestio IX. Utrum voluntas eodem actu quo vult finemDELECTETUR IN EO ................................................................................... 214

Solutio [388-390] ..................................................................................................214

Responsio [391-394]........................................................................................... 214

Contra [395-399] ................................................................................................ 215Dicoaliter [400-404]............................................................................................ 216

Quod patet tripliciter [405-408]......................................................................... 217

Quod probo [409-410] ....................................................................................... 218

Distinctio II..................................................................................................... 219

Quaestio I. Utrum in universitate entium sit dare aliquodENS UNIVERSALITER PERFECTUM............................................................ 219

Positio quaestionis [1-4]...................................................................................... 219

Solutio quaestionis [5] ......................................................................................... 219Membrum I. Quid intellegitur nomine universaliterperfecti................................... 220

Primum quid est? [6-8]........................................................................................ 220

Quantum ad secundum [9]................................................................................. 221

Quantum ad tertium [10] ................................................................................... 221

Iste est perfectior conceptus quem de Deo possimus habere in vita ista [11] ...... 222

Conclusio [12]..................................................................................................... 222

Membrum IL Ponit octo conclusiones................................................................. 222

Ponit aliquas conclusiones [13] .......................................................................... 222Prima conclusio [14-17] ....................................................................................... 222

Contra [18-22] .................................................................................................... 223

Responsio [23-28] .................................................................................................223

Secunda conclusio [29-34].................................................................................... 224

Tertia conclusio [35-40]..........................................................................................225

Quarta conclusio [41-46] .......................................................................................226

Quinta conclusio [47-55]........................................................................................227



Sexta conclusio [56-61] ......................................................................................... 229

Septima conclusio [62] .......................................................................................... 230

Octava conclusio [63] ........................................................................................... 231

Istae rationes videntur non concludere [64-69] ................................................. 231Responsiones ad istas rationes [70-76]............................................................... 232

Contra [77] .......................................................................................................... 233Ad rationes [78-82] ............................................................................................. 233

Ad rationes principales [83-87] .......................................................................... 234

Ad propositum [88] ............................................................................................ 235

Quaestio IL Utrum ex causalitate ultimi finis omnium pos-SIT CONCLUDI SUFFICIENTER CAUSALITAS PRIMI EFFICIENTIS OMNIUM...................................................................................................... 235

Positio quaestionis [89-90]................................................................................... 235

Contra [91-93] ...................................................................................................... 236Responsio et divisio videndorum [94] ............................................................... 236

Membrum I. Utrum sit aliqua continentia extrinseca prior continentiacausali efficientis etfinis [95-100] ............................................................... 237

Membrum IL Utrum causalitasfinis sit prior quoad nos causalitate agentisvel e converso [101-103] ............................................................................... 238

Membrum III. Utrum finis habeat rationem causae secundum quod habet esse obiective in intentione agentis vel secundum quod habet esse realiter extra............................................................................................................. 239

Prima opinio [104-107]....................................................................................... 239

Secunda opimo [108-114] .................................................................................. 239

Membrum IV. UtrumDeus sit causafinalis omnium [115-117] ....................... 241Membrum V. Utrum ex causalitate finis possit concludi causalitas agentis

[118-121] ...................................................................................................... 243

Quidam Doctor contra istam opinionem [122-123].......................................... 244

Ad rationes: quia non concludunt [124-126].................................................... 244

Ista responsio non sufficit [127-129]....................................................................245

Arguoaliter contra istam opinionem [130-135] ............................................... 245Responsio [136] .................................................................................................... 246


Sedcontra [137-141] ..................................................................................................247

Respondeo [142-143] ............................................................................................... 248

Sed contra [144-148] ................................................................................................ 248

Ideo dico aliter [149] .................................................................................................. 249

Ad propositum [150-156] ........................................................................................ 249

Contra [157]............................................................................................................... 251

Quod dicunt Philosophus et Commentator [158-168] ....................................... 251

Respondeo in oppositum [169-172] ...................................................................... 254

Quaestio III. Utrum ex infinitate motus extensiva possitCONCLUDI INFINITAS VIRTUTIS IN PRIMO MOTORE .............................. 255

Positio quaestionis [173-174] .................................................................................. 255

Responsio [175-177]................................................................................................... 255

Aliquid potest concludi de aliquo dupliciter [178].............................................. 256

Membrum I. Utrum ex infinitate motus possit concludi positive infinitasvirtutis intensiva motoris................................................................................... 256

Primum, comparatur ad quattuor [179] ................................................................ 256

0stendo ex quadruplici via [180].............................................................................. 256

Primus modus ostendendi [181-183]..................................................................... 256

Contra [184]............................................................................................................... 257

Secundus modus ostendendi [185-187] ................................................................. 257

Forte dices [188] ........................................................................................................ 258

Contra [189].................................................................................................................258

Tertius modus ostendendi [190-192] ..................................................................... 258

Quartus modus ostendendi [193] ........................................................................... 259

Respondetur dupliciter [194] ..................................................................................... 259

Prima responsio [195]............................................................................................... 259

Contra [196-197] ........................................................................................................259

Responsio secunda [198] ........................................................................................... 260

Contra [199-207] ........................................................................................................260

Contra sunt instantiae [208] .................................................................................... 262

Prima instantia [209] ..................................................................................................262


Secunda instantia [210-211] ............................................................................... 263

Tertia instantia [212-215] ................................................................................... 263Adista respondet [216-217] ................................................................................. 264Contra [218-221] ..................................................................................................265Responsio ad ista [222-235] ................................................................................ 265Membrum II. Utrum ex infinitate motus intensiva possit concludi negative

virtutemprimi motoris non esse injinitam intensive.................................... 268Videtur quod sic propter tria [236-239]............................................................. 268Ad rationes respondetur [240]............................................................................ 270Contra [241-246] ................................................................................................ 270

Respondetur ab aliis [247].................................................................................. 271Contra [248-251] ................................................................................................ 271Potest dici aliter [252-260]................................................................................... 272

Respondeo [261] ................................................................................................. 274

Per hoc ad secundum [262-263]......................................................................... 274Contra hoc est instantia fortior [264].................................................................. 275

Responsio dupliciter [265-266]............................................................................ 275Adpropositum [267]...........................................................................................276

Estne infinita positive? [268-269]....................................................................... 276Salvatur ibi subiectum velocitatis ? [270-271]..................................................... 277Et si quaeras [272]................................................................................................ 277

Ad argumentum in contrarium [273-275]......................................................... 277

Quaestio IV. Utrum prima causa possit producere extra seALIQUEM EFFECTUM ACTU INFINITUM .................................................. 278

Positio quaestionis [276].......................................................................................278

Contra [277]........................................................................................................ 278Responsio [278-279]............................................................................................. 278Infinitum est triplex [280] .................................................................................... 279

Est hic una opimo negans infinitum [281]...........................................................279Primo probatur: De infinito secundum magnitudinem [282-287] ....................279Secundo. De infinito secundum multitudinem [288-291]................................. 280


Tertio. De infinito secundum intentionem [292-293] ........................................280

Conclusio [294-295].............................................................................................281Arguo contra conclusionem et contra rationes [296] ........................................281

Arguo contra conclusionem [297-307] .............................................................. 281De infinito secundum multitudinem [308-316]..................................................283

Responsio ad haec [317-319] .............................................................................. 284

Dico aliter [320-324]............................................................................................ 285

Deus potest facere infinitum [325-328] ............................................................. 286

Triplex est quantitas distincta [329-333]..............................................................286

Similiter de magnitudine [334-335].....................................................................287Ad rationes [336-341] .......................................................................................... 287

Adaliud [342-343]................................................................................................289

Adaliud [344-348]..................................... 289

Adaliud [349-351]................................................................................................289

Ad aliam rationem [352-353] ...............................................................................290Adaliud [354-356]................................................................................................291

Ad aliam rationem [357-358] ...............................................................................291

Adaliud [359] .......................................................................................................291Adaliud [360] .......................................................................................................292

Hic sunt duo dubia [361-364] ..............................................................................292

Ratio Augustini [365]........................................................................................... 293

Solutio illius rationis [366-367] ...........................................................................293

Secundum dubium [368] .................................................................................... 293

Responsio ad dubium [369] ................................................................................. 294

Ad primum argumentum [370].......................................................................... 294

Distinctio III (pars I): Quid intellectus noster primo at-TINGIT DE SUBSTANTIA SENSIBILI ........................................................ 295

Positio quaestionis [1]........................................................................................... 295

Quaestio I. Utrum intellectus noster naturaliterhabeat ali-QUEM CONCEPTUM PROPRIUM DE SUBSTANTIA SENSIBILI VEL NON..... 295


Respondeo [4-10] ...................................................................................................... 295

Intellectus habet duplicem conceptum [11-13] ......................................................296

Contra [14-16] ........................................................................................................... 297

Dico aliter [17-19]..................................................................................................... 298

Alius est conceptus proprius [20-22]...................................................................... 299

Forte dices... [23] ....................................................................................................... 300

Sed contra [24-27]..................................................................................................... 300

Contra ista [28-30].................................................................................................... 301

Ad istas affirmationes [31-42].................................................................................. 301

Ad alias rationes [43-49] ........................................................................................... 303

Quaestio II. Utrum substantia prius intellegatur a nobisQUAM ACCIDENS ............................................................................................. 305

Positio quaestionis [50-52] ....................................................................................... 305

Respondeo [53]............................................................................................................305

Videnda sunt duo [54].............................................................................................. 305

Triplex modus substantiae [55-58] ......................................................................... 305

Quod probo sigillatim [59-67] .................................................................................. 306

Intentio Philosophi et Commentatoris [68-70].................................................... 308

Contra [71-74] ........................................................................................................... 308

Responsio [75-82] ....................................................................................................... 309

Ad primum in oppositum [83] ................................................................................ 311

Quaestio III. Utrum intellectus noster habeat de acciden-TIBUS NATURALITER ALIQUEM CONCEPTUM PROPRIUM ESSEN- TIALEM ............................................................................................................... 311

Positio quaestionis [84-85] ....................................................................................... 311

Contra [86-87].............................................................................................................311

Respondeo [88].......................................................................................................... 312

Probo, primo, de genere; secundo, de specie [89-93]........................................... 312

Quod probo, primo, sic [94-97] .............................................................................. 313

Contra ista [98-105] ................................................................................................. 314


Responsio ad haec [106-125] ............................................................................. 315

Quaestio IV. Utrum intellectus noster prius natura intel-LEGAT UNIVERSALE QUAM SINGULARE.................................................. 318

Positio quaestionis [126] ..................................................................................... 318

Contra [127-128] ..................................................................................................319Responsio et divisio videndorum [129-130] ..................................................... 319

Membrum I. Quantum ad suppositum .............................................................. 319

Responsio [131-135]............................................................................................. 319

Quid senserint philosophi [136-137]................................................................. 320

Hic modus dicendi non potest stare [138-146] ................................................. 320

Contra hoc tripliciter [147-151] ........................................................................ 322

Ideo dico aliter [152-157]................................................................................... 322

Membrum IL Circa quaesitum............................................................................ 324

Responsio et divisio videndorum [158] .............................................................. 324

Art. 1. Utrum prius intellegatur a nobis magis universale vel minusuniversale.................................................................................................... 324

Primus modus dicendi [159-161] ....................................................................... 324

Secundus modus dicendi [162-165] ................................................................... 325

Respondeo aliter [166-168] ................................................................................ 325

Art. II. Utrum prius intellegatur a nobis universale vel singulare ................ 326

Secunda pars probatur [169-173] ....................................................................... 326Philosophus videtur varie loqui [174-176]......................................................... 327

Distinctio III (Pars II): Utrum trinitas Personarum possitconcludi ex creaturis......................................................................... 329

Quaestionem ponit [1-3] .................................................................................... 329

Contra [4].............................................................................................................. 330

Quattuor sunt videnda [5] .................................................................................. 330

Membrum I. Quid est vestigium ingenerali......................................................... 330

Vestigium dicitur ab investigando [6]................................................................. 330

Membrum II. In quo differt vestigium ab umbra et imagine.............................. 331


Alii dicunt [9]...................................................................................................... 331

Contra [10-11]...................................................................................................... 332Secundus modus dicendi [12]............................................................................. 332

Contra [13-14] ..................................................................................................... 332

Dico aliter [15-19].................................................................................................333Sed in quo differì vestigium? [20-21]................................................................. 334

Membrum III. In qualibet creatura, reperitur vestigium creatoris quantumad essentialia et appropriata ........................................................................ 335

Creatura ducit in notitiam Trinitatis [22] .......................................................... 335Membrum IV. Quomodo reperiatur in creaturis vestigium quantum ad no-

tionalia et propria......................................................................................... 335Duo modi dicendi [23]........................................................................................ 335

Contra [24-28] ...................................................................................................... 335

Secundus modus dicendi [29-30]........................................................................ 337

Contra haec [31-33].............................................................................................. 337Dico aliter [34-35].................................................................................................338Ad rationes in oppositum [36-40] ...................................................................... 338

Ad argomenta in oppositum [41-42] ................................................................... 339

Distinctio IV: Utrum formaliter terminus generationisDIVINAE SIT ESSENTIA VEL RELATIO VEL SUPPOSITUM..................... 341

Quaestionem ponit [1-3] ......................................................................................341Contra omnia ista [4].......................................................................................... 341

Quattuor videnda [5]............................................................................................ 342

Membrum I. Utrum in creaturis per se relatio sitper se terminus mutationis 342

Differentia inter actionem et mutationem [6-8] ................................................ 342

Hoc probo [9-10] ..................................................................................................343Intendo Philosophi [11-12] ................................................................................. 344

Pono duas conclusiones [13-15]......................................................................... 344

Primam conclusionem probo [16] ...................................................................... 344

Forte dices [17]...................................................................................................... 345

Contra haec [18-25]............................................................................................ 345


Probatio secundae conclusionis [26-29] ............................................................. 346

Contra primam et secundam conclusionem [30-32] ......................................... 348

Ad rationes [33-40] ............................................................................................. 348

Membrum II. Utrum forma substantialis in creaturìs sit per se terminusgenerationis................................................................................................... 349

Opinio Philosophi et Commentatoris [41-42] .................................................. 349

Contra [43-47]...................................................................................................... 350Contra [48] .......................................................................................................... 351

Forte dices... [49] ................................................................................................. 351

Sed contra... [50-51] ........................................................................................... 351

Ad principale [52-57] .......................................................................................... 352Tunc quaero [58-61] ........................................................................................... 353

Tunc arguo [62-70] ............................................................................................... 353

Dicoaliter [71-72]............................................................................................... 355

Istud probo [73-74]............................................................................................... 355

Ad alias rationes [75-81] ..................................................................................... 356Ad aliam rationem [82-83]................................................................................. 357

Ad tertium [84-85]................................................................................................357

Membrum III. Utrum proprietas indivisibilis in creaturìs sit per se princi-pium agendi et etiarn terminus..................................................................... 358

Natura specifica potest considerari dupliciter [86-87]...................................... 358

Opinio Thomae [88-89]...................................................................................... 358

Ratio Scoti [90]..................................................................................................... 359

Contra Thomam et Scotum [91-95].....................................................................359

Ad principale [96-97] .......................................................................................... 360Secundus modus dicendi [98-101] ..................................................................... 360Contra [102-104] ..................................................................................................361

Dico aliter [105-106]............................................................................................ 361

Ad propositum [107-112] .................................................................................... 362

Pro utroque membro arguo [113-114] ............................................................... 363

Ad rationes alterius partis [115-120].................................................................. 363


Ad rationes alterius partis [121-126].................................................................. 364

Membrum IV. An per se terminus generationis divinae sit essentia vel rela-

tio vel suppositum........................................................................................... 365

Duo modi dicendi oppositi [127-128]................................................................ 365

Responsio [129-131]............................................................................................ 366

Contra [132]........................................................................................................ 366

Responsio [133-136]............................................................................................. 366

Distinctio VI: Utrum actuaeis volitio Filii praesuppona-TUR IN Patre eius generationi ......................................................... 369


Contra [3]............................................................................................................. 369

Hic est una opinio extrema [4-8]......................................................................... 369

Contra [9]...............................................................................................................370

Secunda opinio [10-11]....................................................................................... 371

Contra hoc [12-14] ............................................................................................. 371

Dico aliter [15-16]............................................................................................... 372

Primo [17] ............................................................................................................ 372

Secundo [18-21] .................................................................................................. 372

Tertio [22-23] ...................................................................................................... 373

Unum dubium [24] ............................................................................................. 374

Responsio [25-27] ............................................................................................... 374

Si non placet [28]................................................................................................. 375

Ad rationes alterius partis [29-34] ...................................................................... 375

Ad aliam rationem [35-36].................................................................................. 376

Ad alias rationes [37-41] ..................................................................................... 377

Secundum dubium [42] ...................................................................................... 378

Respondeo [43].................................................................................................... 378

Distinctio VII: Utrum Filius in divinis possit generareALIUM FILIUM............................................................................................. 379



Contra [3].................................................................................

Solutio quaestionis [4] ..............................................................

Membrum I.Quid sii formale principium generandi essentia vel relatio

Quantum ad primum [5] .........................................................Contra [6-7]..............................................................................

Responsio [8-9] ........................................................................

Pono tres conclusiones [10-13]................................................

Contra [14-15] .........................................................................Responsio [16-20] ....................................................................

Confirmatur [21] ......................................................................

Contra [22-27] ......................................................................... .

Ad ista [28-35] ..........................................................................

Ad ultimum [36-37]..................................................................

Membrum II.Utrum in Deo possent essepluresfilii.................................

Positio quaestionis [38] ............................................................

Contra hoc dupliciter [39-44] .................................................

Deficit in forma [45-51]...........................................................

Ideo dicitur aliter [52-56] .........................................................

Contra haec [57-59]..................................................................

Forte dices [60]..........................................................................

Sed contra [61-62]....................................................................

Ideo dicitur [63-65]...................................................................

Contra haec [66-68]................................................................. .

Ideo dico [69-71] .......................................................................

Membrum III.Utrumpotentiagenerandi cadatsub omnipotentia.......... .

Positio quaestionis [72] ............................................................

Contra [73-74] ..........................................................................

Dico aliter [75-79].....................................................................

379

379

379

379

380

380

381

381

381

382

383

384

386

386

386

386

388

389

390

390

390

390

391

392

392

392

393

393


Adrationes [80-81] ................................................................................................... 394

Distinctio Vili....................................................................................................... 395

Quaestio I. Utrum ens independens subiective ab alio habe-AT ALIQUID COMMUNE UNIVOCUM CUM DEPENDENTIBUS AB IPSO ... 395

Quaestionem ponit [1-2] .......................................................................................... 395

Contra [3]......................................................................................................................395

Responsio et divisio dicendorum [4]...................................................................... 395

Membrum I. Quae sit dijferentia inter univocum et aequivocum........................ 396

Univocum signifìcat unum, aequivocum vero plura [5-6] ................................... 396

Tria corollaria [7-11] ................................................................................................. 396

Membrum II. Quotsuntgradus univocationis....................................................... 398

Quattuor sunt gradus univocationis [12] ............................................................... 398

Primus gradus [12]..................................................................................................... 398

Secundus gradus [13] ................................................................................................. 398

Tertius gradus [14]..................................................................................................... 399

Quartus gradus [15] .................................................................................................. 399

Membrum III. Utrum ens habeat differentias extra suam rationem..................... 401

Opimo quae ponit tria [16] ........................................................................................401

Primum probatur [17-21] ......................................................................................... 401

Secundum probatur [22-23].......................................................................................402

Tertium probatur [24-26] ...........................................................................................402

Contra primum [27-31] ............................................................................................. 403

Forte dices [32].............................................................................................................403

Contra [33-39].............................................................................................................404

Contra secundum [40-44] ..........................................................................................405

Contra tertium [45-47] .............................................................................................. 406

Dico aliter [48-51]....................................................................................................... 406

Ad rationes alterius opinionis [52-57] ..................................................................... 408

Dico aliter [58-62]....................................................................................................... 409

Membrum IV. Ens est univocum substantiae et accidenti secundum rationem........411


Quoddedaro [63-67]...........................................................................................411

Contra [68-69]......................................................................................................412Respondeo [70].....................................................................................................412

Contra [71-73]......................................................................................................412

Respondeo [74-75]............................................................................................... 413Ad principale [76] ................................................................................................ 413

Quaestio II. Utrum ens habeat aliquid univocum cum aliisENTIBUS AB IPSO DEPENDENTIBUS ......................................................... 414

Quaestionem ponit [77]........................................................................................414Contra [78] ............................................................................................................414

Responsio et divisio videndorum [79] ................................................................. 414Membrum I. Quid intellegiturper univocum [80-84] .....................................415

Membrum II. Utrum Deo et creatume sit aliquid univocum indifferens exparte rei commune utrisque............................................................................416

Quod probo [86] .................................................................................................. 416

Art. 1. Probatio in communi.................................................................................. 416

Prima via [87-89] .................................................................................................. 416

Secundavia [90-93]...............................................................................................417

Tertia via [94-95] .................................................................................................. 418Quarta via [96] ...................................................................................................... 419

Forte dices [97]...................................................................................................... 419Contra [98-101].................................................................................................... 419

Quinta via [102-104] ............................................................................................ 420

Sextavia [105] ....................................................................................................... 421Septimavia [106].................................................................................................. 421

Art. 2. Probatio in speciali [107-110] ....................................................................421

Contra [111-114] ..................................................................................................422Adista [115-130].................................................................................................. 423

Membrum III.Utrum sit aliquid univocum ex parte rei substantiae et accidenti..................426

Quaestionem ponit [131-137]............................................................................. 426


Contra [138]..........................................................................................................427Respondeo [139-148]........................................................................................... 427Triplex est univocum [149-154]........................................................................... 429

Una ratio prò conclusione univocationis [155-157] ........................................... 431Ad rationes alterius partis [158-160]....................................................................432Membrum IY. Utrum aliquid sit univocum Deo et creaturae secundum ra-

tionem.............................................................................................................432Positio quaestionis [161-168] ...............................................................................432

Modus istius opinionis [169-177]........................................................................ 434

Contra istam opinionem [178-183] .....................................................................437Ad principale [184-189]........................................................................................438Respondeo [190-191] ........................................................................................... 439Ad probationes [192-196] .................................................................................... 439Ad secundum principale [197-200]......................................................................440

Ad inconvenientia [201-205]................................................................................441Sed remanent aliqua dubia [206-216].................................................................. 441Posset dici aliter [217-222] ................................................................................. 443

Posset dici ad rationes praecedentes [223-235]....................................................445

Distinctio X: Utrum Spiritus Sanctus procedat a Patre etFilio libere vel naturaliter.............................................................449

Positio quaestionis [1]........................................................................................... 449Contra [2].............................................................................................................. 449

Solutio quaestionis [3] ...........................................................................................449Membrum I. Voluntas nostra est libera respectu actus sui intrinseci .....................450Opinio de libertate voluntatis [4]........................................................................ 450

Rationes prò opinione [5-7] ................................................................................. 450Responsio [8-12]................................................................................................... 450Contra [13-24] .................................................................................................... 451

Dico aliter [25-31].................................................................................................454Ad rationes alterius partis [32-36] ....................................................................... 455Membrum IL Voluntas divina est libera respectu actus sui intrinseci................... 455

Habet duplicem libertatem [37-43]..................................................................... 455

Corollarium [44-46] .............................................................................................457

Contra [47] ........................................................................................................... 457

Respondeo [48-55]................................................................................................457Hic sunt duo dubia [56-57].................................................................................. 459Responsio [58-60] ................................................................................................ 459

Contra [61] ........................................................................................................... 460Dicitur, secundo [62] ............................................................................................ 460

Contra [63] ........................................................................................................... 460Dicoaliter [64-71].................................................................................................460Membrum III. Spiritus Sanctusproducitur libere................................................461Productio Spiritus Sancti [72-73] ........................................................................ 461

Ad rationem [74] .................................................................................................. 462

Distinctio XI: Utrum productio Spiritus Sancti distin-GUATUR A PRODUCTIONE FlLII RATIONE PRINCIPII PRODUC-TIVI VEL ALIUNDE ..................................................................................... 463

Quaestionem ponit [1] ......................................................................................... 463

Contra [2-3]...........................................................................................................463Solutio [4].............................................................................................................. 464

Videnda sunt tria [5] ............................................................................................. 464

Membrum I. Utrum in creaturisprincipium unius rationispossit esseprin-cipium plurium actionum ..............................................................................464

Ponit duas conclusiones [6-8] ...............................................................................464

Instantia [9]........................................................................................................... 465

Contra [10-17]...................................................................................................... 465Forte dices [ 18-22] ................................................................................................467

Contra hoc arguo dupliciter [23-24]....................................................................468

Responsio [25-28] ................................................................................................ 468

Membrum II. Si idem principium tripliciter possit habere diversos modos...........469

Potest intellegi tripliciter [29-39].........................................................................469

Contra istam opinionem [40-43].........................................................................471



Neutrum est nobilius alio [44]..............................................................................472

Instantia probatur [45-48]....................................................................................472

Sed contra [49-53].................................................................................................473

Contra [54-59]...................................................................................................... 474

Adrationes [60-67] ...............................................................................................475Est hic una difficultas [68-70] ...............................................................................477

Respondeo [71-73]................................................................................................477

Ad argumenta in oppositum [74-76] ................................................................... 478

Distinctio XII: Utrum Spiritus Sanctus prius procedat aPatre quam a Fino................................................................................. 479

Quaestiones ponit [1-2] ........................................................................................479

Solutio [3].............................................................................................................. 479

MembrumI. Utrum in divinis sit aliquis ordo.................................................... 480

Quid est ordo [4] ...................................................................................................480

Est triplex ordo [5-7]............................................................................................. 480Obiectio [8] ...........................................................................................................481

Responsio [9].........................................................................................................481

MembrumII. Utrum in divinis sit ordo alicuiusprioritatis.................................481

Triplex est prioritas [10-12].................................................................................. 481

Hic sunt duo contraria [13-19].............................................................................482

Hoc non potest stare propter duo [20-30] ...........................................................483

Sed contra [31-34].................................................................................................486

Ad istas rationes [35-38] .......................................................................................486

Contra [39-44]...................................................................................................... 487

Ideo dico aliter [45]............................................................................................... 488

Ad rationes [46-47]............................................................................................... 488

Forte dices [48]...................................................................................................... 489

Respondeo [49-52]................................................................................................489

Obiectio et responsio [53-54]...............................................................................490

Responsio non sufficit [55]................................................................................... 490


Respondeo [56-58]............................................................................................... 491

Membrum III. Utrum Spiritus Sanctuspriusprocedat a Patre quam a Filio.... 492

Actus spirandi dupliciter [59] .............................................................................. 492

Contra [60] ........................................................................................................... 492

Respondeo [61]..................................................................................................... 492

Prima ratio non concludit [62] .............................................................................493

Respondeo [63-66]................................................................................................493

Distinctio XIII: Utrum Pater et Filius spirent SpiritumSanctum naturaliter vel libere..................................................... 495

Positio quaestionum [1] ........................................................................................495Contra [2].............................................................................................................. 495

Responsio ad quaestiones [3] ................................................................................495

Solutio quaestionum [4]........................................................................................495

Membrum I. Quomodo voluntas divina sit libera respectu actus essentialis....... 496

Voluntas divina est libera [5-8] .............................................................................496

Pro ista conclusione arguo [9-12]......................................................................... 497

Contra hoc aliquae difficultates. Prima difficultas [13-15]................................. 498

Secunda difficultas [16-18]................................................................................... 498

Tertia difficultas [19-20] .......................................................................................499

Contra. Ratio non concludit [21-22]...................................................................499

Responsio [23-25] .................................................................................................499

Contra haec [26-29]............................................................................................ 500

Responsio [30-35] ............................................................................................... 501

Secunda difficultas [36] ....................................................................................... 502

Tertia difficultas [37-44] ..................................................................................... 503

Respondeo [45-46].............................................................................................. 504

Ad rationes alterius partis [47-55] ..................................................................... 505Membrum II. Quomodo voluntas sit libera respectu actus notionalis [56].......... 506

Prima conclusio [57-60] ..................................................................................... 506

Secunda conclusio [61-65] ................................................................................. 507


Alia obiectio [66]................................................................................................. 508Respondeo [67-68].............................................................................................. 508Membrum III.

Quomodo sit libera respectu actus includentis utrumque actum.................. 508Missio est manifestatio personae divinae [69-73] .............................................. 508

Diversificantur opiniones [74-75]....................................................................... 510Ad argumenta in oppositum [76]........................................................................ 511Utrum Spiritus Sanctus inchoètur a seipso [77]................................................. 511

Contra [78] .......................................................................................................... 511Responsio [79]..................................................................................................... 511Utrum Spiritus Sanctus mittatur libere a Patre et Filio [80].............................. 512Contra [81] .......................................................................................................... 512

Responsio [82-83] ............................................................................................... 512

Distinctio XVII: De caritate.................................................................... 513Quaestio I. Utrum habitus caritatis sit necessaria ratio

ACCEPTANDI HABENTEM AD VITAM AETERNAM................................... 513Quaestionem ponit [1] ........................................................................................ 513Contra [2]............................................................................................................. 513Solutio [3-4]......................................................................................................... 514

Membrum I. Utrum caritas sit ratio acceptandi habentem ........................................... 514Ratio elicitiva et ratio obiectiva [5-6] ................................................................. 514

Est ergo quaestio [7]............................................................................................ 515Probatur tripliciter [8-11] ................................................................................... 515Contra ista [12-16].............................................................................................. 516Aliaopinio [17-18].............................................................................................. 517Sed contra [19-24]............................................................................................... 517Dico aliter [25-26]............................................................................................... 518Ad rationes primae opinionis [27-35] ................................................................ 519

Ad rationem alterius opinionis [36-39] .............................................................. 520Ad primum in oppositum [40-43] ...................................................................... 521

Membrum II. Utrum habitus caritatis sit necessarius ad salutem viatoris......... 522


Quaestionem ponit [44]........................................................................................... 522

Contra [45] ................................................................................................................ 522

Responsio [46-47] ..................................................................................................... 523

Quod probatur [48] .................................................................................................. 523

Contra istud arguo [49-54] ..................................................................................... 523

Dico aliter [55]........................................................................................................... 525

Declaro quomodo [56-58]....................................................................................... 525

Hoc probo [59-60] .................................................................................................... 525

Hoc patet quadrupliciter [61-65]............................................................................ 526

Ad oppositum [66] .................................................................................................... 527

Membrum III. Utrum in augmentatione caritatis gradus caritatis praece-dens maneat in adventu sequentisgradus........................................................ 527

Quaestionem ponit [67]........................................................................................... 527

Contra [68] ................................................................................................................. 528

Hic est una opinio [69-78] ....................................................................................... 528

Contra haec [79-90].................................................................................................. 530

Ideo dico aliter [91]................................................................................................... 531

Ad aliam opinionem [92-96] ................................................................................... 532

Per hoc ad probationes [97-104] ............................................................................. 533

Sunt aliqua dubia [105-107]..................................................................................... 534

Quaestio IL Utrum caritas augeatur per essentiam.......................... 535


Contra [109]............................................................................................................... 535

Solutio. Tres modi dicendi [111-113] .................................................................... 535

Contra [114-115] ...................................................................................................... 536

Secundus modus dicendi [116-118]....................................................................... 536

Contra [119-124] ...................................................................................................... 536

Tertius modus dicendi [125-127]............................................................................ 537

Declaro tripliciter [128-135]................................................................................... 537

Adrationem [136-138.b]......................................................................................... 539


Quaestio III. Utrum caritas augeatur per additionem velPER SIMPLICEM ACTUATIONEM ................................................................... 540

Quaestionem ponit [139] ......................................................................................... 540

Contra [140]............................................................................................................... 540

Responsio [141] ......................................................................................................... 540

Ad hoc pono tres conclusiones [142] ..................................................................... 541

Probo multipliciter [143-153] ................................................................................. 541

Sed contra [154-158] ................................................................................................ 543

Responsio [159-169]................................................................................................. 543

Adista [170-175]....................................................................................................... 546

Secunda conclusio [176-185]................................................................................... 547

Probo istud [186-190] .............................................................................................. 549

Contra haec [191-192] .............................................................................................. 549

Responsio ad ista [193-196] ..................................................................................... 550

Tertia conclusio [197-204] ....................................................................................... 551

Contra istam conclusionem [205-210]................................................................... 553

Responsio ad ista [211].............................................................................................. 554

Respondeo ad rationes [212-229] ........................................................................... 554

Distinctio XVIII:Utrum donum sit proprium Spiritus Sancti................................. 559

Quaestionem ponit [1] ............................................................................................. 559

Contra [2].................................................................................................................... 559

Solutio [3].................................................................................................................... 560

Membrum l. Quid sit donum.................................................................................. 560

Quantum ad primum [4-8]....................................................................................... 560

Quantum ad secundum [9-12] ................................................................................ 561

Triplex connexio in tribus divinis personis [13-19].............................................. 562

Contra [20-21] ........................................................................................................... 564

Donum est datio irreddibilis [22-27] ..................................................................... 565

Patet ratione et exemplo [28-31] ............................................................................. 566

Contra ista [32-33].................................................................................................... 567


Responsio ad haec [34-35].................................................................................. 567

Sed contra haec [36]............................................................................................ 568

Respondeo [37-39]............................................................................................... 568

Membrum II. Donumpotest accipi dupliciter: velformaliter velfundamen-taliter [40-43].............................................................................................. 569

Donum sumitur actualiter aut aptitudinaliter [44-46]...................................... 570

Ad rationem in oppositum [47-48] .................................................................... 570

Sed contra [49-51]............................................................................................... 571

Distinctio XIX: Utrum persona divina sit in alia conver-TIBILITER .................................................................................................. 573


Contra [2]............................................................................................................ 573

Respondeo [3-12]................................................................................................ 573

Distinctio XX: Utrum divinae Personae sint aequales se-CUNDUM PERFECTIONEM ........................................................................ 577

Quaestionem ponit [1]........................................................................................ 577

Contra [2]............................................................................................................ 577

Respondeo [3] ..................................................................................................... 577

Tria sunt videnda [4] ........................................................................................... 578

Membrum I. Utrum relatio dicat formaliter perfectionem vel non..................... 578

Quidquid est in Deo dicit perfectionem [5-14]................................................. 578

Hoc potest declarari tripliciter [15-22].............................................................. 580

Ad hoc argumentant alii [23-28]........................................................................ 581

Potest declarari tripliciter [29-37]...................................................................... 582

Posset dici ad istas rationes [38-46] .................................................................... 584

Ad rationes alterius opinionis [47-55] ............................................................... 586

Membrum II. Utrum relatio in deo habeatpropriam entitatem....................... 587

In Deo duplex est entitas [56-59]....................................................................... 587

Contra [60-64].................................................................................................... 588

Ideo dico aliter [65-70]....................................................................................... 589


Ad rationes [71-78] ................................................................................................... 591

Membrum III. Utrum relatio in deo habeatpropriam quantitatem entita-tis seu virtutis velperfectionis secundumpropriam infinitatem..................... 592

Relatio in divinis non est formaliter infinita nec formaliter finita [79-85] ....... 593

Contra [86-93]........................................................................................................... 594

Responsio [94]............................................................................................................ 595

Contra [95-98]........................................................................................................... 596

Respondet tertiaeviae [99-102] .............................................................................. 597

Ex quarta via [103-104]............................................................................................. 597

Ad alias rationes [105-116] ...................................................................................... 598

Sed contra [117]......................................................................................................... 600

Responsio [118-121]................................................................................................... 600

Respondetur ad rationes alias [122] ....................................................................... 601

Ad primam rationem [123-124]................................................................................601

Ad secundam rationem [125-127]............................................................................ 602

Ad tertiam rationem [128-130]................................................................................. 602

Sed contra [131-132] ................................................................................................ 603

Ad tertiam rationem principalem [133-134]......................................................... 603

Sed contra [135-138] ................................................................................................ 604

Ad quartam [139-143] ............................................................................................. 604

Distinctio XXI: Utrum haec sit vera: “solus Pater est Deus”.....607


Contra [2]..................................................................................................................... 607

Respondeo [3] ............................................................................................................ 607

Membrum I. Quomodo unum relativum includat aliud relativum................... 607

Aliquid includit aliud [4-16]......................................................................................607

Contra utrumque modum arguo [17-23]............................................................... 610

Contra primum et secundum modum [24-25] ..................................................... 611

Pono tres conclusiones [26-32]................................................................................ 611

Contra haec [33-34].................................................................................................. 612


Membrum IL Quomodo unum relativum excludat aliud relativum................. 612

Status quaestionis [35-37]................................................................................... 612

Contra [38-40] .................................................................................................... 613

Forte dices [41]......................................................................................................613

Contra [42-51].................................................................................................... 613Dubium [52]......................................................................................................... 616

Explanatio [53-55].................................................................................................616

Ad rationes in oppositum [56-59] ...................................................................... 617Ad rationes alterius opinionis [60-63] ................................................................. 618

Ad rationes alterius opinionis [64-65] ............................................................... 618Responsio ad secundum membrum [66-70]...................................................... 618

Distinctio XXII: Utrum nomina dicta de Deo negative seuPRIVATIVE VEL POSITIVE DICANTUR DE IPSO FORMALITER ............ 621

Exponit duo principia [1] ................................................................................... 621

Quaestio I: Utrum nomina dicta de Deo negative seu privative DICANTUR DE IPSO FORMALITER [2] ............................................ 621

Incontrarium [3] ................................................................................................. 621Responsio [4]....................................................................................................... 622

Membrum I. Qualiter ìsta dicantur de creaturis ................................................ 622

Privatio vel negatio [5] ........................................................................................ 622

Ponit duas conclusiones [6] ..................................................................................622

Prima conclusio [7-12]......................................................................................... 622

Contra [13-15]......................................................................................................623Responsio [16-18] ................................................................................................ 624

Secundam conclusionem probo [ 19-27] ............................................................... 624Contra [28-30] .................................................................................................... 626

Respondeo [31-36]............................................................................................. 626

Membrum II. Qualiter ista dicantur de Deo........................................................628

Nulla negatio convenir Deo [37-42] ................................................................... 628

Hic est dubium [43] ............................................................................................. 629


Sed contra haec [44-46].........................................................................................629

Responsio [47-50] .................................................................................................630

Sed contra [51] ...................................................................................................... 631Respondeo [52-54.1] ............................................................................................ 631Dubium [54.2] ...................................................................................................... 631Responsio [54.3-54.8]........................................................................................... 631

Ad rationes in oppositum [54.9-54.10] ............................................................... 632

Quaestio II: Utrum nomina dicta de Deo positive dicanturFORMALITER DE IPSO [55] ........................................................................ 633

Contra [56-57]...................................................................................................... 633Quattuor sunt videnda [58-59] .......................................................................... 633Art. 1. Secundum quidsit ensformaliter in aliquo [60] ...................................... 633

Art. 2. Distinguendum est de his quae dicuntur de Deo positive [61].................... 634

Art. 3. Quid sit dicendum circa hoc secundum principia aliorum [62-65] ............634Respondeo [66].................................................................................................... 635

Contra [67-73]...................................................................................................... 635Respondeo [74]..................................................................................................... 636

Contra [75-80] .................................................................................................... 636

Contra [81] ............................................................................................................638Respondeo [82].................................................................................................... 638

Contra hoc dupliciter [83-93] ............................................................................ 638Forte dices [94]...................................................................................................... 640

Contra [95-100].....................................................................................................640

Art. 4. Quid sit dicendum secundum ventatemi 101-118] .................................. 641Respondeo [119-125]........................................................................................... 646

Contra ista [126-133]........................................................................................... 648Responsio [134-141]........................................................................................... 649

Distinctio XXIV............................................................................................. 651

Quaestio I. Utrum unum reperiatur in divinis.................................... 651Quaestionem ponit [1] ........................................................................................ 651


Contra [2]................................................................................................................... 651

Solutio et divisio videndorum [3] ........................................................................... 651

Membrum I. Quale sit unum quod estprincipium numeri.................................. 652

Duplex est unum [4-9].............................................................................................. 652

Contra ista arguo tripliciter [10-14]....................................................................... 653

Duplex est unitas numeri [15-24] ........................................................................... 654

Ad rationes [25-27] ..................................................................................................... 656

Membrum II. Quale sit unum convertibile cum ente.............................................. 656

Quaestionem ponit [28-32] ..................................................................................... 656

Rationes additivae [33-44]........................................................................................ 657

Contra multipliciter [45-53].................................................................................... 659

Responsio [54-57] ....................................................................................................... 660

Contra [58-64].............................................................................................................661

Ideo dico aliter [65-69]............................................................................................... 662

Pro ista conclusione arguo [70-73] ......................................................................... 663

Ad rationes [74-93] ................................................................................................... 664

Membrum III. Quomodo unum et ens reperiantur in Deo................................... 668

De numero in divinis [94-95] .................................................................................. 668

Quaestio II: Utrum numerus in divinis sit forma absolutavel respectiva [96-97]..................................................................................668

Contra [98] ................................................................................................................ 668

Responsio [99]............................................................................................................ 669

Membrum I. Degenere numeri remoto.................................................................... 669

Numerus est quaedam forma respectiva [100-105].............................................. 669

Arguo tripliciter contra opinionem [106-108] ..................................................... 670

Contra [109-120] ........................................................................................................670

Ideo dico aliter [121-123]......................................................................................... 672

Tunc ad rationes [124-127] ........................................................................................673

Membrum II. Degenere numeri propinquo.............................................................674

Numerus est pluralitas determinata [128-129] ..................................................... 674


Contra [130-133] ...................................................................................................... 675

Quaestio III. Utrum numerus in divinis sit formaliter extraANIMAM ............................................................................................................. 676

In Deo numerus non est formaliter extra animam [134] ..................................... 676

Contra [135]............................................................................................................... 676

Respondeo [136-142] ............................................................................................... 676

Pro ista opinione arguitur [143-152] ..................................................................... 678

Contra [153-157] ........................................................................................................ 679

Contra [158-160] ...................................................................................................... 680

Respondeo [161-165]............................................................................................... 681

Ad rationes alterius partis [166-190]...................................................................... 682

Distinctiones XXV-XXVI: Utrum divinae personae consti-TUANTUR IN ESSE PERSONALI PER ABSOLUTA VEL PER RELATIVA....... 689


Contra [2].................................................................................................................... 689

Responsio [3].............................................................................................................. 689

Membrum 1.1Quae ab omnibusfidelibus supponunturper viam rationis............ 690

Diversae rationes a diversis [4-19]........................................................................... 690

Distinctio XXVII: Utrum paternitas et filiatio in divinisSINT RELATIONES REALES VEL RATIONIS TANTUM [1] ....................... 693

Contra [2].................................................................................................................... 693

Solutio [3].................................................................................................................... 693

Membrum I. Utrum istae relationes sint reales in creaturis [4-10] ..................... 693

Responsio [11-15] ....................................................................................................... 695

Ad articulum secundum et tertium [16-20]........................................................... 696

Sed contra [21-23]..................................................................................................... 697

Quantum ad primum [24-26].................................................................................. 697

Hic est dubium [27].................................................................................................. 698

Responsio ad dubium [28]........................................................................................ 698

Contra [29-33].............................................................................................................698


Contra [34-36]......................................................................................................700

Ideo dico aliter [37-53]......................................................................................... 700

Membrum II. Utrumpaternitas etfiliatio sint relationes reales in Deo............... 702Communis modus dicendi [54-59] ..................................................................... 702Contra [60-68].......................................................................................................703

Distinctio XXVIII: Utrum paternitas et generatio sit ea-DEM NOTIO ................................................................................................. 705

Quaestio I. Utrum paternitas et generatio in divinis sintIDEM FORMALITER VEL DISTINCTA ........................................................ 705

Quaestionem ponit [1] ..........................................................................................705Contra [2].............................................................................................................. 705

Responsio [3].........................................................................................................705Membrum I. Quomodo paternitas et generatio sint in Deo..................................705

Hic sunt tres modi dicendi [4]..............................................................................705

Primus modus dicendi [5-8]................................................................................ 706Secundus modus dicendi [9-12] ........................................................................... 706Tertius modus dicendi [13-14] .............................................................................707

Contra primum modum [15-19].......................................................................... 707Contra secundum modum [20-23]...................................................................... 708Contra tertium modum [24-26]...........................................................................709

Ideo dico aliter [27-59]......................................................................................... 709Rationes contra istas opiniones [60-62]............................................................... 715

Responsio [63-66] .................................................................................................715Membrum IL Utrurn paternitas et generatio in divinis distinguantur [67-69]....... 717

Probationes [70-73] .............................................................................................. 717Membrum III. Quod divinaepersonae non distinguuntur nec constituun-

turformaliter in essentia personali per relationes consequentes [74]..............718

Ad rationes [75-77] ...............................................................................................718

Quaestio II. Utrum Verbum in divinis procedat a Patre perACTUM INTELLECTUS ................................................................................ 719

Quaestionem ponit [78]....................................................................................... 719


Contra [79] ...................................................................................................................719

Responsio et divisio videndorum [80] ..................................................................... 719

MembrumI. Quid sit verbum in nobis.................................................................... 719

Est conceptus actualis emanans ab intellectu [81-91]............................................ 719

Membrum II. Quomodo verbum in nobisprocedatper actum intellectus..........ITI

Intellectus comparatur ad duo: ad subiectum et ad obiectum [92] ..................... 722

Pono tres conclusiones [93-98]..................................................................................722

Sed contra [99-100] .................................................................................................... 724

Respondeo [101-103] ................................................................................................. 724

Secunda conclusio [104-105].....................................................................................725

Tertia conclusio [106-114] .........................................................................................725

Quod si dicatur... [115-126].......................................................................................726

Intendo Augustini [127-132].....................................................................................729

Membrum III. Utrum Verbum divinumprocedat per actum intellectus.............. 730

Intellectus divinus potest comparari tripliciter [133-136].....................................730

Contra [137-138] ........................................................................................................ 731

Contra primum [139-140] .........................................................................................731

Contra secundum [141-147] .....................................................................................732

Contra [148-150] ........................................................................................................ 733

Conclusio [151] ...........................................................................................................734

Ad rationes alterius opinionis [152-154]..................................................................734

Ad argumenta in principio [155-156]...................................................................... 735

Distinctio XXIX: De ratione principii ad extra et intra............737

Quaestiones ponit [1-4] ............................................................................................. 737

Quaestio I. Utrum tres Personae sint unum principium crea-turae.................................................................................................................. 738

Respondeo [5-16] ........................................................................................................738

Quaestio II. Utrum Pater et Filius sint unum principium Spi-ritus Sancti..................................................................................................... 740

Tres personae et principium quo et quod [17-29] .................................................. 740


Quaestio III. Utrum principium dicatur univoce in DominoDeo de principio ad intra et principio ad extra...................... 745

Principium potest accipi dupliciter [30-34]........................................................ 745

Ad rationem primae quaestionis [35-36]............................................................. 746

Distinctio XXX: Utrum Dei ad creaturam sit aliqua rela-tio realis.................................................................................................. 747

Quaestionem ponit [1]......................................................................................... 747

Contra [2].............................................................................................................. 747

Responsio et divisio videndorum [3]....................................................................747

Membrum I. De modis relationis in generali...........................................................748

Triplex est relatio [4-7] ......................................................................................... 748

Probatio [8-19]...................................................................................................... 749

Membrum II. De modis referendi Deum realiter ad creaturam ........................ 751

Eadem relatione reali tripliciter [20-29]............................................................. 751

Membrum III.Quomodo Deus referatur realiter ad creaturam secundum aliquemillorum modorum......................................................................................... 754

Relatio Dei ad creaturam est duplex [30-36] ....................................................... 754

Pono tres conclusiones. Prima [37-39]................................................................. 756

Secunda conclusio [40-46] ................................................................................... 756

Tertia conclusio [47-54] ........................................................................................757

Contra [55-57]...................................................................................................... 759

Dei ad creaturam non est aliqua relatio realis [58] ............................................ 760

Contra [59-62]...................................................................................................... 760

Alii probant conclusionem per hoc [63-64] ........................................................ 760

Aliter potest probari ista conclusio [65-67] ....... 761

Membrum IV.Quomodo Deus referatur ad creaturam secundum rationem......................... 762

Relationes rationis sunt in Deo [68-70]............................................................... 762

Corollarium [71-72] .............................................................................................762

Ad argumentum in oppositum [73] .................................................................... 763


Contra [74] ............................................................................................................764

Respondeo [75]..................................................................................................... 764

Distinctio XXXI: Utrum identitas similitudo et aequali-TAS PERSONARUM DIVINARUM SINT RELATIONES REALES VELRATIONIS TANTUM ................................................................................... 765

Quaestionem ponit [1-2] ......................................................................................765Contra [3-4]...........................................................................................................765

Responsio et divisio videndorum [5]....................................................................765Membrum I. Defundamentis istarum relationum ingenerali.......................... 766Quaestionem ponit [6-10].................................................................................... 766Membrum II. De conditionibusfundamentorum in speciali................................767

Duplex est relatio [11-12] ..................................................................................... 767Primumpatet [13-16]........................................................................................... 768

Secundum patet [17-25] .......................................................................................768Sed illud non potest stare [26-29]........................................................................ 770Ideo dico aliter [30-33]..........................................................................................771Corollarium [34] ...................................................................................................772Membrum III. De conditionibusfundamentorum in speciali..............................772Istae relationes non sunt reales in creaturis [35-43]............................................. 772

Aliaopinio [44-51].............................................................................................. 774Responsio [52-56] .................................................................................................775Quod declaratur primo de aequalitate, secundo de aliis [57-70].......................775Tripliciter prò hac opinione [71-81].....................................................................777

Patet responsio ad rationes opinionis [82-88] ..................................................... 779Primum non obstat [89-92].................................................................................. 780Secundum non obstat [93-96] ..............................................................................780Similiter ad rationes alterius partis [97-114] ....................................................... 781Membrum IV. Utrum istae relationes sint reales in Deo...................................... 785

Istae relationes non sunt reales in Deo [115-127] ............................................... 785Respondetur [128] ................................................................................................788

Contra [129-131] ..................................................................................................788


Ad principale [132-135]....................................................................................... 788

Contraista [136-138]...........................................................................................789

Responsio ad haec [139-148] ............................................................................... 790

Distinctio XXXIII: Utrum relatio originis comparata adESSENTIAM DIVINAM TRANSEAT IN IPSAM REAEITER VEL FOR- MALITER VEL TOTALITER........................................................................ 793

Quaestiones ponit [1] ........................................................................................... 793

Arguo per unicum medium [2].............................................................................793

Contra [3].............................................................................................................. 793

Responsio [4].........................................................................................................793

Membrum I. De entriate relationis in creaturis....................................................794

Relatio in creaturis habet duplicem modum: modum essendi in et mo-dum essendi ad [5-6].....................................................................................794

Pro ista conclusione arguì tur in creaturis [7-10]..................................................794

Contra opinionem arguit [11]..............................................................................795

Forte dices [12]...................................................................................................... 795

Contra [13-18] ...................................................................................................... 795

Dicoaliter [19-22].................................................................................................796

Ad rationes [23-29] ...............................................................................................797

Membrum II. De identitate relationis cum essentia in divinis.............................799

Una opimo exponitur [30-35] ..............................................................................799

Contra istam conclusionem arguo [36-41] ........................................................ 800

Aliaopinio [42-43]................................................................................................801

Contra [44-46]...................................................................................................... 801

Dico aliter [47-50]............................................................................................... 802

Ad argumentum in oppositum [51-52] .............................................................. 803

Ad rationes opinionis primae [53-56]................................................................ 804

Distinctio XXXIV: I. Utrum relatio in Deo sit totaliterEADEM ESSENTIAE DIVINAE II. UTRUM RELATIO SIT TOTALI- TER EADEM PERSONAE CONSTITUTAE III. UTRUM ESSENTIA SIT TOTALITER EADEM PERSONAE ........................................................ 807


Per unicum medium arguo quod sic [1].............................................................. 807Contra [2].............................................................................................................. 807Responsio et divisio ponendorum [3] ................................................................ 807MembrumI. Ponuntur aliqui modi dicendi...................................................... 808Ad primum est unus modus dicendi [4-5].......................................................... 808Probatur quod ita sit [6-7] ................................................................................... 808Contra istam opinionem [8] ............................................................................... 809

Quod probo [9-27].............................................................................................. 809Contra primum:

membra distinctionis includunt contradictionem [28-39] ....................... 813Membrum II. Dicendo, ad quaestiones............................................................... 816Pono tres modos [40-43].......................................................................................816Distinctio personarum secundum quid [44-48] ................................................ 816

Quod ita sit declaro [49-55]................................................................................ 817De effectibus formalibus aliquorum [56-57] ...................................................... 819Arguo prò conclusione [58-63.e] ........................................................................ 819

Quaestio IV seu occasionalis. Utrum essentia divina et re-LATIO DISTINGUANTUR SE IPSIS .............................................................. 821

Positio quaestionis [64] ....................................................................................... 821

Contra [65] .......................................................................................................... 821Responsio. Tria videnda [66]............................................................................... 821Membrum I. Quid sit distingui se ipso ab alio........................................................ 821Positio quaestionis [67-69] ................................................................................. 821

Membrum II. Utrum essentia et relatio se ipsis distinguantur........................... 822Essentia distinguitur a relatione [70-72]............................................................. 822

Quod probo [73-75] ........................................................................................... 822

Accipio tertiam rationem [76-77]....................................................................... 823Contra istud [78-82]........................................................................................... 824

Dico aliter [83-85]............................................................................................... 825Ad rationes [86-89] ............................................................................................. 826Membrum III. Utrum trespersonae distinguantur se ipsis................................. 827


Tres personae conveniunt secundum rem absolutamet differunt relatione [90] ........................................................................... 827

Arguitur prò ista opinione [91-95]..................................................................... 827Contra opinionem [96-110] ............................................................................... 828

Distinctio XXXV: Utrum futurum contingens sit deter-MINATUM IN RE AD ALTERAM PARTEM CONTRADICTIONIS ............. 833

Contingens et necessarium [1-2]........................................................................ 833

Responsio [3-4] ................................................................................................... 833

Pro ista opinione arguitur [5-10]........................................................................ 834Contra opinionem [11-20]................................................................................. 835Ideo dico aliter [21-25]........................................................................................ 838Probo de ista secunda indeterminatione [26-30] ............................................... 839


Contra [54-55].................................................................................................... 844Responsiones [56-60] .......................................................................................... 844

Distinctio XXXVI: Utrum effectus contingens sit determinate SCIBILIS PER CAUSAS CONTINGENTES .................................. 847

Quaestionem ponit [1-2] .................................................................................... 847

Contra [3]............................................................................................................ 847Responsio et divisio videndorum [4].................................................................. 848Membrum I. Quomodo contingentia sit in rebus................................................ 848

Duplex est contingentia [5-11]........................................................................... 848Secunda contingentia est actuum voluntatis [12-16]......................................... 849Contingentia potest ostendi tripliciter [17-20] ................................................. 850Membrum II. Quomodo effectus contingens sit cognoscibilis per causas con-

tingentes ....................................................................................................... 851Notitia probabilis et certa [21-27] ...................................................................... 851Contra istam conclusionem [28-29]................................................................... 852

Quaero de determinatione [30-35]..................................................................... 853Ideo dico aliter [36]............................................................................................... 854

Pono duas conclusiones [37-43]........................................................................... 854


Secunda conclusio [44-49] .................................................................................. 856


Membrum III.Utrum Deus habeat determinatavi notitiamfuturorum contingentium..... 858

Declarat tripliciter [57] ....................................................................................... 858

Primo [58-59]...................................................................................................... 858

Secundo [60-62] .................................................................................................. 859

Tertio [63-65] ...................................................................................................... 859

Contra ista [66-70].............................................................................................. 860

Responsio [71-85] .................................................................................................861Membrum IV.

Quomodo Deus cognoscat determinate ipsa contingentia............................. 864

Tres modi dicendi [86] ........................................................................................ 864

Primus modus dicendi [87] ................................................................................. 864

Contra [88-91].................................................................................................... 864

Secundus modus dicendi [92]............................................................................. 865

Contra [93-95] .................................................................................................... 865

Tertius modus dicendi [96-97] ........................................................................... 866

Contra [98-107]................................................................................................... 866

Ideo dico aliter [108-109]................................................................................... 868Conclusio [110-112]........................................................................................... 868

Distinctio XXXVIII:Utrum praedestinatio futurorum contingentium im-PONAT NECESSITATEM LIBERO ARBITRIO ............................................ 871

Quaestionem ponit [1]........................................................................................ 871

Contra [2]............................................................................................................. 871

Respondeo [3-5] .................................................................................................. 871

Tria videnda [6] .................................................................................................... 872

Membrum I.Utrum praescientia futurorum sit in se necessaria vel contingens ................ 873

Praescientia futurorum potest considerari dupliciter [7-12] ............................. 873


Contra [13-16] .................................................................................................... 874

Membrum II. Utrum praescientia sit necessaria respectu liberi arbitrii velsit contingens respectu eius\\7-\7i\............................................................. 875

Membrum III.Utrum praescientia imponat necessitatem libero arbitrio vel non................ 876

Dicitquodnon [18-33]....................................................................................... 876

Distinctio XXXIX:Utrum in Deo sint ideae infinitae..................................................881

Quaestionem ponit [1] ........................................................................................ 881Contra [2]............................................................................................................. 881

Responsio et divisio videndorum [3].................................................................. 881Membrum I.

Aliqui modi dicendi Deus intellegit omnia et singula.................................. 882

Haec videtur esse intendo et auctoritas Augustini [5] ....................................... 882

Triplex modus dicendi [6]................................................................................... 882

Primus modus dicendi [7-10].............................................................................. 882Contra hoc [11-16] ............................................................................................. 883

Contra opinionem arguitur [17-19]................................................................... 885Tertius modus dicendi [20-24] ........................................................................... 885

Sed contra [25-29]............................................................................................... 886Conclusio [30]..................................................................................................... 887Membrum II.

Dicitur ad quaestionem................................................................................ 887

Art. 1. Quomodo idem sub eadem ratione potest esse ratio intellegendipluradistincte [32-36] ........................................................................................... 887

Art. 2. Ad quidponuntur ideae \37-41] .............................................................. 889

Opinio propria [42]............................................................................................. 890Art. 3. Quale esse habeant ideae [43-47] ............................................................. 890

Sed contra [48-51]............................................................................................... 892Solutio [52-55].................................................................................................... 893Esse cognitum vel volitum dicit duo [56-58]..................................................... 894

Ad argumenta [59-67] ........................................................................................ 894


Distinctio XL:UTRUM PRAEDESTINATIO HABEAT ALIQUAM CAUSAM EX PARTE PRAEDESTINATORUM ......................................................................... 897

Positio quaestionis [1].......................................................................................... 897

Contra [2]............................................................................................................. 897

Respondeo [3] ..................................................................................................... 897

Quattuor modi dicendi [4]................................................................................. 898

Membrum I.Primus modus dicendi depraedestinatione et reprobatone [5-12] .............. 898

Contra istam opinionem [13-19]........................................................................ 899

Membrum II.Praedestinatio et reprobatio habent aliquam causarn.................................. 901

Pro ista opinione arguitur [22-25] ...................................................................... 901

Contra opinionem est Augustinus [26-34].......................................................... 902

Membrum III.Radix distinctionis non venit ex operibus bonis et malis.............................. 906

Tertius modus dicendi [35-41] .............................................................................906

Contra haec sunt omnes rationes Augustini [42-47] ......................................... 908

Ista opimo non videtur rationalis [48-50] .......................................................... 909

Membrum IV.Electio electorum non habet causarn nisi voluntatem eligentis..................... 910

Hic est quartus modus dicendi [51-52] .............................................................. 910

Pro ista opinione arguitur [53-54] ...................................................................... 910

Pro ista opinione videntur Apostolus et Anselmus [55-56]...............................911

Contra istum modum arguo [57-59].................................................................. 911

Contra conclusionem [60-62] ............................................................................ 912

Dicoaliter [63]..................................................................................................... 913

Triplex est voluntarium [64]..................................................................................913

Ad propositum [65-84] .........................................................................................914

Appendix: Partes carentes in textu 919


Bibliographia........................................................................................................921

I. Fontes et editiones ........................................................................................... 921II. Studia.................................................................................................................925

Indices......................................................................................................................... 929

1. Index codicum manuscriptorum..................................................................... 9312. Index locorum Sacrae Scripturae..................................................................... 9333. Index auctorum et operum citatorum............................................................. 9354. Index nominum personarum .......................................................................... 943

5. Index generalis.................................................................................................. 947

A di F R da O. Min5 Tavole sinottiche Quaestionespraeambulae

Documents

Transcript of A di F R da O. Min5 Tavole sinottiche Quaestionespraeambulae